Characterization of cold-active trehalose synthase from Pseudarthrobacter sp. for trehalose bioproduction
Bioresources and Bioprocessing volume 10, Article number: 65 (2023)
Trehalose is a functional sugar that has numerous applications in food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical products. Production of trehalose from maltose via a single-step enzymatic catalysis using trehalose synthase (TreS) is a promising method compared with the conventional two-step process due to its simplicity with lower formation of byproducts. In this study, a cold-active trehalose synthase (PaTreS) from Pseudarthrobacter sp. TBRC 2005 was heterologously expressed and characterized. PaTreS showed the maximum activity at 20 °C and maintained 87% and 59% of its activity at 10 °C and 4 °C, respectively. The enzyme had remarkable stability over a board pH range of 7.0–9.0 with the highest activity at pH 7.0. The activity was enhanced by divalent metal ions (Mg2+, Mn2+ and Ca2+). Conversion of high-concentration maltose syrup (100–300 g/L) using PaTreS yielded 71.7–225.5 g/L trehalose, with 4.5–16.4 g/L glucose as a byproduct within 16 h. The work demonstrated the potential of PaTreS as a promising biocatalyst for the development of low-temperature trehalose production, with the advantages of reduced risk of microbial contamination with low generation of byproduct.
Trehalose, a naturally occurring colorless and odorless sugar, serves as a potent additive to protect functional biological compounds in diverse consumable products from adverse environmental conditions. It is accepted as a safe food ingredient by the US Food and Drug Administration (Ohtake and Wang 2011). Nowadays, trehalose is widely used as a functional ingredient not only in the food application but also in the cosmeceutical and pharmaceutical industries as a functional additive, stabilizer, humectant, moisturizing agent, and sweetener purposes (Burek et al. 2015; Chang et al. 2010).
Trehalose is basically a disaccharide comprising two α-glucose molecules connected with α-1,1-glycosidic linkage (Schiraldi et al. 2002). Currently, trehalose is produced via a two-step enzymatic method from starch employing the enzymes maltooligosaccharide trehalose synthase (TreY) and maltooligosyltrehalose trehalohydrolase (TreZ). However, this approach has certain drawbacks because it produces a variety of byproducts, such as branched starch, maltose, and maltotriose due to the specificity of TreY that performs the catalysis against only linear maltooligosaccharides with chain length ≥ 3 (Cai et al. 2018).
A single-step trehalose biosynthesis by trehalose synthase (TreS) has been proposed as a promising alternative (Cai et al. 2018). TreS (EC 184.108.40.206) is an isomerase that catalyzes the reversible single-step enzymatic reaction in transformation of maltose (α-D-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-α-D-glucopyranoside) to trehalose (α-D-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 1)-α-D-glucopyranoside) through transglucosylation and hydrolytic activities (Cai et al. 2019). According to the CAZy database, TreS is categorized into glycoside hydrolase family (GH) 13 subfamily 16 and 33 (http://www.cazy.org/) (Janecek and Gabrisko 2016; Stam et al. 2006). The enzymes have been identified in several bacterial genera, e.g., Pseudomonas sp. (Gao et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2005; Trakarnpaiboon et al. 2021), Thermus sp. (Koh et al. 1998; Lin et al. 2020; Zdziebło and Synowiecki 2006), Deinococcus sp. (Filipkowski et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2007), Arthrobacter sp. (Cai et al. 2019) and Enterobacter sp. (Yue et al. 2009). Most reported TreS enzymes showed an optimal temperature at 25–50 °C with approximately 60–74% of conversion yield under specified experimental conditions. At higher temperatures, the flexibility of the protein increases making the catalytic pocket more straightforward to hydrolytic reaction, and hence, decreases the yield of trehalose while increasing thess glucose side product (Cai et al. 2018; Koh et al. 2003). On the contrary, trehalose production by TreS at low temperatures may lead to decreased byproduct (glucose) generation. Despite cold-active enzymes or psychrophilic enzymes, which exhibited higsh specific activity at temperature range below 25 °C, have been discovered and utilized in various applications (Hamid et al. 2022; Joseph et al. 2008; Kuddus 2018; Maharana and Ray 2015; Santiago et al. 2016; Sarmiento et al. 2015), cold-active TreS is still uncommon (Cai et al. 2018). In this work, a cold-active recombinant TreS from Pseudarthrobacter sp. TBRC 2005 (PaTreS) was characterized. Application of PaTreS on trehalose production under low-temperature conditionss was demonstrated, showing its potential for further implementation in industry.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains, plasmids, cultures, and chemicals
Pseudarthrobacter sp. TBRC 2005 was provided by the Thailand Bioresource Research Center (TBRC) (www.tbrcnetwork.org). The bacterial strain was cultivated at 30 °C in nutrient broth for genomic DNA extraction. Escherichia coli DH5α was used as a host for plasmid propagation and E. coli BL21(DE3) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used for recombinant protein production. The pJET1.2 vector and pET28a vectors (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) were used for cloning and protein expression, respectively. Maltose and trehalose used as standardss for analysis were purchased from Megazyme (Wicklow, Ireland). All analytical-grade chemicals and reagents used in this work were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Merck and Fluka.
DNA extraction, PaTreS gene isolation, and plasmid construction
To isolate the PaTreS gene, the genomic DNA of Pseudarthrobacter sp. TBRC 2005 was extracted using GeneJET genomic DNA purification kit (Thermo Scientisfic, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The PaTreS gene was amplified from the genomic DNA using the universal primers designed based on Cai et al. (2019). The target PCR product was subsequently purified and cloned into pJET1.2/blunt vector (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After propagation in E. coli DH5α, the recombinant plasmid was extracted and subjected tso DNA sequencing to determine nucleotide sequence of the PaTreS gene (1st BASE Laboratories Sdn. Bhd., Malaysia).
For recombinant plasmid construction, the PaTreS gene was amplified from pJET1.2/PaTreS using specific primers, ArTreS/EcoRI (5′-GCGAATTCATGATTTTCAATCCGCAAGACTCG-3′) and ArTreS/NotI (5′-GCGGCCGCATTCTCAATCGACAGGATCGGCAT-3′) containing sites for restriction enzymes (underlined). Following digestion, the gene fragment was ligated to the pET28a vector at the EcoRI and NotI cloning sites to produce PaTreS-pET28a, which was subsequently introduced into E. coli DH5 using the heat-shock method (Sambrook and Russell 2001). The transformants were selected on Luria–Bertani (LB) agar (tryptone 10 g/L, yeast extract 5 g/L, and NaCl 5 g/L) supplemented with 50 µg/mL kanamycin and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. The transformants were verified by colony PCR using PaTreS/EcoRI and PaTreS/NotI-specific primers. After confirmation of nucleotide sequence, the PaTreS-pET28a wass then transformed into E. coli BL21(DE) used as an expression host. The transformants were selected on LB agar containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin at 37 °C. The selected transformants were subsequently verified by colony PCR.
Sequence and structural analysis
The sequence similarity analysis of PaTreS was analyzed against the NCBI database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi; accessed on 4 March 2022). The signal peptide for protein translocation was predicted using SignalP 5.0 (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/ service.php?SignalP-5.0; accessed on 4 March 2022). The three-dimensional structure of the enzyme was predicted using SWISS-MODEL homology modeling (Schwede et al. 2003) based on the trehalose synthase from Thermobaculum terrenum (PDB 5 × 7u) (Wang et al. 2017). The predicted model was visualized using Chimera software (Pettersen et al. 2004).
Production and purification of recombinant PaTreS
To produce recombinant PaTreS, E. coli BL21(DE3) harboring PaTreS-pET28a was cultivated in LB broth supplemented with 50 μg/mL kanamycin at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm for 18 h for inoculum preparation. The inoculum was then transferred at 1% v/v into LB broth containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin and cultivated at 37 °C, 200 rpm for 3 h. After that, β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (0.5, 0.25, 0.1 mM) was added to induce expression of the PaTreS gene and the cells were further cultivated at 25 °C for 3 h. The cells were collected by centrifugation at 8000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The cell pellet was resuspended in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.4 and disrupted by sonication using Ultrasonic Processor model VCX 130 PB (Sonics & Materials, Inc., Newtown, CT, USA). After that, cell debris and insoluble protein were removed by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 30 min.
The His trap™ FF affinity chromatographic column was used to purify the target protein according to the manufacturer's instructions (GE Healthcare, St Giles, UK). The unbound proteins were washed using a washing buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.4, 0.5 M NaCl, containing 20 mM and 50 mM imidazole, respectively). Subsequently, the elution step was carried out by step-gradient elution with the buffer containing 100, 200, 300, and 400 mM imidazole, respectively. The purified protein was pooled and desalted using an Amicon® centrifugal filter with a 30 kDa molecular weight cut-off (Merck Millipore Ltd., Cork, Ireland). The purified protein was then analyzed by 12% SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Protein concentrations were determined by Bio-Rad protein assay kit (BioRad Laboratory, Hercules, CA, USA) using bovine serum albumin as a standard.
Biochemical characterization of PaTreS
To understand the biochemical properties of recombinant PaTreS, the effects of pH, temperatures, metal ions, pH stability, and thermostability were investigated. The effect of pH on trehalose synthase activity of purified PaTreS was determined at 40 °C in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 3.0–5.0), potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0–8.0), and glycine–NaOH buffer (pH 9.0–11.0). Before measuring activity, the enzyme was pre-incubated at 30 °C for 1 h at several pH ranging from 3.0 to 11.0 to test the pH stability of PaTreS. The srelative activity of an enzyme was defined as 100% in the absence of pre-incubation.
The effect of temperature was evaluated in 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0 under temperatures ranging from 4 to 70 °C. The maximum activity obtained was set as 100% relative activity. The enzyme was pre-incubatsed at 4–70 °C for 6 h in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) before its activity was measured to test its thermostability. The activity of the enzyme without pre-incubation was defined as 100% relative activity.
The effects of metal ions on enzyme activity were investigated using demetallized enzyme in the presence of 0.1, 1, 10, and 20 mM final concentrations of CuCl2, MgCl2, MnCl2, CoCl2, FeCl2, ZnCl2, LiCl, NiCl2, and CaCl2. The demetallized enzyme was prepared by treating the purified PaTreS with 30 mM EDTA for 30 min at 30 °C before removing EDTA by an sextensive buffer exchange membrane centrifugation tube (MWCO 10 kDa, Pall Corporation, Port Washington, USA). The relative activity was determined by comparing the activity in the presence of metal ions to the obtained in the absence of metal ions.
The TreS activity was determined using maltose as the substrate according to Trakarnpaiboon et al. 2021 with slight modification. Reactions contained 50 µl of purified PaTreS and 250 μl of 5% (w/v) maltose solution in 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0. The reaction was incubated at 40 °C for 1 h before measurement of the generated product by Trehalose Assay Kit (Megazyme). One TreS unit is defined as the amount of enzyme to produce 1 µmol/min of trehalose from maltose.
Substrate specificity and kinetic parameters
The specificity and kinetic parameters of PaTreS were examined against various substrates including maltose, trehalose, sucrose, glucose, fructose, and lactose. To evaluate the substrate specificity, the purified PaTreS was mixed with 2% (w/v) substrate dissolved in 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0. The reaction was incubated at 30 °C for 3 h. The sugar composition was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography.
Kinetic parameters were determined using varying concentrations of maltose and trehalose (0–1500 mM) as the substrates. The enzyme reaction rate was measured at 20 °C and pH 7.0. The Lineweaver–Burk equation was used to obtain the kinetic values (Km and Vmax) for each substrate. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
Effect of enzyme loading and substrate concentrations
The influence of PaTreS loading on trehalose yield and specificity was investigated. The reaction mixture contained 100 g/L maltose in 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0 with a varying amount of purified PaTreS (1–4 mg/g substrate). The effect of substrate concentrations on enzyme activity was tested using 100, 200, and 300 g/L of maltose with 2 mg protein of PaTreS per g substrate. The reactions were incubated at 20 °C for 15 h. The products were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography.
Bioproduction of trehalose from maltose
The purified PaTreS (2 mg protein/g substrate) was added into 50 mL of 100–300 g/L maltose dissolved in 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 20 °C with a mixing rate of 50 rpm. The samples were collected at regular intervals during the 20 h incubation. The enzymatic reaction was stopped by heating at 100 °C for 10 min. The amount of trehalose was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography.
The concentrations (%, w/v) of products (glucose, maltose, and trehalose) released from PaTreS-catalyzed reactions were determined at 40 °C using a high-performance liquid chromatograph model LC-20A Series (Shimadzu-GL Sciences, Kyoto, Japan) using Shodex HILICpak VG-50 4E column (4.6 250 mm, 5 m). Acetonitrile:ultrapure water (80:20 v/v) was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.
Identification of PaTreS and structural analysis
The gene encoding trehalose synthase (PaTreS) was successfully isolated from the genomic DNA of Pseudarthrobacter sp. TBRC 2005 using TreS universal primers designed based on Cai et al. (2019). The size of the PaTreS gene was 1794 bp which encoded 597 amino acid residues without a signal peptide. The calculated molecular weight and pI value of the protein are 67.94 kDa and 4.75, respectively. The gene exhibited the highest similarity to maltose alpha-D-glucosyltransferases from unclassified Pseudarthrobacter sp. (WP_141158082.1) (99% identity), followed by Arthrobacter sp. ISL-85 (WP_214945216.1) (98% identity), and Arthrobacter sp. NicSoilC5 (98% identity).
Using SWISS-MODEL homology modeling, the three-dimensional structure of PaTreS was predicted based on the crystal structure of TreS from Thermobaculum terrenum (PDB 5 × 7u), which shared 57.95% identity and a GMQE score of 0.79. The predicted 3D-structure of PaTreS contained 4 domains comprising domain A, domain B, Domain C, and the subdomain S7 (Fig. 1A). Domain A (27–125, 202–353 and 379–477) located at the N-terminus is a catalytic module containing the TIM barrel structure. The proposed key amino acid residues are consisted of H128/D225/E267/H334/D335 (Agarwal and Singh 2021) (Fig. 1B). Domain B (126–201) is inserted between the TIM barrel structure. Domain A and B are connected via the subdomain S7 (354–378). Domain C (478–582) containing all the β-strands is located at the C-terminus. PaTreS was assigned to the GH13 16 subfamily based on phylogenetic analysis (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Furthermore, sequence logo analysis revealed that PaTreS contains five conserved regions that are similar to those found in GH13 16 subfamily TreS enzymes (Additional file 1: Fig. S2).
Expression and characterization of PaTreS
After induction by 0.1–0.5 mM IPTG at 25 °C for 3 h, the PaTreS gene was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) and resulted in production of the recombinant protein in an active soluble form (Fig. 2A). The SDS-PAGE analysis showed that the recombinant PaTreS was purified to more than 90% homogeneity using Ni2+-affinity column, corresponding to an apparent molecular weight of 66 kDa (Fig. 2B).
Recombinant PaTreS exhibited the maximum activity at pH 7.0, but its catalytic activity markedly decreased at pH below 6.0 and above 8.0 with 52.6% and 28.6% of residual activity, respectively (Fig. 3). However, the enzyme had high stability in the pH range of 7.0–9.0 after 6 h of pre-incubation (Fig. 3). According to analysis of activity at 4–70 °C, PaTreS showed the highest activity at 20 °C (Fig. 4). Interestingly, 58.9% and 86.6% of the maximum activity was observed at the temperature of 4 and 10 °C, respectively. The enzyme showed high thermostability with > 90% remaining activity after pre-incubation at 4–40 °C (Fig. 4). The enzymatic activity markedly decreased at a temperature above 40 °C.
Additionally, the impact of metal ions on PaTreS activity was investigated (Fig. 5). The activity of the enzyme was decreased by the chelation of metal ions from the enzyme. Diverse divalent metal ions restored and enhanced the activity to varying degrees. PaTreS activity was strongly increased by Mg2+, Ca2+, and Mn2+ at concentrations of 1 mM and 10 mM. The highest enzyme activity was achieved by the addition of Mg2+ at 10 mM. However, at a concentration of 0.1 mM and 20 mM, almost all examined metal ions decreased PaTreS activity.
Substrate specificity and kinetic parameters
The specificity of PaTreS was investigated on a variety of sugars, including maltose, trehalose, lactose, sucrose, fructose, and glucose under the optimal enzyme working conditions. According to the results, PaTreS selectively facilitated the reversible conversion of maltose and trehalose by releasing a small amount of glucose as the byproduct (Table 1). There was no evidence of catalytic activity against other sugars. Regarding kinetic performance, PaTreS exhibited the highest rate of reaction against maltose with a Vmax of 6.74 ± 0.26 mM/min, followed by trehalose (Vmax 5.70 ± 0.38 mM/min) with the Km 285.01.76 ± 3.30 and 808.14 ± 1.16 mM for maltose and trehalose, respectively. This corresponded to a turnover number (kcat) of 2.24 s−1 and catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of 126.96 on the conversion of maltose to trehalose.
Effect of enzyme loading and substrate concentration on reaction specificity
The effect of enzyme loading on trehalose production yield and by-product formation was investigated by varying PaTreS enzyme loading ranging from 1 to 4 mg protein/g substrate using 100 g/L maltose as a substrate (Fig. 6). Based on the results, the greatest trehalose yield of 69.9% with 6.7% of glucose as a by-product was obtained with an enzyme dosage of 2 mg/g. Increasing enzyme dosage decreased trehalose production yields while boosting glucose by-product formation.
The performance of PaTreS on trehalose biosynthesis was evaluated at varying substrate concentrations at 4, 20, and 30 °C (Fig. 7). The maximum conversion yield of 55.0–69.3% was achieved with 100–300 g/L maltose concentration at 4–20 °C. Maltose concentration higher than 300 g/L resulted in a lower trehalose yield with higher formation of glucose. A decrease in trehalose yield was also found at 30 °C, indicating that the enzyme has a strong specificity for trehalose at low temperatures. The time course of trehalose production was then studied using different maltose concentrations in a 50 mL reaction at pH 7, 20 °C for 20 h. The maximum trehalose concentrations of 71.7, 147.3, and 225.5 g/L, were achieved using 100, 200, and 300 g/L maltose as the substrate, respectively (Fig. 8). The concentration of glucose was between 4.5 and 16.4 g/L under these experimental conditions. This was equivalent to the trehalose yield between 55 and 69% with the maximal yield at 20 °C.
A recombinant TreS from Pseudarthrobacter sp. TBRC 2005 was first characterized in this study. The enzyme showed a high identity of 99% to an uncharacterized maltose alpha-D-glucosyltransferase from Pseudarthrobacter and Arthrobacter species. According to evolutionary analysis with the sequence data set of biochemically characterized TreS enzymes from Agarwal et al. (2021), PaTreS was classified into the same clade with TreS from glycoside hydrolase family 16 (GH13_16) (Additional file 1: Fig. S2 and Table S1). The enzyme shared a similar three-dimensional structure comprising 4 domains to other homologous enzymes with the presence of conserved key amino acid residues (H128/D225/E267/H334/D335) in the catalytic domain previously reported in other microbial TreS enzymes (Agarwal et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2007).
PaTreS was classified as a cold-active enzyme based on the definition of psychrophilic enzymes (Hamid et al. 2022; Joseph et al. 2008; Kuddus 2018; Maharana and Ray 2015; Santiago et al. 2016; Sarmiento et al. 2015). PaTreS showed high activity in broad temperature ranges (10–40 °C). The enzyme optimally worked at 20 °C with more than 80% and 60% residual at 10 °C and 4 °C, respectively under the experimental conditions. The working condition of PaTreS was similar to the optimum temperature (20 °C) of the characterized cold-active lipases from different microorganisms (Joseph et al. 2008). Comparative results with previous TreS enzymes that show optimum below 30 °C, PaTreS showed trehalose yield higher than those reported for TreS from Thermobifida fusca DSM 43792 (Wei et al. 2004) and Rhodococcus opacus ATCC 41021(Yan et al. 2013) but lower than TreS from Deinococcus radiodurans ATCC 13939 (Wang et al. 2007) and Pimelobacter sp R48 (Tsusaki et al 1996). PaTreS also showed higher thermostability better than its homolog in D. radiodurans ATCC 13939 (Wang et al. 2007) and Pimelobacter sp. R48 (Tsusaki et al. 1996). Although PaTreS showed strong activity at low temperature, it gave a higher trehalose yield than those reported by several mesophilic and thermophilic TreS enzyme such as D. geothermalis DSMZ 11300 (Filipkowski et al.2012), Meiothermus ruber (Zhu et al. 2010), T. fusca (DSM 43792) (Wei et al. 2004), Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 (Kim et al. 2010), D. radiodurans R1 (Filipkowski et al. 2012), Enterobacter hormaechei (Yue et al. 2009), Arthrobacter aurescens CGMCC1.1892a (Wu et al. 2009), Pseudomonas sp. P8005 (Gao et al. 2013), which were in the range of 43.6–67.0%. Moreover, its byproduct (glucose) was lower than that obtained from thermophilic and mesophilic TreS from D. geothermalis DSMZ 11300 (Filipkowski et al. 2012), T. fusca (DSM 43792) (Wei et al. 2004), Thermomonospora curvata DSM 43183 (Liang et al. 2013), C. glutamicum (ATCC 13032) Kim et al. 2010, D. radiodurans R1 (Filipkowski et al. 2012), Paenarthrobacter aurescens CGMCC1.1892a (Wu et al. 2009), Pseudomonas sp. P8005 (Gao et al. 2013), which were between 7.3 and 21.7%.
Based on evolutionary analysis, PaTreS was classified into the same clade with TreS enzymes previously reported to be active at low temperatures, with the optimal temperature ranging from 20 to 37 °C (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). The temperature profile of PaTreS was similar to TreS from Pimelobacter sp. R48 (20 °C), Thermobifida fusca DSM 43792 (25 °C), D. radiodurans ATCC 13939 (15 °C) and R. opacus ATCC 41021 (25 °C) (Wu et al. 2009; Tsusaki et al. 1996; Wei et al. 2004; Yan et al. 2013). However, PaTreS showed higher relative activity at low temperature (≤ 20 °C) than the previous TreS enzymes from Pimelobacter sp. R48, T. fusca DSM 43792, R. opacus ATCC 41021 (Tsusaki et al. 1996; Wei et al. 2004; Yan et al. 2013). The low-temperature active characteristic of PaTreS could sresult from the lower percentage of nonpolar residues (Gly, Ala, Ile, Leu, Val, Phe, Pro, and Trp) (50.42%) than those found in thermophilic TreS from Thermus thermophilus (53.78%), Thermus antranikianii (53.91%), and Meiothermus ruber (53.01%) which exhibited the highest activity at 50–65 °C. The presence of non-polar residues in thermophilic proteins could enhance the protein structural stability by creating hydrophobic interactions which can stabilize the protein folding configuration (Panja et al. 2015). Moreover, the lower distribution of Asp, Arg, Glu, and Lys residues and salt bridge formation in PaTreS could be another factor contributing to its activity at low temperatures (Agarwal et al. 2021; Panja et al. 2015).
In general, TreS can reversibly interconvert maltose and trehalose in a reaction (Cai et al. 2018). The Vmax and Km of PaTreS showed a stronger affinity for maltose and a preferred reaction direction for trehalose synthesis. Moreover, the catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of PaTreS is higher than the previously reported cold-active TreS enzymes from R. opacus (Yan et al. 2013). The higher preference and catalytic reaction rate of the enzyme against maltose led to a higher conversion rate from maltose to trehalose.
The recombinant PaTreS showed the optimum pH at pH 7.0 but it had high stability in the pH range from 7.0 to 9.0. The wide pH range of PaTreS was similar to the previous TreS from C. glutamicum, M. ruber, P. torridus, P. putida, R. opacus, and T. aquaticus (Kim et al. 2010; Zhu et al. 2010; Chen et al. 2006; Ma et al. 2006; Yan et al. 2013; Nishimoto et al. 1996). In addition, PaTreS showed higher stability at alkaline pH than those of the previously reported TreS, which showed 66% residual activity at pH 10. Higher stability under alkaline condition of PaTreS may be due to the ionization state of amino acid residues in the protein structure which remain unchanged at high pH. This leads to the maintained protein shape and enzyme activity under alkaline conditions (Di et al. 2012).
Application of PaTreS on trehalose biosynthesis using high concentration maltose syrup (100–300 g/L) led to high trehalose yield (71.7–225.5 g/L), equivalent to 55–69% conversion with low formation of glucose byproduct (4.5–16.4 g/L). In comparison with previously reported trehalose synthases, PaTreS has ability to convert higher maltose concentration compared to that reported for TreS from Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 (5 g/L maltose, 3.45 g/L trehalose) (Kim et al. 2010), hot spring metagenome (36.03 g/L maltose, 27 g/L trehalose) (Agarwal et al. 2021), Pseudomonas putida KT2440 (150 g/L maltose, 92.2 g/L trehalose) (Zheng et al. 2015), and Pseudomonas monteilii TBRC 1196 (200 g/L maltose, 118.2 g/L trehalose) (Trakarnpaiboon et al. 2021). However, the obtained trehalose yield was lower than that reported from a TreS from saline–alkali soil metagenomes gave 234 g/L trehalose from 300 g/L maltose under mesophilic alkaline conditions (45 °C, pH 9.0) (Jiang et al. 2013). However, considering operation cost, the use of PaTreS could be advantageous in terms of lower heating energy cost and reduced risk of contamination (Hamid et al. 2022; Kuddus 2018). Therefore, as a result, the recombinant PaTreS provides a potential candidate for large-scale bioconversion of trehalose from high substrate loading at low temperatures (4–20 °C) and a wide pH range (6.0–8.0).
This study described the cold-active trehalose synthase (PaTreS) from Pseudarthrobacter sp. TBRC 2005. Due to its low optimum temperature with high substrate and product specificity, and kinetic characteristics, PaTreS is one of the most promising biocatalysts for converting high concentration maltose syrup to trehalose. The enzymatic conversion process demonstrated a high conversion yield and product specificity under low-temperature settings which are beneficial for low byproduct generation and reduced risk of microbial contamination.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).
Agarwal N, Singh SP (2021) A novel trehalose synthase for the production of trehalose and trehalulose. Microbiol Spectr 9(3):e0133321–e0133321. https://doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.01333-21
Burek M, Waśkiewicz S, Wandzik I, Kamińska K (2015) Trehalose—properties, biosynthesis and applications. Chemik 69(8):469–476
Cai X, Seitl I, Mu W, Zhang T, Stressler T, Fischer L, Jiang B (2018) Biotechnical production of trehalose through the trehalose synthase pathway: current status and future prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102(7):2965–2976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-8814-y
Cai X, Seitl I, Mu W, Zhang T, Stressler T, Fischer L, Jiang B (2019) Characterization of a recombinant trehalose synthase from arthrobacter chlorophenolicus and its unique kinetics indicating a substrate cooperativity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 187(4):1255–1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-018-2877-1
Chang SW, Chang WH, Lee MR, Yang TJ, Yu NY, Chen CS, Shaw JF (2010) Simultaneous production of trehalose, bioethanol, and high-protein product from rice by an enzymatic process. J Agric Food Chem 58(5):2908–2914. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf903382e
Chen YS, Lee GC, Shaw JF (2006) Gene cloning, expression, and biochemical characterization of a recombinant trehalose synthase from Picrophilus torridus in Escherichia coli. J Agric Food Chem 54:7098–7104. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf060828q
Di Russo NV, Estrin DA, Martí MA, Roitberg AE (2012) pH-dependent conformational changes in proteins and their effect on experimental pKas: the case of nitrophorin 4. PLoS 8(11):e1002761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002761
Filipkowski P, Panek A, Agnieszka F, Pietrow O, Synowiecki J (2012) Expression of Deinococcus geothermalis trehalose synthase gene in Escherichia coli and its enzymatic properties. Afr J Biotechnol 11(67):13131–13139. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB12.734
Gao Y, Xi Y, Lu XL, Zheng H, Hu B, Liu XY, Jiao BH (2013) Cloning, expression and functional characterization of a novel trehalose synthase from marine Pseudomonas sp. P8005. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29(11):2195–2206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1385-2
Hamid B, Bashir Z, Yatoo AM, Mohiddin F, Majeed N, Bansal M, Poczai P, Almalki WH, Sayyed RZ, Shati AA, Alfaifi MY (2022) Cold-active enzymes and their potential industrial applications-a review. Molecules 27(18):5885. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185885
Janecek S, Gabrisko M (2016) Remarkable evolutionary relatedness among the enzymes and proteins from the alpha-amylase family. Cell Mol Life Sci 73(14):2707–2725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-016-2246-6
Jiang L, Lin M, Zhang Y, Li Y, Xu X, Li S, He H (2013) Identification and characterization of a novel trehalose synthase gene derived from saline-alkali soil metagenomes. PLoS ONE 8(10):e77437. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077437
Joseph B, Ramteke PW, Thomas G (2008) Cold active microbial lipases: some hot issues and recent developments. Biotechnol Adv 26(5):457–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.05.003
Kim TK, Jang JH, Cho HY, Lee HS, Kim YW (2010) Gene cloning and characterization of a trehalose synthase from Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC13032. Food Sci Biotechnol 19(2):565–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-010-0079-x
Koh SK, Shin HJ, Kim JS, Lee DS, Lee SY (1998) Trehalose synthesis from maltose by a thermostable trehalose synthase from Thermus caldophilus. Biotechnol Lett 20(8):757–761. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005342921339
Koh S, Kim J, Shin HJ, Lee D, Bae J, Kim D, Lee DS (2003) Mechanistic study of the intramolecular conversion of maltose to trehalose by Thermus caldophilus GK24 trehalose synthase. Carbohydr Res 338(12):1339–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6215(03)00172-1
Kuddus M (2018) Cold-active enzymes in food biotechnology: an updated mini review. J Appl Biol Biotechnol 6(3):58–63. https://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2018.60310
Lee JH, Lee KH, Kim CG, Lee SY, Kim G-J, Park YH, Chung S-O (2005) Cloning and expression of a trehalose synthase from Pseudomonas stutzeri CJ38 in Escherichia coli for the production of trehalose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 68(2):213–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1862-5
Lin YF, Su PC, Chen PT (2020) Production and characterization of a recombinant thermophilic trehalose synthase from Thermus antranikianii. J Biosci Bioeng 129(4):418–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2019.10.009
Ma Y, Xue L, Sun DW (2006) Characteristics of trehalose synthase from permeablized Pseudomonas putida cells and its application in converting maltose into trehalose. J Food Eng 77:342–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.06.042
Maharana A, Ray P (2015) A novel cold-active lipase from psychrotolerant Pseudomonas sp. AKM-L5 showed organic solvent resistant and suitable for detergent formulation. J Mol Catal B Enzym 120:173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2015.07.005
Nishimoto T, Nakada T, Chaen H, Fukuda S, Sugimoto T, Kurimoto M, Tsujisaka Y (1996) Purification and characterization of a thermostable trehalose synthase from Thermus aquaticus. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 60(5):835–839. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.60.835
Ohtake S, Wang YJ (2011) Trehalose: current use and future applications. J Pharm Sci 100(6):2020–2053. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.22458
Panja AS, Bandopadhyay B, Maiti S (2015) Protein thermostability is owing to their preferences to non-polar smaller volume amino acids, variations in residual physico-chemical properties and more salt-bridges. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0131495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131495
Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE (2004) UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25(13):1605–1612. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084
Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning. A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York
Santiago M, Ramírez-Sarmiento CA, Zamora RA, Parra LP (2016) Discovery, molecular mechanisms, and industrial applications of cold-active enzymes. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01408
Sarmiento F, Peralta R, Blamey J (2015) Cold and hot extremozymes: industrial relevance and current trends. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 3:148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00148
Schiraldi C, Di Lernia IF, De Rosa M, De Rosa M (2002) Trehalose production: exploiting novel approaches. Trends Biotechnol 10:420–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7799(02)02041-3
Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC (2003) SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res 31(13):3381–3385. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg520
Stam MR, Danchin EG, Rancurel C, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B (2006) Dividing the large glycoside hydrolase family 13 into subfamilies: towards improved functional annotations of alpha-amylase-related proteins. Protein Eng Des Sel 19(12):555–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzl044
Trakarnpaiboon S, Bunterngsook B, Wansuksriand R, Champreda V (2021) Screening, cloning, expression and characterization of new alkaline trehalose synthase from pseudomonas monteilii and its application for trehalose production. J Microbiol Biotechnol 31(10):1455–1464. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2106.06032
Tsusaki K, Nishimoto T, Nakada T, Kubota M, Chaen H, Sugimoto T, Kurimoto M (1996) Cloning and sequencing of trehalose synthase gene from Pimelobacter sp. R48. Biochem Biophys Acta 1290(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4165(96)00023-2
Wang JH, Tsai MY, Chen JJ, Lee GC, Shaw JF (2007) Role of the C-terminal domain of Thermus thermophilus trehalose synthase in the thermophilicity, thermostability, and efficient production of trehalose. J Agric Food Chem 55(9):3435–3443. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf070181p
Wang YL, Chow SY, Lin YT, Hsieh YC, Lee GC, Liaw SH (2014) Structures of trehalose synthase from Deinococcus radiodurans reveal that a closed conformation is involved in catalysis of the intramolecular isomerization. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 70(Pt 12):3144–3154. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1399004714022500
Wang J, Ren X, Wang R, Su J, Wang F (2017) Structural characteristics and function of a new kind of thermostable trehalose synthase from Thermobaculum terrenum. J Agric Food Chem 65(35):7726–7735. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02732
Wei YT, Zhu QX, Luo ZF, Lu FS, Chen FZ, Wang QY, Huang K, Meng JZ, Wang R, Huang RB (2004) Cloning, expression and identification of a new trehalose synthase gene from Thermobifida fusca genome. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 36(7):477–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/36.7.477
Wu XL, Ding HB, YueM QY (2009) Gene cloning, expression, and characterization of a novel trehalose synthase from Arthrobacter aurescens. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 83(3):477–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-1863-5
Yan J, Qiao Y, Hu J, Ding H (2013) Cloning, expression and characterization of a trehalose synthase gene from Rhodococcus opacus. Protein J 32(3):223–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-013-9476-3
Yue M, Wu XL, Gong WN, Ding HB (2009) Molecular cloning and expression of a novel trehalose synthase gene from Enterobacter hormaechei. Microb Cell Fact 8(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-8-34
Zdziebło A, Synowiecki J (2006) Production of trehalose by intramolecular transglucosylation of maltose catalysed by a new enzyme from Thermus thermophilus HB-8. Food Chem 96(1):8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.01.048
Zheng Z, Xu Y, Sun Y, Mei W, Ouyang J (2015) Biocatalytic production of trehalose from maltose by using whole cells of permeabilized recombinant Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE 10(10):e0140477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140477
Zhu Y, Wei D, Zhang J, Wang Y, Xu H, Xing L, Li M (2010) Overexpression and characterization of a thermostable trehalose synthase from Meiothermus ruber. Extremophiles 14:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-009-0281-z
The authors would like to thank Dr. Nattapol Arunrattanamook for improving the language in this manuscript.
This work was financially supported by the National Science and Technology Development Agency (P2350210).
Ethics approval and consent for participation
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figure S1. Evolutionary analysis of PaTreS and homolog sequences classified in GH13 subfamily GH13_16 and GH13_33 subfamilies. Figure S2. Fiver conserved regions found in PaTreS compared with trehalose synthases from GH13_16 and GH13_33 subfamilies. Figure S3. Evolutionary analysis of PaTreS and biochemically characterized trehalose synthases. Table S1. List of trehalose synthases from GH13_16 and GH13_33 subfamilies used in conserved region analysis
About this article
Cite this article
Trakarnpaiboon, S., Bunterngsook, B., Lekakarn, H. et al. Characterization of cold-active trehalose synthase from Pseudarthrobacter sp. for trehalose bioproduction. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 10, 65 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-023-00681-0