- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Utilization of durian seed for Monascus fermentation and its application as a functional ingredient in yogurt
Bioresources and Bioprocessing volume 9, Article number: 128 (2022)
Abstract
As a widely consumed fermented milk product, yogurt undergoes constant development to increase its functional properties. Monascus purpureus-fermented durian seed, which has been proven to possess antioxidative properties, has the potential to improve yogurt properties. This study aimed to analyze the use of Monascus-fermented durian seed (MFDS) as a functional ingredient in yogurt and its effect on physicochemical properties, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) count, antioxidative properties, and consumer acceptability of set-type yogurt during refrigeration. Changes in physicochemical properties, including color, pH, titratable acidity, syneresis, LAB count, total phenolic content (TPC), and antioxidant activity were evaluated at 7-day intervals during 14 days of refrigerated storage (4 °C). Sensory evaluations were carried out for freshly made samples after 7 days of storage. The results showed that the addition of MFDS to yogurt gave significant effects on some of the parameters measured. Yogurt with added MFDS powder produced a more red color (L = 88.55 ± 1.28, a* = 2.63 ± 0.17, b* = 11.45 ± 1.15, c = 11.75 ± 1.15, H = 77.00 ± 0.64), reached the highest TPC (2.21 ± 0.46 mg/GAE g), antioxidant activity (0.0125 ± 0.0032 mg GAE/g), and syneresis (5.24 ± 0.51%) throughout 14 days of storage. The addition of MFDS only gave a slight difference to pH and titratable acidity, while no significant difference was made for LAB count. For sensory evaluation, the addition of MFDS, particularly the ethanol extract, to yogurt was well-liked by panelists. Citrinin content in MFDS yogurt can be decreased under the limits set. Overall, the addition of MFDS has a high potential of improving yogurt properties, particularly its antioxidative properties.
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
Yogurt is a fermented dairy product usually produced with Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus. Yogurt is rich in activity probiotics and nutritional compounds, such as calcium, protein, and potassium (Gahruie et al. 2015; Liu and Lv 2018). Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in yogurt are credited with improving digestion, harmful bacteria growth suppression in the gastrointestinal tract, the bioavailability of milk constituents, alleviation of lactose intolerance, cancer suppression, and hypocholesterolemic effects (Shiby and Mishra 2013; Aryana and Olson 2017). Owing to its functional properties, yogurt has been widely consumed for thousands of years and undergoes constant development to improve its health benefits. One of the most common ways to improve yogurt quality is by adding functional ingredients, such as essential oils (Comunian et al. 2017), fruits, flowers (Chouchouli et al. 2013; Marchiani et al. 2015; Sah et al. 2016; Liu and Lv 2018; Dimitrellou et al. 2020), green tea and coffee powders (Dönmez et al. 2017), and Monascus-fermented products (Jeon et al. 2011; Abdel-Raheam et al. 2019).
Monascus-fermented products are substrates fermented by Monascus sp., typically from the three species: Monascus purpureus, Monascus pilosus, and Monascus ruber. The most notable Monascus product is red mold rice or commonly known in Indonesia as angkak, which is a Monascus-fermented rice product. These products have been commonly used as food colorants and dietary material due to the secondary metabolites produced during fermentation: Monascus pigments, monacolin K, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and dimerumic acid (Lee and Pan 2012). These compounds have been reported to have bioactivities, such as anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antimicrobial, antiobesity, antidiabetic, and antihypercholesterolemia (Srianta et al. 2021). Jeon et al. (2011) reported on the addition of Monascus sp. and Lactobacillus sp. fermented Chinese yam (Dioscorea batatas) powder in yogurt and found that the addition increased total phenolic content, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activity, reducing power, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity, and GABA content of yogurt in comparison to the control. Abdel-Raheam et al. (2019) also reported that the addition of red, orange and yellow pigments from Monascus ruber fermentation in yogurt received high acceptability scores on texture, odor, color, taste, and overall acceptability. These results show the potential of Monascus-fermented products to be added as a yogurt ingredient, especially with substrates other than rice.
Durian is one of the many tropical fruits largely produced in Indonesia. Waste from durian production can go as high as 70% which consists of shells and seeds (Purnomo et al. 2016). Srianta et al. (2012), Subianto et al. (2013), and Nugerahani et al. (2017) reported that Monascus purpureus fermentation on durian seeds is possible and has been proven to exhibit antioxidant, antihypercholesterol, and antidiabetic activities due to Monascus pigments, phenolics, and monacolin K. These compounds have different polarities, which could affect MFDS bioactivity according to the extraction solvent (Subianto et al. 2013). This raises the potential of Monascus-fermented durian seeds (MFDS) of various forms to be sustainable and functional ingredients for food products, especially yogurts. This study aimed to analyze the use of MFDS as a functional ingredient in yogurt and its effect on physicochemical properties, LAB count, antioxidative properties, and consumer acceptability of set-type yogurt during refrigeration.
Materials and methods
Monascus-fermented durian seed preparation
The durian seeds of the Petruk variety were provided by a local durian product seller in Surabaya, Indonesia. The seeds were washed clean, sorted, and kept in the freezer (Sharp, Japan) at − 20 °C before use. The seeds were thawed for 30 min (30 °C), washed, weighed, and heated with 5% (w/v) Ca(OH)2 solution (1:1) for 10 min at 85–90 °C. The seeds were washed and separated from their skin, diced into smaller pieces (1 cm3), weighed (50 g/batch) inside 250 mL titration flasks, sterilized with an autoclave (121 °C, 15 lbs/inch2, 15 min, Hirayama, Saitama, Japan), and cooled to 30 °C. The sterilized durian seeds were inoculated with 5% (v/w) Monascus purpureus M9 (NCBI Accession Number: HM188425.1) and left to ferment for 14 days at 30 °C to obtain MFDS. The MFDS was then dried in an oven for 24 h at 45 °C (Binder, Germany), ground, and sieved (80 mesh) to obtain MFDS powder. MFDS powder would then be analyzed for citrinin content.
MFDS powder was then extracted with two different solvents, water and ethanol. MFDS that had been weighed were extracted with sterile distilled water (1:50 w/v) using a shaking water bath (LabTech, Hopkinton, Massachusetts) at 100 rpm, 40 °C, for 1 h and strained using a vacuum pump to obtain the MFDS water extract. The MFDS ethanol extract was made by extracting MFDS powder with ethanol (1:50 w/v) using the Soxhlet method for 2.5 h. The extract was then evaporated with a rotary evaporator (70 °C, 50 rpm, Buchi, Switzerland) and rehydrated with sterile distilled water. Both MFDS extracts were pasteurized for 30 min at 70 °C in a water bath (Faithful, Hebei, China) and stored at 4 °C.
Yogurt preparation
Commercial ultra-high temperature sterilized full cream milk (Ultrajaya, Indonesia) was purchased from a local market. Granulated sugar (10% w/v) and skimmed milk powder (2.2% w/v) were added to the milk and mixed thoroughly. The mixture was pasteurized at 90 °C for 5 min above a Bunsen burner fire. Gelatin (0.8% w/v) and MFDS treatments as illustrated in Table 1 were added to the mixture at 80 °C. After it was homogenously mixed, the mixture was taken off the fire and cooled in an ice bath to 41 °C. Commercial yogurt starter (a mixture of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, and Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lallemand, France) of 0.3% (w/v) was inoculated and mixed into the yogurt mixture. The mixture was poured into sterile plastic cups with some put aside for pH analysis. Fermentation was conducted at 42 °C for 4 h to obtain MFDS yogurt. Color, syneresis, titratable acidity, pH, total LAB count, antioxidant activity, phenolic content, and sensory evaluation were determined after fermentation. The yogurt samples were cooled at 4 °C for 14 days and underwent analysis of the parameters mentioned at 7-day intervals.
Physicochemical analysis
Color parameters of lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*) were determined by using a color reader (Konica Minolta, Japan). Chroma and hue parameters were further derived from a* and b* values based on Eqs. (1) and (2):
Syneresis analysis was conducted according to Amatayakul et al. (2006). The yogurt samples inside the plastic cups were weighed to obtain the initial weights before the cups were tilted to 45° for whey extraction with a pipette and filtration paper. After extraction, the yogurt samples were weighed to obtain the final weight. Syneresis percentage was calculated according to Eq. (3):
The pH of the samples was determined by using a pH meter (Xylem Analytics, Germany). The titratable acidity (lactic acid) was determined according to the methodology suggested by Widagdha and Nisa (2015). Standardized NaOH was used to titrate 10 mL of the sample (previously diluted tenfold) with added phenolphthalein indicator until the solution reaches a stable pink color. The results were expressed as total lactic acid percentages.
Microbiological analysis
The counts of LAB were done in duplicate using de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe agar and incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. The results were expressed as colony-forming units per milliliter of yogurt (CFU mL−1).
Antioxidant activity
Determination of the samples’ antioxidant activity was done with the DPPH assay according to Subianto et al. (2013). In preparation for the assay, distilled water was added to the samples (1:1), centrifuged for 30 min at 5000 rpm, and filtered with Whatman number 42 filter paper. The supernatants were diluted fivefold to obtain the samples for DPPH assay. The samples and the DPPH solution reacted for 30 min and the absorbance (A) was measured at 517 nm in a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). The Gallic acid standard curve was conducted with methanol as the solvent. The samples’ antioxidant activity was expressed in milligrams of Gallic acid equivalent per gram of yogurt (mg GAE·g−1) and calculated according to Eq. (4):
Phenolic content
The preparation of the samples was carried out using the same procedure as the samples for the DPPH assay. The samples (0.1 mL) were reacted to 0.5 mL Folin Ciocalteu reagent inside a 10 mL volumetric flask, homogenized, then 1.5 mL of 20% Na2CO3 and distilled water were added. After homogenization, the solution was put aside for 30 min at room temperature and the absorbance was measured at 750 nm. The Gallic acid standard curve was conducted with distilled water as the solvent. The results were expressed in milligrams of Gallic acid equivalent per gram of yogurt (mg GAE·g−1).
Sensory evaluation
Fifty untrained students of Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University who have basic sensory knowledge of yogurt products were instructed to evaluate the color, taste, and consistency of yogurt samples. A hedonic 5-point scale was used, in which ‘5’ represents ‘most like’, ‘4’ represents ‘like’, ‘3’ represents ‘neutral’, ‘2’ represents ‘dislike’, and ‘1’ represents ‘most dislike’ (Setyaningsih et al. 2010).
Citrinin content
Citrinin content analysis of MFDS was carried out according to Li et al. (2003). MFDS (0.5 g) was extracted with 20 mL of toluene−ethyl acetate−formic acid reagent (7:3:1, v/v/v) and disintegrated for 10 min in an ultrasonic disintegrator. The extract and its container were weighed pre and post-sonication and added with the complex extract reagent to make up for the deficiency. The residue was extracted twice with 15 mL of the reagent and was combined with the initial extract to be centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min. The upper layer of the extract was evaporated and the residue was dissolved in 30 mL of methanol for citrinin determination by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) after filtration.
The HPLC system (Hewlett-Packard 1100, USA) was used for citrinin determination. A reversed phase column (Eclipse XDB C18, 4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) was used after being thermostated at 28 °C in a column oven. The system included a fluorescence detector with an excitation wavelength of 331 nm/500 nm. The samples were eluted with acetonitrile-acidified water (pH 2.5, 35:65, v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The detection limit was 50 μg/L.
Citrinin confirmation was done with a liquid chromatography−mass spectrometry (LC–MS) system (Waters ZMD 4000), with an inlet temperature of 120 °C and a dissolvent temperature of 25 °C. The capillary voltage was 3.78 kV and the molecular weights were 100 to 500 Da. The same mobile phase, column, and employed flow rate were used.
Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 19.0). The added MFDS and storage time of the yogurt samples were the two factors that could affect the parameters tested. Two-way ANOVA was conducted and continued with post hoc pairwise comparisons using Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05) when the effects were significant.
Results and discussion
Color analysis
For all food products, including yogurt, color is one of the visual attributes which has a part in influencing consumers’ preferences. Data of each yogurt sample’s L* (lightness), a* (redness), b* (yellowness), c (chroma), and H (hue) are shown in Table 2. Treatments of MFDS forms had a significant difference in the L*, a*, b*, and h values of yogurt, particularly in the a* value. MFDS has a bright red color from the pigments produced by Monascus purpureus during fermentation e.g. the yellow pigments: monascin and ankaflavin, orange pigments: rubropunctatin and monascorubrin, and the red pigments: rubropunctamine and monascorubramine (Feng et al. 2012). These added pigments would give a significant effect on the yogurt color in comparison to the control. Yogurt with added MFDS powder also produced the highest a* values and the lowest H values throughout storage, while yogurt with added MFDS water extract produced the second highest a* values. Overall, yogurt with added MFDS powder produced a redder color compared to other yogurt samples.
The extraction process of MFDS could decrease the color intensity of the MFDS water and ethanol extracts by losing some of the pigments during extraction. Some pigments may have been degraded from the high temperature of extraction and pasteurization. Most Monascus pigments are unstable outside of 30–60 °C (Feng et al. 2012). Also, the pigments may have not been fully extracted from the MFDS powder due to the solvent used. Srianta et al. (2019) found that MFDS extracted using ethanol:water solvent with a ratio of 7:3 produced higher red pigment content compared to extraction using a 10:0 ratio solvent. Meanwhile, MFDS powder was added straight into the yogurt mixture, thus most of the pigments were able to be incorporated into the yogurt without any further degradation from the extraction process.
Yogurt with added ethanol extract was less red in comparison to the yogurt with added water extract. The six main Monascus pigments are ethanol soluble, but reactions with –COOH or NH3 groups of amino acids would produce water-soluble derivative pigments (Feng et al. 2012). Srianta et al. (2012) found more water-soluble yellow, orange, and red pigments in MFDS, which might be due to the amino acid content in durian seeds as a source of NH3. A study by Mirhosseini et al. (2013) found that leucine, lysine, aspartic acid, glycine, alanine, glutamic acid, valine, proline, serine, threonine, isoleucine, and phenylalanine were the most abundant amino acids in the chemical structure of durian seed gum. More pigments were extracted with distilled water, resulting in yogurt with a redder color than using the ethanol extract.
Total phenolic content
The total phenolic content data of all yogurt samples is shown in Fig. 1. Yogurt with added MFDS powder reached the highest total phenolic content (TPC) throughout 14 days of storage, with 1.54 ± 0.24 mg GAE/g on day 0, 2.37 ± 0.42 mg GAE/g on day 7, and 2.21 ± 0.46 mg/GAE g on day 14. Yogurt with added MFDS ethanol extract reached the second highest TPC (1.35 ± 0.21, 1.53 ± 0.17, and 1.89 ± 0.25 mg GAE/g on day 0, day 7, and day 14, respectively), while the addition of MFDS water extract did not affect TPC in comparison to the control. MFDS water extract and ethanol extracts were reported to have TPC as high as 3.58 mg GAE/g and 3.61 mg GAE/g, respectively (Srianta et al. 2014).
Durian seeds contain natural phenolics and exhibit antioxidant activity (Subianto et al. 2013). According to Ramli et al. (2021), freeze-dried and rotary evaporated durian seeds had TPC of 4.46 mg GAE/mL and 29.52 mg GAE/mL, respectively. The TPC of durian seeds from previous studies being higher than MFDS extracts might be due to differences in the extraction process and the variety of durian used. Another study by Srianta et al. (2013) compared durian seed water and ethanol extract with MFDS water and ethanol extract. MFDS water extract (589.8 μg GAE/mL) and ethanol extract (473.3 μg GAE/mL) exhibited higher TPC than durian seed water extract (325.8 μg GAE/mL) and ethanol extract (132.0 μg GAE/mL). Monascus sp. fermentation can further increase the TPC of substrates and their bioavailability by releasing enzymes including amylases, cellulases, esterases, tannases, and glucosidases to break down cell walls and facilitate phenol extraction (Suraiya et al. 2018; Zhihao et al. 2022). These enzymes can also break bonds between phenolic compounds and other groups such as polysaccharides, lipids, and amines (Cheng et al. 2022; Wang et al. 2018). Monascus sp. can also produce micromolecular phenolic compounds by itself (Bei et al. 2017).
The addition of MFDS powder in yogurt resulted in the highest TPC of all the samples, which is due to fewer processing steps of MFDS before being incorporated into the yogurt. A larger amount of phenolic compounds in the MFDS powder could have been preserved and thus able to be detected during the TPC analysis. Ethanol and water extracts of MFDS underwent a few more heat processing steps and would have lost more phenolics due to degradation. Based on the TPC of the yogurt samples, it is observed that phenolics in MFDS were more ethanol soluble rather than water soluble. Abd Razak et al. (2015) also found similar results where methanol extracts of rice bran fermented with Rhizopus oligosporus and Monascus purpureus had higher amounts of TPC compared to the water extracts.
TPC of yogurt with added MFDS powder and ethanol extract experienced an increase throughout 14 days of storage. The addition of MFDS powder increased the TPC of yogurt from 1.54 ± 0.24 to 2.21 ± 0.46 mg/GAE g during 14 days of storage, while MFDS ethanol extract increased the TPC from 1.35 ± 0.21 to 1.89 ± 0.25 mg GAE/g. Aside from the phenolic compounds present in MFDS, the degradation of milk proteins during fermentation by LAB could release phenolic amino acids and nonphenolic compounds which could have interfered during TPC analysis (Shori 2013; Baba et al. 2014). Similar results were found by Szołtysik et al. (2020), in which the phenolic compounds (anthocyanins, favan-3-ols, ellagitannins, and flavonols) in yogurt with added Rosa spinosissima extract experienced a slight elevation after 14 days of storage. Yogurt with added Azadirachta indica also experienced an increase in TPC from 38.5 ± 7.2 μg GAE/mL on day 14 to 74.9 ± 6.2 μg GAE/mL by day 28 (Shori and Baba 2013).
Antioxidant activity
The antioxidant activity of yogurt samples was determined based on their DPPH scavenging capacities and are shown in Fig. 2. On day 0, yogurt with added MFDS water extract reached the highest antioxidant activity (0.0210 ± 0.0035 mg GAE/g) while the control had the lowest activity (0.0165 ± 0.0043 mg GAE/g). Through day 7 and day 14, yogurt with added MFDS powder produced the highest antioxidant activity (0.0118 and 0.0125 ± 0.0032 mg GAE/g respectively), while the control reached the lowest values with 0.0093 ± 0.0003 mg GAE/g on day 7 and 0.113 ± 0.0014 mg GAE/g on day 14. The addition of any form of MFDS increased the antioxidant activity of yogurt, which was due to the bioactive compounds produced by M. purpureus which are Monascus pigments, GABA, and monacolins. Srianta et al. (2017) reported that Monascus purpureus M9 pigments monapilol B and rubropunctamine were the main antioxidants of Monascus-fermented products among the 12 pigments detected (rubropunctatin, monascorubrin, rubropunctamine, monascorubramine, monascin, ankaflavin, xanthomonascin A, xanthomonascin B, yellow II, and monapilol B). The two pigments had a high correlation with the DPPH radical scavenging activity. Tan et al. (2018) found that water-soluble yellow Monascus pigments exhibited DPPH and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS+) radical scavenging activity, reaching up to 86.33% inhibition from 1 mg/mL sample and 99.95% from 0.25 mg/mL respectively. Other secondary metabolites such as GABA, monacolin K, and dihydromonacolin MV also contribute to DPPH radical scavenging (Srianta et al. 2014). Phenolics from Monascus-fermented oats were also reported to have a high correlation with DPPH and ABTS+ radical scavenging activity (Bei et al. 2017).
After fermentation, the antioxidant activities of all the yogurt samples were significantly higher than the initial yogurt mixture. The increase in antioxidant activity of the yogurt mixture after fermentation was due to LAB activity. Using the thiobarbituric acid method, Kim et al. (2005) found that Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Lactobacillus acidophilus exhibit antioxidant activity (81.30% and 65.32% respectively). They can demonstrate radical scavenging activity, inhibitory activity towards lipid peroxidation, show strong reducing power, and produce proteolytic enzymes which help release antioxidative milk peptides (Virtanen et al. 2007; Zhang et al. 2011; Aloglu and Oner 2011). Gjorgievski et al. (2014) found that yogurt fermented with Streptococcus thermophilus and L. bulgaricus mix culture and L. acidophilus monoculture also exhibited antioxidant activity by DPPH radical scavenging (52.44% and 63.99% respectively).
The antioxidant activity of the yogurt samples then significantly decreased by day 7 and stayed stagnant between day 7 and day 14. This data has a negative correlation with the TPC of yogurt samples throughout storage time, in which yogurt with added MFDS powder and ethanol extract had increasing TPC up until day 14. This suggests that the phenolics detected in yogurt with added MFDS did not have DPPH radical scavenging properties. Bei et al. (2017) found that the bound phenolic fraction of fermented oats with Monascus anka, mainly ferulic acid, showed greater ABTS+ scavenging activity than DPPH radical scavenging activity. Abd Razak et al. (2015) reported that TPC and radical-scavenging activity of rice bran fermented with R. oligosporus and M. purpureus were poorly correlated for the water and methanol extracts, which might be due to many factors such as the concentration and chemical structures of the phenolics detected. This result suggests that other antioxidant compounds in MFDS might have stronger DPPH scavenging activity than the phenolics detected i.e. pigments, monacolins, and GABA (Srianta et al. 2014; Suraiya et al. 2018). These compounds would have been degraded during storage, thereby decreasing the antioxidant activity of yogurt samples. Similar results have been observed by Chouchouli et al. (2013), in which the antiradical capacities of grape seed-fortified full-fat yogurt decreased during 32 days of storage time (from 1487.4 ± 38.2–1567 ± 52.8 mg TE/100 g on day 1 to 234.8 ± 20.6–440.5 ± 40.3 mg TE/100 g by day 32).
pH and titratable acidity
Changes in yogurt pH added with different MFDS forms are shown in Table 3. pH of the unfermented yogurt mixture decreased significantly after fermentation due to the formation of acids by LAB. pH data from yogurt with added MFDS powder experienced the biggest reduction during storage time from 4.492 ± 0.093 on day 0 to 4.175 ± 0.087 by day 14. Yogurt with added water extract reached the lowest pH on day 0 and day 7, while MFDS powder yogurt has the lowest pH by day 14. These results were in line with the titratable acidity data shown in Fig. 3. The majority of acids found in yogurt are lactic acids, produced by LAB by converting lactose in milk (Chen et al. 2017). The total lactic acid percentage of all yogurt mixture samples increased significantly after fermentation and increased gradually throughout storage time, which is in line with the pH data. The highest total acid percentage was reached by MFDS powder yogurt by day 14. Overall, the addition of MFDS forms to yogurt only gave a slight effect on the pH and titratable acidity in comparison to the control. Darwish et al. (2017) and Melani et al. (2021) found that the addition of angkak (Monascus-fermented rice/red mold rice) did not give a significant effect on the pH value and acidity of yogurt and goat milk kefir respectively. Pyo and Song (2009) found that the addition of Monascus-fermented soybean decreased the pH and increased the acidity of yogurt, while Jeon et al. (2011) found that the pH of yogurt increased after the addition of Monascus-fermented Chinese yam. Different substrates of Monascus-fermentation will produce different amounts and types of compounds which could affect the characteristics of each Monascus-fermented product.
Syneresis
As a commercial product, syneresis percentage is best kept at a minimum for yogurt to suit consumer preferences. Table 3 shows the effect of different MFDS forms addition to syneresis percentage in yogurt. The addition of MFDS forms gave a significant effect on the syneresis percentage of yogurt samples, although only yogurt with added MFDS powder experienced an increase in syneresis percentage by day 14. Syneresis percentages of yogurt with added MFDS powder (3.29 ± 0.43–5.24 ± 0.51%) throughout storage are higher compared to other yogurt samples. Syneresis takes place due to the weakening of the yogurt gel structure thus losing the ability to entrap water (Sah et al. 2016). A higher syneresis percentage found in yogurt with added MFDS powder might be related to its TPC. Yogurt with MFDS powder reached the highest TPC out of all the samples (1.54 ± 0.24–2.21 ± 0.46 mg/GAE g) and a high amount of phenolic compounds has been proven to affect yogurt syneresis by other studies. Increased rates of syneresis were detected in yogurts with added ingredients containing phenolic compounds such as blueberry juice, green tea powder, Ferulago angulata extract, and grape pomace (Marchiani et al. 2015; Jeong et al. 2018; Dimitrellou et al. 2020; Keshavarzi et al. 2020). Excess polyphenol concentrations could reduce the gel matrix that confines the yogurt serum by decreasing the volume of each protein–phenolic cage and preventing gel matrix formation (Jeong et al. 2018). Increasing the number of particle–particle junctions in the gel structure could lead to the shrinkage of the network and dismissing interstitial liquid (Dönmez et al. 2017).
Total plate count
Changes in the total plate count of yogurt with added MFDS are shown in Table 3. The addition of MFDS forms to yogurt did not give a significant difference in the total plate count in comparison to the control. The total plate count yogurt mixture increased after fermentation for all yogurt samples. However, the total plate count of yogurt with added MFDS did not increase significantly from day 0 to day 7. By day 14, the total plate count of all samples except the control experienced a decrease. Yogurt with added MFDS powder was not significantly affected during storage time even though it produced the same pattern of data as the other samples. The addition of MFDS powder to yogurt resulted in the lowest total plate count reached, from 6.22 × 109 on day 0 to 1.90 × 107 on day 14). Yogurt without any added MFDS experienced an increase in the total plate count by day 14, reaching 1.96 × 1011 from 6.27 × 109 on day 0.
Monascus fermentation produces various compounds, among them are pigments and phenolics which have antibacterial characteristics. These compounds may have inhibited the growth of LAB during storage. Pigments are the major bioactive compounds found in Monascus-fermented products along with monacolins (Zhu et al. 2019), with each group of pigments having different antibacterial mechanisms. Kim et al. (2006) found that amino acid derivatives of red Monascus pigments can suppress the growth of Gram-positive bacteria, which indicates that the red pigment derivatives from MFDS could have inhibited LAB growth. The hydrophobicity of bacteria cell surfaces increases when the pigments are adsorbed into the cell, which leads to cell aggregation into pellets. Pellet formation of cells results in the limited transfer of oxygen and nutrients into bacteria cells. Orange pigments have a good affinity with liposomes, resulting in an interaction with the phospholipid of bacteria cytoplasmic membranes. The interaction disrupts the bacteria membrane and causes cellular leakage. Orange pigments can also stimulate pellet formation in cells (Zhao et al. 2016). On the other hand, phenolics can disrupt cytoplasmic membrane and cause lysis, and interact with enzymes, substrates, and metal ions which prevents bacteria metabolism (Vaquero et al. 2007; Oulahal and Degraeve 2022; Melani et al. 2021).
MFDS water and ethanol extracts underwent further processing, starting with the extraction of compounds with various polarities using purely polar or nonpolar solvents and then being treated to sterilization. These caused the number of compounds in the extracts to be less than in the MFDS powder. This would explain why the addition of MFDS powder suppressed the growth of LAB in yogurt the most. Melani et al. (2021) found that the total plate count of angkak-supplemented kefir also decreased during storage time. Pyo and Song (2009), however, found that Monascus-fermented soybeans had an increase in viable LAB due to the free and essential amino acids produced from Monascus fermentation being a source of nutrients. According to the National Standardization Agency of Indonesia (BSN), the minimal amount of starter bacteria in yogurt is 107 log/g (BSN 2009) thus MFDS-supplemented yogurt is by the standard.
Sensory evaluation
According to Fig. 4, the acceptance scores of all yogurt samples were in the range of 2.56 (dislike-neutral) to 4.06 (like-most like). The addition of MFDS powder had a significant difference in the panelist acceptance score for color and taste, while the addition of any form of MFDS did not give a significant effect on the consistency acceptance score. Storage time did not give a significant effect on the panelist acceptance scores, which meant the quality of all yogurt samples remained stable after seven days of storage. Yogurt with added MFDS powder obtained the lowest acceptance scores for color (3.28–3.34) and taste (2.56–2.81) on days 0 and 7 respectively. The highest score for each parameter was reached by yogurt with added ethanol extract, with scores of 3.97–4.00 for color, 3.87–3.84 for taste, and 3.53–3.97 for consistency. The results show that the addition of MFDS, particularly the ethanol extract, to yogurt was well-liked by panelists.
Color analysis results from Table 2 show that yogurt with added MFDS powder produced a more red-colored yogurt in comparison to the other samples. Without the information about any flavor or added ingredients in yogurt, panelists could have an expectation of a white color regularly found in plain yogurt. A difference in the color of yogurt with added MFDS powder in comparison to other samples might affect panelists’ acceptance scores. MFDS powder was not incorporated evenly in the yogurt, which lead to the accumulation of powder at the bottom of the yogurt cup. This overall appearance might also affect the scores. Panelists have also commented that yogurt with added MFDS powder had a bitter taste. The bitterness might be due to the presence of phenolics in the yogurt (Li and Duan 2018). According to the total phenolic content data from Fig. 2, yogurt with added MFDS powder was found to have the highest TPC out of all the samples. Reginio et al. (2016) also reported that bitterness and astringency were detected by panelists from Monascus biopigment beverages.
Citrinin content of Monascus-fermented durian seed
A notable secondary metabolite from Monascus purpureus not yet discussed is citrinin. Citrinin is a mycotoxin produced from the same polyketide biosynthesis pathway as Monascus pigments and monacolin K (Agboyibor et al. 2018). Citrinin has cytotoxic, nephrotoxic, hepatotoxic, carcinogenic, and immunosuppression effects when ingested by humans and animals (Magro et al. 2016). It is essential to analyze the citrinin content of MFDS to ensure the safety of MFDS yogurt. HPLC analysis (Fig. 5) shows that the citrinin concentration of MFDS is 5.53 ppm.
Countries have different regulations for citrinin content in angkak. The citrinin limit in Taiwan is 2 ppm, 0.2 ppm in Japan, and 0.02 mg/kg body weight per day in Europe (Lee et al. 2010; Pattanagul et al. 2007; European Food Safety Authority 2012). The citrinin concentration of MFDS is higher than the limits mentioned, thus not recommended for high and frequent amounts of consumption. However, the MFDS extraction process with a 1:50 (w/v) ratio of MFDS and solvent produced MFDS yogurt with an estimated 0.1106 ppm of citrinin, which is below the limit in Taiwan and Japan. Citrinin has been stated to be unstable and thermolabile (Doughari 2015; Zhang et al. 2021). According to Trivedi et al. (1993a, b), citrinin heated at 80 °C for 60 min in watery conditions resulted in a 50% reduction but did not affect the citrinin cytotoxicity, while the heating temperatures of 90–110 °C increased the cytotoxicity. Citrinin H1, a highly toxic compound formed from citrinin degradation, was found after heating at 140 °C with the presence of water or at 100 °C for 30 min (Trivedi et al. 1993a, b). Shu and Lin (2002) found that citrinin concentration in angkak was dramatically decreased after boiling in water, while Hirota et al. (2002) stated that citrinin degrades on heating above 80 °C under aqueous conditions. The processing heat of 80 °C during yogurt production would neither increase nor decrease the cytotoxicity of MFDS yogurt but might have slightly decreased citrinin content. Further research should be done regarding the amount of citrinin content in MFDS yogurt.
Conclusion
In this study, the addition of MFDS powder to yogurt produced the largest improvement in yogurt parameters, particularly its antioxidative properties, among the other forms of MFDS. Besides producing a more interesting appearance of yogurt from the red color MFDS imparts, TPC and antioxidant activity were also increased due to less loss of phenolic compounds in MFDS powder in comparison to other forms which undergo the extraction process. Due to higher phenolic content, yogurt with added MFDS powder also experienced the highest syneresis percentage and imparted a bitter taste, which was reflected in the lowest acceptance scores by panelists. MFDS powder had a high citrinin concentration. On the other hand, yogurt with added MFDS ethanol extract had the highest acceptance scores and the extracts had a lower citrinin concentration than the limits set. MFDS has the potential as a functional ingredient for food, especially yogurt.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- MFDS:
-
Monascus-fermented durian seed
- LAB:
-
Lactic acid bacteria
- GABA:
-
γ-Aminobutyric acid
- DPPH:
-
Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
- ACE:
-
Angiotensin-converting enzyme
- HPLC:
-
High-performance liquid chromatography
- LC–MS:
-
Liquid chromatography−mass spectrometry
- ABTS+ :
-
2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)
- TPC:
-
Total phenolic content
References
Abd Razak DL, Abd Rashid NY, Jamaluddin A, Sharifudin SA, Long K (2015) Enhancement of phenolic acid content and antioxidant activity of rice bran fermented with Rhizopus oligosporus and Monascus purpureus. Biocatal 4(1):33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2014.11.003
Abdel-Raheam HEF, Abdel-Mageed WS, Abd El-Rahman MAM (2019) Optimization of production of Monascus ruber pigments on broth medium and their application in flavored yogurts. Egypt J Food Sci 47(2):271–283. https://doi.org/10.21608/EJFS.2019.19654.1030
Agboyibor C, Kong WB, Chen D, Zhang AM, Niu SQ (2018) Monascus pigments production, composition, bioactivity and its application: a review. Biocatal 16:433–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.09.012
Aloglu HS, Oner Z (2011) Determination of antioxidant activity of bioactive peptide fractions obtained from yogurt. J Dairy Sci 94(11):5305–5314. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4285
Amatayakul T, Sherkat F, Shah NP (2006) Syneresis in set yogurt as affected by EPS starter cultures and levels of solids. Int J Dairy Technol 59(3):221–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0307.2006.00264.x
Aryana KJ, Olson DW (2017) A 100-year review: yogurt and other cultured dairy products. J Dairy Sci 12:9987–10013. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12981
Baba AS, Najarian A, Shori AB, Lit KW, Keng GA (2014) Viability of lactic acid bacteria, antioxidant activity and in vitro inhibition of angiotensin-I-converting enzyme of Lycium barbarum yogurt. Arab J Sci Eng 39(7):5355–5362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1127-2
Bei Q, Liu Y, Wang L, Chen G, Wu Z (2017) Improving free, conjugated, and bound phenolic fractions in fermented oats (Avena sativa L.) with Monascus anka and their antioxidant activity. J Funct Foods 32:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2017.02.028
BSN (2009) SNI 2981:2009 Yogurt. Badan Standardisasi Nasional, Jakarta
Chen C, Zhao S, Hao G, Yu H, Tian H, Zhao G (2017) Role of lactic acid bacteria on the yogurt flavor: a review. Int J Food Prop 20(1):316–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2017.1295988
Cheng J, Lee SK, Palaniyandi SA, Suh JW, Yang SH (2022) Effect of fermentation with Monascus pilosus on the antioxidant activities and phenolic acid contents of adzuki bean (Vigna angularis). J Coast Life Med 3(3):276–283. https://doi.org/10.12980/JCLM.3.2015JCLM-2015-0007
Chouchouli V, Kalogeropoulos N, Konteles SJ, Karvela E, Makris DP, Karathanos VT (2013) Fortification of yoghurts with grape (Vitis vinifera) seed extracts. LWT Food Sci Technol 53(2):522–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2013.03.008
Comunian TA, Chaves IE, Thomazini M, Moraes ICF, Ferro-Furtado R, Castro IA, Favaro-Trindade CS (2017) Development of functional yogurt containing free and encapsulated echium oil, phytosterol and sinapic acid. Food Chem 237:948–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.071
Darwish AZ, Darwish SM, Ismail MA (2017) Utilization of fermented yeast rice by the fungus Monascus ruber AUMC 4066 as food coloring agents. J Food Process Technol 8(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7110.1000645
Dimitrellou D, Solomakou N, Kokkinomagoulos E, Kandylis P (2020) Yogurts supplemented with juices from grapes and berries. Foods 9:1158. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091158
Dönmez Ö, Mogol BA, Gökmen V (2017) Syneresis and rheological behaviors of set yogurt containing green tea and green coffee powders. J Dairy Sci 100(1):901–907. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11262
Doughari JH (2015) The occurrence, properties and significance of citrinin mycotoxin. J Plant Pathol Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7471.1000321
European Food Safety Authority (2012) Scientific opinion on the risks for public and animal health related to the presence of citrinin in food and feed. EFSA J 10(3):1–82. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2605
Feng Y, Shao Y, Chen F (2012) Monascus pigments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 96(6):1421–1440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4504-3
Gahruie HH, Eskandari MH, Mesbahi G, Hanifpour MA (2015) Scientific and technical aspects of yogurt fortification: a review. Food Sci Hum Wellness 4(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2015.03.002
Gjorgievski N, Yomovska J, Dimitrovska G, Makarijoski B, Shariati MA (2014) Determination of the antioxidant activity in yogurt. J Hyg Eng Des 8:88–92
Hirota M, Menta AB, Yoneyama K, Kitabatake N (2002) A major decomposition product, citrinin H2, from citrinin on heating with moisture. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 66(1):206–210. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.66.206
Jeon CP, Lee JB, Choi CS, Kwon GS (2011) Physiological effect of yogurt with powder two stage fermented Dioscorea batatas Dence by Monascus sp. and Lactobacillus sp. Korean J Microbiol 47(2):151–157
Jeong CH, Ryu H, Zhang T, Lee CH, Seo HG, Han SG (2018) Green tea powder supplementation enhances fermentation and antioxidant activity of set-type yogurt. Food Sci Biotechnol 27(5):1419–1427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-018-0370-9
Keshavarzi M, Sharifan A, Ardakani SAY (2020) Effect of the ethanolic extract and essential oil of Ferulago angulata (Schlecht.) Boiss. on protein, physicochemical, sensory, and microbial characteristics of probiotic yogurt during storage time. Food Sci Nutr 9(1):197–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1984
Kim HS, Chae HS, Jeong SG, Ham JS, Im SK, Ahn CN, Lee JM (2005) Antioxidant activity of some yogurt starter cultures. Asian Aust J Anim Sci 18(2):255–258. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.255
Kim C, Jung H, Kim YO, Shin CS (2006) Antimicrobial activities of amino acid derivatives of Monascus pigments. FEMS Microbiol Lett 264(1):117–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00451.x
Lee BH, Pan TM (2012) Benefit of Monascus-fermented products for hypertension prevention: a review. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 94(5):1151–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4076-2
Lee CH, Lee CL, Pan TM (2010) A 90-D toxicity study of Monascus-fermented products including high citrinin level. J Food Sci 75(5):91–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01626.x
Li SY, Duan CQ (2018) Astringency, bitterness and color changes in dry red wines befotr and during oak barrel aging: an updated phenolic perspective review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 59(12):1840–1867. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1431762
Li FQ, Xu GR, Li YW, Chen Y (2003) Study on the production of citrinin by Monascus strains used in food industry. J Hygiene Res 32(6):602–605
Liu D, Lv XX (2018) Effect of blueberry flower pulp on sensory, physicochemical properties, lactic acid bacteria, and antioxidant activity of set-type yogurt during refrigeration. J Food Process Preserv. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13856
Magro M, Moritz DE, Bonaiuto E, Baratella D, Terzo M, Jakubec P, Malina O, Čépe K, Aragao GMF, Zboril R, Vianello F (2016) Citrinin mycotoxin recognition and removal by naked magnetic nanoparticles. Food Chem 203:505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.01.147
Marchiani R, Bertolino M, Belviso S, Giordano M, Ghirardello D, Torri L, Piochi M, Zeppa G (2015) Yogurt enrichment with grape pomace: effect of grape cultivar on physicochemical, microbiological and sensory properties. J Food Qual 39(2):77–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfq.12181
Melani D, Nurliyani N, Indratiningsih I (2021) Characteristics of goat milk kefir with addition of red yeast rice extract during storage. Bull Animal Sci 45(1):45–55. https://doi.org/10.21059/BULETINPETERNAK.V45I1.12494
Mirhosseini H, Amid BT, Cheong KW (2013) Effect of different drying methods on chemical and molecular structure of heteropolysaccharide-protein gum from durian seed. Food Hydrocoll 31:210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.11.005
Nugerahani I, Sutedja AM, Srianta I, Widharma RM, Marsono Y (2017) In vivo evaluation of Monascus-fermented durian seed for antidiabetic and antihypercholesterol agent. Food Res 1(3):83–88. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.3.023
Oulahal N, Degraeve P (2022) Phenolic-rich plant extracts with antimicrobial activity: An alternative to food preservatives and biocides? Frontiers Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.753518
Pattanagul P, Pinthong R, Phianmongkhol A (2007) Review of angkak production (Monascus purpureus). Chiang Mai J Sci 34(3):319–328
Purnomo A, Yudiantoro YAW, Putro JN, Nugraha AT, Irawaty W, Ismadji S (2016) Subcritical water hydrolysis of durian seeds waste for bioethanol production. Int J Ind Chem 7:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40090-015-0059-3
Pyo YH, Song SM (2009) Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of a medicinal soy yogurt containing health-benefit ingredients. J Agric Food Chem 57(1):170–175. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf8026952
Ramli ANM, Sukri NAM, Azelee NIW, Bhuyar P (2021) Exploration of antibacterial and antioxidative activity of seed/peel extracts of Southeast Asian fruit Durian (Durio zibethinus) for effective shelf-life enhancement of preserved meat. J Food Process Preserv. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.15662
Reginio FJC, Hurtada WA, Dizon EI (2016) Quality and acceptability of Monascus biopigment beverage. Int Food Res J 23(4):1492–1500
Sah BNP, Vasiljevic T, McKechnie S, Donkor ON (2016) Physicochemical, textural and rheological properties of probiotic yogurt fortified with fibre-rich pineapple peel powder during refrigerated storage. LWT Food Sci Technol 65:978–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.09.027
Setyaningsih D, Apriyantono A, Sari MP (2010) Analisis sensori untuk industri pangan and agro. IPB Press, Bandung
Shiby VK, Mishra HN (2013) Fermented milks and milk products as functional foods: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 53(5):482–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.547398
Shori AB (2013) Antioxidant activity and viability of lactic acid bacteria in soybean-yogurt made from cow and camel milk. J Taibah Univ Sci 7:202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2013.06.003
Shori AB, Baba AS (2013) Antioxidant activity and inhibition of key enzymes linked to type-2 diabetes and hypertension by Azadirachta indica-yogurt. J Saudi Chem Soc 17(3):295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2011.04.006
Shu PY, Lin CH (2002) Simple and sensitive determination of citrinin in Monascus by GC-selected ion monitoring mass spectrometry. Anal Sci 18(3):283–287
Srianta I, Hendrawan B, Kusumawati N, Blanc PJ (2012) Study on durian seed as a new substrate for angkak production. Int Food Res J 19(3):941–945
Srianta I, Kusumawati N, Nugerahani I, Artanti N, Xu GR (2013) In vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of Monascus-fermented durian seed extracts. Int Food Res J 20(2):533–536
Srianta I, Nugerahani I, Kusumawati N, Suryatanijaya E, Subianto C (2014) Therapeutic antioxidant activity of Monascus-fermented durian seed: a potential functional food ingredient. IJFNP 7(1):53–59. https://doi.org/10.47556/J.IJFNPH.7.1.2014.5
Srianta I, Zubaidah E, Estiasih T, Iuchi Y, Harijono YM (2017) Antioxidant activity of pigments derived from Monascus purpureus-fermented rice, corn, and sorghum. Int Food Res J 24(3):1186–1191
Srianta I, Ristiarini S, Nugerahani I (2019) Pigments extraction from Monascus-fermented durian seed. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/443/1/012008
Srianta I, Kusdiyantini E, Zubaidah E, Ristiarini S, Nugerahani I, Alvin A, Iswanto N, Zhang BB (2021) Utilization of agro-industrial by-products in Monascus fermentation: a review. Bioresour Bioprocess. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-021-00473-4
Subianto C, Srianta I, Kusumawati N (2013) Effect of proportion of water and ethanol as solvent on antioxidant activity of durian seeds angkak with phosphomolybdenum and DPPH methods. J Food Technol Nutr 12(2):75–80. https://doi.org/10.33508/jtpg.v12i2.1487
Suraiya S, Lee JM, Cho HJ, Jang WJ, Kim DG, Kim YO, Kong IS (2018) Monascus spp. fermented brown seaweeds extracts enhance bio-functional activities. Food Biosci 21:90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2017.12.005
Szołtysik M, Kucharska AZ, Sokół-Łętowska A, Dąbrowska A, Bobak Ł, Chrzanowska J (2020) The effect of Rosa spinosissima fruits extract on lactic acid bacteria growth and other yoghurt parameters. Foods. https://doi.org/10.3390/2Ffoods9091167
Tan H, Xing Z, Chen G, Tian X (2018) Evaluating antitumor and antioxidant activities of yellow Monascus pigments from Monascus ruber fermentation. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23123242
Trivedi AB, Doi E, Kitabatake N (1993a) Toxic compounds formed on prolonged heating of citrinin under watery conditions. J Food Sci 58(1):229–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb03251.x
Trivedi AB, Hirota M, Doi E, Kitabatake N (1993b) Formation of a new toxic compound, citrinin H1, from citrinin on mild heating in water. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1(18):2167–2171. https://doi.org/10.1039/P19930002167
Vaquero MJR, Alberto MR, Nadra MCM (2007) Antibacterial effect of phenolic compounds from different wines. Food Control 18(2):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.08.010
Virtanen T, Pihlanto A, Akkanen S, Korhonen H (2007) Development of antioxidant activity in milk whey during fermentation with lactic acid bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 102(1):106–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03072.x
Wang L, Luo Y, Wu Y, Wu Z (2018) Impact of fermentation degree on phenolic compositions and bioactivities during the fermentation of guava leaves with Monascus anka and Bacillus sp. J Funct Foods 41:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2017.12.044
Widagdha S, Nisa FC (2015) The effect of grape juice (Vitis venifera L.) and different fermentation period toward physico-chemical properties of yogurt. J Pangan Dan Agroindustri 3(1):248–258
Zhang S, Liu L, Su Y, Li H, Sun Q, Liang X, Lu J (2011) Antioxidative activity of lactic acid bacteria in yogurt. Afr J Microbiol Res 5(29):5194–5201. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.997
Zhang H, Ahima J, Yang Q, Zhao L, Zhang X, Zhang X (2021) A review on citrinin: its occurrence, risk implications, analytical techniques, biosynthesis, physiochemical properties and control. Food Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.110075
Zhao GP, Li YQ, Yang J, Cui KY (2016) Antibacterial characteristics of orange pigment extracted from Monascus pigments against Escherichia coli. Czech J Food Sci 34(3):197–203. https://doi.org/10.17221/430/2015-CJFS
Zhihao W, Wen M, Yuhan Y, Gongjian F, Caie W, Tingting L, Chunyan X, Dongbei S (2022) Preparation of Monascus-fermented ginkgo seeds: optimization of fermentation parameters and evaluation of bioactivity. Food Sci Biotechnol 31:721–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-022-01078-z
Zhu B, Qi F, Wu J, Yin G, Hua J, Zhang Q, Qin L (2019) Red yeast rice: a systematic review of the traditional uses, chemistry, pharmacology, and quality control of an important Chinese folk medicine. Front Pharmacol 10:1449–1476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01449
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Special thanks to Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, Deputi Bidang Penguatan Riset dan Pengembangan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi for the financial support for this research work with the contract number of 2600/WM01.5/N/2022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Srianta, I., Kuswardani, I., Ristiarini, S. et al. Utilization of durian seed for Monascus fermentation and its application as a functional ingredient in yogurt. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 9, 128 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00619-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00619-y