Enhancement of photo-driven biomethanation under visible light by nano-engineering of Rhodopseudomonas palustris
Bioresources and Bioprocessing volume 8, Article number: 30 (2021)
Biomethanation is of great interest as it can transform CO2 to methane under ambient conditions. In particular, genetically engineered bacterium of Rhodopseudomonas palustris showed great promise for one-step biomethanation powered by solar energy, which is attractive for CO2 fixation as well as solar energy storage. However, biomethanation with R. palustris under visible light is inefficient due to its poor visible light response. In this study, CdS quantum dots with excellent visible light response were prepared and R. palustris/CdS hybrid cells were constructed. Interestingly, this bio-nano-hybrid cells showed high cell viability without significant cell damage, and the biomethanation performance of was enhanced about ~ 79% compared to that of the bare R. palustris cells. Moreover, the effects of different parameters on the methane production of this bio-nano-hybrid cells were determined, and the methane production rate was further improved by parameter optimization. This work demonstrated an efficient approach to reinforce the biomethanation of bacteria under unfavorable light wavelength, which would be helpful to extend the light spectra for photo-driven biomethanation.
CO2 methanation which refers to transformation of CO2 to methane attracted much attention, as it can fix the greenhouse gas of CO2 and produce the renewable energy of methane (Zheng et al. 2018; Ma et al. 2020a, b). To date, several approaches have been developed for CO2 methanation, which include electrochemical reduction, photocatalysis, biomethanation, etc. (Nikiforov et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2017a, b; Ferry 2011). Among these methods, biomethanation which uses the microorganism as the catalytic module holds great promise because it required minimum energy and operation investment. Actually, there are at least one billion tonnes of methane produced with biomethanation each year (Thauer and Shima 2006). Methanogenic archaea, which had complex pathways for methanation, was the main microorganism for methane production from CO2 in nature (Zheng et al. 2018).
Recently, a new pathway for methane production by bacterial Fe-only nitrogenase was explored (Fixen et al. 2016; Zheng et al. 2018). It was found that the Fe-only nitrogenase from Rhodopseudomonas palustris could reduce CO2 to methane simultaneously with nitrogen fixation. More interestingly, 9% of diverse nitrogen-fixing microorganisms contained this Fe-only nitrogenase, suggesting this new biomethanation pathway is widespread among the microorganisms (Zheng et al. 2018; Fixen et al. 2018). This pioneering finding implied the possibility to use nitrogen-fixing bacteria for biomethanation. As compared with the methane production by methanogenic archaea, the biomethanation with bacteria (such as R. palustris) might have the advantages of fast growth rate, high catalytic activity, and easy operation. In particular, R. palustris can use solar energy to power this biomethane production, which is more sustainable and can be considered as another new route for solar energy storage. Therefore, photo-driven biomethanation with R. palustris attracted much attention (Fixen et al. 2016; Ma et al. 2020a, b). Recently, our group found that genetic engineering of a fast growth R. palustris strain (CGMCC 1.2180) resulted in efficient one-step photo-driven biomethanation from CO2 (Ma et al. 2020a, b). This photo-driven biomethanation was conducted under infrared light due to R. palustris has weak response under visible light. However, according to the wavelength and energy spectra of the solar light, the energy under visible light is much more powerful than that in the infrared region. Thus, it is desirable to improve the photo-driven biomethanation efficiency of R. palustris under visible light irradiation.
Bio-nano-hybrid cells, which integrated the advantages of living cell (high enzymatic catalytic activity and versatile/flexible metabolic pathways) with the exceptional properties of nanomaterials (excellent photocatalytic activity) (Yong et al. 2014; Saldrnoto et al. 2017; Yu et al. 2020; Luo et al. 2021), enabled the invention of photo-driven system for solar chemicals synthesis (Sakimoto et al. 2016; Guo et al. 2018; Shen et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2017a, b; Wei et al. 2018; Ye et al. 2020; Chen et al. 2019). For example, by integrating the Cu2O and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, the bio-nano-hybrid cells showed high performance of solar hydrogen production (Shen et al. 2020). It was also explored that the photogenerated electrons from the nanomaterials could be injected into cells and were employed as the intracellular reducing equivalents for enzymatic catalysis (Shen et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2020). Recently, the bio-nano-hybrid for biomethanation with methanogenic archaea was also developed, which improved the methane production by archaea (Ye et al. 2020). However, the methanogenic archaea employed a multi-step methanation pathway, which was much more complex than the one-step biomethanation of R. palustris (Ma et al. 2020a, b). Thus, it is speculated that the bio-nano-hybrid cells for biomethanation with bacteria of R. palustris could be developed.
With the aim of improving the performance of one-step photo-driven biomethanation, we developed bio-nano-hybrid cells based on the genetically engineered bacterial strain of R. palustris CGMCC 1.2180. The developed bio-nano-hybrid cell was characterized in details and the biomethanation performance was evaluated. It was found that the nano-engineering approach significantly improved the methane production of the strain under visible light and the effects of different parameters on methane production were determined.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strain and cultivation
The genetically engineered strain of R. palustris CGMCC 1.2180 (nifDV75AH201Q) (RP strain) was used in this study. The strain was anaerobically cultured in YP medium at 30 °C under shaking (200 rpm) (Ma et al. 2020a, b). When the OD660 reached 0.2, the cells were centrifuged (4000 rpm, 10 min) and transferred into anaerobic UPM medium (NFM medium (Zhang et al. 2018) with 1 g/L yeast extract and 3 g/L sodium acetate) for cell growth and nitrogenase accumulation under 60 W LED lamp at 30 °C.
CdS quantum dots (QDs) synthesis
The CdS QDs were synthesized according to previous report with minor modification (Ding et al. 2019). Briefly, CdO (38.4 mg), oleic acid (OA, 1904 µl) and 1-octadecene (ODE, 10 g) were added into a 100-ml flask and heated to 300 °C under argon. Then, the sulfur precursor (0.048 g sulfur powder dispersed in 10 ml ODE) was injected into the flask and the mixture was cooled down to 250 °C and kept for 1 h to allow the growth of CdS QDs. After that, the unreacted reagents were extracted with methanol and the CdS QDs was precipitated by chloroform and acetone according to previous report (Ding et al. 2019).
CdS QDs ligand exchange
The ligand exchange of CdS QDs was performed according to previous report (Ding et al.2019). A mixture of 1 ml 3-mercaptopropionic acid, 3 ml CdS QDs (dissolved in chloroform) and 3 ml ethanol was vigorously stirred and heated for 1 min (40 °C). Then, 10 ml NaOH (1 M) was added into the mixture and stirred for at least 5 min in a water bath (40 °C). Next, the stirring stopped to allow the mixture to separate into two layers. The upper aqueous phase was collected and precipitated with ethanol. The yellow precipitate was re-dissolved in water for further assembly of RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid.
Construction of RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid and characterization
The RP strain was grown in 100 ml anaerobic UPM medium at 30 °C to an OD660 of 0.3. Then, the cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in fresh anaerobic UPM medium to the designed cell density. Next, 0.1 mM ligand-exchanged CdS QDs were added into the cell suspension and the mixture was cultivated at 30 °C with shaking (100 rpm) under anaerobic condition. After 12 h, the mixture was washed three times by anaerobic UPM medium in anaerobic workstation (Baker Ruskinn, Bridgend, UK), and the cell pellets were collected as RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid. The viability of the RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cell was analyzed with fluorescence microscope (MF30, Guangzhou Mshot Photoelectric Technology CO., LTD., China) by using LIVE/DEAD BacLight bacterial viability kit (ThermoFisher, USA) staining. The RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells were collected, pretreated and subjected for characterization with transmission electron microscope (TEM) (ht-7800, HITACHI, Japan), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) (Team Octane Super, EDAX, USA), Raman (Thermo Fisher, USA), X-ray diffraction (XRD) (D8 Advance, Bruker, German) analyses.
The RP and RP/CdS cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in the anaerobic NFM medium (Zhang et al. 2018) in an anaerobic workstation. For photocatalytic biomethanation (Ma et al. 2020a, b), NaHCO3 was added into the anaerobic NFM medium as the carbon source. L-Cystine (L-Cys) was added into the medium as sacrificial agent. Different wavelengths of light were obtained by using a xenon lamp with different optical filters. The biomethanation was conducted at 30 °C in anaerobic shaking incubator. Total protein of the cells was determined by using Bradford method (Ma et al. 2020a, b). The methane gas produced was detected by using a gas chromatograph (GC 7900, Techcomp, China) equipped with an 80/100 TDX-01 column (Ma et al. 2020a, b).
Results and discussion
Assembly of RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid and characterization
CdS is a commonly used nanoparticle for bio-nano-hybrid cells construction due to its suitable band gap for visible light response (Cheng et al. 2018). Thus, it is speculated to use CdS QDs to assemble the bio-nano-hybrid cells. First of all, the growth curve of the genetic engineered RP strain was characterized. It was found that this engineered RP strain showed typical growth curve with an exponential growth phase (0–96 h) and a steady growth phase (96–192 h) (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). The highest cell density of RP cell could reach an OD660 of ~ 0.35. The CdS QDs synthesized was also characterized by UV–vis and fluorescence analyses, which showed typical spectra of CdS nanoparticles (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). Next, the RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells were constructed by incubating the RP cells with CdS QDs. The CdS QDs were anchored onto the cell surface due to electrostatic interaction. After that, the RP/CdS hybrid cells were isolated and the excessive CdS QDs in the suspension was washed (Fig. 1a). According to the TEM observation (Fig. 1b), it was clear that the RP/CdS hybrid cell consists of RP cell and nanoparticles. Many nanoparticles usually showed biotoxicity, which might be detrimental to microorganisms (Zhu et al. 2019). Thus, the cell viability of the RP/CdS hybrid was determined by using LIVE-DEAD Baclight staining and colony formation unit (CFU) analysis. As shown in Fig. 1c, the RP/CdS hybrid cells showed dominant green fluorescence, indicating high cell viability. According to the image analysis and statistical calculation, the cell viability of RP/CdS hybrid cells was about 98.9 ± 0.5%. Moreover, the CFU analysis indicated there was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.1) between bare RP cells and RP/CdS hybrid cells (Fig. 1d). Thus, these results suggested the RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells with high cell viability were successfully constructed.
To further confirm the formation of the RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells, XRD, Raman and X-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analyses were performed. It was observed that the pure CdS QDs showed typical diffraction peaks that could be indexed as (111), (220) and (311) planes of the cubic phase of CdS (JCPDS #10-0454) (Hao et al. 2019). The bare RP cells did not show any obvious XRD peaks. As expected, the XRD pattern of RP/CdS hybrid cells also showed diffraction peaks attributed to CdS QDs (Fig. 2a). In addition, Raman analysis of the RP/CdS hybrid cells also showed a typical peak similar to that of pure CdS, while bare RP cells did not exhibit obvious peak (Fig. 2b). The distinct Raman peak at ~ 295 cm−1 could be identified as the longitudinal optical phonon resulting from the Cd–S bond vibration (Ye et al. 2020; Ma et al. 2020a, b), suggesting the presence of CdS on the bio-nano-hybrid cells. Furthermore, EDS analysis was also applied to analysis the elemental composition of the RP/CdS hybrid cells. It could be concluded that Cd element and S element coexisted with C, N, O, P elements in these hybrid cells, although the Cd element and S element were not prominent due to their low content (the CdS loading in the hybrid cell is 0.11 wt%) (Fig. 2c). These results confirmed that the CdS QDs was assembled onto the RP cell, demonstrating that the RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells were successfully constructed.
Biomethanation performance of RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells
In order to improve the biomethanation efficiency of the RP cell under visible light, the methane production of the bio-nano-hybrid cells was compared with that of the bare RP cells. The visible light was divided into three different groups with different wavelength ranges by using different optical filters (400–500, 500–600, 600–700 nm). Once the RP cells or RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells were anaerobically incubated under light irradiation, methane gas gradually accumulated and reached the highest production at around 48 h (Fig. 3). It was found that bare RP cells delivered the highest methane production of about 17, 36, and 42 nmol/mg total protein under irradiation with light of 400–500, 500–600, and 600–700 nm, respectively (Fig. 3). Pure CdS QDs under the same conditions did not produce detectable methane (Fig. 3). Then, the methane production by the RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells was determined. As shown in Fig. 3a, under the irradiation of light RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells with the wavelength of 400–500 nm, the RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells reached the highest methane production of 31 ± 0.6 nmol/mg total protein, while the bare RP cells only showed the highest production of 17.3 ± 0.6 nmol/mg total protein. Under light irradiation with the wavelength of 500–600 nm, there was no significant difference could be observed between bare RP cells and the RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells (Fig. 3b). Under the light irradiation with the wavelength of 600–700 nm, only a very slight improvement (< 10%) was observed by the RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells as compared to the bare RP cells (Fig. 3c). In accordance, CdS QDs prepared here had high adsorption at 400–500 nm, while only weak adsorption was observed over 500 nm (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). Thus, it is reasonable that the modification of RP cells with CdS QDs greatly improved the biomethanation efficiency at 400–500 nm, while only slight effect was observed over 500 nm.
As only sodium bicarbonate was presence as the carbon source and no nitrogen source was provided in the biomethanation medium of the RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells, the hybrid cells solely used CO2 for methane production (Fixen et al. 2018). In addition, it was already proved that the genetically engineered RP strain converted the CO2 to methane with a single enzymatic step catalyzed by the mutated nitrogenase (Fixen et al. 2018; Ma et al. 2020a, b). The biomethanation (CO2-to-CH4) by mutated nitrogenase of RP strain with the photogenerated ATP (energy source) and electrons (reducing equivalent) harvested from the reducing agents (Additional file 1: Fig. S3) (Fixen et al. 2018; Zheng et al. 2018). Here, it could be proposed that the CdS QDs generated photoelectrons under visible light irradiation, which might be involved in the biomethanation process via two possible pathways (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). On the one hand, the photogenerated electrons from CdS QDs might directly inject into the nitrogenase with cellular electron transfer pathways (Chen et al. 2019), which might directly reinforce the reducing equivalent for improved methane production. On the other hand, the photogenerated electrons from CdS QDs might be injected into cell, which in turn induce the proton efflux and facilitate ATP generation (Fixen et al. 2018). The enhanced ATP generation might further provide extra energy source to improve the efficiency of biomethanation. However, the detailed mechanism is still unclear, which calls for further investigation.
Effects of different parameters on biomethanation of RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid
With the aim of further improving the methane production of bio-nano-hybrid cells, the effects of different parameters (cell density, substrate concentration, L-Cys concentration, light intensity) on methane production of the RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells were determined.
For biological product synthesis by microorganisms, cell density and substrate concentrations are essential parameters. It was found that, cell density significantly affected the methane production from the RP/CdS hybrid cells (Fig. 4a). Once the initial cell density of OD660 was over 0.5, the methane production decreased along with the increased cell density. The methane production could reach 30 ± 2.3 nmol/mg total protein with the OD660 of 0.1, which is comparable with that obtained under the OD660 of 0.5 (p > 0.1). The effect of substrate (sodium bicarbonate) concentration on the methane production was also evaluated. According to the results (Fig. 4b), no significant difference (p > 0.1) could be found among these tested concentrations. The result was reasonable as the minimum concentration of substrate used here was already saturated for methane production by this RP/CdS hybrid cells.
It is also well-known that light intensity and scavenger concentration have great impact on the bio-photocatalysis (Jiang et al. 2018). The hole/radical scavenger could accelerate the separation of photogenerated charge and remove the detrimental radical to avoid the inactivation of bacterial cell (Shen et al. 2020). Therefore, the concentration of L-Cys should be optimized. With the increase of L-Cys concentration from 2 to 14 mM, the methane production increased from 24 nmol/mg total protein to 38 ± 0.4 nmol/mg total protein (Fig. 4c). The light intensity should also be optimized as low intensity cannot provide enough energy for high catalytic activity while high intensity may result in photo-toxicity (Jiang et al. 2018). As shown in Fig. 4d, the bio-nano-hybrid cells could not produce any methane without light irradiation. With the increasing of light intensity (100–5000 lx), the methane production dramatically increased along with the light intensity from about 30 nmol/mg total protein to 168 ± 7 nmol/mg total protein. However, further increasing the light intensity to 7500 lx resulted in decreased methane production, which might be due to photo-toxicity. Among these parameters, it could be found that the light intensity was the most prominent factor that dramatically affected the methane production. Based on the effects of different parameters, the methane production from RP/CdS hybrid cells was tested under the optimum conditions (OD660 = 0.1, sodium bicarbonate = 2 mM, L-Cys = 14 mM, light intensity = 5000 lx) (Fig. 5). It was found that the methane production steadily increased upon inoculation and reached the highest production of 171 ± 10 nmol/mg total protein.
In summary, this work demonstrated the construction of bio-nano-hybrid bacterial cells for biomethane production from CO2 under visible light irradiation. The hybrid cells were assembled by using CdS QDs and the genetically engineered bacterial strain of R. palustris. The CdS QDs anchored on the cell surface might reinforce the visible light adsorption capability of R. palustris cell and thus facilitate the photo-driven biomethanation. Compared with the bare RP cells, the RP/CdS bio-nano-hybrid cells delivered ~ 79% higher methane production. Moreover, with essential parameters optimization, a methane production of 171 nmol/mg total protein was eventually reached under 400–500 nm visible light irradiation. This finding demonstrated the power of bio-nano-hybrid cells on photo-driven biomethanation, which would be helpful to extend the toolbox for methane production from CO2.
Availability of data and materials
All data and materials are available in the main text and supporting information.
Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGMCC 1.2180 (nifDV75AH201Q)
Energy dispersive spectroscopy
Transmission electron microscope
Colony formation unit
Chen M, Zhou XF, Yu YQ, Liu X, Zeng RJX, Zhou SG, He Z (2019) Light-driven nitrous oxide production via autotrophic denitrification by self-photosensitized Thiobacillus denitrificans. Environ Int 127:353–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.045
Cheng L, Xiang QJ, Liao YL, Zhang HW (2018) CdS-Based photocatalysts. Energy Environ Sci 11(6):1362–1391. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ee03640
Ding YC, Bertram JR, Eckert C, Bommareddy RR, Patel R, Conradie A, Bryan S, Nagpal P (2019) Nanorg microbial factories: light-driven renewable biochemical synthesis using quantum dot-bacteria nanobiohybrids. J Am Chem Soc 141(26):10272–10282. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b02549
Ferry JG (2011) Fundamentals of methanogenic pathways that are key to the biomethanation of complex biomass. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22(3):351–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.04.011
Fixen KR, Zheng YN, Harris DF, Shaw S, Yang ZY, Dean DR, Seefeldt LC, Harwood CS (2016) Light-driven carbon dioxide reduction to methane by nitrogenase in a photosynthetic bacterium. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 113(36):10163–10167. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611043113
Fixen KR, Chowdhury NP, Marta MP, poudel S, Boyd ES, Harwood CS, (2018) The path of electron transfer to nitrogenase in a phototrophic alpha-proteobacterium. Environ Microbiol 20(7):2500–2508. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14262
Guo JL, Suástegui M, Sakimoto KK, Moody VM, Xiao G, Nocera DG, Joshi NS (2018) Light-driven fine chemical production in yeast biohybrids. Science 362(6416):813–816. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat9777
Hao XQ, Hu Y, Cui ZW, Zhou J, Wang Y, Zou ZG (2019) Self-constructed facet junctions on hexagonal CdS single crystals with high photoactivity and photostability for water splitting. Appl Catal B-Environ 244:694–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.006
Jiang ZF, Wang B, Yu JC, Wang JF, An TC, Zhao HJ, Li HM, Yuan SQ, Wong PK (2018) AglnS(2)/In2S3 heterostructure sensitization of Escherichia coli for sustainable hydrogen production. Nano Energy 46:234–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.001
Luo B, Wang YZ, Li D, Shen H, Xu LX, Fang Z, Xia Z, Ren J, Shi W, Yong YC (2021) A periplasmic photosensitized biohybrid system for solar hydrogen production. Adv Energy Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100256
Ma LJ, Liu MC, Jing DW, Guo LJ (2020a) Photocatalytic hydrogen production over CdS: effects of reaction atmosphere studied by in situ Raman spectroscopy. J Mater Chem A 3:5701–5707. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta06577h
Ma LQ, Fang Z, Wang YZ, Zhou J, Yong YC (2020b) Photo-driven highly efficient one-step CO2 biomethanation with engineered photo-synthetic bacteria Rhodopseudomonas palustris. ACS Sus Chem Eng 8(26):96169621. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c02703
Nikiforov AV, Petrushina IM, Christensen E, Berg RW, Bjerrum NJ (2020) Voltammetric study of one-step electrochemical methane production during water and CO2 co-electrolysis in molten CsH2PO4. Renew Energy 145:508–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.075
Sakimoto KK, Wong AB, Yang PD (2016) Self-photosensitization of nonphotosynthetic bacteria for solar-to chemical production. Science 351(6268):74–77. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad3317
Saldrnoto KK, Kornienko N, Yang PD (2017) Cyborgian material design for solar fuel production: the emerging photosynthetic biohybrid cells. Acc Chem Res 50(3):476–481. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00483
Shen HQ, Wang YZ, Liu GW, Li LH, Xia R, Luo BF, Wang JX, Suo D, Shi WD, Yong YC (2020) A whole-cell inorganic-biohybrid cells integrated by reduced graphene oxide for boosting solar hydrogen production. ACS Catal 10(22):13290–13295. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c03594
Thauer RK, Shima S (2006) Biogeochemistry-methane and microbes. Nature 440(7086):878–879. https://doi.org/10.1038/440878a
Wang B, Zeng CP, Chun KH, Wu D, Ho YY, Ye LQ, Wong PK (2017a) Enhanced biological hydrogen production from Escherichia coli with surface precipitated cadmium sulfide nanoparticles. Adv Energy Mater 7(20):1700611. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201700611
Wang KQ, Fang ZB, Huang XY, Feng WH, Wang YZ, Wang B, Liu P (2017b) Enhanced selectivity of methane production for photocatalytic reduction by the piezoelectric effect. Chem Commun 53(70):9765–9768. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cc05112c
Wei W, Sun PQ, Li Z, Song KS, Sun WY, Wang B, Liu WZ, Zhao J (2018) A surface-display biohybrid approach to light-driven hydrogen production in air. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap9253
Ye J, Ren GP, Kang L, Zhang YY, Liu X, Zhou SG, He Z (2020) Efficient photoelectron capture by Ni decoration in Methanosarcina barkeri-CdS biohybrids for enhanced photocatalytic CO2-to-CH4 conversion. iScience 23(7):101287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101287
Yong YC, Yu YY, Zhang XH, Song H (2014) Highly active bidirectional electron transfer by a self-assembled electroactive reduced-graphene-oxide-hybridized biofilm. Angew Chem Int Ed 53(17):4480–4483. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201400463
Yu YY, Wang YZ, Fang Z, Shi YT, Chen QW, Chen YX, Shi WD, Yong YC (2020) Single cell electron collector for highly efficient wiring-up electronic abiotic/biotic interface. Nat Commun 11(1):4087. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17897-9
Zhang H, Liu H, Tian ZQ, Lu D, Yu Y, Cestellos-Blanco S, Sakimoto KK, Yang PD (2018) Bacteria photosensitized by intracellular gold nanoclusters for solar fuel production. Nat Nanotechnol 13(10):900–905. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0267-z
Zhang RT, He Y, Yi J, Zhang LJ, Shen CP, Liu SJ, Liu LF, Liu BH, Qiao L (2020) Proteomic and metabolic elucidation of solar-powered biomanufacturing by bio-abiotic hybrid cells. Chem 6(1):234–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2019.11.002
Zheng Y, Harris DF, Yu Z, Fu YF, Poudel S, Ledbetter RN, Fixen KR, Yang ZY, Boyd ES, Seefeldt LC, Harwood CS (2018) A pathway for biological methane production using bacterial iron-only nitrogenase. Nat Microbiol 3(3):281–286. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-017-0091-5
Zhu Y, Wu JH, Chen M, Liu XL, Xiong YJ, Wang YY, Feng T, Kang S, Wang XF (2019) Recent advances in the biotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles: Impacts on plants, animals and microorganisms. Chemosphere 237:124403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124403
This work was supported by 333 Program of Jiangsu Province (BRA2020299), Independent Innovation Program for Agricultural Science and Technology of Jiangsu Province (CX(20)2014) and a Project of Faculty of Agricultural Equipment of Jiangsu University.
333 program of Jiangsu Province (BRA2020299), Independent Innovation Program for Agricultural Science and Technology of Jiangsu Province (CX(20)2014) and a Project of Faculty of Agricultural Equipment of Jiangsu University.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
All the authors have read and approved the manuscript before the submission to Bioresources and Bioprocessing.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Fig. S1. The cell growth curve of RP strain in anaerobic UPM medium at 30 °C. Fig. S2. The a UV–vis spectrum and b fluorescence spectrum of the ligand-exchanged CdS QDs dispersed in water. The excitation wavelength in b is 400 nm. Fig. S3. Schematic of the photo-driven biomethanation by RP cell or RP/CdS hybrid cell.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, MY., Fang, Z., Xu, LX. et al. Enhancement of photo-driven biomethanation under visible light by nano-engineering of Rhodopseudomonas palustris. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 8, 30 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-021-00383-5