Goat dung as a feedstock for hyper-production of amylase from Glutamicibacter arilaitensis strain ALA4

Bioresources and Bioprocessing

Table 3 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for amylase yield by 2⁵ factorial design

Source	Sum of squares	df	Mean square	F value	P value prob > F
Model	2.318E+006	19	1.220E+005	20.82	< 0.0001
A–A	5668.73	1	5668.73	0.97	0.3447
B–B	64,520.40	1	64,520.40	11.01	0.0061
C–C	1.816E+005	1	1.816E+005	31.00	0.0001
D–D	62,853.74	1	62,853.74	10.73	0.0066
E–E	2.355E+005	1	2.355E+005	40.20	< 0.0001
AB	46,284.79	1	46,284.79	7.90	0.0157
AC	2.294E+005	1	2.294E+005	39.15	< 0.0001
AD	91,466.85	1	91,466.85	15.61	0.0019
AE	18,366.30	1	18,366.30	3.13	0.1020
BC	3.991E+005	1	3.991E+005	68.12	< 0.0001
BD	1563.94	1	1563.94	0.27	0.6148
BE	5053.39	1	5053.39	0.86	0.3713
CE	97,842.29	1	97,842.29	16.70	0.0015
ABC	2.254E+005	1	2.254E+005	38.47	< 0.0001
ABD	2.563E+005	1	2.563E+005	43.75	< 0.0001
ABE	1.621E+005	1	1.621E+005	27.67	0.0002
ACE	42,107.29	1	42,107.29	7.19	0.0200
BCE	3423.57	1	3423.57	0.58	0.4594
ABCE	1.894E+005	1	1.894E+005	32.33	0.0001
Residual	70,302.09	12	5858.51
Cor total	2.388E+006	31

R ² 0.9706, Adj R ² 0.9240, predicted R ² 0.7907, CV 3.54%, Adeq precision 24.085
df degree of freedom
Significant P < 0.05, non-significant P > 0.05