Application of response surface methodology to improve the production of antimicrobial biosurfactants by Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. tolerans N2 using sugar cane molasses as substrate

Bioresources and Bioprocessing

Table 7 Comparison of the properties of biosurfactants from this study with those reported in the literature

Biosurfactant-producing strains	Substrates	Yield (g/L)	Nature	MIC (mg/mL)		References
Biosurfactant-producing strains	Substrates	Yield (g/L)	Nature	Pathogens	Values	References
L. jensenii P6A	MRS broth	0.27	Glycolipoprotein	Escherichia coli	0.016	Morais et al. (2017)
L. jensenii P6A	MRS broth	0.27	Glycolipoprotein	S. saprophyticus	0.128	Morais et al. (2017)
L. gasseri P65	MRS broth	0.42	Glycolipoprotein	Escherichia coli	0.016
L. gasseri P65	MRS broth	0.42	Glycolipoprotein	S. saprophyticus	0.128
Lactococcus lactis 53	MRS broth	0.10	Glycoprotein	S. epidermidis GB 9/6	> 40	Rodrigues et al. (2006a)
Lactococcus lactis 53	MRS broth	0.10	Glycoprotein	S. aureus GB 2/1	> 40	Rodrigues et al. (2006a)
L. jensenii 25258	MRS broth	–	–	E. coli	50	Sambanthamoorthy et al. (2014)
	MRS broth	–	–	S. aureus UMS-1	50
	MRS broth	–	–	MR S. aureus*	50
L. rhamnosus	MRS broth	–	–	E. coli,	> 50
		–	–	S. aureus UMS-1	> 50
		–	–	MR S. aureus	> 50
L. agilis CCUG31450	Cheese whey	0.96	Glycoprotein	S. aureus	> 5	Gudiña et al. (2015)
				P. aeruginosa	> 5
	MRS broth	0.084	Glycoprotein	–	–
L. paracasei	MRS broth		–	S. aureus	50
			–	E. coli	25
			–	P. aeruginosa	> 50
L. paracasei N2	Molasses	2.70	Glycolipoprotein	P. aeruginosa PSB2	6.4	This study
				Salmonella sp. SL2	6.4
				E. coli MTCC 118	12.8
				P. putida PSJ1	12.8
				Bacillus sp. BC1	3.2
				S. aureus STP1	3.2