Open Access

Identification of a new thermostable and alkali-tolerant α-carbonic anhydrase from Lactobacillus delbrueckii as a biocatalyst for CO2 biomineralization

Contributed equally
Bioresources and Bioprocessing20152:44

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-015-0074-4

Received: 25 September 2015

Accepted: 19 November 2015

Published: 30 November 2015

Abstract

Background

Carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1), an ancient enzyme and the fastest among many enzymes, is a useful biocatalyst for carbon capture use and storage (CCUS). The use of alkaline buffers and high temperatures are favorable for biomineralization. Hence, the stability of CA under such harsh conditions is extremely important for its practical application.

Methods and results

Herein, we report a new thermostable and alkaline-tolerant α-CA (designated as LdCA), with only 26 % identity to bovine CA (BCA), which was identified by genome mining from Lactobacillus delbrueckii CGMCC 8137. It was overexpressed in Escherichia coli in a soluble form and purified to electrophoretic homogeneity by His-Trap affinity chromatography. The dimer protein had a subunit molecular weight of 23.8 kDa and showed extremely high stability at pH 6.0–11.0 and 30–60 °C. Its activity was maintained even after incubation at 90 °C for 15 min. The half-lives of the enzyme measured at 30, 40, and 50 °C were 630, 370, and 177 h, respectively. At pH 9.0, 10.0, and 11.0, its half-lives were 105, 65, and 41 min, respectively. LdCA was applied at 50 °C to accelerate the formation of calcium carbonate in a vaterite phase.

Conclusions

In summary, a new CA with high thermal and alkaline stability was identified from a general bacterium, demonstrating an effective strategy for discovering new and useful biocatalysts.

Keywords

Lactobacillus delbrueckii α-Carbonic anhydrase Stability Biomineralization

Background

With the development of modern industry, increases in the atmospheric concentrations of CO2, which is one of the main greenhouse gases, have led to several undesirable consequences such as global warming and associated changes (Hewett-Emmett and Tashian 1996). To this effect, various solutions have been proposed and applied, not only to reduce the concentration of CO2, but also to recover CO2 for reuse under the carbon capture use and storage (CCUS) scheme. The critical and rate-limiting step of these processes is the hydration of CO2, with a reaction constant of 6.2 × 10−3 s at 25 °C (Sullivan et al. 1993). Therefore, it is necessary to explore a new method to accelerate this reaction.

A series of physical and chemical technologies for speeding up CO2 hydration have been reported and received considerable attention over the last decade (Abu-Khader 2006). However, transformation processes using inorganic catalysts and alkaline media are costly, poisonous, and tedious. Contrarily, similar processes catalyzed by enzymes are considerably cheaper, more environmentally friendly, and energy efficient (Alvizo et al. 2014). Thus, bio-based capture is a very important and promising alternative to consider in the future.

Carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1), an ancient enzyme, is known as the fastest enzyme with a maximal k cat of 106 s−1. It is a zinc metalloenzyme that catalyzes the interconversion between CO2 and HCO3 (Supuran and De Simone 2015), and is undoubtedly the most suitable and direct catalyst for CCUS (Sathaye et al. 2006). The enzyme was first discovered in red blood cells and subsequently identified in most organisms including animals, plants, archaebacteria, and eubacteria (Smith and Ferry 2000). Some CAs have been isolated and characterized from different species. The enzymes exist in five distinct classes (α, β, γ, δ, and ε); the first three classes of enzymes are found in almost all prokaryotes, undertaking important physiological functions such as CO2 and ion transport, and CO2/bicarbonate balance required for biosynthetic reactions (Smith et al. 1999).

Additionally, CA is useful for in vitro processes. Among several carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies, biotechnology using CA for biomimetic CaCO3 mineralization holds much promise because it is viable and environmentally benign (Liu et al. 2005). An integrated system was developed, whereby CA was used to accelerate the hydration of CO2 (Bond et al. 2001). The feasibility of using CA as a catalyst for CO2 hydration and its precipitation to calcium carbonate was demonstrated (Liu et al. 2005; Mirjafari et al. 2007). At higher pH, two phases of CaCO3 (calcite and vaterite) were observed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Favre et al. 2009). Conversely, at pH values below 8.5, very few CO3 2− ions were detected and little precipitation was observed (Jo et al. 2013).

Undoubtedly, thermostability significantly affects the application of CA in CCUS processes. Most thermostable CAs were identified in archaebacteria such as MtCA from Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum (Smith and Ferry 1999). Only a few brief studies have been reported on methods using CAs to facilitate CO2 adsorption and sequestration, and the results were unsatisfactory owing to the high costs and lack of stability.

Several methods have been proposed to overcome the problems of long operation times and low stability across a wide range of pH values and temperatures. For example, BCA was immobilized in three different matrices, i.e., acrylamide, alginate, and chitosan–alginate that improved CA stability at elevated temperatures (Bond et al. 2001). Additionally, CA from Neisseria gonorrhoeae (ngCA) was highly expressed in the periplasm of Escherichia coli in a soluble form (Jo et al. 2013). However, such a process increased the cost of CA and was difficult to scale up to an industrial level. Therefore, a new CA with high stability and activity is still highly desirable for CO2 hydration.

In this work, a new and highly stable CA was identified from Lactobacillus delbrueckii CGMCC 8137. It is the first thermostable α-CA cloned from this genus, and displayed a relatively high activity even following incubation at 90 °C for 15 min. Owing to its excellent thermal and alkaline stability, LdCA appears to be promising for application in CCUS. Herein, as merely 1 mg of protein (cell free extract) was added to the reaction system, as much as 183 mg of CaCO3 was yielded at 50 °C within 5 min. The crystallographic nature and crystal shape of the resulting solid were determined by XRD and SEM.

Methods

Bacterial strains and vectors

Escherichia coli DH 5α and E. coli BL21 (DE3), routinely grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium, were used as the cloning and expression hosts, respectively (Du et al. 2014). Kanamycin (50 μg ml−1) was used for the selection of recombinant strains in E. coli. Lactobacillus delbrueckii was obtained from China General Microbiological Cultures Center, with an accession number of CGMCC 8137. Other strains used in this study are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. Cells were cultured as described previously (Qian et al. 2011). Vector pET-28a (+) for heterogeneous expression studies (Chen et al. 2015) was obtained from Novagen (Shanghai, China).

Gene identification, cloning, and construction of expression plasmids

Homologous protein sequences of BCA were collected from NCBI protein sequence database using pBLAST search. Sequences were chosen with identities under 40 %. The genomic DNA of different microorganisms was extracted and purified using the TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit from Tiangen (Shanghai, China).

PCR reaction conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min, and finally 72 °C for 10 min. The restriction sites and the oligonucleotides used as forward and reverse primers are listed in Additional file 2: Table S2. All the homologous genes were subcloned into expression vector pET-28a (+), and recombinant proteins were fused with C terminus His-tag. The gene insertion was verified by DNA sequencing. The constructs were transformed into E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) which had the gene for T7 RNA polymerase under the control of the lac promoter for overproduction of the CAs.

Expression and purification

The protein expression in E. coli BL21 (DE3) was induced by addition of 0.5 mM IPTG and 0.5 mM ZnSO4 (final concentrations) and incubation at 25 or 16 °C and 180 rpm for 10 or 20 h. The induced culture broth was harvested by centrifugation (15,483×g), washed, and re-suspended in Tris-HCl buffer (25 mM, pH 8.3), followed by sonication with an ultrasonic oscillator (JY92-II, Scientz Biotech Co.) for cell breakage. The supernatant and pellet fractions were separated by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm (23,225×g) for 10 min at 4 °C, and the protein expression was analyzed by SDS-PAGE (15 % gel).

For purification, the resultant supernatant was loaded onto a Ni-NTA column (5 ml, GE Healthcare Co.) equilibrated with buffer A (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole). The proteins were eluted with an increasing gradient of imidazole from 10 to 500 mM in buffer A at a flow rate of 5 ml/min. The purity of fractions was examined by SDS-PAGE. The fractions containing the target protein were collected and dialyzed against 25 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.3) for desalting. The protein concentration and CA activity were determined by the Bradford method (Bradford 1976) with bovine serum albumin as standard and Wilbur–Anderson method (Wilbur and Anderson 1948), respectively.

Protein analysis

Gel electrophoresis was performed on 15 % SDS-polyacrylamide gel with Tris-glycine buffer system. Protein bands were visualized by staining the gel with silver stain. The apparent molecular masses were determined by gel filtration chromatography using a TSK gel 2000SWxl column (Tosoh, Japan) connected to an HPLC system equilibrated with 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.7) containing 0.1 M Na2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. Protein molecular weight standards were horse heart cytochrome c (12.4 kDa), bovine carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa), bovine serum albumin (66 kDa), yeast alcohol dehydrogenase (150 kDa), and sweet potato β-amylase (200 kDa) from Sigma (Shanghai, China).

CO2 hydration activity assay

The activity of LdCA was detected using an accommodating electrometric method of Wilbur–Anderson (Wilbur and Anderson 1948). It was followed with some modifications. The samples were assayed at 0 °C by adding 0.1 ml of the enzyme solution or buffer to 6 ml of 25 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.3). The reaction was initiated by the addition of 4 ml ice-chilled CO2-saturated water (pH 3.8). The activity measured in the special unit (WAU) was calculated with the equation (t c  − t)/t, where t is the time required for the drop in two units of pH from 8.3 to 6.3 was measured, while t c (control) is the time required for the pH change when buffer was substituted for the test sample. Values presented were the means of three replications. The protein content was estimated using the Bradford method.

pH and temperature stability

To investigate the effect of temperature on LdCA, the samples were incubated at different temperatures from 30 to 90 °C for 15 min, and then its activity was assayed at 0 °C under conditions similar to the standard assay. The tolerance of pH was assayed in different buffers (pH 3.0–11.0): sodium citrate for pH values ranging from 3.0 to 5.0, sodium phosphate for pH values ranging from 5.0 to 8.0, and Glycine–NaOH for pH values ranging from 8.0 to 11.0. The samples were incubated in different buffers for 30 min. Then, the residual activity was detected as described above. The half-lives of pH 9.0, 10.0, and 11.0 were also detected. The samples were incubated in Glycine–NaOH buffer at 30 °C. At intervals predetermined, samples of the enzyme were withdrawn, and their residual activities were measured under the standard assay condition.

Thermostability test

For the evaluation of stability, the purified LdCA was preincubated in PBS buffer (pH 6.3) at 30, 40, 50, or 60 °C. The purified protein was diluted to a concentration of approximately 1 mg/ml. At intervals predetermined, samples of the enzyme were withdrawn, and their residual activities were measured under the standard assay condition.

Sequestration of CO2 in CaCO3

The sequestration of CO2 was performed at high pH and temperature. CO2 saturated solution using purified water was prepared at room temperature as described. The precipitation was detected via A600 using UV/vis spectrophotometer to monitor the turbidity of the reaction system. 500 μl of CO2-saturated water was added to a reaction cuvette containing 450 μl buffer (1 M Tris, 20 mM CaCl2, pH 9.0, 10.0 or 11.0) and 50 μl of samples (or Tris buffer as blank) and throughly mixed. Immediately after the cuvette was closed with a plastic cap to prevent CO2 leakage, the reaction was performed at 30 °C. No additional Zn2+ was added into the reaction mixture, since the active enzyme has contained the desired metal ions in a state of complex with the protein. The natural culture medium used for fermentation of the enzyme contains a trace but enough amount of various metal ions including Zn2+ for cell growth and enzyme function. The required time for onset of precipitation (defined here as the first second of the time period that showed an average rate of increase more than 0.001 A600/s) was recorded. Once precipitation was detected, initial slopes of absorbance curves were used to compare relative rates (Li et al. 2013).

Preparation and characterization of CaCO3 solid crystals

At pH 11.0, the reaction volume was scaled up to 100 ml at 30, 40, 50 °C to prepare enough solid powder for further characterization. The cell free extract (1 mg) was added to the reaction system, in 5 min, the reaction was terminated, and the mixture was filtered through 0.22-μm-pore membrane filters. The powder left on the membrane was dried at 65 °C until constant weight. To follow up quantitatively the generation of Ca-carbonate, the free Ca2+ concentration in the CaCl2 solution was determined by EDTA titration (Slowinski et al. 2011).

The identities and polymorphs of the precipitates were analyzed by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) with D/max 2550 V, using Cu α radiation operated at 40 kV and 100 mA. To determine the crystal morphology, imaging by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed with S-3400N under an electrical tension of 15 kV.

Results

Expression, purification, and identification of LdCA

To obtain an efficient and new carbonic anhydrase from microorganisms, homologous protein sequences of the α-CA family were collected from the NCBI protein sequence database using pBLAST. We chose 10 potential sequence encoding α-CA (Additional file 3: Table S3) and overexpressed them in Escherichia coli cells. During the screening process, the enzyme (LdCA) from Lactobacillus delbrueckii CGMCC 8137, YP_618592.1, showed significant activity (110 WAU/mg). A BLAST search revealed that LdCA has 26 % homology with BCA.

LdCA with an N-terminal His-tag was purified to electrophoretic homogeneity by nickel affinity chromatography. The specific activity of the enzyme after purification reached 468 WAU/mg with a purification fold of 4.54. The purified enzyme migrated as a single band with a size of about 23.8 kDa on SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1), a molecular weight in agreement with that predicted from the gene sequence.
Fig. 1

SDS-PAGE of purified LdCA. A 15 % gel was used for analysis. Lane 1 Cell free extract of LdCA; Lane 2 purified LdCA with a molecular weight of 23.8 kDa

For analyzing the sequence of LdCA, an alignment of the amino acid sequence of some CAs belonging to the same family of LdCA was done (Additional file 4: Figure S1). Compared with Human CAs I and II, and CAs from Neisseria, Synechococcus, and Rhodopseudomona, LdCA possesses the amino acids involved in the catalytic cycle of this class of enzymes: the Zn (II) binding residues His 81, His 83, and His 97 (based on the LdCA numbering). These three residues probably coordinate to the metal ion, similarly to other α-CAs investigated to date, of which some of the X-ray crystal structures have been reported (Smith and Ferry 2000). Likewise to the majority of such CAs, coordination of the zinc ion by three His residues and one H2O ligand represents the “closed” status. Hence, the protein only exhibits activity when the H2O is replaced by a hydroxide ion upon salt bridge formation between the H2O and Thr158 residue. Thus, the fourth metal ligand becomes a strong nucleophile that can attack CO2 for conversion into bicarbonate.

pH stability and thermostability of LdCA

When considering the application of CA in industry-based processes, thermostability and pH stability are key factors to examine that significantly influence the efficiency and cost of such enzyme-based CCUS technology. Enzymes that exhibit a wide pH and temperature tolerance are more suitable for CCUS. Thus, pH stability and thermostability tests were performed under the following conditions.

As shown in Fig. 2, LdCA displayed stable activities under alkaline pH from 8.0 to 11.0; however, LdCA was the most stable at pH 6.0. Similar results were documented for CA from Enterobacter taylorae. The Bovine erythrocyte CA displayed activity in the pH range of 6.5–7.5 and temperature range of 35–40 °C.
Fig. 2

The stability of pH on activity of purified LdCA. The assay was carried out at 0 °C with CO2 as a substrate, using 25 mM of different buffers for incubation: sodium citrate (circle); sodium phosphate (diamond); glycine–NaOH (triangle). The enzyme activity measured without any treatment was taken as 100 %

Stability of CA at high temperatures (40–60 °C) is required in postcombustion CCS (Lee et al. 2010; Savile and Lalonde 2011). Surprisingly, the activity of LdCA was retained following incubation at 90 °C for 15 min; this represents the best result obtained to date among all the α-CAs cloned from bacteria. Additionally, the data were comparable with other thermostable CAs. The residual activity of BcCA cloned from Bacillus clausii was only 8 % following incubation at 80 °C. The half-life of immobilized BCA at 60 °C is ~10 min (Bonra and Ekrem 2010).

From 30 to 60 °C, the enzyme displayed minimal activity loss and deactivated very slowly. With the increase of temperatures from 60 to 80 °C, the enzyme retained ~80 % activity at 60 °C and dropped to ~30 % activity at 80 °C. Moreover, still a 5 % residual activity was observed at 90 °C (Fig. 3). The half-life of LdCA was then assessed. As observed in Fig. 4, LdCA preserved at least 70 % activity at 30 °C for 240 h. When the incubation temperature was further increased, the enzyme slowly lost its activity. After 100 h of reaction at 60 °C, 15 % of LdCA remained active. Based on the measured deactivation rate constant (k d), the half-lives of LdCA were calculated to be 630, 370, and 177 h at 30, 40, and 50 °C, respectively. The half-lives of LdCA at alkaline pHs of 9.0, 10.0, and 11.0 were 105, 65, and 41 min, respectively (Fig. 5). These results indicate that this new enzyme is very stable at high temperatures and relatively tolerant to alkaline buffers that are suitable properties for CO2 biomineralization. To our knowledge, this is the first example of a thermostable α-CA cloned from bacteria Lactobacillus species. Previously, studies were focused on data mining of archaebacteria, and only one patent is available concerning thermostable CAs cloned from Bacillus clausii for application in CCUS (Borchert and Saunders 2010). Though the current obtained activity is not as high as that of commercial enzyme BCA, the low homology to BCA and extremely high thermostability suggest that the discovered LdCA may become a useful enzyme.
Fig. 3

The effect of temperature on activity of purified LdCA. The assay was carried out at 0 °C with CO2 as a substrate, using 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3) as buffer. Purified enzyme was preincubated at 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 °C for 15 min. The enzyme activity measured without any pre-treatment was taken as 100 %

Fig. 4

Thermostability of purified LdCA in a temperature range of 30–60 °C. The purified enzyme was incubated at 30 °C (circle), 40 °C (diamond), 50 °C (triangle), 60 °C (cubic) in 25 mM PBS (pH 6.0), respectively. Values are means of three parallel experiments

Fig. 5

Inactivation profiles of the purified LdCA in a range of pH 9.0–11.0. The purified enzyme was incubated at pH 9.0 (cubic), pH 10.0 (circle), or pH 11.0 (triangle) in 25 mM PBS (pH 6.0), respectively, for a certain period of time. Values are means of three parallel experiments

Acceleration of biomineralization

To assess the ability of LdCA to accelerate the biomineralization, the conversion of CO2 into CaCO3 was examined. In the presence of Ca2+ and CO3 2−, precipitation occurred within a short time. CO3 2− is produced from HCO3 at a high pH (i.e., pH 11.0) because the pK a for HCO3 dissociation is very high (10.3) (Lowry et al. 1951). However, CA cannot shift the equilibrium but rather accelerates the rate of this reaction. It has been reported that higher pH and temperatures are favorable for the reaction. In fact, almost no CO3 2− ions exist at pH values lower than 9.0 and high temperatures will accelerate the reaction, consequently affording cooling costs reduction of the industrial gas. Furthermore, vaterite can form at high pH (Ki et al. 2013). Owing to the adequate stability of LdCA, we chose pH 11.0 and 3050 °C as the reaction conditions. As observed, the reaction was completed within shorter periods at increasing temperatures (Additional file 5: Figure S2; Additional file 6: Figure S3; Additional file 7: Figure S4), and the reaction slowed down at lower pH (Additional file 8: Figure S5; Additional file 9: Figure S6). When the reaction was scaled up to 100 mL at pH 11.0, the process could also be completed within 5 min. Using a LdCA catalyst load of 1 mg at 50 °C, the conversion was 91.8 % and CaCO3 yield was 183 mg. In the absence of the enzyme catalyst, both the conversion and yield were lower.

To determine the crystal nature and morphology of the precipitates, XRD and SEM analyses were conducted. The morphological characteristics of the calcite and vaterite particles assessed by SEM are illustrated in Fig. 6. Vaterite was observed as spherical particles owing to its more complex packing structure. Moreover, the spherical vaterite particles were porous, unlike the slender planar calcite crystals that grew on the external surface of the vaterite particles. Based on the SEM analysis, at increasing temperatures from 30 to 50 °C, the particles featured better dispersibility properties and were more regularly shaped.
Fig. 6

SEM images of the CaCO3 precipitates obtained by the different samples at 50 °C. The scale bars in the SEM images are 10 μm for ×3000 (left) and 5 μm for ×10,000 (right)

A large difference in the XRD patterns of the enzyme and enzyme-free systems was observed. In the absence of CA, the precipitate was primarily presented as the thermodynamically stable calcite phase, whereas the metastable vaterite phase dominated when the reaction was catalyzed by CA at all temperatures tested. The diffraction peaks at 2θ 29.38° and 43.90° correspond to calcite. The other main peaks at 14.18, 20.14, and 22.54 degrees were attributed to vaterite (Fig. 7). Both phases feature a hexagonal structure (Kamhi 1963; Graf 1961); however, a more complex packing was observed on the spherical surface of the vaterite crystals. Furthermore, some results have shown that calcite is the major phase obtained upon precipitation in the presence of CA (Favre et al. 2009; Li et al. 2010).
Fig. 7

XRD peaks of the CaCO3 precipitates obtained by the different samples at 30, 40, and 50 °C. The lower black line is the biomimetically produced CaCO3 and the upper red line is the naturally produced CaCO3

Because the concentration of the protein was very low in our experiments, precipitate formation could be explained by the onset of a dissolution–reprecipitation process during aging. In this process, CA served as a catalyst to speed up the successive formation of HCO3 and CO3 2−. Thus, the final aging process occurred at an early stage, resulting in a faster precipitate formation. So, conversion of CaCO3 from the metastable vaterite phase to the thermodynamically calcite phase did not occur owing to lack of time. Additionally, the crystal nuclei that were well diffused in water did not facilitate crystal assembly.

Under the precipitation condition (pH 11.0), bicarbonate ions existed in equilibrium with carbonate ions, and in the presence of calcium ions, calcium carbonate precipitation took place (Sharma et al. 2011). Thus, CA plays an important role in the hydration reaction corresponding to calcium carbonate formation, with vaterite as the dominant form. Therefore, the application of an efficient, thermostable, and alkaline-tolerant CA will open up new avenues for cost-effective sequestration technologies of CO2 into CaCO3.

Feasibility for practical biomineralization using LdCA

A few studies on biomineralization using CA from various microorganisms, such as Pseudomonas fragi, Micrococcus lylae, and Micrococcus luteus, have been reported (Graf 1961). Additionally, a study on constructing a whole-cell system with recombinant CA by surface display technology was also reported (Fan et al. 2011). However, all these studies resulted in relatively low enzyme activities, and the calcite was generally obtained as the major product. Hence, the use of a stable enzyme, such as LdCA, that does require any pre-treatment, is crucial and highly desirable.

The first detailed investigation on the economic impact of using biologically catalyzed systems for mineralization was recently reported (Barbero et al. 2013). The study demonstrates that expenditure can be further reduced (by 4 %) if the precipitation catalyst can be used for longer times. The half-life of free LdCA is about 60 times longer than the engineered system at 50 °C (Table 1). It is reasonable to expect that application of the enzyme can attain cost reduction by 16 %.
Table 1

Comparison of activities among various CAs

Entry

Microorganism or system

Activity (unit)

Half-life at 50 °C (h)

Crystal form of carbonate

Conversion (50 °C/5 min)a

References

1

P. fragi

70.6 (U/mg)

4

ND

53.3

Sharma et al. (2011)

2

M. lylae

66.5 (U/mg)

4

ND

48.8

Sharma et al. (2011)

3

M. luteus

61.0 (U/mg)

8

ND

44.4

Sharma et al. (2011)

4

INP-N-CA

6.54 × 10−2 (nU/cell)

ND

Calcite and vaterite

ND

Fan et al. (2011)

5

CA2 surface-displaying yeast cellsb

2.69 × 10−1 (nU/cell)c

ND

Calcite and vaterite

ND

Barbero et al. (2013)

6

periCA

1.90 (nU/cell)c

5

Calcite

ND

Jo et al. (2013)

7

LdCA

454.0 (U/mg)

177

Vaterite

91.2

This work

aConversions were determined by the weight of carbonate quantity after drying

bEngineering system. This is the name of the gene construct, rather than the name of the recombinant strain

cnU/cell represents the single-cell activity of each system

Conclusions

In this paper, we report the cloning of a thermostable CA (LdCA) identified from Lactobacillus species and its application as enzyme catalyst for the precipitation of CaCO3 to generate vaterite at 50 °C for the first time. The newly discovered enzyme shows potential for application in CCUS owing to its acceptable catalytic activity and extremely high thermostability that are desirable attributes for CO2 biomineralization. Future work will focus on the application and immobilization of this new enzyme to improve its catalytic property. Improvements may be acquired via protein engineering approaches including directed evolution, rational design, or a combination of these techniques.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

CXL and JHX designed the experiments and modified the manuscript. XCJ performed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (2011CB710800) and the State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, People’s Republic of China.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Synthetic Biotechnology, State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology
(2)
Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center for Biomanufacturing

References

  1. Abu-Khader MM (2006) Recent progress in CO2 capture/sequestration: a review. Energ Sour Part A 28:1261–1279View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvizo O, Nguyen LJ, Savile CK, Bresson JA, Lakhapatri SL, Solis EOP, Fox RJ, Broering JM, Benoit MR, Zimmerman SA, Novick SJ, Liang J, Lalonde JJ (2014) Directed evolution of an ultrastable carbonic anhydrase for highly efficient carbon capture from flue gas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:16436–16441View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbero R, Carnelli L, Simon A, Kao A, Monforte AD, Ricco M, Bianchi D, Belcher A (2013) Engineered yeast for enhanced CO2 mineralization. Energy Environ Sci 6:660–674View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond GM, Stringer J, Brandvold DK, Simsek FA, Medina MG, Egeland G (2001) Development of integrated system for biomimetic CO2 sequestration using the enzyme carbonic anhydrase. Energy Fuels 15:309–316View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonra K, Ekrem O (2010) Thermal stability of carbonic anhydrase immobilized within polyurethane foam. AIChE J 26:1474–1480Google Scholar
  6. Borchert M, Saunders P (2010) Heat-stable carbonic anhydrases and their use. US Pat 20100297723:A1Google Scholar
  7. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal Chem 72:248–254Google Scholar
  8. Chen J, Luo XJ, Chen Q, Pan J, Zhou J, Xu JH (2015) Marked enhancement of Acinetobacter sp. organophosphorus hydrolase activity by a single residue substitution Ile211Ala. Bioresour Bioprocess 2:39Google Scholar
  9. Du FL, Yu HL, Xu JH, Li CX (2014) Enhanced limonene production by optimizing the expression of limonene biosynthesis and MEP pathway genes in E. coli. Bioresour Bioprocess 1:10Google Scholar
  10. Fan LH, Liu N, Yu MR et al (2011) Cell surface display of carbonic anhydrase on Escherichia coli using ice nucleation protein for CO2 sequestration. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:2853–2864View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Favre N, Christ ML, Pierre AC (2009) Biocatalytic capture of CO2 with carbonic anhydrase and its transformation into solid carbonate. J Mol Catal B Enzym 60:163–170View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Graf DL (1961) Crystallographic tables for the rhombohedral carbonates. Am Miner 46:1283–1315Google Scholar
  13. Hewett-Emmett D, Tashian RE (1996) Functional diversity, conservation, and convergence in the evolution of the α-, β-, and γ-carbonic anhydrase gene families. Mol Phylogenet Evol 5:50–77View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Jo BH, Kim IG, Seo JH, Kang DG, Cha HJ (2013) Engineered Escherichia coli with periplasmic carbonic anhydrase as biocatalyst for CO2 sequestration. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:6697–6705View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kamhi SR (1963) On the structure of vaterite CaCO3. Acta Cristallogr 16:770–772View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ki MR, Min K, Kanth BK, Lee J, Pack SP (2013) Expression, reconstruction and characterization of codon-optimized carbonic anhydrase from Hahella chejuensis for CO2 sequestration application. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 36:375–381View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee SW, Park SB, Jeong SK, Lim KS, Lee SH, Trachtenberg MC (2010) On carbon dioxide storage based on biomineralization strategies. Micron 41:273–282View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Li W, Liu L, Chen W, Yu L, Li W, Yu H (2010) Calcium carbonate precipitation and crystal morphology induced by microbial carbonic anhydrase and other biological factors. Process Biochem 238:208–214Google Scholar
  19. Li W, Chen WS, Zhou PP et al (2013) Influence of initial calcium ion concentration on the precipitation and crystal morphology of calcium carbonate induced by bacterial carbonic anhydrase. Chem Eng J 218:65–72View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu N, Bond GM, Abel A et al (2005) Biomimetic sequestration of CO2 in carbonate form: role of produced waters and other brines. Fuel Process Technol 86:1615–1625View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lowry OH, Rosenbrough NJ, Forr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1193:265–275Google Scholar
  22. Mirjafari P, Asghari K, Mahinpey N (2007) Investigating the application of enzyme carbonic anhydrase for CO2 sequestration purposes. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:921–926View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Qian L, Liu JY, Liu JY, Yu HL, Li CX, Xu JH (2011) Fingerprint lipolytic enzymes with chromogenic p-nitrophenyl esters of structurally diverse carboxylic acids. J Mol Catal B Enzym 73:22–26Google Scholar
  24. Sathaye J, Shukla PR, Ravindranath NH (2006) Climate change, sustainable development and India: global and national concerns. Curr Sci 3:90–95Google Scholar
  25. Savile CK, Lalonde JJ (2011) Biotechnology for the acceleration of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22:818–823View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Sharma A, Bhattacharya A, Shrivastava A (2011) Biomimetic CO2 sequestration using purified carbonic anhydrase from indigenous bacterial strains immobilized on biopolymeric materials. Enzyme Microb Technol 48:416–426View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Slowinski EJ, Wolsey WC, Rossi RC (2011) Chemical principles in the laboratory, 10th edn. Cengage Learning, StandfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith KS, Ferry JG (1999) A plant type (β-class) carbonic anhydrase in the thermophilic methanoarchaeon Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. J Bacteriol 181:6247–6253Google Scholar
  29. Smith KS, Ferry JG (2000) Prokaryotic carbonic anhydrases. FEMS Microbiol Rev 24:335–366View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith KS, Jakubzick C, Whittam TS (1999) Carbonic anhydrase is an ancient enzyme widespread in prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:15184–15189View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Sullivan BP, Kirst K, Guard HE (1993) Electrical and electrocatalytical reactions of carbon dioxide, Chapter 5. Elsevier, New York, pp 118–144Google Scholar
  32. Supuran CT, De Simone G (2015) Carbonic anhydrases as biocatalysts. Elsevier Science and Technology, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilbur KM, Anderson NG (1948) Electrometric and colorimetric determination of carbonic anhydrase. J Biol Chem 176:147–154Google Scholar

Copyright

© Li et al. 2015

Advertisement