Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparative evaluation of different extraction techniques for extraction of bioactive compounds

From: Food waste: a potential bioresource for extraction of nutraceuticals and bioactive compounds

S. no.

Bioactive component

Sources

Method

Extraction solvent used

Optimum conditions

Yield

References

1.

Alkaloid (sanguinarine)

Macleaya cordata

Maceration

Hydrochloric acid

100 °C/30 min

16.87a

Zhang et al. (2005)

MAE

Hydrochloric acid

280 W/5 min

17.10

UAE

Hydrochloric acid

250 W/30 min

10.74

Percolation

Hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide

_

6.14

2.

Anthocyanin

Grape

WE

Water

70 °C

7.93b

Corrales et al. (2008)

Ultrasonics

Water and ethanol

600 MPa

7.76

 

HHP

Water and glycol

35 kHz

11.21

 

PEF

Water and ethanol

3 kV cm−1

14.05

 

3.

Hesperetin

Orange

LPT

–

70 °C/30 s

11.56f

Plaza et al. (2011)

HPT

–

400 MPa/40 °C/1 min

13.34

PEF

–

35 kV cm1/750 ms

11.09

4.

Lutein

Orange

LPT

–

70 °C/30 s

226.42e

Plaza et al. (2011)

HPT

–

400 MPa/40 °C/1 min

361.17

PEF

–

35 kV cm1/750 ms

260.86

5.

Lycopene

Tomato waste

SFE

Liquid CO2

400 bar/80 °C/4 g CO2/min/105 min

728.98c

Kehili et al. (2017)

SE

Hexane

–

608.94

Ethyl acetate

–

320.35

Ethanol

–

284.53

6.

Naringenin

Orange

LPT

–

70 °C/30 s

3.87e

Plaza et al. (2011)

HPT

–

400 MPa/40 °C/1 min

4.43

PEF

–

35 kV cm1/750 ms

3.42

7.

Total phenolic

Red grape pomace

SE

Water

Refluxing for 2–3 h

96,386d

Drosou et al. (2015)

Ethanol

Refluxing for 5–6 h

102,995

UAE

Water

25 kHz/300 W/20 °C/60 min

50,959

Water and ethanol

25 kHz/300 W/20 °C/60 min

438,984

MAE

Water

50 °C/200 W/60 min

52,645

Water and ethanol

50 °C/200 W/60 min

200,025

8.

Total phenolic content

Orange pomace (dry)

SFE

Pure ethanol

25 MPa and 60 °C

21.2g

Espinosa-Pardo et al. (2017)

Ethanol:water-9:1

25 MPa and 60 °C

20.7

Orange pomace (fermented)

SFE

Pure ethanol

25 MPa and 60 °C

19.0

Ethanol:water-9:1

25 MPa and 60 °C

47.0

9.

Zeaxantin

Orange

LPT

–

70 °C/30 s

259.95g

Plaza et al. (2011)

HPT

–

400 MPa/40 °C/1 min

408.56

PEF

–

35 kV cm1/750 ms

278.70

10.

α-Carotene

Orange

LPT

–

70 °C/30 s)

25.04g

Plaza et al. (2011)

HPT

–

400 MPa/40 °C/1 min

38.06

PEF

–

35 kV cm1/750 ms

26.64

11.

α-Cryptoxanthin

Orange

LPT

–

70 °C/30 s

93.99

Plaza et al. (2011)

HPT

–

400 MPa/40 °C/1 min

167.26

PEF

–

35 kV cm1/750 ms

101.52

12.

β-Carotene

Orange

LPT

–

70 °C/30 s

32.72g

Plaza et al. (2011)

HPT

–

400 MPa/40°C/1 min

53.78

PEF

–

35 kV cm1/750 ms

33.74

13.

β-Cryptoxanthin

Orange

LPT

–

70 °C/30 s

235.21g

Plaza et al. (2011)

HPT

–

400 MPa/40 °C/1 min

330.07

PEF

–

35 kV cm1/750 ms

230.53

  1. HHP high hydrostatic pressure, HPT high-pressure treatment, LPT low pasteurization treatment, MAE microwave assisted extraction, PEF pulsed electric field, SE solvent extraction, WE water extraction
  2. amg/g sample; bmg Cy-3-glu eq. g−1 dry matter; cmg/kg’; dppm GAE in dry extract of air dried grape pomace; eµg/100ml; fmg/100ml; gGAE/g of extract