Open Access

Responses of CHO-DHFR cells to ratio of asparagine to glutamine in feed media: cell growth, antibody production, metabolic waste, glutamate, and energy metabolism

  • Li-xiang Zhang1,
  • Wei-yan Zhang1,
  • Chen Wang1,
  • Jin-tao Liu1,
  • Xian-cun Deng1, 2,
  • Xu-ping Liu1,
  • Li Fan1Email author and
  • Wen-song Tan1
Bioresources and Bioprocessing20163:5

DOI: 10.1186/s40643-015-0072-6

Received: 1 September 2015

Accepted: 9 November 2015

Published: 8 February 2016

Abstract

Background

Optimization of chemically defined medium has been a critical way to produce monoclonal antibody. Usually, amount of glutamine was added into the feed medium, but a half of asparagine was added. Our study found that asparagine was important in the antibody production phase. Increasing the ratio of asparagine to glutamine in feed medium for enhancement of antibody production in CHO-DHFR cell culture would be an efficient way.

Results

We optimized the total amount and the ratio of the two vital amino acids in feed medium to increase antibody production. In this work, we have demonstrated that feeding medium of high ratio between asparagine and glutamine (FB-H) can enhance the cell density after reaching the stationary phase. Moreover, FB-H was shown to improve cell maintenance, and increased the antibody production. The metabolic flux analysis proved that ratio of asparagine to glutamine had little influence on glycolysis. Furthermore, the TCA cycle of FB-H was enhanced by 20 % compared to that of low ratio of asparagine to glutamine (FB-L). And the energy metabolism of FB-H was 22.6 % higher than that of FB-L. For the later, lactate can be less produced in FB-H.

Conclusions

We should improve the ratio between asparagine and glutamine in feed medium properly under the premise of no influence on cell growth to achieve high mAb producing goal.

Keywords

Chinese Hamster ovary cells Feed medium Ratio between asparagine and glutamine Cell growth Monoclonal antibody production Metabolism

Background

Mammalian cell culture has been used to produce various recombinant proteins for therapeutic applications (Wurm 2004). CHO cell is a kind of important industrial cell line for monoclonal antibodies (mAb) production due to its robust growth feature and the ability to produce desired post-translational modifications. Industrial scale production of recombinant therapeutic proteins, including mAb, is predominantly performed in fed-batch cultures (Birch and Racher 2006). Optimization of cell culture medium to meet the nutrient demands and minimize toxic production in cell cultures has played a critical role in the productivity improvements, especially for dihydrofolate reductase-deficient Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-DHFR) cells, while they were easy to accumulate metabolic wastes (Altamirano et al. 2004; Matsuoka et al. 2006; Behjousiar et al. 2012). Therefore, medium optimization is considered as one of the key contributors to high titer. To better control cell metabolism and avoid using of animal-derived raw materials and ill-defined hydrolysates, much progress has been made in understanding cell nutrient requirements and development of chemically defined medium including feed formulations over the last 10 years (Wurm 2004; Franek et al. 2000; Huang et al. 2010; Young 2013). More recently, metabolic flux analysis (MFA) has become a useful tool in medium development for hybridoma (Follstad et al. 1999; Europa et al. 2000; Gambhir et al. 2003) and CHO cell cultures (Nyberg et al. 1999; Altamirano et al. 2006), which can help quantifying nutrient demands and metabolite production in cell culture (Zhao et al. 2009).

Mammalian cells including CHO cells consume large quantities of glucose and glutamine in carbon and nitrogen metabolism, while releasing waste products lactate and ammonia. It is reported that asparagine and glutamine are significant nitrogen and energy sources. Additionally, glutamine is known as an anaplerotic metabolic fueling biosynthesis substance (Xing et al. 2011), and asparagine is essential for the synthesis of glycine, cysteine, proteins, nucleotides, and lipids in cell proliferation. Glutamine and asparagine are the two most consumed amino acids in mammalian cell culture. To achieve high-specific growth rate, cell density, and productivity, the culture should be fed with high levels of glutamine or asparagine (Wlaschin and Hu 2006; Jain and Kumar 2008; Lu et al. 2013; Sengupta et al. 2011). Specifically, glutamine and asparagine are mutually related to each other not only in transportation but also in metabolism (Wipf et al. 2002; Huang et al. 2007; Kobayashi et al. 2015; Xu et al. 2014). Glutamine and asparagine could turn into glutamate and aspartate through deamination. And glutamate can carry on deamination to form α-ketoglutarate (α-KG). In addition, aspartate used α-ketoglutarate to form oxaloacetate and glutamate through transamination. Oxaloacetate and α-ketoglutarate could enter TCA cycle to be further metabolized. Our study found that asparagine was important in the antibody production phase. Usually the concentration of asparagine was only half of glutamine concentration in feed media. Although asparagine and glutamine are key amino acids for cell growth and mAb productivity, but there were always more glutamine than asparagine in feed media. Therefore, how to correctly supply asparagine and glutamine in feed media to achieve high mAb production becomes a critical issue.

In this study, we performed fed-batch culture with CHO-DHFR cells. First, we optimized the total amount of asparagine and glutamine in feed media to avoid the shortage of them, and we also optimized the ratio of them in feed medium to increase antibody production. Finally, we designed FB-L (60 mM Asn, 120 mM Gln), FB-H (120 mM Asn, 60 mM Gln), and FB-N (with no Asn and Gln) to deeply study the effects of ratio on cell growth, antibody production, metabolic wastes, and energy metabolism. Furthermore, we used MFA method to study different processes of FB-L and FB-H during the stationary phase of fed-batch culture, such as glutamate metabolism and TCA cycle.

Methods

Cell line and cell culture

A CHO-DHFR cell line expressing a chimeric anti-human CD20 monoclonal antibody was used in this study. The cells were transfected with a plasmid encoding IgG mAb. Cells were routinely maintained in a protein-free cell culture, which was composed of a mixture of DMEM/Ham’s F12 (1:1 (v/v); Gibco) supplemented with vitamins, nucleic acids, ethanolamine, sodium selenite, ferric citrate, Pluronic F-68, etc. This basal medium contains 50 mM glucose, 4 mM asparagine, and 6 mM glutamine. Furthermore, cells were routinely passaged every 2 days at a density of 0.5~1.0 × 106 cells/mL in shake flasks in a humidified incubator maintained at 37 °C and 5 % CO2 with shaking at 140 rpm.

For fed-batch culture, exponentially growing CHO cells were collected by centrifugation (1000 rpm, 5 min) and inoculated at a density of 0.8~1.0 × 106 cells/mL into basal medium. Fed-batch culture was carried out using shaking flasks (Corning, NY, USA) on a rotary shaker at 140 rpm, with an medium volume of 200 ml. Feed medium with different concentrations of asparagine and glutamine for cells was added 3 % (v/v)/day after 24 h. The culture temperature was shifted from 37 to 32 °C at day 5. Cell suspension samples were taken every day to determine cell density, antibody concentration, and other metabolites. Two independent experiments were performed.

Feed media

The feed medium contained glucose, amino acid, vitamins, Pluronic F-68, etc. This feed medium contains 500 mM glucose. The concentration of asparagine (Asn) and glutamine (Gln) in feed medium (FM) is listed in Table 1. First, we fixed the ratio of asparagine to glutamine at 1:1, and increased the total amount of them to find a suitable total concentration. Then, we fixed the total amount of them, and changed the proportion between asparagine and glutamine to see the effect of ratio on titer. Finally, three fed-batch cultures were performed under different conditions to see the metabolism distinction: FB-L with feed medium contained 120 mM glutamine and 60 mM asparagine; FB-H with feed medium contained 60 mM glutamine and 120 mM asparagine; and FB-N with feed medium contained no glutamine and asparagine.
Table 1

The formula of feed media used in the fed-batch cultures

  

Asn (mM)

Gln (mM)

Asn/Gln

Asn + Gln (mM)

Total

T1

0

0

/

0

T2

30

30

1:1

60

T3

60

60

1:1

120

T4

90

90

1:1

180

T5

120

120

1:1

240

Proportion

P1

180

0

/

180

P2

150

30

5:1

180

P3

120

60

2:1

180

P4

90

90

1:1

180

P5

60

120

1:2

180

P6

30

150

1:5

180

P7

0

180

/

180

 

FB-L

60

120

1:2

180

FB-H

120

60

2:1

180

FB-N

0

0

/

0

Extraction of intracellular metabolites

Metabolism was quenched by addition of 40 mL of cold saline water (9 g/L NaCl) to 10 mL cell's sample (1~2 × 107 cells). Then, the samples were centrifuged at 2000 rpm and 0 °C for 1 min and discarded the supernatant. Intracellular metabolites were extracted by addition of 1 mL 50 % acetonitrile to cells, and the tubes were vortexed vigorously. After incubation on ice for 10 min, the tubes were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm and 0 °C for 10 min. The supernatant was kept at −80 °C. Before analysis, the extracted supernatants were dried at 37 °C with air using an evaporator (Reacti-Vap/reacti-Therm; Fierce, Rochford, 1L). Dried metabolites were dissolved in water and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The aqueous solution was filtered (0.45 μm) for analysis by HPLC.

Analytical measurements and specific metabolic rates

Viable cell density and cell viability were determined by counting cells with a hemocytometer using the trypan blue dye exclusion method. The mAb was purified by Protein A affinity chromatography (Hi Trap Protein A HP Columns, GE), and the mAb concentration was quantified by HPLC as described previously (Chen et al. 2012). The concentrations of glucose, ammonia, and lactate were determined using test kits purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute and Shanghai Institute of Biological products, China. The specific consumption/production rate (q) was calculated by plotting cumulative metabolites consumption versus the integral of viable cells (IVC) (Zhao et al. 2009), and fitting the plots by a liner correlation. The slopes of the corresponding straight lines were used as average specific rates. Amino acid concentrations were assayed by reversed-phase HPLC (1525 Binary HPLC pump, 717plus Autosampler, 2487 Dual λ absorbance detector, Nova-Pak C18 4 μm 3.9 × 150 mm column, Waters) after derivatization with ACCQ-Tag kit purchased from Waters. The oxygen uptake rate (OUR) was determined through the online dynamic method (Eyer et al. 1995).

Methodology of MFA

The metabolic network of CHO cell is simplified as shown in Fig. 1, while the reaction in the simplified biochemical network is listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. According to the basic principle of metabolic flux analysis, the mass conservation equation of cell metabolic network was presented:
$$ \frac{{{\text{d}}x_{i} }}{{{\text{d}}t}} = \mathop \sum \limits_{j} a_{ij} \cdot f_{j} - r_{i}, $$
(1)
where x i , mole concentration of the ith metabolite (mmol/L); t reaction time (h); a ij , the stoichiometric coefficient of the ith metabolite (non-dimensional); f j , the metabolic flux of the jth reaction (mmol C/(109cells h)); and r i , the specific rate of metabolite i (mmol C/(109cells h)). Reactions in the metabolic networks react so fast compared to the cell growth rate that intermediate metabolites in cells are in pseudo-steady state (Chen et al. 2012; Hilal-Alnaqbi et al. 2013). So, Eq. (1) was simplified to
$$ \mathop \sum \limits_{\text{j}} {\text{a}}_{ij} \cdot {\text{f}}_{j} = {\text{r}}_{i} $$
(2)
or
$$ A \; \times \; F\; = \; r, $$
(3)
where A, m × n matrix of stoichiometry; F, n dimensions vector of reaction rate; and r, m dimension vector of metabolite specific rate.
Fig. 1

Simplified metabolic network of CHO-DHFR cells. Assumptions: a cell metabolic network is mainly composed of glycolysis, TCA cycle, amino acid metabolism, and product synthesis. Metabolic fluxes of other synthetic pathways, such as nucleic acid, lipids, and protein synthesis are integrated into cell and product synthesis part, b poly step reactions can be regarded as one overall reaction

This network consists of glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), and amino acid metabolic pathways (Wlaschin and Hu 2006; Dean and Reddy 2013). The stoichiometry matrix was determined according to metabolic reactions listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. The coefficients of biomass synthesis equation (F12) were determined based on typical cell amino acid composition (Bertz et al. 2013). The coefficients of glucose and glutamine were calculated from carbon and nitrogen balance, respectively. The coefficients of antibody synthesis equation (F13) were calculated from the sequence of antibody by searching the drug bank with proprietary information.

Specific rates used to solve the equation were calculated from the data in the comparable periods with similar culture environment and relatively stable cell state (day7–day9). The spontaneous decomposition of glutamine was neglected in calculation, because it was negligibly slow compared to the specific uptake rates in metabolic flux analysis. The respiratory quotient of cells was constant in metabolic flux analysis, and the value was one (Sengupta et al. 2011; Ferreira et al. 2005; Duarte et al. 2014; Ahn and Antoniewicz 2012). So, the specific rate of CO2 production was equal to that of O2 consumption. The units of all rates input were conformed to mmol/(109cells day).

Estimation of ATP production rate

ATP production rate was estimated according to the equation (4) (Ozturk et al. 1992)
$$ q{\text{ATP}} \; = \; q{\text{Lac}}\; + \; 6q{\text{O}}_{ 2}. $$
(4)

The contributions of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation were determined by the term qLac and 6qO2, respectively.

Results and discussion

The effects of glutamine and asparagine

CHO-DHFR cells were grown in fed-batch cultures over a period of 12 days. First, we fixed the ratio of asparagine to glutamine at 1:1 and increased the total amount of them to find a suitable concentration (Table 1). Thus, the effect of ratio would not impact by the limitation of them either. Figure 2a shows the total amount profiles of antibody production and concentrations of lactate and ammonia. The antibody titer increased from 0.51 g/L with no asparagine and glutamine to 0.95 g/L with 90 mM asparagine and 90 mM glutamine. When the total amount increased from 180 mM to 240 mM, the mAb titer was not increased significantly. But the concentration of lactate and ammonia was increased following the addition of total amount. Thus, we chose the total amount at 180 mM. Then, we fixed the total amount (180 mM) and changed the ratio.

Figure 2b shows the ratio profiles of antibody production and concentrations of lactate and ammonia. Antibody titer slightly increased from 0.91 g/L (180 mM Asn, 0 mM Gln) to 1.11 g/L (120 mM Asn, 60 mM Gln), which then rapidly decreased to 0.62 g/L (0 mM Asn, 180 mM Gln). The concentration of ammonia was changeless during the ratio of gradient. But the lactate concentration was increased following the addition glutamine concentration. Thus, we chose high ratio (Asn:Gln = 2:1, named FB-H), low ratio (Asn:Gln = 1:2, named FB-L), and no asparagine and glutamine (FB-N) in feed medium to study the effects of ratio on cell growth, antibody production, and metabolism deeply.

The time profiles of cell growth are shown in Additional file 2: Fig. S1. There were differences between them, but they had no statistical significance. The differences of antibody titer were due to the productivity of a single cell. And the metabolic profiles were affected by changes in nutrient supplements.

The impacts of ratio between asparagine and glutamine on cell growth and antibody production

The results of fed-batch culture in shaking flasks of three fed-batch cultures were summarized. Figure 3a and b show the time profiles of viable cell density and viability in the fed-batch cultures. Due to the concentrations of asparagine and glutamine were optimized, the cells directly entered the logarithmic growth phase without delay. FB-H reached maximum viable cell density of 3.92 × 106 cells/mL at day 6, while FB-L was 3.32 × 106 cells/mL and FB-N was 3.43 × 106 cells/mL at day5. Maximum VCD of FB-H was 18.0 % higher than that of FB-L (or FB-N). The VCD and viability of FB-L and FB-N declined quickly from day 9 to day 12. Interestingly, the viability and cell density of FB-H maintained relatively higher than that in FB-L and FB-N.

Antibody production was evaluated by volumetric concentration and qmAb. As shown in Fig. 3c, the mAb concentrations increased gradually during the whole fed-batch process for three cultures. The mAb concentration reached 0.791 g/L (FB-L), 1.056 g/L (FB-H), and 0.589 g/L (FB-N) at day 12, respectively. Antibody production in FB-H was 33.5 and 79.3 % higher compared to FB-L and FB-N. We found that antibody production was improved by increasing the ratio between asparagine and glutamine. By plotting cumulative mAb concentration versus viable cell density (IVCC), qmAb was determined, which denoted a single cell’s ability to produce antibody. As shown in Fig. 3d, the qmAb of FB-H was 20 % higher than that of FB-L and 84.6 % higher than that of FB-N. We found that the enhancement of antibody production in FB-H was due to increase of VCD and qmAb. However, the higher titer of FB-L than that of FB-N was due to the increase of a single cell’s ability to produce antibody.
Fig. 2

Effects of asparagine and glutamine on titer and metabolic wastes. Results of total amount of asparagine and glutamine (a) and ratio of asparagine to glutamine (b) in feed media were listed. Significant analysis of (a) was titer, lactate, and ammonia. Significant analysis of (b) was titer and lactate (*p < 0.05)

Effects of ratio on metabolic wastes and energy sources

The lactate, ammonia, and alanine concentrations changed greatly among metabolites in the fed-batch cultures. Three metabolites were produced rather than consumed. Both lactate and ammonia were metabolic wastes, which was harmful for cell culture. They were stern problems need to be solved because CHO-DHFR cells were easy to accumulated metabolic wastes. The generated lactate of FB-H was approximately 19.1 % lower than that of FB-L during the stationary phase, while both of them were higher than FB-N obviously (Fig. 3e). As for the generated ammonia, there was no evident difference between FB-L and FB-H, and it maintained low concentration in FB-N, which was 40 % lower than that of FN-L and FB-H after day 7 (Fig. 3f). We got the same conclusion about the alanine concentration (Fig. 3g). As previously mentioned, the by-product ammonia was related to the total amount of asparagine and glutamine, but the concentration of lactate was only related to the amount of glutamine (Fig. 2a and b).
Fig. 3

Cell growth and metabolic profiles. Effects of FB-L (square), FB-H (circle) and FB-N (triangle) on a viable cell density (VCD), b viability, c mAb concentration, d qmAb, the concentration of e lactate, f ammonia, g alanine, h glutamine, i asparagine, j glutamate, k aspartate, l glucose, m ratio of Asn/Gln, n ratio of Asp/Glu. Significant analysis was between FB-L and FB-H (*p < 0.05)

The time profile of glutamine concentration is shown in Fig. 3h. The concentration of glutamine decreased during the exponential growth phase from day 0 to day 3, and remained relatively constant during the next 4 days. But then they rapidly increased from day 8 to day 12. Thus, glutamine consumed fleetly during exponential growth phase and accumulated during antibody production phase (day 7~day 12). And the concentration of glutamine in FB-L (120 mM Asn, 60 mM Gln) was approximately 37.5 % (1.80 mM) higher than that of FB-H (60 mM Asn, 120 mM Gln) during the antibody production phase. The time profile of asparagine concentration is shown in Fig. 3i. The concentration of asparagine decreased during the exponential growth phase, and remained relatively constant from day 6 to 12. Asparagine concentration of FB-H was slightly (approximately 7 %) higher than that of FB-L. Thus, asparagine was consumed rapidly during antibody production phase.

The time profiles of glutamate and aspartate concentration are shown in Fig. 3j and k. Glutamate concentration was changeless among three cultures during the whole process. This kind of metabolite was always the key metabolism. So, we should study its metabolism deeply. Aspartate concentration of FB-N remained unchanged, while that of FB-L and FB-H increased. Aspartate concentration of FB-H was approximately 26.7 % higher than that of FB-L during antibody production phase. As shown in Fig. 3l, glucose concentrations of three cultures were almost the same before day 6. And then that of FB-N was the highest, which was approximately 13.1 % and 9.5 % higher than that of FB-L and FB-H. Glucose of FB-H consumed maximum.

The time profiles of Asn/Gln and Asp/Glu ratio in fermentation broths are shown in Fig. 3m and n. Ratio of Asn/Gln was decreased during the whole process. And Asn/Gln ratio in FB-H was approximately 93.4 % higher than that of FB-L from day 3 to day 12. The ratio of Asp/Glu maintained 1.30 and 1.00 in FB-H and FB-L, respectively, after day 3. Asp/Glu ratio of FB-H was 30.0 % higher than that of FB-L.

Metabolic kinetics analysis

FB-H culture could improve the antibody production. To further investigate metabolism in the three cultures, we used kinetics to evaluate the impact of glutamine and asparagine on metabolism. Kinetic results of main nutrients and metabolites at different conditions from day 7 to day 9 are listed in Additional file 1: Table S2 and Fig. 4a.
Fig. 4

Kinetic results and metabolic flux. Kinetic results of basic metabolism (a) and the metabolic flux of glutamate consumption (b) and glutamate production (c) in different cultures. The cell dry weight was 240 pg/cell. All results were calculated from the data in the period of day 7~day 9 (***p < 0.001)

As shown in Fig. 4a, the specific glucose consumption rate had no significant difference in different cultures. It meant that glucose metabolism (glycolysis pathway) was not influenced by asparagine to glutamine ratio. The lactate yield from glucose was 0.158, −0.184, and −0.114 (mmol/mmol) for FB-L, FB-H, and FB-N, respectively. It meant that most of glucose flew into TCA cycle to provide immediate metabolites and energy in stationary phase. FB-L produced lactate, while FB-H and FB-N consumed in antibody production phase.

In Additional file 1: Table S2, all essential amino acids were in the condition of consumption. Besides, there was no evident difference. For non-essential amino acid, the differences were emerged. As reported before (Matsuoka et al. 2006), glutamine and asparagine trended toward glutamate and aspartate through deamination pathways. Aspartate used α-ketoglutarate to produce glutamate and oxaloacetate through transamination pathways. In Additional file 1: Table S2, it showed that the specific consumption rate of aspartate in FB-H was 2.22 times of that in FB-L, but the kinetic rate of glutamate was similar between FB-L and FB-H. These data indicated that when there was a large sum of asparagine in FB-H, it could turn into aspartate through deamination pathway. Hence, the consumption rate of aspartate increased evidently. But both in FB-L and FB-H, the consumption rate of glutamate was always changeless. The reason may be that many amino acids could transfer to glutamate through transamination to maintain a stable value of glutamate. Thus, for amino acid metabolism, glutamate was a key substance in stationary phase. We need to focus on it in the following discussion.

Glutamate metabolic flux analysis

As one of the critical linkers and the similar glutamate specific consumption rate of FB-L and FB-H, we investigated the glutamate metabolic flux analysis in FB-L and FB-H. The metabolic fluxes of glutamate are listed in Fig. 4b, c and Table 2. These data indicated that more aspartate turned into glutamate when the proportion was high (30 % higher than that of FB-L). That was the reason why the consumption rate of aspartate increased evidently in FB-H (Table 2). The flux of glutamate production in FB-H was almost from aspartate transamination (59.66 %) and glutamine deamination (38.96 %) which accounted for more than 98 % (Table 2). However, in the Fig. 4b of glutamate consumption, the flux of glutamate to α-ketoglutarate (F10) was 0.384 mmol/(109cells day) in FB-H which was 12.6 % higher than that of FB-L. These data suggested that when there was a high ratio between asparagine and glutamine, glutamate was more inclined to produce α-ketoglutarate which flew into TCA cycle supporting immediate metabolites and energy (Fig. 5b, c). And the flux from glutamate to alanine was reduced in FB-H. But the total fluxes of glutamate consumption were changeless. The flux of glutamate to antibody in FB-H was 35.5 % higher than that of FB-L. And the flux from glutamate to biomass was similar in two cultures (Table 2).
Table 2

Contribution of glutamate flow in different cultures

Culture

 

FB-L

FB-H

p

Percentage (%)

Percentage (%)

Glutamate production

Gln-Glu

58.73 ± 3.02

38.98 ± 2.10

**

Asp-Glu

39.26 ± 1.25

59.66 ± 2.34

**

Other

2.01 ± 0.15

1.86 ± 0.03

 

Total

100.00 ± 4.42

100.00 ± 4.47

 

Other

8.65 ± 0.11

7.66 ± 0.15

**

Glutamate consumption

Biomass

1.14 ± 0.03

1.07 ± 0.07

 

Antibody

1.14 ± 0.02

1.53 ± 0.09

*

Glu-αKG

55.63 ± 3.03

58.81 ± 3.25

 

Glu-Ala

33.44 ± 1.84

31.09 ± 2.16

 

Total

100.00 ± 5.03

100.00 ± 6.16

 

The p value was calculated between FB-L and FB-H

0.01 < * p < 0.05, 0.001 < ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001

Fig. 5

Metabolic flux distribution. a The calculated values of flux were normalized with respect to that of the low proportion between asparagine and glutamine. The line size was increased with the value of flux. The figure indicated that TCA cycle was strengthened in high proportion condition. b Metabolism of high proportion between glutamine and asparagine in CHO-DHFR cell lines. Glutamate and aspartate tended to flow into TCA cycle for immediate metabolites and energy. c Metabolism of low proportion between glutamine and asparagine in CHO-DHFR cell lines. Glutamate was inclined to produce lactate via a truncate TCA cycle

Metabolic flux distribution

Metabolic flux distribution (FB-H/FB-L) is described in Fig. 5. The TCA cycle of FB-H was enhanced by 20 % compared to FB-L (Fig. 5a). NADH and FADH2, which were the products of TCA cycle, could enter the respiratory chain to form ATP. Thus, the energy production of FB-H would be raised compared to FB-L. In addition, ammonia accumulation was closely related to the total supplement of glutamine and asparagine as described before (Fig. 2a, b). Both glutamine and asparagine were firstly metabolized by deamination (Additional file 1: Table S1) which produced ammonia and then aspartate tended to occur transamination reaction (Huang et al. 2007; Duarte et al. 2014; Ahn and Antoniewicz 2012; Ozturk et al. 1992; Ahn and Antoniewicz 2012; Rajendra et al. 2012). Amino acid, such as aspartate, could use α-ketoglutarate to initiate transamination and generate glutamate simultaneously. Under the catalytic action of glutamate dehydrogenase, glutamate occurred deamination to form α-ketoglutarate. Thus, ammonia was related to the total supplement of glutamine and asparagine. It explained that why ammonia production was not influenced by proportion of asparagine to glutamine (Fig. 2b).

However, lactate acid metabolism was significantly influenced by the proportion of asparagine to glutamine. As shown in the metabolite flux (Fig. 5), the production fluxes of lactate and alanine in FB-H were 13.0 and 10.0 % lower than that in FB-L. And lactate production was closely related to glutamine concentration (Fig. 2b). In fact, Jamey D Young has recently shown that glutamine entering TCA cycle has three possible fates: firstly, conversion to lipids; secondly, glutaminolysis to form lactate via a truncate TCA cycle; thirdly, complete oxidation to CO2 (Young 2013). In low proportion, glutamate complied with the secondly way. It could be used to supply ATP and/or NADPH with retention of carbon to form lactate (Fig. 5c). In high proportion, glutamate mostly entered the thirdly way. More glutamate could be formed from aspartate and then flowed into TCA cycle for complete oxidation to CO2 (Fig. 5c). Thus, the produced lactate in FB-H was approximately 19.1 % lower than that in FB-L. And complete oxidation enhanced TCA cycle in FB-H.

In FB-H, the flux of F17 (ASP + α-KG → OAA + GLU) was 37.8 % higher than that of FB-L. The consumption of α-KG was fast, and the flux of F10 (GLU → α-KG + NH3) was increased by 13.0 %. Thus, the fluxes of aspartate and glutamate that enter TCA cycle were enhanced, respectively. These made substances (glutamine and asparagine) use more completely (Fig. 5b). In FB-L, abundant glutamate from glutamine could not turn into other amino acids and diffused into TCA cycle. Therefore, glutamate developed into lactate through malate overflow (Fig. 5c).

Energy metabolism

Results showed that the oxygen uptake rate (OUR) increased in FB-H compared to FB-L. Compared with OUR and lactate production rate, ATP production rates are calculated and presented in Table 3. The highest ATP production rate occurred in FB-H, which was 22.6 and 59.6 % higher than that of FB-L and FB-N, respectively. And oxidative phosphorylation contribution accounted for a higher proportion in ATP production for three cultures. Considering from the aspect of energy metabolism, feed medium with high asparagine to glutamine ratio was recommended for CHO-DHFR cells.
Table 3

Effect of asparagine to glutamine ratio on ATP production rate

Culture

Lactate production rate (mmolC/109cells/day)

Oxygen consumption rate (mmolC/109cells/day)

ATP production rate (mmolC/109cells/day)

FB-L

0.322 ± 0.032***

4.805 ± 0.201*

28.508 ± 1.411*

FB-H

−0.403 ± 0.029

5.760 ± 0.156

34.963 ± 1.152

FB-N

−0.299 ± 0.014

3.612 ± 0.098

21.901 ± 0.997

The p value was calculated between FB-L and FB-H

0.01 < * p < 0.05, 0.001 < ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001

Conclusion

In this work, we have demonstrated that feeding medium of high ratio between asparagine and glutamine can significantly enhance the cell maintenance after reaching the stationary phase. Moreover, improving the ratio between asparagine and glutamine in the feeding medium was shown to improve cell maintenance, increased the antibody production, and specific antibody production rate. Furthermore, glutamate can be formed from aspartate easily and more inclined to produce α-ketoglutarate which flew into TCA cycle supporting immediate metabolites and energy in high proportion situation. For the later, lactate can be produced less through TCA circle in high ratio. The results of this study obviously can provide constrains and information for improving CHO-DHFR cell fed-batch culture.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

LXZ and WYZ conducted the experiment. LF and WST conceived the research. CW, JTL, XPL, and LF have made substantive intellectual contribution to this study and substantial contributions to the design of the study. XCD provided the cell line. LXZ and LF wrote this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21206040, 21406066), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2012AA02A303), the National Science and Technology Major Project (No.2013ZX10004003-003-003), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WF1214035).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology
(2)
Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical (Hangzhou) Co. Ltd

References

  1. Ahn WS, Antoniewicz MR (2012a) Towards dynamic metabolic flux analysis in CHO cell cultures. Biotechnol J 7:61–74View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn WS, Antoniewicz MR (2012b) Metabolic flux analysis of CHO cells in fed-batch culture. Abstr Pap Am Chem S 24:237–243Google Scholar
  3. Altamirano C, Paredes C, Illanes A, Cairo JJ, Godia F (2004) Strategies for fed-batch cultivation of t-PA producing CHO cells: substitution of glucose and glutamine and rational design of culture medium. J Biotechnol 110:171–179View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Altamirano C, Illanes A, Becerra S, Cairo JJ, Godia F (2006) Considerations on the lactate consumption by CHO cells in the presence of galactose. J Biotechnol 125:547–556View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Behjousiar A, Kontoravdi C, Polizzi KM (2012) In Situ monitoring of intracellular glucose and glutamine in CHO cell culture. Public Libr of Sci One 7:29–36Google Scholar
  6. Bertz M, Buchner J, Rief M (2013) Mechanical stability of the antibody domain CH3 homodimer in different oxidation states. J Am Chem Soc 135:15085–15091View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Birch JR, Racher AJ (2006) Antibody production. Adv Drug Deliver Rev 58:671–685View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen F, Fan L, Wang JQ, Zhou Y, Ye ZY, Zhao L, Tan WS (2012) Insight into the roles of hypoxanthine and thydimine on cultivating antibody-producing CHO cells: cell growth, antibody production and long-term stability. Appl Microbiol Biot 93:169–178View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Dean J, Reddy P (2013) Metabolic analysis of antibody producing CHO cells in fed-batch production. Biotechnol Bioeng 110:1735–1747View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Duarte TM, Carinhas N, Barreiro LC, Carrondo MJT, Alves PM, Teixeira AP (2014) Metabolic responses of CHO cells to limitation of key amino acids. Biotechnol Bioeng 111:2095–2106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Europa AF, Gambhir A, Fu PC, Hu WS (2000) Multiple steady states with distinct cellular metabolism in continuous culture of mammalian cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 67:25–34View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Eyer K, Oeggerli A, Heinzle E (1995) On-line gas analysis in anomal cell cultivation: II. Methods for oxygen uptake rate estimation and its application to controlled feeding of glutamine. Biotechnol Bioeng 45:54–62View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferreira TB, Ferreira AL, Carrondo MJT, Alves PM (2005) Two different serum-free media and osmolality effect upon human 293 cell growth and adenovirus production. Biotechnol Lett 27:1809–1813View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Follstad BD, Balcarcel RR, Stephanopoulos G, Wang DIC (1999) Metabolic flux analysis of hybridoma continuous culture steady state multiplicity. Biotechnol Bioeng 63:675–683View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Franek F, Hohenwarter O, Katinger H (2000) Plant protein hydrolysates: preparation of defined peptide fractions promoting growth and production in animal cells cultures. Biotechnol Prog 16:688–692View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Gambhir A, Korke R, Lee JC, Fu PC, Europa A, Hu WS (2003) Analysis of cellular metabolism of hybridoma cells at distinct physiological states. J Biosci Bioeng 95:317–327View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hilal-Alnaqbi A, Hu AYC, Zhang ZB, Al-Rubeai M (2013) Growth, metabolic activity, and productivity of immobilized and freely suspended CHO cells in perfusion culture. Biotechnol Appl Bioc 60:436–445View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang HY, Yu YH, Yi XP, Zhang YX (2007) Nitrogen metabolism of asparagine and glutamate in Vero cells studied by H-1/N-15 NMR spectroscopy. Appl Microbiol Biot 77:427–436View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang YM, Hu WW, Rustandi E, Chang K, Yusuf-Makagiansar H, Ryll T (2010) Maximizing productivity of CHO cell-based fed-batch culture using chemically defined media conditions and typical manufacturing equipment. Biotechnol Prog 26:1400–1410View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Jain E, Kumar A (2008) Upstream processes in antibody production: evaluation of critical parameters. Biotechnol Adv 26:46–72View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kobayashi H, Motoyoshi N, Itagaki T, Suzuki M, Inokuchi N (2015) Effect of the replacement of aspartic acid/glutamic acid residues with asparagine/glutamine residues in RNase He1 from Hericium erinaceus on inhibition of human leukemia cell line proliferation. Biosci Biotech Bioch 79:211–217View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Lu F, Toh PC, Burnett I, Li F, Hudson T, Amanullah A, Li JC (2013) Automated dynamic fed-batch process and media optimization for high productivity cell culture process development. Biotechnol Bioeng 110:191–205View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Matsuoka H, Watanabe J, Takeda T (2006) Influence of both glucose and glutamine concentration on mAb production rate in chemostat culture of CHO cells. Anim Cell Technol Basic Appl Asp. 14:121–125View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Nyberg GB, Balcarcel RR, Follstad BD, Stephanopoulos G, Wang DIC (1999) Metabolism of peptide amino acids by Chinese hamster ovary cells grown in a complex medium. Biotechnol Bioeng 62:324–335View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ozturk S, Riley M, Palsson B (1992) Effects of ammonia and lactate on hybridoma growth, metabolism and antibody production. Biotechnol Bioeng 39:418–431View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Rajendra Y, Kiseljak D, Baldi L, Hacker DL, Wurm FM (2012) Reduced glutamine concentration improves protein production in growth-arrested CHO-DG44 and HEK-293E cells. Biotechnol Lett 34:619–626View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Sengupta N, Rose ST, Morgan JA (2011) Metabolic flux analysis of CHO cell metabolism in the late non-growth phase. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:82–92View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Wipf D, Ludewig U, Tegeder M, Rentsch D, Koch W, Frommer WB (2002) Conservation of amino acid transporters in fungi, plants and animals. Trends Biochem Sci 27:139–147View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Wlaschin KF, Hu WS (2006) Fedbatch FB-Lnd dynamic nutrient feeding. Adv Biochem Eng Biot 101:43–74Google Scholar
  30. Wurm FM (2004) Production of recombinant protein therapeutics in cultivated mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol 22:1393–1398View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Xing ZZ, Kenty B, Koyrakh I, Borys M, Pan SH, Li ZJ (2011) Optimizing amino acid composition of CHO cell culture media for a fusion protein production. Process Biochem 46:1423–1429View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Xu P, Dai XP, Graf E, Martel R, Russell R (2014) Effects of glutamine and asparagine on recombinant antibody production using CHO-GS cell lines. Biotechnol Prog 30:1457–1468View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Young JD (2013) Metabolic flux rewiring in mammalian cell cultures. Curr Opin Biotech 24:1108–1115View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhao L, Fan L, Wang JQ, Niu HX, Tan WS (2009) Responses of GS-NS0 myeloma cells to osmolality: cell growth, intracellular mass metabolism, energy metabolism, and antibody production. Biotechnol Bioproc E 14:625–632View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhang et al. 2016

Advertisement