Skip to main content

Table 2 Solvent effect on the optimization of enzymatic kinetic resolution of acetylenic alcohol 3

From: Chemoenzymatic construction of chiral alkenyl acetylenic alcohol, a key building block to access diastereoisomers of polyacetylenes

Entry

Solvent

Log P

t (h)

Conversion (%) a

( R )-3 b

( S )-11 b

E c

% e.e.

% e.e.

1

Dioxane

−1.10

1.5

4

2.2

58.0

4

2

CH3CN

−0.33

1.5

22

23.3

95.2

51

3

Acetone

−0.23

1.5

15

20.6

80e

11

4

THF

0.49

1.5

13

10.0

84.5

13

5

Et2O

0.85

1.5

46.6

78.7

95.0

94

6

tBuOMe

0.96

1.5

45

76.4

97.0

152

7

Toluene

2.50

1.5

49.3

91.1

96.6

185

8

n-Hexane

3.50

0.5

56

96.0

97.7

340

9

n-Octane

4.50

0.5

51.1

89.0

97.9

284

10

n-Hexane

3.50

6

60.0

96.0

64.2

17

11

n-Octane

4.50

6

54.3

98.4

96.2

300

12

Et2O

0.85

6

52.9

97.7

89.2

78

13

tBuOMe

0.96

6

52.4

98.4

91.6

109

14

Toluene

2.50

6

50.3

98.4

97.3

354

15d

Toluene

2.50

6

50.3

97.4

97.3

319

  1. Reaction conditions: rac-3 (30 mg, 0.1 mmol), Novozym 435 (20 mg, 67% w/w, 1,000 U/mmol), vinyl acetate (62 μL, 6.6 equiv), solvent (1 mL), R.T. aConversion (C) was determined by HPLC (Chiralcel AS-H; flow rate: 0.50 mL/min; iPrOH/n-hexane: 1/99; temperature: 25°C; UV: λ = 199 nm); bthe determination of enantioselectivity (HPLC Chiralcel AS-H) and the absolute configuration (Mosher's method) of 3 are illustrated in Additional file 1; c E = ln[(1 − e.e.S)(1 − C)]/ln[(1 + e.e.S)(1 − C)], where e.e.S represents the enantiomeric excess of the recovered alcohol; d257 mg of rac-3 was applied, see the Experimental section for details; esince considerable side products were contaminated, the HPLC determination (80% e.e.) of (R)-3 was not calibrated.