Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of testing the best LEH mutants evolved for epoxide 1 as catalysts in the hydrolytic desymmetrization of further meso-substrates

From: Exploring productive sequence space in directed evolution using binary patterning versus conventional mutagenesis strategies

Code

1

3

5

7

Substrate concentration (mM)

ee %

c %

ee %

c %

ee %

c %

ee %

c %

WT

3 (S,S)

87

7 (R,R)

69

22 (S,S)

99

93 (R,R)

98

5

SZ501

97 (S,S)

96

83 (S,S)

30

89 (S,S)

97

19 (R,R)

93

SZ502

97 (S,S)

93

94 (S,S)

34

97 (S,S)

96

19 (R,R)

93

SZ503

79 (R,R)

97

51 (R,R)

48

53 (R,R)

99

94 (R,R)

99

SZ504

96 (S,S)

93

87 (S,S)

31

94 (S,S)

97

24 (R,R)

95

WT

2 (S,S)

99

13 (R,R)

64

18 (S,S)

99

92 (R,R)

99

10

SZ501

97 (S,S)

98

94 (S,S)

18

97 (S,S)

91

21 (R,R)

62

SZ502

98 (S,S)

95

94 (S,S)

39

97 (S,S)

96

22 (R,R)

85

SZ503

80 (R,R)

97

51 (R,R)

64

54 (R,R)

99

95 (R,R)

99

SZ504

95 (S,S)

98

90 (S,S)

26

94 (S,S)

91

27 (R,R)

55