From: Organosolv pretreatment: an in-depth purview of mechanics of the system
Pretreatment type | Pretreatment method | Biomass used | Untreated sample | Treated sample | Remarks | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical | Ball milling | Oil palm biomass | 15.9% glucose yield | 67.5% glucose yield | CI reduced from 56.1% (untreated) to 9.3% | (Zakaria et al. 2014) |
5.4% Xylose yield | 80.1% xylose yield | |||||
Twin-screw extrusion | Corn stover | 25Â g/L glucose yield | 45Â g/L glucose yield | Increase in cellulose content, decrease in hemicellulose content, and CI | (Wang et al. 2020) | |
19Â g/L Xylose yield | 40Â g/L Xylose yield | |||||
Microwave pretreatment | Wheat straw | Ethanol yield of 26.78 g/kg | Ethanol yield of 148.93 g/kg | – | (Xu et al. 2011) | |
– | Cellulose recovery > 93% | |||||
80% Hemicellulose recovery | ||||||
Chemical pretreatment | Alkaline pretreatment | Corn stover | – | glucose and xylose yield 0.48 g/g of the original biomass | 78.2% sugar yield | (Li et al. 2012b) |
92% lignin removal | ||||||
Corn stover | – | 95.1% glucose yield | Glucose yields were two to fourfold compared to untreated, with less than 5% cellulose removal | (Mirmohamadsadeghi et al. 2016) | ||
Fivefold xylose yield | ||||||
40–45% lignin removal | ||||||
Miscanthus | – | 62.3% glucose yield | ||||
20-fold xylose yield | ||||||
40–45% lignin removal | ||||||
Switchgrass | – | 81.3% glucose yield | ||||
40–45% lignin removal | ||||||
Acid pretreatment | Sunflower stalks | 100Â g raw material | 33Â g glucose recovery | Recovery of 65% of the glucose and xylose present in the raw material | (Ruiz et al. 2013) | |
33Â g xylose recovery | ||||||
Organosolv pretreatment | Sugarcane bagasse | – | 91% glucose yields | 99% glucan enzyme digestibility, 90% lignin purity | (Hassanpour et al. 2020) | |
67% xylose yields | ||||||
63% lignin yield | ||||||
Physio-chemical pretreatment | AFEX | Corn stover | ~ 32% glucan conversion | Higher severity AFEX gave rise to higher glucan conversion (~ 85%) | The total pore volume of the biomass decreased | (Chaudhari et al. 2022) |
~ 23% Xylan conversion | ~ 85% maximum xylan conversion | |||||
Hot-water pretreatment | Napier grass | – | 73% of inhibitor-free glucose yield | Higher temperatures may lead to inhibitor production | (Wells et al. 2020) | |
Energycane | – | 65% of inhibitor-free glucose yield | ||||
Steam explosion | Spruce wood chips | Very recalcitrant | Up to 90% cellulose digestibility | The particle size of the biomass is decreased | (Pielhop et al. 2016) | |
Biological pretreatment | White rot fungi (Pleurotus ostreatus) | Eucalyptus grandis sawdust | 2.8% hydrolysable cellulose recovery | 16.7% of total cellulose generation for hydrolysis | – | (Castoldi et al. 2014) |
White rot fungi (Ceriporiopsis subvermispora) | Sugarcane bagasse | – | 47% of the potential glucose of untreated biomass was recovered after pretreatment followed by enzymatic hydrolysis | Increased cellulose digestibility of the biomass | (Machado and Ferraz 2017) | |
Mixed microbes/bacteria | Corn straw | – | Cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin degradation rates were 34.9%, 44.4%, and 39.2%, respectively | Strong ability to degrade lignin, could accelerate the hemicellulose degradation rate, increased methane content, and shortened the fermentation period | (Li et al. 2020) |