Microorganism | Substrate | Reactor type | Operating conditions | Biohydrogen yield | References | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Temperature, T | pH | |||||
Clostridium butyricum INET 1 | Glucose | Batch | 35 °C | Initial = 7.0, Operation = uncontrolled | 2.24 mol H2/mol hexose | Yin and Wang (2017) |
Clostridium butyricum INET 1 | Xylose | Batch | 35 °C | Initial = 7.0, Operation = uncontrolled | 1.23 mol H2/mol hexose | Yin and Wang (2017) |
Clostridium butyricum INET 1 | Sucrose | Batch | 35 °C | Initial = 7.0, Operation = uncontrolled | 1.44 mol H2/mol hexose | Yin and Wang (2017) |
Clostridium butyricum INET 1 | Lactose | Batch | 35 °C | Initial = 7.0, Operation = uncontrolled | 1.83 mol H2/mol hexose | Yin and Wang (2017) |
Clostridium butyricum INET 1 | Starch | Batch | 35 °C | Initial = 7.0, Operation = uncontrolled | 2.17 mol H2/mol hexose | Yin and Wang (2017) |
Clostridium butyricum INET 1 | Glycerol | Batch | 35 °C | Initial = 7.0, Operation = uncontrolled | 0.67 mol H2/mol hexose | Yin and Wang (2017) |
Clostridium butyricum TISTR 1032 | Food waste | CSTR | 37 °C | Initial = 6.0, Operation = uncontrolled | 362 mL H2/g VS | Kanchanasuta et al. (2017) |
Clostridium butyricum DSM 10,702 | Microalgae | Batch | 37 °C | ND | 2.74 mol H2/mol glucose | Ortigueira et al. (2015) |
Clostridium butyricum CWBI 1009 | Glucose | TBSBR | 30 °C | Initial = 5.2, Operation = 5.2 | 1.67 mol H2/mol glucose | Puhulwella et al. (2014) |
Clostridium butyricum | Glycerol | Batch | 37 °C | Initial = 7.4, Operation = uncontrolled | 3.0 mol H2/mol glycerol | Kivistö et al. (2013) |
Clostridium butyricum CWBI 1009 | Glucose | AnSBR | 30 °C | Initial = 7.6, Operation = uncontrolled | 2.2 mol H2/mol glucose | Beckers et al. (2013) |
Clostridium butyricum CWBI 1009 | Glucose | ABR | 30 °C | Initial = 8.5, Operation = uncontrolled | 2.49 mol H2/mol glucose | Laurent et al. (2012) |
Clostridium butyricum TISTR 1032 | Sugarcane bagasse | Serum bottle | 37 °C | Initial = 6.5, Operation = 6.5 | 1.52 mol H2/mol hexoseused | Plangklang et al. (2012) |
Clostridium beijerinckii DSM 791 | Rice mill wastewater | Serum bottle | 37 °C | Initial = 7.0, Operation = uncontrolled | 214.9 mL H2/L | Rambabu et al. (2021) |
Clostridium beijerinckii PS-3 | Oil palm sap | Serum bottle | 30 °C | Initial = 7.0, Operation = uncontrolled | 141 mL H2/g substrate | Noparat et al. (2012) |
Clostridium pasteurianum DSM 525 | Glycerol | Serum bottle | 37 °C | Initial = 7.0, Operation = 7.0 | 1.10 mol H2/mol glycerol | Sarma et al. (2019) |
Clostridium pasteurianum | Glucose | Serum bottle | 35 °C | Initial = 7.0, Operation = uncontrolled | 2.2 mol H2/mol xylose | Hsieh et al. (2016) |
Clostridium BOH3 | Fruit waste | Serum bottle | 37 °C | Initial = 6.8, Operation = uncontrolled | 359.97 mL H2/g TS utilised | Mahato et al. (2020) |
Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27,405 | Date seeds | Serum bottle | 50 °C | Initial = 7.0, Operation = uncontrolled | 103.97 mmol H2/ L | Rambabu et al. (2020) |
Clostridium acetobutylicum YM1 | Rice bran | Batch | 34 °C | Initial = 5.5, Operation = uncontrolled | 117.24 mL H2/g sugarconsumed | Azman et al. (2016) |
Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27,405 | Sugarcane bagasse | Serum bottle | 55 °C | Initial = 6.6, Operation = uncontrolled | 4.89 mmol H2/g mediumadded | Tian et al. (2015) |
Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4 | Rice bran | Batch | 30 °C | Initial = 6.0, Operation = uncontrolled | 3.37 mol H2/mol sugarconsumed | Dada et al. (2013) |
Clostridium tyrobutyricum Fya102 | Glucose | CSTR | 35 °C | Initial = 6.0, Operation = 6.0 | 1.06 mmol H2/mmol glucose | Whang et al. (2011) |
Enterobacter aerogenes ZJU1 | Aquatic weed | Batch | 37 °C | Initial = 6.0, Operation = uncontrolled | 62.2 mL H2/g VS | Song et al. (2020) |
Enterobacter asburiae | Lactose | Batch | 25.6 °C | Initial = 7.2, Operation = uncontrolled | 1.19 mol H2/mol lactose | Alvarez-Guzmán et al. (2020) |
Enterobacter aerogenes CDC 819–56 | Sago wastewater | Serum bottle | 31 °C | Initial = 6.8, Operation = uncontrolled | 7.42 mmol H2/mol glucose | Ulhiza et al. (2018) |
Enterobacter aerogenes PTCC 1221 | Rice straw | Serum bottle | 37 °C | Initial = 5.8, Operation = 5.8 | 19.73 mL H2/g straw | Asadi and Zilouei (2017) |
Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT 08 | Distillery effluent | Serum bottle | 37 °C | Initial = 7.5, Operation = uncontrolled | 7.38 mol H2/kg CODreduced | Mishra and Das (2014) |
Bacillus cereus | Wheat straw | Batch | 37 °C | Initial = 7.5, Operation = uncontrolled | 156.4 mL H2/g VS | Saleem et al. (2020) |
Ethanoligenens harbinense B49 | Glucose | Serum bottle | 36 °C | Initial = 6.5, Operation = uncontrolled | 113.5 mmol H2/L | Xu et al. (2016) |
Ethanoligenens harbinense YUAN-3 | Glucose | Batch | 35 °C | Initial = 7.0, Operation = 4.5 | 2.62 mol H2/mol glucose | Zhang et al. (2015) |
Escherichia coli | Glucose | Serum bottle | 37 °C | ND | 2.0 mol H2/mol glucose | Bisaillon et al. (2006) |
Janthinobacterium agaricidamnosum | Glucose | Serological bottle | 25 °C | Initial = 6.5, Operation = uncontrolled | 0.86 mol H2/mol glucose | Alvarado-Cuevas et al. (2015) |
Polaromonas jejuensis | Glucose | Serological bottle | 25 °C | Initial = 6.5, Operation = uncontrolled | 1.57 mol H2/mol glucose | Alvarado-Cuevas et al. (2015) |
Klebsiella pneumoniae | Brewery wastewater | AnBBR | 35–36 °C | Initial = 5.5, Operation = uncontrolled | 0.80–1.67 mol H2/mol glucose | Estevam et al. (2018) |
Klebsiella pneumoniae BLb01 | Glycerol | Batch | 39 °C | Initial = 9.0, Operation = uncontrolled | 45.0 mol % | Costa et al. (2011) |