Characterization of a novel GH10 alkali-thermostable xylanase from a termite microbiome
Bioresources and Bioprocessing volume 9, Article number: 84 (2022)
The aim of the present study was to assess the biochemical and molecular structural characteristics of a novel alkali-thermostable GH10 xylanase (Xyl10B) identified in a termite gut microbiome by a shotgun metagenomic approach. This endoxylanase candidate was amplified, cloned, heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli and purified. The recombinant enzyme was active at a broad range of temperatures (37–60 ºC) and pH values (4–10), with optimal activity at 50 ºC and pH 9. Moreover, its activity remained at more than 80% of its maximum at 50 °C for 8 h. In addition, Xyl10B was found to be stable in the presence of salt and several ions and chemical reagents frequently used in the industry. These characteristics make this enzyme an interesting candidate for pulp and paper bleaching industries, since this process requires enzymes without cellulase activity and resistant to high temperatures and alkaline pH (thermo-alkaliphilic enzymes). The products of xylan hydrolysis by Xyl10B (short xylooligosaccharides, xylose and xylobiose) could be suitable for application as prebiotics and in the production of bioethanol.
Biochemical and molecular structural characterization of a novel GH10 xylanase (Xyl10B) from a termite gut microbiome.
Xyl10B is a candidate biocatalyst in the bleaching process of pulp and the paper industries because of its inactivity on carboxymethyl cellulose.
The shorter xylooligosaccharides generated from the hydrolysis of xylan would be suitable in different applications, including the food industry as prebiotics.
A sustainable promising alternative for the production of bio-products, such as biofuels, food additives, prebiotics and enzymes is the use of the lignocellulosic biomass (Adegboye et al. 2021; Gabanelli et al. 2021; Vasić et al. 2021).
Lignocellulosic biomass is mainly composed of three major polymers: cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Hemicellulose represents the second most abundant renewable polymer present in plant cell walls after cellulose (Narisetty et al. 2021). Among hemicellulases, xylanases (EC 22.214.171.124) are responsible for the degradation of xylan backbones into short xylooligosaccharides by a general acid–base mechanism that involves two glutamic acid residues. These enzymes are classified into glycoside hydrolase (GH) families and belong to some of the following families: GH5, GH8, GH10, GH11, GH30 and GH141, according to amino-acid sequence similarities (Verma 2021).
In the last years, some novel xylanases with desirable properties for biotechnological applications have identified and characterized by following two metagenomic approaches: functional metagenomic libraries (Mo et al. 2010; Alvarez et al. 2013; Ellilä et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2019; Alves et al. 2020; Wu et al. 2021b), and shotgun metagenomic sequencing (Joshi et al. 2020; Romero Victorica et al. 2020; Dao et al. 2021; Liew et al. 2022). Several xylanases are present in a variety of microorganisms from different environments; however, most of these enzymes lack adequate characteristics to withstand the extreme conditions of the industrial processing of lignocellulosic materials (Verma 2021). Besides, different industrial processes require specific characteristics for the same type of enzyme. For example, the biobleaching processes of the pulp and paper industries require thermo-alkali-stable xylanases (Bhardwaj et al. 2019; Mhiri et al. 2020), while the bread, juice, and feed industries prefer xylanases and β-xylosidases with thermo-acid stable properties (Verma 2021). The seafood industry, on the other hand, require salt-tolerant hemicellulases (Al-Darkazali et al. 2017).
Most of the hemicellulases available in the market to date are acidic and come from fungi. However, several of these fungal enzymes have high molecular weight and short life span at acidic environments and, for these reasons, researchers have searched for acidiphilic and alkaliphilic xylanases in other organisms, such as bacteria and archaea (Verma and Satyanarayana 2020). Bacterial xylanases have low molecular weight, present enzymatic activity under broad temperature and pH ranges, and display longer stability than fungal xylanases. These characteristics of bacterial xylanases allow rapid diffusion into the rigid lignocellulosic biomass. In addition, some of these xylanases are not active on cellulose, which is a highly desirable characteristic for some industries, including the pulp and paper industries. Finally, the easy culture and rapid harvesting of bacterial cells make bacteria an attractive choice for enzyme production (Verma and Satyanarayana 2020).
The development of novel enzymes is highly dependent on the screening strategy and the diversity of the microorganisms present at a given environment (Batista-García et al. 2016; Adegboye et al. 2021). In the case of termites, their efficiency in lignocellulosic degradation relies on both endogenous and exogenous enzymes produced by a diversity of microorganisms hosted in their intestines (Dheeran et al. 2012; Ben Guerrero et al. 2015; Batista-García et al. 2016; Vikram et al. 2021).
In a previous study, through a shotgun approach to analyze microbiomes obtained from the gut of two termite species, we identified some bacterial candidate genes coding for enzymes with lignocellulose-degrading features (Romero Victorica et al. 2020). With those results in mind, the aim of the present study was to in silico scan the metagenomic contigs to assess possible alkali-thermostable enzymes, and thereafter clone and express as a recombinant, a GH10 endoxylanase candidate (Xyl10B) to perform biochemical and molecular structural characterizations.
Materials and methods
Identification and selection of a GH10-enconding gene from a termite gut microbiome
Our previous studies on contigs constructed using shotgun metagenomic sequencing from termite gut microbiomes revealed that GH10 is the most abundant family involved in hemicellulose degradation (Romero Victorica et al. 2020). From the contigs assembled, we selected a predicted GH10-encoding gene KBCPBGKF_14734 (hereafter termed as Xyl10B), according to the criteria described in that study.
Sequence analysis and molecular modeling of Xyl10B
An initial sequence analysis of Xyl10B was performed with Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for protein sequences (BLASTP) against the RefSeq protein collection of the NCBI database. The Xyl10B amino acid sequence was then aligned with 32 bacterial GH10 reference sequences with BLASTP. The expected value used was < 1E−64, available in the NCBI database, and the Muscle method was used as implemented in the MEGA X software (v. 10.2.6) (Kumar et al. 2018). Multiple alignment was used to calculate a Jones-Taylor-Thornton (JTT) substitution model for proteins and therefore build a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree with 1000 bootstrap replicates using MEGA X.
Molecular models of the Xyl10B structure were developed with the I-TASSER server (Roy et al. 2010) (http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/) and the AlphaFold software, using its online Colab notebook (Jumper et al. 2021). AlphaFold improves the accuracy of structure predictions by incorporating novel neural network architectures and training procedures based on the evolutionary, physical and geometric constraints of protein structures. For the model refining stage, we used FoldX software routines (script RepairPDB; http://foldx.crg.es/). FoldX identifies the residues that have bad torsion angles or Van der Waals' clashes and we repair them, and explores different rotamer combinations to achieve new minimum energy (Schymkowitz et al. 2005). The quality of the models was evaluated at the SWISS-MODEL Workspace (Structure Assessment tool) using QMEAN (Benkert et al. 2011) and MolProbity (Chen et al. 2010) (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/qmean/). Model manipulation and imaging were developed using the Chimera software (Pettersen et al. 2004).
Cloning, heterologous expression and protein purification of Xyl10B
Total DNA was extracted from N. aquilinus gut samples by using the QIAamp DNA Stool kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's indications with modifications. Briefly, pooled gut samples from six individuals were heated at 95 °C in 1 mL of lysis buffer, and then disrupted with a FastPrep protocol (3 cycles of 20 s at 6,000 rpm) using glass beads (300 mg; 150–212 μm beads; Sigma, USA). An additional magnetic purification step was performed with 1.5 volumes of magnetic bead solution (Agencourt AMPure XP magnetic beads, Beckman Coulter, USA) for 5 min, followed by two 80% ethanol washes.
The Xyl10B sequence was amplified, without the native signal peptide, with specific primers (designed from the contig sequence assembled) containing the BamHI and XhoI restriction enzyme sites (Xyl10B-F: 5′ GGATCCTACAACGCCCCCG 3′, Xyl10B-R: 5′ CTCGAGTTACTTAACCAGTTCCC- 3′), to subsequently perform an N-terminal fusion to a 6xHis tag (restriction sites are shown underlined). The amplification product was first cloned into a pGEM-T Easy vector, using E. coli DH5-α competent cells. Then, the plasmid inserts from positive colonies were subcloned into a pET28b ( +) vector (BamHI/XhoI) (Novagen, United Kingdom) and transformed into competent E. coli Rosetta cells (DE3) (Novagen, United Kingdom).
Xyl10B protein expression was induced with 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) for 16 h at 28 °C. The cells were subjected to lysis and sonication (six pulses of 10 s, 28% amplitude) and the recombinant protein was purified in the soluble fraction with a Ni-NTA agarose resin (Qiagen), using 50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, and 250 mM imidazole, at pH 8, as elution buffer. The concentration of the purified protein was estimated using Bradford Reagent (Biorad) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard. This process allowed producing 2.6 mg of purified soluble active recombinant protein from 50 mL induced E. coli cultures.
Protein electrophoresis and Western blot assays
The molecular weight of protein fractions was assessed with standard sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The purified enzyme fractions mixed with the same volume of cracking buffer 2X were boiled at 100 °C for 5 min and electrophoretically separated on 12% SDS–PAGE. The proteins fixed in the gels were visualized with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 and de-stained with discoloring solution (50% methanol, 10% acetic acid and 40% water) for 3 h.
Western blotting was performed by blotting SDS–PAGE- separated proteins onto a Hybond C-Extra nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare Life Science, USA) by using Mini Trans-Blot™ (BioRad, Irvine, USA) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. The recombinant proteins were detected with the anti-His mouse antibody (GE Healthcare Life Science, USA) and the anti-mouse alkaline phosphatase conjugated goat antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), using the BCIP/NBT substrate. A prestained Page ruler Plus protein ladder (10–250 kDa) (Thermo Scientific, USA) was used as a molecular weight marker.
The endoxylanase and endoglucanase activities of Xyl10B were assessed in 1% (w/v) of beechwood xylan and 1% (w/v) carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), respectively (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in a final reaction volume of 0.1 mL, at 50 °C and 400 rpm for 20 min in a Thermomixer (Eppendorf, Germany). The reducing sugars released from the hydrolysis of xylan and CMC were measured using the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay at 540 nm with xylose or glucose as standards, respectively. The reaction was adapted to small volumes (Romano et al. 2013).
The arabinofuranosidase, β-glucosidase and xylosidase activities of Xyl10B were evaluated using, 4-nitrophenyl α-L-arabinofuranoside (pNPA) (Megazyme, Ireland), 4-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG) and 4-nitrophenyl-β-D-xylopyranoside (pNPX) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Reactions of 0.1 mL containing 2.5 mM of each substrate were prepared in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8) and the properly diluted enzyme solution. The mixtures were incubated at 50 °C for 20 min and, subsequently, the reaction was stopped by adding 0.5 mL of 2% Na2CO3. The concentration of the released p-nitrophenol (pNP) was calculated according to a standard curve by measuring the absorbance at 410 nm. The enzyme activities were expressed as IU/mg of protein. One international unit (IU) was defined as the amount of enzyme that released 1 μmol of product per minute under the conditions specified for all enzymatic assays.
Optimum pH, temperature and thermal stability
The optimal pH was assessed using sodium citrate (pH 3–4), sodium phosphate (pH 5–8) and glycine–NaOH (pH 8.5–10) buffers at 50 °C. The influence of temperature was evaluated by incubation at pH 9 and at temperatures ranging between 20 °C and 70 °C.
The thermal stability was assessed by pre-incubating the enzymes at 40 °C and 50 °C from 0 to 16 h. In addition, kinetic parameters were determined under optimal assay conditions using 0–50 mg/mL of beechwood xylan as substrate, by fitting models to data with the GraphPad Prism software v 8.0 (http://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/).
Effects of metal ions and reagents
The effects of various metal ions (CaCl2, CuSO4, NiCl2, MgCl2, MnSO4, and ZnSO4 at 1 mM and 10 mM), chemical reagents (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), SDS, Tween-40, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and β-mercaptoethanol at 1 mM, 10 mM or 0.5%) and NaCl (1 M, 3 M and 5 M) on Xyl10B activity were determined by adding the individual reagent in sodium phosphate buffer (pH 9.0) into the standard reaction and incubating at 50 °C for 20 min. Beechwood xylan (1%) was used as substrate. The activity observed in the absence of metal ions or reagents was considered as 100% (control).
Determination of the mode of action of Xyl10B and ligand interaction analysis
The hydrolysis patterns were qualitatively analyzed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) according to Ben Guerrero et al. (2020). After performing the enzyme reactions over different times in 100 µL reaction mixtures with 1% beechwood xylan (20 min, 40 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h and 16 h), we carried out the TLC technique, where the plate with the samples was placed in a chamber with ethanol/acetic acid/water as solvents in a proportion of 2:2:1 as mobile phase for 2 h. Later, the plates were revealed using water/ethanol/sulfuric acid in a proportion of 20:70:3, with orcinol solution 1% (v/v) as development system with spray and heat-gun. The hydrolysis patterns were compared with the following xylooligosaccharides as standards: xylose (X1) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), xylobiose (X2), xylotriose (X3), xylotetraose (X4) and xylopentaose (X5) (Megazyme, Ireland). The mode of action of Xyl10B was evaluated by using X2, X3, X4 and X5 (10 mM), and beechwood xylan (1%) and then subjecting the hydrolysates to TLC. Both assays were performed at 50 ºC and pH 9.
The in silico ligand interaction analysis was implemented starting from a structure alignment of Xyl10B with a specific Protein Data Bank (PDB) model for the GH10 CbXyn10C complexed with xyloheptaose (PDB 5OFK) and using the Chimera software (Pettersen et al. 2004). This task positioned the exogenous ligand at the Xyl10B enzymatic groove and, after the removal of the CbXyn10C, the remaining Xyl10B-xyloheptaose complex was energetically optimized in its interacting atoms. The resulting complex was uploaded at the PDBsum server (Laskowski et al. 2018), which runs a program for automatically plotting protein–ligand interactions (LIGPLOT) (Wallace et al. 1995).
All the assays were carried out in triplicate. Two independent biological replicate assays were performed with equivalent results. The results are expressed as the mean ± one standard deviation of the triplicate measurements.
To assess the reproducibility of the enzyme activities we considered the measurements for the control treatments of four independent experiments. In the case of thermostability experiments, we also included data with up to 2 h of exposure at 40 °C and 50 °C. The standard conditions for the control treatments were pH 9 and 50 °C. The coefficient of variation was 17.5% and non-significant statistical differences among experiments were observed for the control treatments (ANOVA, P = 0.032) (Additional file 1: Fig. S1).
Nucleotide and amino acid sequence accession numbers
The nucleotide and amino acid sequences of Xyl10B were deposited in the GenBank database, with accession numbers OK617332 and UKT5974, respectively.
Amino acid sequence, phylogenetic analysis and structural predictions for Xyl10B
According to the BLASTP analysis, the amino acid sequences most similar to Xyl10B were that of a GH10 endo-1,4-β-xylanase from Treponema azotonutricium (WP_015712816.1) (45% identity, E value 2e−96, and 99% coverage) and a GH10 endo-1,4-β-xylanase from an uncultured bacterium contig obtained from the gut microbiome of a wood-feeding higher termite (AGS52346.1) (49% identity, E value 6e−107, and 95% coverage).
According to a functional query based on the amino acid sequence of Xyl10B in the Interpro database, the sequence highly matched the GH10 consensus at the levels of family, domain and motif in several databases. Figure 1 depicts the positions of four matches of Xyl10B to the glycoside hydrolase family 10 signature (PR00134) in the PRINTS-S database and the alignment of the six most similar sequences retrieved from the GH10 accessions deposited in the CAZy database. The coordinates of Xyl10B that correspond to these matches are indicated above each block (Fig. 1).
The phylogenetic analysis with the most similar GH10 reference sequences retrieved by BLASTP from the CAZy database revealed that, although Xyl10B grouped with other GH10 bacterial amino acid sequences from termite gut microbiomes, these reference sequences were more distantly related (Fig. 2).
As mentioned above Xyl10B molecular models were developed by the I-TASSER and AlphaFold methods, and their quality, after a refining stage (FoldX), was estimated using the structure assessment tool at the SWISS-MODEL Workspace. Specifically, we obtained a MolProbity score of 2 and a QMEANDisCo score of 0.6 for the first AlphaFold model and an improvement for the second FoldX-refined model with a MolProbity score of 1.95 and a QMEANDisCo score of 0.7. The MolProbity score is expressed as a single number that reflects the crystallographic resolution of the model, where a lower score means a better model (Chen et al. 2010). According to references, the above-mentioned quality scores of the AlphaFold raw and FoldX-refined models are enough for the current analysis of Xyl10B functional residues (Baker and Sali 2001). In that sense, the structure of Xyl10B corresponds to the canonical (β/α)8-barrel structural fold (known as TIM barrel), which is common to many glycosyl hydrolases. Regarding the structure and sequence alignment, Xyl10B contains the key residues Glu52, Lys56, His91, Trp95, Asn144, Glu145, Asn203, Asn206, Gln237, His239, Glu274, Trp334, and Trp342, which are conserved in the functional motif of the GH10 family (Tian et al. 2018). The active site is composed of several aromatic residues that line the long active-site groove and are responsible for the ligand-binding function. In the model structure, Glu145 and Glu274 can be identified as the catalytic acid/base and the nucleophile residues, respectively, according to the conserved sequence and their topology. The side chains of the catalytic glutamate residues are at a distance of 5 A˚ (Fig. 3a). Finally, the top predicted ligands for the Xyl10B model were β-D xylopyranose and β-D xylose (Fig. 3b). According to the prediction analyses, the enzyme has the glutamate catalytic residues located at the C terminus of β-sheets 7 and 4, the acid/base Glu145 and the nucleophile catalyst Glu274, respectively. The active site located in a shallow groove, at the C-terminal side of the barrel β-strands, can be divided into two regions (glycon and aglycon), which include several subsites. For Xyl10B, the − 2 and − 1 subsites in the glycon region contain conserved amino acid residues with a predicted key role in substrate recognition. Specifically, the residues Glu52, Lys56, His91, Glu145 and Trp334 established several hydrogen bond interactions with the xylose moieties (Fig. 3c).
Concerning the optimal alkaline activity at high pH, we assessed the number of surface- exposed (> 30%) negatively and positively charged residues, by following an approach detailed by Mamo et al. (2009). Compared to high and non-alkaline active xylanases, Xyl10B has a high percent composition of acidic residues, which results in high ratio of negatively to positively charged residues (Table 1).
Cloning and heterologous expression of Xyl10B
The cloning and recombinant expression of Xyl10B expressed as a 6xHis N-terminal fusion protein without signal peptide yielded a recombinant protein of 46 kDa. This result agrees with the expected size of Xyl10B, as evidenced by the SDS-PAGE and Western blot analyses (Fig. 4a, b).
Activity characterization of the recombinant Xyl10B
Regarding the hydrolytic activity analyzed on various substrates, Xyl10B showed high activity on beechwood xylan (255 ± 12.33 IU/mg). However, no activity was detected on other cellulosic or hemicellulosic substrates (pNPA, pNPG, pNPX) or CMC (Table 2).
According to the endo-1,4-β-xylanase activity analysis, the optimal activity of Xyl10B occurred at pH 9.0 and 50 °C (Fig. 5a, b). Furthermore, Xyl10B showed acceptable activity (> 60%) at broad pH ranges (5–9) and more than 70% between 37 °C and 60 °C. The enzyme maintained more than 80% activity at 50 °C after 8 h and more than 60% activity at 40 °C after 16 h (Fig. 5c).
The Xyl10B kinetic profile on beechwood xylan at optimal pH and temperature values was fitted to a Michaelis–Menten function (Fig. 5d). The Km and Vmax of Xyl10B were 13.49 mM and 221.8 μmol min−1 mg−1, respectively.
Regarding the effects of some metal ions and chemicals on Xyl10B activity (Table 3), only Cu2+ at 10 mM strongly inhibited it, while the other ions evaluated (Ca2+, Ni2+, Mg2+, Mn2+ and Zn2+) showed no or slight inhibition regardless of the concentration used (concentrations known to inhibit many xylanases). With respect to the other compounds, only SDS strongly inhibited Xyl10B activity, while the others inhibited the activity at a range of 52% to 80% (Table 3). All the substances evaluated significantly inhibit the activity of most xylanases used in industrial applications (Wang et al. 2017a). Finally, Xyl10B was halotolerant, as evidenced by its high activity relative to the control: 93.16% ± 0.12 (NaCl 1 M), 79.55% ± 3.44 (NaCl 3 M) and 64.21% ± 5.46 (NaCl 5 M) (Table 3).
Activity profile of Xyl10B
On beechwood xylan, Xyl10B induced an evident increase in the content of xylooligosaccharides over time up to 16 h, by releasing xylose and at least four types of xylooligosaccharides (X2, X3, X4 and X5) (Fig. 6a). With xylooligosaccharides as substrate, in the TLC, Xyl10B was active and hydrolyzed different xylooligosaccharides (X3, X4 and X5). X3 was hydrolyzed to X1 and X2, X4 was hydrolyzed to X1, X2 and X3, and X5 was hydrolyzed to X2 and X3 (Fig. 6b).
In this study, we characterized Xyl10B, a new xylanase, recently identified and selected by a shotgun metagenome sequencing approach by our group (Romero Victorica et al. 2020). Metagenomics is a powerful tool to discover novel bioactive molecules from diverse environments without the limitations of culture (Berini et al. 2017; Fredriksen et al. 2019). This technology has become a revolutionary invention in microbiology because it allows recovering the product of interest through direct cloning from the community DNA and its analysis (Verma and Satyanarayana 2020). However, it should be noted that most researchers have used synthetic genes, and only a few groups have been able to perform successful amplifications from environmental DNA (Ben Guerrero et al. 2020; Joshi et al. 2020; Romero Victorica et al. 2020; Pavarina et al. 2021).
The results of the amino acid sequence analysis here performed showed moderate to low identity with sequences of enzymes of the GH10 family previously identified in the gut microbiota of a wood-feeding higher termite (Liu et al. 2019). Moreover, the phylogenetic analysis revealed that Xyl10B is distantly related to the other GH10 sequences described so far.
From a molecular structure perspective, this protein belongs to GH family 10, with the canonical (β/α)8-barrel fold, which resembles the shape of a salad bowl. The distance of the side chains of the catalytic glutamates (Glu145 and Glu274) suggests that the enzymatic reaction takes place by the retaining mechanism. In addition, the carboxylate group of Glu145 would be held in position by interactions with Gln237 and its acid–base functional role supported by the near aspartates Asp149 and Asp204. Concerning the candidate nucleophile glutamate Glu274, it is surrounded by His91 and His239, an environment that would favor its charged status.
Thus, considering the analysis of its structure and its sequence alignment, Xyl10B has a sequence similar to that of the conserved functional motif of the GH10 family (Tian et al. 2016) and a conserved network of functional residues.
The analysis of the xylooligosaccharides hydrolysis pattern allowed further understanding the mechanism by which Xyl10B recognizes substrates (Fig. 7). Xyl10B was unable to hydrolyze X2, which may be due to the incapacity of X2 to bind at the productive − 1 and + 1 subsites. Concerning X3, Xyl10B exhibited low activity, thus suggesting that only a small number of X3 molecules reach a productive complex between –1 and + 1. In that sense, X3 molecules may be trapped in the region from − 3 and − 1 subsites and form a nonproductive complex, in a manner similar to that observed for X2, where xylose moieties formed stronger interactions with residues at the − 2 and − 1 subsites.
X4 was the first substrate that reflected a more robust enzymatic activity. Cleaved primarily into X2, X4 seems to be the preferred substrate bound between the − 2 to + 2 subsites of Xyl10B. On the other hand, X4 could be bound at the − 3 to + 1 subsites and this would lead to low amounts of X1 and X3.
X5 was hydrolyzed with major productive binding at –3 to + 2, which is a shared feature with X4. This converged in a common core of four subsites (− 2 to + 2), which yielded a more effective function. Other GH10 enzymes have also shown the establishment of strongest interactions at –2 and + 2 moieties (Charnock et al. 1998).
Therefore, previous studies and our protein–ligand interaction analysis, where the four moieties mentioned are the most embraced at the enzyme active site, support the establishment of strongest interactions at -2 and + 2 moieties (Fig. 7).
Except for the xylan specificity, Xyl10B showed no activity towards the other polysaccharides assayed here. Some endo-1,4-β-xylanases have cellulase activity, which can be useful for some industries but detrimental for others. For example, in the paper industry, any cellulose loss is undesirable because it reduces pulp quality (Collins et al. 2005). In the present study, Xyl10B showed no cellulase activity, which makes it a good candidate for the paper industry, e.g. in paper bleaching.
Xylanases are generally inhibited by the end-product, such as xylobiose and xylan hydrolysis products (Mo et al. 2010; Polizeli et al. 2005). In the present study, we found that Xyl10B was not inhibited by xylobiose end-product, because xylooligosaccharides (X3 and X4) can be hydrolyzed into xylobiose and xylose. It should be noted that xylobiose is a product of interest as a prebiotic, since it stimulates the selective growth of intestinal species of Bifidobacterium genus, which is important for maintaining a healthy intestinal microbiota (Mo et al. 2010). For this reason, Xyl10B could be useful in the production of xylobiose and would help to reduce the currently very high costs of the industry (Mo et al. 2010).
Xyl10B presented higher specific activity values (255 IU/mg) than other GH10 xylanases identified from metagenomics analyses, such as: Pm25, derived from the gut microbiome of the termite Pseudacanthotermes militaris (~ 7.4 IU/mg) (Wu et al. 2021a), denovogenes_5086, from the rumen of Vietnamese native goats (~ 25 IU/mg) (Dao et al. 2021), PW-xyl37, from paper wastewater treatment microbiota (~ 113.7 IU/mg) (Wang et al. 2021), and XynM1, from aquatic habitats of extreme temperature (~ 75.12 IU/mg) (Joshi et al. 2020). On the other hand, Xyl10B presented activity values in the same range as other GH10 xylanases, such as Xyl10E, previously characterized from a termite gut microbiome (~ 288 IU/mg) (Romero Victorica et al. 2020), and Xyn10N18, from bovine rumen (~ 242 IU/mg) (Gong et al. 2013). However, Xyl10B showed lower activity than PW-xy137, derived from paper wastewater treatment microbiota (~ 470 IU/mg) (Wang et al. 2021). As compared with xylanases derived from bacteria, Xyl10B showed higher specific activity than some of them, such as JdXyn10A, derived from Jonesia denitrificans (~ 65 IU/mg), CoXyn10A, derived from Cohnella sp. (~ 71.16 IU/mg), and XynA2, derived from Caulobacter crescentus (~ 1.02 IU/mg) (Jacomini et al. 2020; Hero et al. 2021; Vacilotto et al. 2021). On the other hand, it showed an activity range similar to that of rXylR from Duganella sp. (~ 274.7 IU/mg) (Kim et al. 2021) and, in a lower proportion, higher activity than PUL15 from Prevotella copri (~ 611.7 IU/mg) (Linares-Pastén et al. 2021) and Xyn30Y5-SLH from Bacillus sp. (394.4 IU/mg) (Lai et al. 2021).
The optimal temperature of Xyl10B to degrade beechwood xylan was 50 °C and the optimal pH value was 9. These characteristics make this enzyme an interesting candidate for the pulp and paper industries, since the procedures in these industries require thermo-alkaliphilic enzymes to resist the high temperature and alkaline pH reached (Collins et al. 2005; Dheeran et al. 2012; Verma and Satyanarayana 2020). Besides, given that this enzyme remains active in a pH range of 5–9 (60%), it is applicable to overcome the harsh conditions of the biofuel synthesis processes, such as the increases in pH and salt concentration (Amoozegar et al. 2019).
In this regard, Xyl10B also showed a suitable activity at high salt concentrations. This halotolerance of Xyl10B is an advantage for many industrial applications. In recent years, salt-tolerant xylanases have become interesting candidates because of their potential use in several downstream processes such as bioethanol production, processing of seafood/feed, aquaculture, paper industry and marine wastewater treatment. The high salt concentrations that are produced in the processes of these industries make halotolerant enzymes mandatory (Liu et al. 2013).
Most of the halotolerant and halophilic xylanases so far reported are either from marine bacteria (Guo et al. 2009; Yu et al. 2019) or from saline soils (Prakash et al. 2009; Zhou et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2017b). It is worth noting that, unlike Xyl10B, no other alkaline xylanase from termites has so far been proven to be halotolerant. On the other hand, several metal ions often inhibit the activity of xylanases (Verma et al. 2013). In the present study, however, the candidate enzyme maintained a suitable activity in the presence of most of the metal ions assessed (Ca2+, Ni2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, and Zn2+). Indeed, this activity remained above 59% in the presence of any of these ions even at high concentrations (10 mM). Thus, these results suggest that Xyl10B is stable and resistant to the main limitations for industrial application.
Most termite gut endoxylanases reported until now are acidic and thermophilic (Brennan et al. 2004; Rashamuse et al. 2017; Liu et al. 2019; Romero Victorica et al. 2020). This could be due to adaptations to the gut environment (Verma 2021). However, several years ago, some researchers reported that the pH in the P1 segment of the hindgut of higher termite guts, especially in the family Termitidae, is strongly alkaline (pH > 9.0) (Bignell and Eggleton 2005). Thus, termite guts could also be useful for the research of alkaliphilic lignocellulose-degrading enzymes (Nimchua et al. 2012).
Therefore, the characteristics of the xylanase Xyl10B, with optimum pH in the alkaline range, the optimum temperature at 50 °C, halotolerant activity, and stability in the presence of several ions and chemical reagents make it a promising candidate to withstand the extreme conditions of several industrial processes.
The xylanase Xyl10B of the GH10 family, selected from a termite gut microbiome, was heterologously produced. This enzyme showed activity at a broad range of pH values (4–10) and temperatures (37–60 °C), with optimum alkaline pH of 9. The enzyme showed stability and tolerance to several ions and chemical reagents frequently used in the industry. The end products generated after Xyl10B hydrolysis of beechwood xylan were the lower xylooligosaccharides, xylose and xylobiose. In addition, Xyl10B showed unusual enzymatic activity against small xylooligosaccharides, such as xylotriose. All these characteristics make this enzyme valuable for biotechnological processes. Our findings provide basis for further studies for the development of novel enzymes for several industrial applications.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for protein sequences
Bovine serum albumin
Carbohydrate-active enzyme database
Nitro blue tetrazolium
National Center for Biotechnological Information
Nickel-charged nitrilotriacetic acid
Protein Data Bank
First proctodeal segment
Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
Thin layer chromatography
Maximum velocity achieved by the system at maximum substrate concentration
Adegboye MF, Ojuederie OB, Talia PM, Babalola OO (2021) Bioprospecting of microbial strains for biofuel production: metabolic engineering, applications, and challenges. Biotechnol Biofuels 14(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-020-01853-2
Al-Darkazali H, Meevootisom V, Isarangkul D, Wiyakrutta S (2017) Gene expression and molecular characterization of a xylanase from chicken cecum metagenome. Int J Microbiol 2017:4018398. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4018398
Alvarez TM, Goldbeck R, dos Santos CR, Paixão DA, Gonçalves TA, Franco Cairo JP, Almeida RF, de Oliveira PI, Jackson G, Cota J, Büchli F, Citadini AP, Ruller R, Polo CC, de Oliveira NM, Murakami MT, Squina FM (2013) Development and biotechnological application of a novel endoxylanase family GH10 identified from sugarcane soil metagenome. PLoS ONE 8(7):e70014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070014
Alves K, Silva M, Cotta S, Ottoni J, van Elsas J, Oliveira V, Andreote F (2020) Mangrove soil as a source for novel xylanase and amylase as determined by cultivation-dependent and cultivation-independent methods. Braz J Microbiol 51(1):217–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-019-00162-7
Amoozegar MA, Safarpour A, Noghabi KA, Bakhtiary T, Ventosa A (2019) Halophiles and their vast potential in biofuel production. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01895
Baker D, Sali A (2001) Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294(5540):93–96. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065659
Batista-García RA, del Rayo S-C, Talia P, Jackson SA, O’Leary ND, Dobson ADW, Folch-Mallol JL (2016) From lignocellulosic metagenomes to lignocellulolytic genes: trends, challenges and future prospects. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 10:864–882. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1709
Ben Guerrero E, Arneodo J, Campanha BR, Abrão de Oliveira P, Veneziano Labate MT, Regiani T, Campos E, Cataldi A, Labate CA, Rodrigues MC, Talia P (2015) Prospection and evaluation of cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes using untreated and pretreated biomass in two argentinean native termites. PLoS ONE 10(8):e0136573. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136573
Ben Guerrero EB, de Villegas RMD, Soria MA, Santangelo MP, Campos E, Talia PM (2020) Characterization of two GH5 endoglucanases from termite microbiome using synthetic metagenomics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104(19):8351–8366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10831-5
Benkert P, Biasini M, Schwede T (2011) Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models. Bioinformatics 27(3):343–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq662
Berini F, Casciello C, Marcone GL, Marinelli F (2017) Metagenomics: novel enzymes from non-culturable microbes. FEMS Microbiol Lett. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx211
Bhardwaj N, Kumar B, Verma PA (2019) A detailed overview of xylanases: an emerging biomolecule for current and future prospective. Bioresour Bioprocess. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-019-0276-2
Bignell DE, Eggleton P (2005) On the elevated intestinal pH of higher termites (Isoptera: Termitidae). Insectes Soc 42(1):57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01245699
Brennan Y, Callen WN, Christoffersen L, Dupree P, Goubet F, Healey S, Hernandez M, Keller M, Li K, Palackal N, Sittenfeld A, Tamayo G, Wells S, Hazlewood GP, Mathur EJ, Short JM, Robertson DE, Steer BA (2004) Unusual microbial xylanases from insect guts. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(6):3609–3617. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.6.3609-3617.2004
Charnock SJ, Spurway TD, Xie H, Beylot MH, Virden R, Warren RA, Hazlewood GP, Gilbert HJ (1998) The topology of the substrate binding clefts of glycosyl hydrolase family 10 xylanases are not conserved. J Biol Chem 273(48):32187–32199. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.48.32187
Chen VB, Arendall WB, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, Murray LW, Richardson JS, Richardson DC (2010) All-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crys 66:16–21. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909042073
Collins T, Gerday C, Feller G (2005) Xylanases, xylanase families and extremophilic xylanases. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29(1):3–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.06.005
Dao TK, Do TH, Le NG, Nguyen HD, Nguyen TQ, Le TTH, Truong NH (2021) Understanding the role of Prevotella genus in the digestion of lignocellulose and other substrates in Vietnamese native goats’ rumen by metagenomic deep sequencing. Animals 11(11):3257. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113257
Dheeran P, Nandhagopal N, Kumar S, Jaiswal YK, Adhikari DK (2012) A novel thermostable xylanase of Paenibacillus macerans IIPSP3 isolated from the termite gut. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39(6):851–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-012-1093-1
Ellilä S, Bromann P, Nyyssönen M, Itävaara M, Koivula A, Paulin L, Kruus K (2019) Cloning of novel bacterial xylanases from lignocellulose-enriched compost metagenomic libraries. AMB Express 9(1):124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0847-9
Fredriksen L, Stokke R, Jensen MS, Westereng B, Jameson JK, Steen IH, Eijsink VGH (2019) Discovery of a thermostable GH10 xylanase with broad substrate specificity from the arctic mid-ocean ridge vent system. Appl Environ Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02970-18
Gabbanelli N, Erbetta E, Sanz Smachetti ME, Lorenzo M, Talia PM, Ramírez I, Vera M, Durruty I, Pontaroli AC, Echarte MM (2021) Towards an ideotype for food-fuel dual-purpose wheat in Argentina with focus on biogas production. Biotechnol Biofuels. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01941-x
Gong X, Gruniniger RJ, Forster RJ, Teather RM, McAllister TA (2013) Biochemical analysis of a highly specific, pH stable xylanase gene identified from a bovine rumen-derived metagenomic library. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97(6):2423–2431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4088-y
Guo B, Chen XL, Sun CY, Zhou BC, Zhang YZ (2009) Gene cloning, expression and characterization of a new cold-active and salt-tolerant endo-beta-1,4-xylanase from marine Glaciecola mesophila KMM 241. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84(6):1107–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2056-y
Hero JS, Pisa JH, Romero CM, Nordberg Karlsson E, Linares-Pastén JA, Martinez MA (2021) Endo-xylanases from Cohnella sp. AR92 aimed at xylan and arabinoxylan conversion into value-added products. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105(18):6759–6778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11495-5
Jacomini D, Bussler L, Corrêa J, Kadowaki M, Maller A, Silva J, Simão R (2020) Cloning, expression and characterization of C. crescentus xynA2 gene and application of Xylanase II in the deconstruction of plant biomass. Mol Biol Rep 47(6):4427–4438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05507-2
Joshi N, Sharma M, Singh SP (2020) Characterization of a novel xylanase from an extreme temperature hot spring metagenome for xylooligosaccharide production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104(11):4889–4901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10562-7
Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Žídek A, Potapenko A, Bridgland A, Meyer C, Kohl SAA, Ballard AJ, Cowie A, Romera-Paredes B, Nikolov S, Jain R, Adler J, Back T, Petersen S, Reiman D, Clancy E, Zielinski M, Steinegger M, Pacholska M, Berghammer T, Bodenstein S, Silver D, Vinyals O, Senior AW, Kavukcuoglu K, Kohli P, Hassabis D (2021) Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596(7873):583–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
Kim DY, Kim J, Lee YM, Lee JS, Shin DH, Ku BH, Son KH, Park HY (2021) Identification and characterization of a novel, cold-adapted d-xylobiose- and d-xylose-releasing endo-β-1,4-xylanase from an Antarctic soil bacterium, Duganella sp. PAMC 27433. Biomolecules 11(5):680. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11050680
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35(6):1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
Lai Z, Zhou C, Ma X, Xue Y, Ma Y (2021) Enzymatic characterization of a novel thermostable and alkaline tolerant GH10 xylanase and activity improvement by multiple rational mutagenesis strategies. Int J Biol Macromol 170:164–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.137
Laskowski RA, Jabłońska J, Pravda L, Vařeková RS, Thornton JM (2018) PDBsum: structural summaries of PDB entries. Protein Sci 27(1):129–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3289
Liew KJ, Liang CH, Lau YT, Yaakop AS, Chan KG, Shahar S, Shamsir MS, Goh KM (2022) Thermophiles and carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) in biofilm microbial consortia that decompose lignocellulosic plant litters at high temperatures. Sci Rep 12:2850. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06943-9
Linares-Pastén JA, Hero JS, Pisa JH, Teixeira C, Nyman M, Adlercreutz P, Martinez MA, Karlsson EN (2021) Novel xylan-degrading enzymes from polysaccharide utilizing loci of Prevotella copri DSM18205. Glycobiology 31(10):1330–1349. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwab056
Liu Z, Zhao X, Bai F (2013) Production of xylanase by an alkaline-tolerant marine-derived Streptomyces viridochromogenes strain and improvement by ribosome engineering. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97(10):4361–4368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4290-y
Liu N, Li H, Chevrette MG, Zhang L, Cao L, Zhou H, Zhou X, Zhou Z, Pope PB, Currie CR, Huang Y, Wang Q (2019) Functional metagenomics reveals abundant polysaccharide-degrading gene clusters and cellobiose utilization pathways within gut microbiota of a wood-feeding higher termite. ISME J 13(1):104–117. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0255-1
Mamo G, Thunnissen M, Hatti-Kaul R, Mattiasson B (2009) An alkaline active xylanase: Insights into mechanisms of high pH catalytic adaptation. Biochimie 91(9):1187–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2009.06.17
Mhiri S, Bouanane-Darenfed A, Jemli S, Neifar S, Ameri R, Mezghani M, Bouacem K, Jaouadi B, Bejar S (2020) A thermophilic and thermostable xylanase from Caldicoprobacter algeriensis: Recombinant expression, characterization and application in paper biobleaching. Int J Biolo Macromol 164:808–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.162
Mo X-c, Chen C-l, Pang H, Feng Y, Feng J-x (2010) Identification and characterization of a novel xylanase derived from a rice straw degrading enrichment culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87(6):2137–2146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2712-2
Narisetty V, Cox R, Bommareddy R, Agrawal D, Ahmad E, Pant KK, Chandel AK, Bhatia SK, Kumar D, Binod P, Gupta VK, Kumar V (2021) Valorisation of xylose to renewable fuels and chemicals, an essential step in augmenting the commercial viability of lignocellulosic biorefineries. Sustain Energ Fuels 6(1):29–65. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1se00927c
Nimchua T, Thongaram T, Uengwetwanit T, Pongpattanakitshote S, Eurwilaichitr L (2012) Metagenomic analysis of novel lignocellulose-degrading enzymes from higher termite guts inhabiting microbes. J Microbiol Biotechnol 22(4):462–469
Pavarina G, Lemos E, Lima N, Sarmanho Pizauro J (2021) Characterization of a new bifunctional endo-1,4-β-xylanase/esterase found in the rumen metagenome. Sci Rep 11:10440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89916-8
Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE (2004) UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25(13):1605–1612. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084
Polizeli ML, Rizzatti ACS, Monti R, Terenzi HF, Jorge JA, Amorim DS (2005) Xylanases from fungi: properties and industrial applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 67(5):577–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-1904-7
Prakash S, Veeranagouda Y, Kyoung L, Sreeramulu K (2009) Xylanase production using inexpensive agricultural wastes and its partial characterization from a halophilic Chromohalobacter sp. TPSV 101. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25(2):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9880-6
Rashamuse K, Sanyika Tendai W, Mathiba K, Ngcobo T, Mtimka S, Brady D (2017) Metagenomic mining of glycoside hydrolases from the hindgut bacterial symbionts of a termite (Trinervitermes trinervoides) and the characterization of a multimodular β-1,4-xylanase (GH11). Biotechnol Appl Biochem 64:174–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/bab.1480
Romano N, Gioffré A, Sede S, Campos E, Cataldi A, Talia P (2013) Characterization of cellulolytic activities of environmental bacterial consortia from an Argentinian native forest. Curr Microbiol 67:138–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-013-0345-2
Romero Victorica M, Soria MA, Batista-García RA, Ceja-Navarro JA, Vikram S, Ortiz M, Ontañon O, Ghio S, Martínez-Ávila L, Quintero García OJ, Etcheverry C, Campos E, Cowan D, Arneodo J, Talia PM (2020) Neotropical termite microbiomes as sources of novel plant cell wall degrading enzymes. Sci Rep 10(1):3864. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60850-5
Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y (2010) I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc 5:725–738. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2010.5
Schymkowitz J, Borg J, Stricher F, Nys R, Rousseau F, Serrano L (2005) The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W382. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki387
Tian L, Liu S, Wang S, Wang L (2016) Ligand-binding specificity and promiscuity of the main lignocellulolytic enzyme families as revealed by active-site architecture analysis. Sci Rep 6:23605. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23605
Tian W, Chen C, Lei X, Zhao J, Liang J (2018) CASTp 3. 0: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 46(W1):W363-w367. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky473
Vacilotto M, Veiga Sepulchro A, Pellegrini V, Polikarpov I (2021) Production of prebiotic xylooligosaccharides from arabino- and glucuronoxylan using a two-domain Jonesia denitrificans xylanase from GH10 family. Enzyme Microb Technol 144:109743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2021.109743
Vasić K, Knez Ž, Leitgeb M (2021) Bioethanol production by enzymatic hydrolysis from different lignocellulosic sources. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26030753
Verma D (2021) Extremophilic prokaryotic endoxylanases: diversity, applicability, and molecular insights. Front Microbiol 12:728475. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.728475
Verma D, Satyanarayana T (2020) Xylanolytic extremozymes retrieved from environmental metagenomes: characteristics, genetic engineering, and applications. Front Microbiol 11:551109. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.551109
Verma D, Kawarabayasi Y, Miyazaki K, Satyanarayana T (2013) Cloning, expression and characteristics of a novel alkalistable and thermostable xylanase encoding gene (Mxyl) retrieved from compost-soil metagenome. PLoS ONE 8(1):e52459. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052459
Vikram S, Arneodo JD, Calcagno J, Ortiz M, Mon ML, Etcheverry C, Cowan DA, Talia P (2021) Diversity structure of the microbial communities in the guts of four neotropical termite species. PeerJ 9:e10959. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10959
Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM (1995) LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng 8(2):127–134. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/8.2.127
Wang G, Wu J, Yan R, Lin J, Ye X (2017a) A novel multi-domain high molecular, salt-stable alkaline xylanase from Alkalibacterium sp. SL3. Front Microbiol 7:2120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02120
Wang H, Li Z, Liu H, Li S, Qiu H-y, Li K, Luo X, Song Y, Wang N, He H, Zhou H, Ma W, Zhang T-C (2017b) Heterologous expression in Pichia pastoris and characterization of a novel GH11 xylanase from saline-alkali soil with excellent tolerance to high pH, high salt concentrations and ethanol. Protein Expr Purif 139:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2017.06.003
Wang J, Liang J, Li Y, Tian L, Wei Y (2021) Characterization of efficient xylanases from industrial-scale pulp and paper wastewater treatment microbiota. AMB Express 11(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01178-1
Wu H, Ioannou E, Henrissat B, Montanier CY, Bozonnet S, O’Donohue MJ, Dumon C (2021a) Multimodularity of a GH10 xylanase found in the termite gut metagenome. Appl Environ Microbiol 87:e01714-e1720. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01714-20
Wu R, Wang L, Xie J, Zhang Z (2021b) Diversity and function of wolf spider gut microbiota revealed by shotgun metagenomics. Front Microbiol 12:758794. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.75879
Yu H, Zhao S, Fan Y, Hu C, Lu W, Guo L (2019) Cloning and heterologous expression of a novel halo/alkali-stable multi-domain xylanase (XylM18) from a marine bacterium Marinimicrobium sp. strain LS-A18. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103(21):8899–8909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10140-6
Zhou J, Wu Q, Zhang R, Mo M, Tang X, Li J, Xu B, Ding J, Lu Q, Huang Z (2014) A thermo-halo-tolerant and proteinase-resistant endoxylanase from Bacillus sp. HJ14. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 59(5):423–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-014-0316-4
MLM, EC and PT are CONICET members. RMDV belongs to the National Institute of Agriculture Technology (INTA). The authors are grateful to Dr. Julia Sabio y García for linguistic improvement in the manuscript.
This study was supported by grants from, the Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) (PI 102, 106, 116, 149 and 159), Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCyT) Proyectos de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (PICT) 2018-#4149 and 2020-#3570, and CONICET Project # PIP-2021-2561, Argentina.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Variation in the control treatments across four independent experiments. The colors of the data points correspond to different experiments. A short degree of noise (jitter) was added to improve the separation between data points. The lower and upper boundaries of the box represent the 75% and 25% percentiles (first and third quartiles) respectively. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation x 100 / mean) was 17.5%.
About this article
Cite this article
Mon, M.L., Marrero Díaz de Villegas, R., Campos, E. et al. Characterization of a novel GH10 alkali-thermostable xylanase from a termite microbiome. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 9, 84 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00572-w