- Research
- Open Access
- Published:
Chemoenzymatic conversion of glycerol to lactic acid and glycolic acid
Bioresources and Bioprocessing volume 9, Article number: 75 (2022)
Abstract
Catalytic valorization of raw glycerol derived from biodiesel into high-value chemicals has attracted great attention. Here, we report chemoenzymatic cascade reactions that convert glycerol to lactic acid and glycolic acid. In the enzymatic step, a coenzyme recycling system was developed to convert glycerol into 1,3-dihydroxyacetone (DHA) with a yield of 92.3% in potassium phosphate buffer (300 mM, pH 7.1) containing 100 mM glycerol, 2 mM NAD+, 242 U/mL glycerol dehydrogenase-GldA and NADH oxidase-SpNoxK184R at 30 °C. Subsequently, NaOH or NaClO2 catalyzes the formation of lactic acid and glycolic acid from DHA. The high yield of lactic acid (72.3%) and glycolic acid (78.2%) verify the benefit of the chemoenzymatic approaches.
Graphical Abstract

Introduction
With the urgency of reducing the dependence on fossil fuels, (Kosamia et al. 2020) the fuel energy and chemical commodities is increasingly preferred towards the use of clean liquid biofuels, ethanol and biodiesel. However, large amount of crude glycerol was produced as a by-product accounting for 10% of the produced biodiesel (Veluturla et al. 2018), with an estimated amount of 4 × 106 tons by 2024 (Singh and Ahuja 2018). Moreover, since glycerol is a by-product with low economic value and cannot be safely disposed in the environment, the generated excess glycerol may become an environmental threat. Therefore, it is highly profitable to transform low-value but versatile glycerol to high value-added chemicals (Walgode et al. 2020). Glycerol is an important C3 platform compounds (Liu et al. 2019) that can be upgraded into various chemical building blocks through chemical oxidation, reduction (Xu and Ni 2015), dehydration, deoxydehydration reaction or a combination of the aforementioned methods, e.g., to allyl alcohol (Tshibalonza and Monbaliu 2017), acrylic acid (Sun et al. 2017), divinyl glycol (Sotto et al. 2016), DHA (Lari et al. 2015), etc.
The conversion of glycerol to DHA was performed by glycerol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.6, EC 1.1.1.72, EC 1.1.99.22). Glycerol dehydrogenase-GldA (from Escherichia coli, EC 1.1.1.6) is an enzyme present in bacterial cytoplasm, converts glycerol to 1,3-dihydroxyacetone accompanied by NAD+ to NADH. It should be noted that it catalyzes the reaction of glycerol for a reversible reaction, glycerol oxidation in alkaline conditions and DHA reduction in acidic conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the change of reaction pH when using it for experiments. For the cofactor regeneration, often NADH oxidase which catalyzes the oxidation of NADH by reducing O2 to H2O through four-electron reduction was used.
Lactic acid and glycolic acid are important building blocks of biodegradable polymer, poly-lactic acid (PLA), poly-glycolic acid (PGA) and poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA). Lactic acid (López-Gómez et al. 2019) is a three carbon alpha hydroxycarboxylic acid widely used in food, medicine, cosmetics, detergents and dairy industries (Marianou et al. 2019) as well as the synthesis of polylactic acid (Huang et al. 2021), lactate ester (Hasegawa et al. 2008), pyruvate (Liu et al. 2010), acrylic acid (Wang et al. 2008), 1,2-propanediol (Oude Elferink et al. 2001), 2,3-pentanedione (Niu et al. 2019), etc. The production of lactic acid by microbial fermentation is the main production method (Wang et al. 2020), because of the wide source of raw materials, low production cost, high optical purity and high safety. Currently, more than 90% of the global lactic acid production is made by the microbial fermentation (Zhang et al. 2019). Arabinose, pentose, sucrose and lignocellulosic hydrolysates have been used as substrates for microbial fermentation of lactic acid. Glycolic acid is a two-carbon α-hydroxy acid, which is widely used in pharmaceutical, textile and food. It is often used in emulsion polymers, solvents and additives in inks and paints to improve flow performance and gloss (Lasprilla et al. 2012). Furthermore, glycolic acid can copolymerize with lactic acid to form poly PLGA, which is an important biodegradable material with unique properties such as non-toxic, biocompatible and degradable in vivo (Shi et al. 2006). PLGA is widely used in the fields of medical polymers such as suture and tonic materials, surgical sutures, drug sustained-release carriers, tissue engineering, etc. (Huang et al. 2020). Glycolic acid is mainly produced by chemical processes, e.g., carbonylation of formaldehyde with synthesis gas (Shi et al. 2020b) or treatment of carbon monoxide with water (Shi et al. 2020a), electrolytic reduction of oxalic acid and hydrolysis of glycolonitrile (Zhu et al. 2020). Microbial fermentation with engineered metabolic pathways have been developed for the production of glycolic acid. Using the lack of a functional carbon-concentrating mechanism (CCM), glycolic acid was accumulated through an inefficient and incomplete photorespiratory pathway (Yun Eun et al. 2021). Using glucose as substrate, glycolysis pathway was integrated with glycolic acid pathway, and finally the yield of glycolic acid with the potency of 41 g/L/h was achieved (Zhu et al. 2021). The titer of glycolic acid in 5-L bioreactor reached 40.9 g/L after multiple rounds of strain engineering using biosensor-based high-throughput method (Xu et al. 2021). Chemical method is commonly used in industrial production of glycolic acid (Shi et al. 2019). Chemoenzymatic cascade reactions are synergistic tandem reactions by combining a variety of chemical catalysts with biocatalysts in vitro, which can effectively reduce by-products and wastes and make the products easier to be purified (Luo et al. 2021).
Inspired by a previous report on lactic acid generation through chemical catalysis (Li et al. 2020), such as KOH, Ba(OH)2, Ca(OH)2 (Lux and Siebenhofer 2013), DHA was firstly dehydrated to pyruvic aldehyde and then isomerized to lactic acid via the intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction under alkaline conditions (Evans and Cornthwaite 2002). And the C–C bond of DHA was selectively cleaved and then oxidized to glycolic acid and formate in the presence of H2O2 and NH4OH (Pullanikat et al. 2010). We decided to use NaOH as catalysts for the conversion of DHA into lactic acid, and NaClO2 as oxidant for the oxidation of DHA to glycolic acid.
In this study, two-step chemoenzymatic cascade reactions were developed to convert glycerol to lactic acid and glycolic acid, respectively. Reaction conditions were optimized to achieve desirable yield. This is a novel pathway for converting glycerol to lactic acid and glycolic acid.
Results and discussion
Design of the cascade reactions
As shown in Scheme 1, the cascade reaction starts with the glycerol dehydrogenase (GldA) catalyzed oxidation of glycerol into DHA, which is subsequently transformed to lactic acid and glycolic acid in different chemical reaction systems. For the generation of lactic acid, NaOH was used to promote the rearrangement of DHA into lactic acid where DHA was firstly dehydrated to pyruvic aldehyde and then isomerized to lactate via the intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction under alkaline conditions. For the generation of glycolic acid, DHA was oxidized to glycolate acid by NaClO2.
Enzymatic conversion of glycerol to DHA
For the initial step of this cascade, in vitro biotransformation of glycerol to DHA was achieved with glycerol dehydrogenase-GldA (Gene ID: CP034658.1) (from Escherichia coli) (Piattoni et al. 2013) using NAD+ as a cofactor and the NADH oxidase-SpNoxK184R (from Streptococcus pyogenes) (Oscar; and Jan-E 2015) for NAD+ regeneration, which requires only O2 as the co-substrate. The GldA gene was cloned into T7 promoter-based plasmid pET21b to construct pET21b-GldA. The SpNox gene with an amino acid substitution K184R was synthesized and cloned into the pRSFDuet-1. pET21b-GldA and pRSFDuet-SpNoxK184R were expressed in E. coli/BL21-Gold (DE3), respectively. After the strain was cultured and expressed, the protein was collected from the broken strain and then for the following purification.
Firstly, three kinds of buffer solution (potassium phosphate buffer (100 mM K2HPO4 and KH2PO4, pH7.1), sodium phosphoric buffer (100 mM NaH2PO4 and Na2HPO4, pH7.1), Tris–HCl buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl, pH7.1)) were investigated for the oxidation of glycerol catalyzed by dehydrogenase-GldA and NADH oxidase-SpNoxK184R (Xu et al. 2017). Enzyme activity of GldA and SpNoxK184R was determined by the slop of decrease and increase of NADH observed at 340 nm, 30 °C. As shown in Fig. 1, glycerol dehydrogenase-GldA exhibited acceptable activity in potassium phosphate buffer, but nearly inactive in Tris–HCl buffer. Meanwhile, SpNoxK184R showed acceptable activity in Tris–HCl buffer and potassium phosphate buffer. Considering the compatibility of these two enzymes in the same reaction system, potassium phosphate buffer was selected for the GldA-SpNoxK184R coupled enzyme system for further investigation.
After the selection of the buffer solution, the optimum pH value of GldA and SpNoxK184R were investigated with the potassium phosphate buffer, ranging from pH 6.1–7.1 (Fig. 2). The activity of GldA and SpNoxK184R was gradually increased with the elevated pH value. Since GldA and SpNoxK184R can reach highest activity at pH 7.1, the following experiments were carried out at pH7.1.
The concentration of the potassium phosphate buffer was optimized for the optimum activity of GldA and SpNoxK184R, ranging from 20 to 500 mM. Figure 3 shows that 300 mM is the optimal concentration of potassium phosphate buffer for GldA and 50 mM was the optimal concentration for SpNoxK184R. On overall consideration, as a key enzyme, GldA's activity affects the catalytic efficiency of the whole system, so 300 mM potassium phosphate buffer is selected for subsequent experiments.
The enzymatic activity of GldA and SpNoxK184R were determined to be 24.2 U mg−1 and 34.62 U mg−1, respectively. One unit of the enzyme activity was defined as catalyzing the conversion of 1 μmol NADH to NAD+ per minute under standard conditions for GldA or vice versa for SpNoxK184R.
And then we conducted an experiment on the thermal stability of the enzyme, and the results are shown in Fig. 4. In potassium phosphate buffer (300 mM, pH 7.1), GldA and SpNoxK184R still maintained more than 50% activity after 25.5 h at 30 °C.
Finally, the optimal concentration of GldA-SpNoxK184R coupled system and substrate glycerol was investigated to achieve higher yield of DHA. In the presence of 2 mM NAD+, the yield of DHA at the experimental setup of GldA (24.2–242 U mL−1), SpNoxK184R (24.2–242 U mL−1) and glycerol (100–1000 mM) was quantified. As shown in Fig. 5, at pH 7.1, 300 mM potassium phosphate buffer, 30 °C, the highest yield of DHA, 92.3%, was achieved with 100 mM glycerol and 242 U mL−1 GldA and 242 U mL−1 SpNoxK184R. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest yield for enzymatic conversion of glycerol to DHA. After reaction, the enzyme will appear in a state of aggregation, the aggregated enzyme will lose activity. This may be caused by undesired enzyme interactions (Sanchez et al. 2016).
Chemoenzymatic conversion of glycerol to lactic acid
The conversion of DHA to lactic acid was performed in NaOH aqueous solution based on our previous study (Li et al. 2020). Firstly, the enzymatic production of DHA with 100 mM glycerol as substrate was carried out and subsequently enzymes was removed from the reaction solution. Then, the reaction solution was added into 5 M NaOH solution with a volume ratio of 1:1. The reaction solution was incubated for 8 h (30 °C, 1000 rpm). Finally, the yield of lactic acid was detected by HPLC. DHA in NaOH solution was completely consumed and the major product was lactic acid. The yield of lactic acid from glycerol in the two-step chemoenzymatic system with GldA, SpNoxK184R and NaOH as catalysts was 72.3% (Table 1). Using the coupled GldA-SpNoxK184R and sodium hydroxide, the chemoenzymatic synthesis of lactic acid from glycerol was successfully established.
Chemoenzymatic conversion of glycerol to glycolic acid
The conversion of DHA to glycolic acid was carried out using NaClO2 as oxidant. Firstly, the enzymatic conversion of glycerol to DHA with 100 mM glycerol as substrate was carried out. Subsequently, enzymes were removed from the reaction solution by ultrafiltration. Then, NaClO2 solution (four times of the concentration of DHA) was supplemented to the reaction system. The reaction mixture was incubated for 24 h (50 °C, 1000 rpm) and the yield of glycolic acid was detected by HPLC. DHA in NaClO2 solution was completely consumed and the major product was glycolic acid. The yield of glycolic acid in the chemoenzymatic system with GldA, SpNoxK184R and NaClO2 as catalysts was 78.2% (Table 1).
Conclusions
In summary, two-step chemoenzymatic approaches for the conversion of glycerol into lactic acid and glycolic acid were established and optimized using coupled enzyme system and NaOH/NaClO2 with high overall yield. Glycerol-dehydrogenase-GldA from Escherichia coli and NADH oxidase-SpNoxK184R from Streptococcus Pyogenes were used to act together to achieve the dynamic balance of NAD+ and NADH transformation, and convert glycerol to DHA. In the enzymatic step, a coenzyme recycling system was developed to convert glycerol into dihydroxyacetone (DHA) with a yield of 92.3% in potassium phosphate buffer (300 mM, pH 7.1) containing 100 mM glycerol, 2 mM NAD+, GldA and SpNoxK184R concentration of 242 U/mL at 30 °C. The conversion of glycerol to DHA by the coenzyme cycle pathway reduced the generation of by-products and accelerated the catalytic efficiency of the enzymes. After the removal of the enzymes, NaOH or NaClO2 catalyzes the formation of lactic acid and glycolic acid from DHA. The high yield of lactic acid (72.3%) and glycolic acid (78.2%) verify the benefit of the chemoenzymatic approaches. The chemoenzymatic production of lactic acid and glycolic acid from low-cost glycerol in this study opens a new route for the utilization of low-cost renewable compound.
Experimental section
Materials and methods
Glycerol was purchased from Sinopharm (Beijing, China), NAD+ was purchased from MesChemExpress (Shanghai, China), 1,3-dihydroxyacetone (DHA) and O-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl) hydroxylamine hydrochloride (PFBHA) for HPLC derivatization were purchased from Bidepharm (Shanghai, China), lactic acid was purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China), sodium chlorite and glycolic acid were purchased from Macklin (Shanghai, China), Acetonitrile was purchased from Innochen (Beijing, China), isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) (inducer, > 99%) was purchased from Solarbio (Beijing, China), Ampicillin was purchased from Inalco (Beijing, China) and Kanamycin was purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Oligonucleotide syntheses and DNA sequencing analyses were carried out by Genewiz (Tianjin, China). Seamless Cloning Kit was purchased from Beyotime (Shanghai, China). The amount of DNA in cloning experiments was quantified by TECAN microplate reader (Infinite M200, TECAN, Switzerland).
Construction of the strains of E. coli (pET21b-GldA), E. coli (pRSFDuet-SpNoxK184R)
Plasmids and recombinant strains constructed in this study are listed in Additional File 1: Table S1. The GldA gene (Gene ID: CP034658.1) from E. coli strain ATCC 98,082 was cloned into T7 promoter-based plasmid pET21b to construct pET21b-GldA and then the heterologous expression was performed with E. coli/BL21-Gold (DE3). The SpNox gene from Streptococcus pyogenes MGAS10394 with an amino acid substitution K184R was synthesized by GENEWIZ (Suzhou, China) and cloned into the pRSFDuet-1. pRSFDuet-SpNoxK184R was expressed in E. coli/BL21-Gold (DE3).
Expression of recombinant strains in shaking flask and protein purification
BL21-Gold (DE3)-pET21b-GldA was inoculated into LB liquid medium (5 mL, 100 μg mL−1 ampicillin) and cultivated at 37 °C overnight. BL21-Gold (DE3)-pRSFDuet-SpNoxK184R was inoculated into LB liquid medium (5 mL, 50 μg mL−1 kanamycin) and cultivated at 37 °C overnight. The precultures were transferred into 700 mL LB liquid medium with the ratio of 1:100, respectively. All the flasks were shaken at 200 rpm at 37 °C until the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached 0.6–0.8, the cultures were induced by adding 0.5 mM IPTG at 20 °C for 24 h. Subsequently, E. coli cells were harvested by centrifugation (4 °C, 6000 rpm, 15 min), resuspended in phosphate buffer (50 mL, 50 mM K2HPO4 and KH2PO4, pH 7.1), and then disrupted with a low temperature ultra-high pressure continuous-flow cell disrupter (LN-3000plus; JNBIO, Guangzhou, China). The disrupted cells were centrifuged (4 °C, 8000 rpm, 20 min), and the supernatants were further filtered through millipore express membrane filters (0.22 μm; Sterile Millex Filter Unit; Merck kGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The supernatant was loaded onto a nickel affinity column equilibrated with 30 mL nickel sulfate. The GldA was step-wise eluted using elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, pH7.4) containing 20, 50, 90, 150, 250 mM imidazole. The SpNoxK184R was step-wise eluted using elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) containing 10, 30, 90, 150, 250 mM imidazole. The concentration of protein was determined using a protein assay kit (Micro BCA Protein Assay Kit; Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) with BSA as the standard. The purity of the purified protein was assessed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) by using standard molecular biology techniques. SDS-PAGE of GldA and SpNoxK184R is shown in Additional File 1: Figure S1.
Preparation of standard curve of NADH
A standard solution of NADH was prepared, diluted with ddH2O, and the absorbance was measured at 340 nm. The linear range was observed to be 0–1 mM. The standard curve of NADH is shown in Additional File 1: Figure S2.
Enzyme activity detection
The activity of GldA was assayed using purified enzyme (20 μg mL−1) at 30 °C in potassium phosphate buffer (300 mM K2HPO4 and KH2PO4, pH 7.1) containing 2 mM NAD+ and 100 mM glycerol. SpNoxK184R was assayed using purified enzyme (25 μg mL−1) at 30 °C in potassium phosphate buffer (300 mM K2HPO4 and KH2PO4, pH 7.1) containing 2 mM NADH. The increase and decrease of absorbance at 340 nm was detected for 20 min by a microtiter plate reader. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 μmol of NADH per min (GldA). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to oxidize 1 μmol of NADH per min (SpNoxK184R). The data are average of two independent experiments (triplicates in each experiment).
Enzyme activity calculation formula:
where D: dilution rate; ∆A1: change in NADH absorbance; ∆A2: change in absorbance value of blank control; Vt: the total reaction system, mL; e: molar absorbance, 6.22 × 10–3 mol L−1 cm−2; Vs: enzyme product, mL; d: optical path distance, cm; and c: protein concentration, mg mL−1.
Transforming the formula according to the actual requirements:
where ΔT is the reaction time.
According to the standard curve of NADH, the generation of NADH (GldA) or the consumption of NADH (SpNoxK184R) were calculated and substituted into the formula to finally calculate the enzyme activity.
Optimization of reaction buffer
Three kinds of buffer solutions (pH 7.1) were investigated as following: potassium phosphate buffer (100 mM K2HPO4 and KH2PO4, pH 7.1), sodium phosphoric buffer (100 mM NaH2PO4 and Na2HPO4, pH 7.1), Tris–HCl buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.1). GldA activity was assayed using purified enzyme (20 μg mL−1) at 30 °C in different buffer containing 2 mM NAD+ and 100 mM glycerol. SpNoxK184R was assayed using purified enzyme (25 μg mL−1) at 30 °C in different buffer containing 2 mM NADH. The increase and decrease of absorbance at 340 nm was detected for 20 min by a microtiter plate reader. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 μmol of NADH per min (GldA). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to oxidize 1 μmol of NADH per min (SpNoxK184R). The data are average of three independent experiments (triplicates in each experiment). The optimum buffer was selected according to the activity of the two enzymes.
Optimization of the pH value and ionic strength of the buffer
According to the characteristics of the enzyme, pH 6.1–7.1 was selected as the enzyme activities were detected in different pH buffers. GldA activity was assayed using purified enzyme (20 μg mL−1) at 30 °C in different buffer containing 2 mM NAD+ and 100 mM glycerol. SpNoxK184R was assayed using purified enzyme (25 μg mL−1) at 30 °C in different buffer containing 2 mM NADH. The increase and decrease of absorbance at 340 nm was detected for 20 min by a microtiter plate reader. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 μmol of NADH per min (GldA). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to oxidize 1 μmol of NADH per min (SpNoxK184R). The data are average of three independent experiments (triplicates in each experiment). The optimum buffer was selected according to the activity of the two enzymes. After selecting pH and buffer type, the buffer concentration was optimized. 20–500 mM potassium phosphate buffers (K2HPO4 and KH2PO4) were prepared at pH 7.1. GldA activity was assayed using purified enzyme (20 μg mL−1) at 30 °C in different buffer containing 2 mM NAD+ and 100 mM glycerol. SpNoxK184R was assayed using purified enzyme (25 μg mL−1) at 30 °C in different buffer containing 2 mM NADH. The increase and decrease of absorbance at 340 nm was detected for 20 min by a microtiter plate reader. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 μmol of NADH per min (GldA). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to oxidize 1 μmol of NADH per min (SpNoxK184R). The data are average of three independent experiments (triplicates in each experiment). The optimum buffer was selected according to the activity of the two enzymes.
Enzymatic stability of GldA and SpNoxK184R
In potassium phosphate buffer (300 mM, pH 7.1), GldA and SpNoxK184R were stored at 30 °C for 25.5 h. Then the enzyme activity was detected and compared with the original enzyme activity to determine the stability of the enzyme.
Biooxidation of glycerol to DHA by GldA coupled with SpNoxK184R
The ratio of GldA and SpNoxK184R was adjusted according to the enzyme specific activity, with activity ratio of 1:1. The 500 μL reaction mixture in 30 °C, potassium phosphate buffer (300 mM K2HPO4 and KH2PO4, pH7.1) containing 100 mM–1 M glycerol, 2 mM NAD+, 24.2–242 U mL−1 GldA, SpNoxK184R was the same enzyme activity as GldA (the enzyme activity ratio of GldA and SpNoxK184R is 1:1). The reactions were carried out in 4.5 mL tubes at 30 °C with shaking (1000 rpm) for 14 h.
The high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis for DHA
The HPLC method was used for the detection of DHA. After removing the enzymes using the concurrent filter unit (Millipore UFC500 3 kDa Filter Devices, The United States) through ultrafiltration at 8000 rpm for 20 min, 30 μL sample solution was added in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube containing 140 μL 20 mg mL−1 PFBHA solution (PFBHA was dissolved into citric acid buffer (0.1 M, citric acid and NaOH, pH 4) and adjusted to pH 4.0 with 1 M NaOH), 30 μL 50 mM veratryl alcohol (internal standard). After reaction at 1000 rpm, 30 °C for 30 min, 200 μL acetonitrile and 100 μL water were added in the tube. The samples were further filtered through 0.22 μm organic filtration membrane and was used for HPLC detection. Detection conditions after derivatization by HPLC (Thermo, UltiMate 3000): Ultimate XB-C18 column, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm; mobile phase: water, acetonitrile; UV absorption wavelength: 263 nm; the flow rate: 1.2 mL min−1; column temperature: 30 °C; sample injection volume: 20 μL. The standard curve of DHA is shown in Additional File 1: Figure S3.
The synthesis of lactic acid from glycerol
Firstly, glycerol was converted to DHA using the coenzyme circulation system (500 μL) including 100 mM glycerol, 2 mM NAD+, 242 U mL−1 GldA and 242 U mL−1 SpNoXK184R and 300 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH7.1). At the end of the reaction, the enzymes were removed and injected slowly into 500 μL NaOH (5 M) through the channel injection pump with a syringe at a rate of 100 μL h−1. The reaction was conducted for 8 h (1000 rpm, 30 °C). After 8 h, reaction mixture was acidified with dilute sulfuric acid to pH 1–2 for HPLC analysis. The HPLC system was carried out on an Agilent 1260 system equipped with a UV detector (210 nm), and fitted with Sugar 10H column (DEVOTE): mobile phase: 5 mM H2SO4, flow rate: 0.5 mL min−1, sample volume: 20 μL, column temperature: 35 °C. Triplicates in each experiment. The standard curve of lactic acid is shown in Additional File 1: Figure S4.
The synthesis of glycolic acid from glycerol
Firstly, glycerol was converted to DHA using the coenzyme circulation system (500 μL) including 100 mM glycerol, 2 mM NAD+, 242 U mL−1 GldA and 242 U mL−1 SpNoXK184R and 300 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH7.1). The 500 μL reaction solution was added into 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube containing 500 μL NaClO2 solution (the concentration of NaClO2 solution is about 4 times concentration of DHA). The reaction was conducted for 24 h (1000 rpm, 50 °C). After, the glycolic acid production was detected by HPLC directly. The HPLC system was carried out on an Agilent 1260 system equipped with a UV detector (210 nm), and fitted with Sugar 10H column (DEVOTE): mobile phase: 5 mM H2SO4, flow rate: 0.5 mL min−1, sample volume: 20 μL, column temperature: 35 °C. Triplicates in each experiment. The standard curve of glycolic acid is shown in Additional File 1: Figure S5.
Yield calculation
The yields of all products were calculated with the following equations:
HPLC analysis of chemoenzymatic conversion of glycerol to lactic acid and glycolic acid is shown in Additional File 1: Figure S6.
Availability of data and materials
All data supporting this article’s conclusion are available.
References
Evans WL, Cornthwaite WR (2002) The mechanism of carbohydrate oxidation. VII. the action of potassium hydroxide on dihydroxy acetone. J Am Chem Soc 50:486–492. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01389a036
Hasegawa S, Azuma M, Takahashi K (2008) Stabilization of enzyme activity during the esterification of lactic acid in hydrophobic ethers and ketones as reaction media that are miscible with lactic acid despite their high hydrophobicity. Enzyme Microb Technol 43:309–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2008.03.017
Huang J, Wei J, Jin S, Zou Q, Li J, Zuo Y, Li Y (2020) The ultralong-term comparison of osteogenic behavior of three scaffolds with different matrices and degradability between one and two years. J Mater Chem B 8:9524–9532. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb01987a
Huang S, Xue Y, Yu B, Wang L, Zhou C, Ma Y (2021) A review of the recent developments in the bioproduction of polylactic acid and its precursors optically pure lactic acids. Molecules 26:6446. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216446
Kosamia NM, Samavi M, Uprety BK, Rakshit SK (2020) Valorization of biodiesel byproduct crude glycerol for the production of bioenergy and biochemicals. Catalysts 10:609. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10060609
Lari G, Mondelli C, Perez Ramirez J (2015) Gas-phase oxidation of glycerol to dihydroxyacetone over tailored iron zeolites. ACS Catal 5:1453–1461. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs5019056
Lasprilla AJR, Martinez GAR, Lunelli BH, Jardini AL, Filho RM (2012) Poly-lactic acid synthesis for application in biomedical devices—a review. Biotechnol Adv 30:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.019
Li T, Tang Z, Wei H, Tan Z, Liu P, Li J, Zheng Y, Lin J, Liu W, Jiang H, Liu H, Zhu L, Ma Y (2020) Totally atom-economical synthesis of lactic acid from formaldehyde: combined bio-carboligation and chemo-rearrangement without the isolation of intermediates. Green Chem 22:6809–6814. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0gc02433c
Liu Z, Jia L, Zheng Y (2010) Biotransformation of DL-lactate to pyruvate by a newly isolated Serratia marcescens ZJB-07166. Process Biochem 45:1632–1637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2010.06.012
Liu D, Liu J, Cai W, Ma J, Yang H, Xiao H, Li J, Xiong Y, Huang Y, Liu B (2019) Selective photoelectrochemical oxidation of glycerol to high value-added dihydroxyacetone. Nat Commun 10:1779. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09788-5
López-Gómez JP, Alexandri M, Schneider R, Venus J (2019) A review on the current developments in continuous lactic acid fermentations and case studies utilising inexpensive raw materials. Process Biochem 79:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2018.12.012
Luo D, Yin W, Han D, He H, Xia S (2021) Glycolic acid and formic acid production from pyrolysis oil water-soluble fraction by catalytic oxidation. Chem Eng Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.116644
Lux S, Siebenhofer M (2013) Synthesis of lactic acid from dihydroxyacetone: use of alkaline-earth metal hydroxides. Catal Sci Technol 3:1380–1385. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CY20859A
Marianou AA, Michailof CC, Ipsakis D, Triantafyllidis K, Lappas AA (2019) Cellulose conversion into lactic acid over supported HPA catalysts. Green Chem 21:6161–6178. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9gc02622c
Niu W, Kramer L, Mueller J, Liu K, Guo J (2019) Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the de novo stereospecific biosynthesis of 1,2-propanediol through lactic acid. Metab Eng Commun 8:e00082–e00082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mec.2018.e00082
Oscar V, Jan EB (2015) Chemoenzymatic dynamic kinetic resolution: a powerful tool for the preparation of enantiomerically pure alcohols and amines. J Am Chem Soc 137:3996–4009. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b01031
Oude Elferink SJWH, Krooneman J, Gottschal JC, Spoelstra SF, Faber F, Driehuis F (2001) Anaerobic conversion of lactic acid to acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol by Lactobacillus buchneri. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.1.125-132.2001
Piattoni CV, Figueroa CM, Diez MDA, Parcerisa IL, Antuña S, Comelli RA, Guerrero SA, Beccaria AJ, Iglesias AÁ (2013) Production and characterization of Escherichia coli glycerol dehydrogenase as a tool for glycerol recycling. Process Biochem 48:406–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2013.01.011
Pullanikat P, Jung SJ, Yoo KS, Jung KW (2010) Oxidative degradation of reducing carbohydrates to ammonium formate with H2O2 and NH4OH. Tetrahedron Lett 51:6192–6194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.09.092
Sanchez A, Cruz J, Rueda N, dos Santos JCS, Torres R, Ortiz C, Villalonga R, Fernandez-Lafuente R (2016) Inactivation of immobilized trypsin under dissimilar conditions produces trypsin molecules with different structures. RSC Adv 6:27329–27334. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA03627A
Shi YH, Sun HY, Lu DM, Le QH, Chen DX, Zhou YC (2006) Separation of glycolic acid from glycolonitrile hydrolysate by reactive extraction with tri-n-octylamine. Sep Purif Technol 49:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2005.08.002
Shi H, Yin X, Bala S, Raghunath VC (2019) Liquid-phase oxidation of ethylene glycol on Pt and Pt–Fe catalysts for the production of glycolic acid: remarkable bimetallic effect and reaction mechanism. Ind Eng Chem Res 58:18561–18568. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03419
Shi Q, Guo H, Chen C, Hou B, Jia L, Li D (2020a) An efficient Bronsted acidic polymer resin for the carbonylation of formaldehyde to glycolic acid. React Kinet Mech Catal 130:1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-020-01819-3
Shi Q, Guo H, Chen C, Hou B, Jia L, Li D (2020b) An efficient Brønsted acidic polymer resin for the carbonylation of formaldehyde to glycolic acid. React Kinet Mech Catal 130:1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-020-01819-3
Singh S, Ahuja K (2018) Glycerol market size. https://www.gminsights.com/industryanalysis/glycerol-market-size
Sotto N, Cazorla C, Villette C (2016) Toward the sustainable synthesis of biosourced divinylglycol from glycerol. Acs Sustain Chem Eng 4:6996–7003. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01900
Sun D, Yamada Y, Sato S, Ueda W (2017) Glycerol as a potential renewable raw material for acrylic acid production. Green Chem 19:3186–3213. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7gc00358g
Tshibalonza NN, Monbaliu JCM (2017) Revisiting the deoxydehydration of glycerol towards allyl alcohol under continuous-flow conditions. Green Chem 19:3006–3013. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7gc00657h
Veluturla S, Archna N, Subba Rao D, Hezil N, Indraja IS, Spoorthi S (2018) Catalytic valorization of raw glycerol derived from biodiesel: a review. Biofuels UK 9:305–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2016.1266234
Walgode PM, Faria RPV, Rodrigues AE (2020) A review of aerobic glycerol oxidation processes using heterogeneous catalysts: a sustainable pathway for the production of dihydroxyacetone. Catal Rev Sci Eng 63:422–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614940.2020.1747253
Wang J, HannahJiangNingFangLiu LSYMS (2020) Optimization of immobilized Lactobacillus pentosus cell fermentation for lactic acid production. Biores Bioprocess 7:286–301. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-020-00305-x
Wang H, Yu D, Sun P, Yan J, Wang Y, Huang H (2008) Rare earth metal modified NaY: structure and catalytic performance for lactic acid dehydration to acrylic acid. Catal Commun 9:1799–1803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2008.01.023
Xu G, Ni Y (2015) Bioreductive preparation of ACE inhibitors precursor (R)-2-hydroxy-4-phenylbutanoate esters: recent advances and future perspectives. Biores Bioprocess. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-015-0040-1
Xu P, Zheng G-W, Zong M-H, Li N, Wen-Yong L (2017) Recent progress on deep eutectic solvents in biocatalysis. Biores Bioprocess 4:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-017-0165-5
Xu S, Zhang L, Zhou S, Deng Y (2021) Biosensor-based multi-gene pathway optimization for enhancing the production of glycolate. Appl Environ Microbiol 87:e00113-00121. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00113-21
Yun Eun J, Zhang GC, Atkinson C, Lane S, Liu JJ, Ort Donald R, Jy Su (2021) Glycolate production by a Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mutant lacking carbon-concentrating mechanism. J Biotechnol 335:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.06.009
Zhang J, Li X, Pang J, Zou W, Tang C, Dong L (2019) An efficient and durable hierarchically porous KLA/TiPO catalyst for vapor phase condensation of lactic acid to 2,3-pentanedione. New J Chem 43:5972–5979. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nj00267g
Zhu Z, Kang G, Yu S, Qin Y, Sun Y, Cao Y (2020) Process intensification in carbonylation of formaldehyde with active and passive enhancement methods. J Flow Chem 10:605–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41981-020-00103-8
Zhu T, Yao D, Li D, Xu H, Jia S, Bi C, Cai J, Zhu X, Zhang X (2021) Multiple strategies for metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for efficient production of glycolate. Biotechnol Bioeng 118:4699–4707. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27934
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was financially supported by grants of National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2102900) and the Tianjin Synthetic Biotechnology Innovation Capacity Improvement Project (TSBICIP-IJCP-003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1:
Table S1. The Plasmids and recombinant strains. Figure S1. SDS-PAGE of glycerol dehydrogenase (GldA) and NADH oxidase (SpNoxK184R). (M: Prestained Protein Ladder, 1: Crude GldA, 2: Purified GldA, 3: Crude SpNoxK184R, 4: Purified SpNoxK184R). Figure S2. Calibration curve of 96-well microtiter-plate-format NADH colorimetric screening assay. Aqueous solutions of 0–1 mM NADH were successively added to a 96-well microtitration plate. The absorbance value of NADH was detected by a microplate reader at 340 nm. The standard curve of NADH concentration was calculated under the condition of subtracting background. Figure S3. HPLC chromatogram and standard curve of 1,3-Dihydroxyacetone (DHA). (a) HPLC chromatogram of derived DHA. The number 1 is internal standard veratryl alcohol, the number 2 is the standard 1,3-Dihydroxyacetone (DHA) and the number 3 is the derivative O-(2,3,4,5,6-Pentafluorobenzyl) (PFBHA). (b) The standard curve of DHA. Notes: Detection conditions after derivatization by using HPLC (Thermo, UltiMate 3000): Ultimate XB-C18 column, 4.6×250 mm, 5 μm; mobile phase: water, acetonitrile; UV absorption wavelength: 263 nm; flow rate: 1.2 mL min-1; column temperature: 30 °C; sample injection volume: 20 μL. The standard curve was calculated according to the peak area of DHA detected by HPLC. Figure S4. HPLC chromatogram and standard curve of lactic acid. (a) HPLC chromatogram of lactic acid. The peak of lactic acid is labelled. (b) The standard curve of lactic acid. Notes: The HPLC analysis was carried out on an Agilent 1260 system equipped with a UV detector (210 nm), and fitted with Sugar 10H column (DEVOTE) : mobile phase: 5 mM H2SO4, flow rate: 0.5 mL min-1, column temperature: 35 °C, sample volume: 20 μL. The standard curve was calculated according to the peak area of lactic acid detected by HPLC. Figure S5. HPLC chromatogram and standard curve of glycolic acid. (a) HPLC chromatogram of glycolic acid. The peak of glycolic acid is labelled. (b) The standard curve of glycolic acid. Notes: The HPLC system was carried out on an Agilent 1260 system equipped with a UV detector (210 nm), and fitted with Aminex HPX- 87H column (DEVOTE): mobile phase: 5 mM H2SO4, flow rate: 0.5 mL min-1, column temperature: 35 °C, sample volume: 20 μL. The standard curve was calculated according to the peak area of glycolic acid detected by HPLC. Figure S6. HPLC chromatogram of the conversion of glycerol to lactic acid and glycolic acid, respectively. (a) The synthesis of DHA from glycerol catalyzed by coenzyme system was determined by derivation method. The number 1 is the internal standard veratryl alcohol, the number 3 is DHA standard and the number 4 is the derivative O-(2,3,4,5,6-Pentafluorobenzyl) (PFBHA). DHA was measured by a derivative method. 100 mM glycerol was catalyzed into DHA by a coenzyme cycle at 30 °C for 14 h. (b) HPLC chromatogram of lactic acid generated from the conversion of DHA (glycerol catalyzed by coenzyme cycle system) in the solution of NaOH. The number 1 is lactic acid, the number 2 is DHA. The black line represents reaction in NaOH solution, the red line represents the control without DHA. (c) HPLC chromatogram of glycolic acid produced from DHA in NaClO2 solution. The number 1 is glycolic acid, the number 2 is DHA. The black line represents the reaction catalyzed in NaClO2 solution, the red line represents the control without DHA.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, Y., Li, T., Tan, Z. et al. Chemoenzymatic conversion of glycerol to lactic acid and glycolic acid. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 9, 75 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00561-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00561-z
Keywords
- Chemoenzymatic catalysis
- Glycerol
- Dihydroxyacetone
- Lactic acid
- Glycolic acid