Skip to main content

High-throughput iSpinach fluorescent aptamer-based real-time monitoring of in vitro transcription

Abstract

In vitro transcription (IVT) is an essential technique for RNA synthesis. Methods for the accurate and rapid screening of IVT conditions will facilitate RNA polymerase engineering, promoter optimization, and screening for new transcription inhibitor drugs. However, traditional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and high-performance liquid chromatography methods are labor intensive, time consuming and not compatible with real-time analysis. Here, we developed an inexpensive, high-throughput, and real-time detection method for the monitoring of in vitro RNA synthesis called iSpinach aptamer-based monitoring of Transcription Activity in Real-time (STAR). STAR has a detection speed at least 100 times faster than conventional PAGE method and provides comparable results in the analysis of in vitro RNA synthesis reactions. It also can be used as an easy and quantitative method to detect the catalytic activity of T7 RNA polymerase. To further demonstrate the utility of STAR, it was applied to optimize the initially transcribed region of the green fluorescent protein gene and the 3T4T variants demonstrated significantly enhanced transcription output, with at least 1.7-fold and 2.8-fold greater output than the wild-type DNA template and common transcription template, respectively. STAR may provide a valuable tool for many biotechnical applications related to the transcription process, which may pave the way for the development of better RNA-related enzymes and new drugs.

Graphical Abstract

iSpinach aptamer-based monitoring of transcription activity in real-time (STAR).

Introduction

Transcription is among the most important biological reactions. In vitro transcription (IVT) is used to synthesize mRNA vaccines (Jain et al. 2021), screen RNA polymerases (RNAPs) (Chelliserrykattil and Ellington 2004), analyze promoter strength (Paul et al. 2013), and identify drugs that inhibit transcription (Villicana et al. 2014). However, the process of IVT will produce by-products, such as dsRNA and truncated fragments, which could reduce the quality and quantity of mRNA drug. Accordingly, it is of great importance to optimize the IVT system for both scientific community and pharmaceutical industry.

Gel electrophoresis remains the mainstream method for analyzing full-length RNA transcripts. The RNA yield and purity can only be analyzed using fluorescent dyes or radioisotopes after IVT is completed. Transcription by-products, such as abortive products (2–10 nucleotide) (Gong and Martin 2006), double-stranded RNA (Baiersdorfer et al. 2019), and truncated RNA products, typically produce smeared bands on polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). High-performance liquid chromatography and nucleic acid mass spectrometry are more accurate tools for quantitative RNA analysis (Burcar et al. 2013; Kanavarioti 2019), but are low-throughput and time- and labor-intensive.

Fluorescent light-up RNA aptamers (FLAPs) (Ouellet 2016) enable direct visualization and tracking of RNA molecules (Su and Hammond 2020). Various FLAPs have been developed that can form specific conformations by binding with fluorogen to generate fluorescence (Chen et al. 2019; Dao et al. 2021). Different aptamers have divergent folding properties and stabilities and are affected by the surrounding RNA conformation, reaction buffer, and other factors (Trachman et al. 2018). FLAPs have been widely used to measure gene transcription (Ying et al. 2019), observe intracellular RNA localization (Guzman-Zapata et al. 2017), and detect RNA aptamer binding to metabolites (Zheng et al. 2022). FLAPs are powerful tools in RNA research for observing RNA synthesis. Some in vitro RNA detection systems have been developed based on FLAPs. Hofer and colleagues fused the Spinach aptamer to an RNA of interest; this aptamer was cleaved by a hammerhead ribozyme after transcription, resulting in the generation of fluorescence (Hofer et al. 2013). However, this method has some variables, such as hammerhead ribozyme’s cleavage efficiency being easily affected by different buffers, existing unspecific cleavage because of its cleavage site being “GUX”, and the aptamer’s high salt ion dependence. These variables may lead to inconsistency between the fluorescent intensity and RNA yield. Kartje and colleagues utilized a hybrid DNA template containing a double-stranded promoter and downstream single-stranded Broccoli aptamer sequence (Kartje et al. 2021); the fully double-stranded DNA template was used in IVT, which has limited applications. Although these methods can be used to directly observe IVT, both methods suffer from low folding efficiency and poor thermostability because the aptamers are not suitable for use in vitro. Therefore, establishing a rapid, simple and less affected by external environment method will provide a valuable tool for many biotechnical applications using IVT.

In this study, we established a high-throughput, simple, and sensitive system for monitoring and quantifying RNA synthesis, named as iSpinach aptamer-based monitoring of transcription activity in real-time (STAR). We optimized the reaction conditions including metal ions, ribonucleotide triphosphates, DNA template, pH, and reaction temperatures. The activity of T7 RNAP was determined using STAR. To further demonstrate the utility of STAR, we optimized the 5′-untranslated region (UTR) sequence from + 1 to + 8 of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene. STAR can be used to easily and rapidly quantify T7 RNAP activity and optimize the 5′-UTR sequence, providing an efficient tool for various methods involving IVT.

Methods

DNA template used for STAR system

Antisense and sense single-stranded DNA templates containing the T7 promoter and a sequence encoding Spinach, tSpinach, Broccoli, tBroccoli, and iSpinach were synthesized by GenScript (Nanjing, China) (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). To prepare the double-stranded DNA template used in the STAR system, the antisense DNA template was annealed to the sense DNA template at a 1:1 molar ratio in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water. Samples were heated to 95 °C for 5 min and then slowly cooled to 25 °C in a heating block for 30 min. The linear DNA template was obtained by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the other DNA templates used in the STAR system. The length of the double-stranded DNA was verified using agarose gel electrophoresis. The sequences are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Determination of the fluorescent intensity of different fluorescent RNA aptamer

The Spinach, tSpinach, Broccoli, tBroccoli, and iSpinach RNA transcripts were recovered and purified using a PAGE recovery kit (BioTeke, Beijing, China). The RNA product was eluted with RNase-free water. The purified RNA aptamers (1 μM) were unfolded by treatment at 85 °C for 5 min and then incubated at 25 °C for 20 min to promote their folding into a proper structure. The aptamers were mixed with 80 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 2 mM MgCl2, 100 μM DFHBI, (MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) and 200 mM K+ or Na+ in a 1:1 ratio. The mixtures were incubated at 25 °C for 15 min. The fluorescence intensity produced by different aptamers was determined using a microplate reader (SpectraMax M4, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

The IVT reaction catalyzed by T7 RNAP contained 200 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 30 mM MgCl2, 5 mM NaCl, 20 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2 U/μL murine RNase inhibitor (Hzymes, Hubei, China), 5 mM ribonucleotide triphosphate (NTP) mix (BBI Life Sciences, Shanghai, China), 0.002 U inorganic pyrophosphatase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 40 U T7 RNAP, and 100 μM DFHBI. The DNA templates of different RNA aptamers (20 nM) were added to the IVT reaction and then incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. The reaction was quickly placed on ice to stop the reaction. The fluorescence intensities produced by different aptamers were determined using a microplate reader (Ex: 469 nm, Em: 501 nm or Ex: 472 nm, Em: 507 nm) in a 96-well plate.

Nucleic acid mass spectrometry

The obtained iSpinach RNA transcripts were purified using PAGE, the target band were cut from the PAGE gel, and the band were recovered and purified using a PAGE recovery kit (BioTeke). RNA was quantified at 50 pmol and analyzed using matrix-assisted laser desorption tandem time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI TOF 7090, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and the data were analyzed using the MALDI Solutions software (Shimadzu).

T7 RNAP enzyme expression and purification

A plasmid expressing T7 RNAP (pQE-80L) was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells (Transgene, Beijing, China). The cells were cultured in 1 L LB medium supplemented with ampicillin (50 μg/mL) at 37 °C to an OD600 of 0.6–0.8, after which expression was induced with 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactosidase at 37 °C for an additional 6 h. The cells were pelleted, treated with Buffer A (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 100 μM EDTA-Na+, and 3 mM imidazole), and lysed by high-pressure homogenization. The obtained lysate supernatant was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 30 min. The lysate was purified using nickel-affinity chromatography. The resin was washed with five-bed volumes of Buffer A and ten-bed volumes of Buffer B (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0; 300 mM NaCl; 10% glycerin; 100 μM EDTA; and 10 mM imidazole) and eluted with five-bed volumes of Buffer C (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 100 μM EDTA-Na+, 10% glycerin, and 300 mM imidazole). The purified protein was concentrated through an ultrafiltration tube (30 kDa; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and exchanged with buffer D (20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 100 μM EDTA-Na+) for three times. The protein concentration was determined by measuring the UV absorbance at 280 nm. The purified T7 RNAP was diluted to a final concentration of 5 mg/mL in storage buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0; 100 mM NaCl; 100 μM EDTA-Na+; 1 mM dithiothreitol; and 75% glycerin), aliquoted, and stored at −80 °C.

Real-time fluorescence measurement of IVT

The sample used for standard in vitro T7 RNAP transcription contained 200 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 30 mM MgCl2, 5 mM NaCl, 20 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2 U/μL murine RNase inhibitor, 5 mM NTPs mix, 0.002 U inorganic pyrophosphatase, 120 nM DNA template, 40 U T7 RNAP, and 100 μM DFHBI. The reaction temperature was typically 37 °C. All reactions were performed in 96-well microtiter plates, and the relative fluorescence units (RFU) generated during IVT were measured in real-time using a microplate reader. Data were processed using Origin 10 software (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).

Denaturing PAGE of IVT products

After the IVT reaction was complete, the samples were treated with 1 U DNase I for 15 min at 37 °C to digest the transcription DNA template. EDTA was added at a final concentration of 60 mM to stop the reaction. The RNA transcripts were mixed with 2 × RNA loading dye (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) in a 1:1 ratio, boiled at 85 °C for 5 min, and immediately placed on ice to stop the reaction. The mixed sample (2 μL) was added to 15% urea-TBE denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The RNA transcript bands were stained with Gel-red dye (Solarbio, Beijing, China) for 5 min. A gel imaging system (Clinx, Shanghai, China) was used to observe the transcription band and acquire photos. The gray level of the gel band was measured using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Results and discussion

Screening fluorescent aptamers suitable for IVT

The RNA product generated from the IVT reaction does not generate fluorescence. To develop a simple, fast, low-cost, and real-time detection method for monitoring RNA synthesis, a double-stranded DNA template for IVT was designed to contain a common T7 promoter (TAATACGACTCACTATA), with a downstream sequence encoding a fluorescent RNA aptamer (Fig. 1a). Several fluorescent RNA aptamers have been reported but their fluorescence intensity, thermal stability, and metal ion dependence vary widely (Ouellet, 2016). To screen the most suitable RNA aptamer for real-time fluorescence monitoring in vitro, we selected five candidate fluorescent aptamers, Spinach (Paige et al. 2011), tSpinach, Broccoli (Filonov et al. 2014), tBroccoli, and iSpinach (Autour et al. 2016), and measured their RFU. Aptamer synthesis and fluorescence were monitored in real-time with a microplate reader in 50-μL reactions in a 96-well plate. Only full-length products folded into the proper structure and bound to the fluorogen DFHBI to produce a fluorescence signal, whereas the double-stranded RNA and abortive products did not generate fluorescence.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Screening a fluorescent aptamer suitable for in vitro transcription. A Schematic design of the real-time fluorescent assay method for monitoring the RNA synthesis. The DNA template contains a T7 promoter and downstream sequence encoding fluorescent RNA aptamer. B The relative fluorescence units (RFU) generated by five different RNA aptamers were measured under the condition that the excitation wavelength (Ex) was 469 nm and the emission wavelength (Em) was 501 nm. C The fluorescence intensities of five different RNA aptamers were measured under the condition that the Ex was 472 nm and the Em was 507 nm. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the triplicate experiments, P < 0.02

These aptamers were transcribed at 37 °C, and their RFU were measured at 25 °C in the presence of 100 mM metal ions (K+ or Na+), as some aptamers strongly depend on the presence of salt to fold correctly (Filonov et al. 2014). The results showed that iSpinach had relatively strong fluorescence at excitation wavelengths of 469 and 472 nm (Fig. 1b, c) and can function in a salt-free environment (Additional file 1: Fig. S2), indicating that iSpinach was suitable for the IVT reaction at 37 °C without K+ supplementation. Because of their low fluorescence in vitro, Broccoli, Spinach, tBroccoli, and tSpinach were not further evaluated in this study.

To confirm this result, we analyzed the RNA transcripts using denaturing PAGE and nucleic acid mass spectrometry (Fig. 2). We observed the target iSpinach band (72 nucleotides), but there were also two other 3′-extended RNA products (76 and 85 nucleotides), which were longer than the full-length product. This result was expected, as T7 RNAP has weak RNA-dependent RNAP activity (Gholamalipour et al. 2018). The 3’-extended RNA products will generate fluorescence in the present of DFHBI. Nevertheless, we found this kind of byproduct usually is not exceed 10% of the total RNA output, so the impact on the results should be quite limited (Fernandez-Millan et al. 2017).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Analysis of iSpinach transcripts by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and nucleic acid mass spectrometry. M represents RNA marker. iSpinach-1, iSpinach-2, and iSpinach-3 represent three different replicates

Effects of ribonucleotide triphosphates and MgCl2 concentrations on the STAR system

To determine the best conditions for the STAR system, we optimized the concentrations of NTPs, MgCl2, monovalent ions, T7 RNAP; temperature; and pH. Beginning with our standard conditions, we determined the optimal concentration of iSpinach DNA template. The transcription yield reached a plateau when the concentration of DNA template exceeded 120 nM (Additional file 1: Fig. S3).

NTPs (Liu et al. 2020) and MgCl2 (Yin and Steitz 2004) affect the efficiency of in vitro T7 RNAP transcription. Mg2+ has important roles in nucleotide addition cycles, and NTPs are substrates of IVT that directly chelate withMg2+. To explore the optimum conditions for the STAR system, we measured the RFU generated at NTP concentrations of 0.5–6 mM in real time (Fig. 3a). The results showed that the RFU, which represents the RNA yield, increased linearly over time at all seven NTP concentrations tested. The RNA yields also increased when the NTP concentrations ranged from 0.5 to 5 mM. However, when NTP concentration exceeded 5 mM, the RNA yield reached a plateau, indicating that 5 mM NTPs support greater RNA synthesis.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of ribonucleotide triphosphate and MgCl2 concentrations on the STAR system. A Effect of NTP concentrations ranging from 0.5 mM to 6 mM. The relative fluorescent units were measured every 5 min. Error bars are standard errors of the mean (SEM). B Effect of MgCl2 concentrations ranging from 5 to 80 mM. The relative fluorescent units were measured every 6 min. The inset shows the results of denaturing PAGE analysis of the 60-min transcription products under different MgCl2 concentrations. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the triplicate experiments

Next, we determined the effect of MgCl2 concentrations ranging from 5 to 80 mM on the STAR system under the optimum NTP concentration (Fig. 3b). We found that both limiting and excessive MgCl2 inhibited the activity of T7 RNAP; 40 mM MgCl2 was the optimal concentration for the STAR system. The RNA transcripts were also analyzed using denaturing PAGE. The RNA yield increased with increasing MgCl2 concentrations and was reduced at MgCl2 concentrations exceeding 40 mM, which is consistent with the fluorescence assay results.

Effect of temperature, pH, and monovalent ions on the STAR system

Temperature is a key factor affecting the efficiency of IVT and affinity of iSpinach binding to DFHBI (Autour et al. 2016). To identify the optimum temperature for the STAR system, we performed transcription experiments at temperatures of 25–50 °C. Fluorescence increased with increasing temperatures from 25 °C to 37 °C and then decreased from 42 °C to 50 °C (Fig. 4a), indicating that iSpinach can form a stable complex with DFHBI at 37 °C. Denaturing PAGE analysis supported these results. The yield of RNA transcripts increased gradually with increasing temperatures but decreased by 80% at 45 °C, with no RNA transcripts observed at temperatures above 45 °C (Fig. 4a). The optimum temperature was approximately 37 °C and 42 °C. These results are consistent with the transcriptional activity of T7 RNAP, whose activity was lost at above 45 °C, indicating that the STAR system can accurately reflect the transcriptional activity of T7 RNAP at different temperatures.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of temperature, pH, and monovalent ions on the STAR system. A Relative fluorescence unit at a range of temperatures, the inset shows the results of denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of the 120-min transcription products. B Relative fluorescence unit for a range of pH values. C Relative fluorescence unit for a range of NaCl concentrations. D Relative fluorescence unit at 20 mM of different kinds of monovalent ions. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the triplicate experiments

The pH affects the charged state of enzymes and substrates (Rodrigues et al. 2013), thereby affecting enzyme activity. We measured the relative fluorescence intensity of the transcription reaction at pH 5.5–8.5. We found that the STAR system was highly sensitive to pH, and the optimum pH value was approximately 7.5, which was our standard condition (Fig. 4b).

Previous studies showed that T7 RNAP is highly sensitive to the ionic strength of ions such as Na+ and Cl (Orlov et al. 2018). Analysis of the effects of 20–400 mM NaCl on the STAR system showed that the RNA yield was strongly inhibited by NaCl. The activity decreased above 20 mM, with only 8.3% remaining activity at 160 mM (Fig. 4c). This result indicates that the system did not require addition of NaCl.

Next, we tested the effects of other monovalent ions on the STAR system, specifically 20 mM potassium, cesium, and lithium. The results showed that the STAR system is not sensitive to any of these monovalent ions, and thus it is not necessary to add them to the IVT reaction (Fig. 4d).

Application of STAR in detecting the activity of T7 RNAP

T7 RNAP has wide applications in in vitro synthesis systems, such as IVT, cell-free transcription/translation systems, and isothermal amplification systems (Ju et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2018). The catalytic activity of T7 RNAP not only affects the final yield of RNA transcripts, but also affects the rate of RNA synthesis. Traditional methods for determining the activity of T7 RNAP typically adopt the isotope method, which is prone to radioactive contamination and has high operating costs, making it difficult to achieve high-throughput (Padmanabhan et al. 2020). Therefore, establishing a simple and efficient method for detecting T7 RNAP activity is helpful for achieving high-throughput and automated activity detection, which is an urgent challenge in research related to T7 RNAP. To demonstrate that STAR can detect the activity of T7 RNAP, we purified T7 RNAP protein and measured the relative fluorescence intensities at T7 RNAP concentrations of 0.78–50 μg/mL in real-time using STAR.

Our results showed that at a specific T7 RNAP concentration, the fluorescence intensity produced by STAR increased proportionally with time (Fig. 5a); the T7 RNAP concentration showed a linear relationship with the RNA transcripts produced by STAR from 0.75 to 25 μg/mL T7 RNAP (Fig. 5a). Nonetheless, beyond 25 μg/mL, T7 RNAP did not produce substantially improved yields (Fig. 5a). We also measured the fluorescence values generated by different concentrations of commercial T7 RNAP. The lowest concentration of T7 RNAP detected by STAR was 0.1 U/μL and the RNA yield reached a plateau once the concentration exceeded 10.4 U/μL. These results demonstrate that the STAR system accurately detected the activity of T7 RNAP within a certain concentration range. In addition, the T7 promoter of the DNA template can be replaced, and thus can be applied to characterize the activities of other types of polymerases such as SP6 RNAP and T3 RNAP.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Application of STAR in characterizing the activity of T7 RNAP. A Real-time determination of relative fluorescence unit produced by STAR under different concentrations of T7 RNAP. B Real-time determination of relative fluorescence unit produced by STAR under different concentrations of commercial T7 RNAP. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the triplicate experiments

Application of STAR in optimizing the initially transcribed region of GFP gene

The complete transcription cycle catalyzed by T7 RNAP involves initiation, elongation, and termination steps (Steitz 2009). Initiation is the rate-limiting step of transcription. Some studies showed that the initially transcribed sequence (ITS) (8–10 base pairs) of DNA template strongly affect the stability of the initiation complex (Henderson et al. 2019). Inappropriate ITS can cause T7 RNAP to fall off the DNA template, resulting in the production of abortive products (2–10 nucleotides), thereby reducing the transcript yield. Therefore, designing a reasonable ITS can improve the production of full-length products and play an important role in RNA synthesis such as for mRNA vaccines. The ITS has been systematically mutagenized in previous studies and shown to affect transcription efficiency (Conrad et al. 2020; Imburgio et al. 2000). These previous studies provided a reliable reference for testing our STAR system.

To investigate the utility of STAR, the initially transcribed sequence (5′-UTR) from the + 1 to + 8 positions of the GFP gene was mutated with each mutation representing a single base-pair change to one of the three other base pairs. For example, the first three mutants contained A, C, or T in place of G at the first nucleotide of the 5′-UTR. To ensure that the measured fluorescence intensities were consistent with the levels of synthesized RNA, denaturing PAGE was performed following each transcription reaction.

We observed that transcripts with a G at position + 1 to + 2 were transcribed more efficiently than those with the three other mutants (Fig. 6). Substituting the G to A at position + 1 resulted in a ~ 93% loss in RNA yield, and the G to T mutant at position + 2 resulted in ~ 60% loss in RNA yield, which corresponded well with the PAGE results (Fig. 6). To confirm this result, we performed truncation experiments at positions + 1 to + 3; transcripts with a G triplet (WT-GGG) were transcribed more robustly compared to other truncated DNA templates containing two G, one G, or no G at positions + 1 to + 3 (Fig. 7). These results agree with previous findings showing that T7 RNAP depends on G at position + 1 to initiate transcription reactions and with common guidelines for T7 RNAP usage in RNA biology (Passalacqua et al. 2020).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Transcription efficiency of systematically mutated initially transcribed regions of GFP gene quantified by STAR. The effect of substituting three other base pairs at each nucleotide position of 5′-UTR (from + 1 to + 8) in the DNA template was determined using STAR system. The X-axis represents different mutants, the Y-axis represents the relative fluorescence units. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the triplicate experiments, P < 0.05. The inset shows the results of denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of the 60-min transcription products

Fig. 7
figure 7

Transcription efficiency of combined mutants and truncated mutants quantified by STAR. The X-axis represents different mutants, the Y-axis represents the relative fluorescence units. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the triplicate experiments, P < 0.02. The inset shows the results of denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of the 60-min transcription products

The downstream sequences from + 4 to + 8 also affected transcription efficiency. Substitution of A-T or T-A base pairs with G-C or C-G base pairs at position + 4 resulted in ~ 62% or greater loss in the RNA yield (Fig. 6). Mutation of + 8A to C and T resulted in 36% and 25% increases in RNA yield, respectively (Fig. 6). However, substitution of + 6A with + 6C resulted in a ~ 100% loss in RNA yield (Fig. 6). These results indicate that this region is more prone to containing A-T or T-A base pairs, which facilitate the melting of DNA templates (Patwardhan et al. 2009).

Next, we combined the mutations in the DNA templates showing increased activity. The product transcribed from the 3T4T mutant was 50% higher than that of the wild type (WT-GGG), and the 3T8C mutant had little effect (Fig. 7). However, T7 RNAP did not recognize other combined mutations, such as 4T8C, 4T8T, and 3T8T (Fig. 7). These results indicate that the initially transcribed region strongly affects the transcriptional activity of T7 RNAP.

The target gene selected for transcription also leads to deviation in the transcription results (Conrad et al. 2020). For example, a mutation at position + 5 has little effect on the transcription efficiency of iSpinach, demonstrating that sequence of the initially transcribed region of different genes must be optimized. Nonetheless, our results generally agree with those of previous studies and suggest that the STAR system is reliable and can be used to rapidly optimize the 5′-UTR sequence. A traditional transcription reactions protocol to analyze RNA using PAGE method require gel preparation, sample loading, electrophoresis, and gel staining steps. The full process usually takes at least 180 min. The maximum throughput of one electrophoresis tank is often 60 samples. As a comparison, STAR method can monitor the transcription of 384 samples simultaneously. Only 5–10 min are required for the transcription of different samples and to make timely adjustments. Therefore, the detection rate of the STAR method is at least 100-fold faster than that of conventional PAGE.

Conclusion

We developed a high-throughput, simple, and real-time iSpinach aptamer-based method for monitoring synthesized full-length RNA in vitro that can be easily implemented by most laboratories. This method is insensitive to metal ions, and no KCl is needed to give a strong fluorescent signal. And it can give more stable results than Höfer's method when targeting the same mRNA in the optimization of IVT system. We quantified the effects of the fundamental reaction components, reaction conditions, and initially transcribed region of the 5′-UTR sequence on real-time IVT. The NTP mix, MgCl2, and NaCl concentrations strongly influenced the total RNA yield, and most of our results supported and confirmed those of previous IVT studies using PAGE. The STAR system exhibited high thermostability, with an optimal reaction temperature between 37 °C and 42 °C, which is consistent with the conditions of conventional IVT reactions. In conclusion, this method only requires a conventional microplate reader and is at least 100-fold faster than traditional PAGE analysis. Our method can be used to rapidly optimize the IVT conditions, promoter strength, and 5′-UTR sequence and is useful for polymerase screening.

Availability of data and materials

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available in the paper and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

IVT:

In vitro transcription

T7 RNAP:

T7 RNA polymerase

FLAPs:

Fluorescent light-up RNA aptamers

DFHBI:

3,5-Difluoro-4-hydroxybenzylidene imidazolinone

STAR:

ISpinach aptamer-based monitoring of Transcription Activity in Real-time

RFU:

Relative fluorescence units

PAGE:

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

NTP:

Ribonucleotide triphosphate

ITS:

Initially transcribed sequence

References

  • Autour A, Westhof E, Ryckelynck M (2016) iSpinach: a fluorogenic RNA aptamer optimized for in vitro applications. Nucleic Acids Res 44:2491–2500

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baiersdorfer M, Boros G, Muramatsu H, Mahiny A, Vlatkovic I, Sahin U, Kariko K (2019) A facile method for the removal of dsRNA contaminant from in vitro-transcribed mRNA. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 15:26–35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Burcar BT, Cassidy LM, Moriarty EM, Joshi PC, Coari KM, McGown LB (2013) Potential pitfalls in MALDI-TOF MS analysis of abiotically synthesized RNA oligonucleotides. Origins Life Evol B 43:247–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chelliserrykattil J, Ellington AD (2004) Evolution of a T7 RNA polymerase variant that transcribes 2′-O-methyl RNA. Nat Biotechnol 22:1155–1160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Zhang D, Su N, Bao B, Xie X, Zuo F, Yang L, Wang H, Jiang L, Lin Q, Fang M (2019) Visualizing RNA dynamics in live cells with bright and stable fluorescent RNAs. Nat Biotech 37(11):1287–1293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad T, Plumbom I, Alcobendas M, Vidal R, Sauer S (2020) Maximizing transcription of nucleic acids with efficient T7 promoters. Commun Biol 3:439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dao NT, Haselsberger R, Khuc MT, Phan AT, Voityuk AA, Michel-Beyerle ME (2021) Photophysics of DFHBI bound to RNA aptamer Baby Spinach. Sci Rep 11(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Millan P, Autour A, Ennifar E, Westhof E, Ryckelynck M (2017) Crystal structure and fluorescence properties of the iSpinach aptamer in complex with DFHBI. RNA 23:1788–1795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Filonov GS, Moon JD, Svensen N, Jaffrey SR (2014) Broccoli: rapid selection of an RNA mimic of green fluorescent protein by fluorescence-based selection and directed evolution. J Am Chem Soc 136:16299–16308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gholamalipour Y, Karunanayake Mudiyanselage A, Martin CT (2018) 3’ end additions by T7 RNA polymerase are RNA self-templated, distributive and diverse in character-RNA-Seq analyses. Nucleic Acids Res 46:9253–9263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gong P, Martin CT (2006) Mechanism of instability in abortive cycling by T7 RNA polymerase. J Biol Chem 281:23533–23544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guzman-Zapata D, Dominguez-Anaya Y, Macedo-Osorio KS, Tovar-Aguilar A, Castrejon-Flores JL, Duran-Figueroa NV, Badillo-Corona JA (2017) mRNA imaging in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii using the light-up aptamer Spinach. J Biotechnol 251:186–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson KL, Evensen CE, Molzahn CM, Felth LC, Dyke S, Liao GY, Shkel IA, Record MT (2019) RNA polymerase: step-by-step kinetics and mechanism of transcription initiation. Biochemistry 58:2339–2352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer K, Langejurgen LV, Jaschke A (2013) Universal aptamer-based real-time monitoring of enzymatic RNA synthesis. J Am Chem Soc 135:13692–13694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Imburgio D, Rong MQ, Ma KY, McAllister WT (2000) Studies of promoter recognition and start site selection by T7 RNA polymerase using a comprehensive collection of promoter variants. Biochemistry 39:10419–10430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jain S, Venkataraman A, Wechsler ME, Peppas NA (2021) Messenger RNA-based vaccines: past, present, and future directions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 179:114000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ju Y, Kim HY, Ahn JK, Park HG (2021) Ultrasensitive version of nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) utilizing a nicking and extension chain reaction system. Nanoscale 13:10785–10791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanavarioti A (2019) HPLC methods for purity evaluation of man-made single-stranded RNAs. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37642-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kartje ZJ, Janis HI, Mukhopadhyay S, Gagnon KT (2021) Revisiting T7 RNA polymerase transcription in vitro with the Broccoli RNA aptamer as a simplified real-time fluorescent reporter. J Biol Chem 296:100175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu QJ, Ke YQ, Kan YH, Tang XJ, Li XJ, He YJ, Wu L (2020) Compatibility and fidelity of mirror-image thymidine in transcription events by T7 RNA polymerase. Mol Ther-Nucl Acids 21:604–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlov MA, Ryasik AA, Sorokin AA (2018) Destabilization of the DNA duplex of actively replicating promoters of T7-like bacteriophages. Mol Biol 52(5):686–692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ouellet J (2016) RNA fluorescence with light-up aptamers. Front Chem 4:29

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Padmanabhan R, Sarcar SN, Miller DL (2020) Promoter length affects the initiation of T7 RNA polymerase in vitro: new insights into promoter/polymerase co-evolution. J Mol Evol 88:179–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paige JS, Wu KY, Jaffrey SR (2011) RNA mimics of green fluorescent protein. Science 333:642–646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Passalacqua LFM, Dingilian AI, Luptak A (2020) Single-pass transcription by T7 RNA polymerase. RNA 26:2062–2071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Patwardhan RP, Lee C, Litvin O, Young DL, Pe’er D, Shendure J (2009) High-resolution analysis of DNA regulatory elements by synthetic saturation mutagenesis. Nat Biotechnol 27:1173–1175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Paul S, Stang A, Lennartz K, Tenbusch M, Uberla K (2013) Selection of a T7 promoter mutant with enhanced in vitro activity by a novel multi-copy bead display approach for in vitro evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues RC, Ortiz C, Berenguer-Murcia A, Torres R, Fernandez-Lafuente R (2013) Modifying enzyme activity and selectivity by immobilization. Chem Soc Rev 42:6290–6307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steitz TA (2009) The structural changes of T7 RNA polymerase from transcription initiation to elongation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19:683–690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Su YC, Hammond MC (2020) RNA-based fluorescent biosensors for live cell imaging of small molecules and RNAs. Curr Opin Biotech 63:157–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trachman RJ, Abdolahzadeh A, Andreoni A, Cojocaru R, Knutson JR, Ryckelynck M, Unrau PJ, Ferre-D’Amare AR (2018) Crystal structures of the mango-II RNA aptamer reveal heterogeneous fluorophore binding and guide engineering of variants with improved selectivity and brightness. Biochemistry 57:3544–3548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Villicaña C, Cruz G, Zurita M (2014) The basal transcription machinery as a target for cancer therapy. Cancer Cell Int 14(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin YW, Steitz TA (2004) The structural mechanism of translocation and helicase activity in T7 RNA polymerase. Cell 116:393–404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ying ZM, Yuan YY, Tu B, Tang LJ, Yu RQ, Jiang JH (2019) A single promoter system co-expressing RNA sensor with fluorescent proteins for quantitative mRNA imaging in living tumor cells. Chem Sci 10:4828–4833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YC, Huang QY, Deng ZX, Xu YC, Liu TG (2018) Enhancing the efficiency of cell-free protein synthesis system by systematic titration of transcription and translation components. Biochem Eng J 138:47–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng G, Zhao L, Yuan D, Li J, Yang G, Song D, Miao H, Shu L, Mo X, Xu X et al (2022) A genetically encoded fluorescent biosensor for monitoring ATP in living cells with heterobifunctional aptamers. Biosens Bioelectron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Prof. Yu Liu from Shanghai Jiao Tong University for providing the protocol of in vitro transcription and T7 RNAP enzyme purification.

Funding

This study was financially supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFE0200501, 2020YFA0907900), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 32030063), Tianjin Synthetic Biotechnology Innovation Capability Improvement Action, Shanghai Pilot Program for Basic Research—Shanghai Jiao Tong University(21TQ1400210).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GY conceived the project and designed the experiment. WQ, LL, FY and SW carried out the experiments. GY and WQ wrote the manuscripts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guang-Yu Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Fig. S1. Preparation of the DNA linear templates of different aptamers. M: Marker. 1, 2: Spinach DNA template. 3, 4: tSpinach. 5, 6: iSpinach. 7: Broccoli. 8: tBroccoli. Fig. S2. Effect of monovalent metal ions on the fluorescence of complexes formed by different aptamers with DFHBI. The reactions were performed at 25oC. Fig. S3. Effect of the DNA template concentrations on the STAR system. Table S1. Aptamer sequence used in this study. Table S2. Strains and plasmids used in this study. Table S3. Primers used in this study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qin, W., Li, L., Yang, F. et al. High-throughput iSpinach fluorescent aptamer-based real-time monitoring of in vitro transcription. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 9, 112 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00598-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00598-0

Keywords