Skip to main content

Tunnel engineering for modulating the substrate preference in cytochrome P450BsβHI

Abstract

An active site is normally located inside enzymes, hence substrates should go through a tunnel to access the active site. Tunnel engineering is a powerful strategy for refining the catalytic properties of enzymes. Here, P450BsβHI (Q85H/V170I) derived from hydroxylase P450Bsβ from Bacillus subtilis was chosen as the study model, which is reported as a potential decarboxylase. However, this enzyme showed low decarboxylase activity towards long-chain fatty acids. Here, a tunnel engineering campaign was performed for modulating the substrate preference and improving the decarboxylation activity of P450BsβHI. The finally obtained BsβHI-F79A variant had a 15.2-fold improved conversion for palmitic acid; BsβHI-F173V variant had a 3.9-fold improved conversion for pentadecanoic acid. The study demonstrates how the substrate preference can be modulated by tunnel engineering strategy.

Introduction

Enzymes are able to catalyze many specific reactions and are widely used in practical application. Previously, the enzyme functions were limited around their natural use; nowadays, the enzymes could be developed by engineering their activity and selectivity for meeting human demands (Bornscheuer et al. 2012; Damborsky and Brezovsky 2014). Two common engineering strategies are the directed evolution based on Darwinian theory and rational design based on the structure–function relationship (Bornscheuer and Pohl 2001). Rational design often focused on the substrate binding pocket which directly influences the enzymatic process (Bornscheuer and Pohl 2001). However, the experiences of directed evolution told us the residues outside the active site also influence the enzyme properties (Kress et al. 2018). Researching on those “non-hotspot” rather than typical active site may be beneficial for expanding the understanding of proteins.

The urgent problem now confronting us is how to obtain the important “non-hotspot” domains beyond the enzyme active site. Tunnel engineering may be one of the answers. Enzymes spanning all of the six classes are found to exist of the tunnels (Kingsley and Lill 2015). It was reported that more than 64% enzymes annotated in Catalytic Site Atlas library have the buried active site with the tunnels connecting the enzyme binding pocket and the environment (Pravda et al. 2014). The tunnels could support the transport of solvent, product and solvent between the enzyme active site and bulk solvent, which play important role in enzymatic reaction (Kokkonen et al. 2019; Zhou and McCammon 2010). The behavior of substrate on the tunnels to the active site could affect the activity, stability and substrate selectivity (Kingsley and Lill 2015; Lu et al. 2019; Yu et al. 2013). A typical example might be that the R47 and Y51 residues, two polar amino acids located at the end of access tunnel of P450 BM3, which could regulate the entry of substrate, water and co-solvents (Whitehouse et al. 2012). Cheng et al. found that a single position located on the access tunnel of nitrile hydratase could invert the regio-selectivity towards aliphatic α,ω-dinitriles (Cheng et al. 2016). Bauer et al. narrowed the substrate tunnel by replacing a valine by a larger isoleucine causing a significantly improved catalytic efficiency of decarboxylase P450OleT towards short-chain fatty acid (Bauer, et al. 2020). Tunnel engineering is becoming a promising strategy to optimize the enzyme property. Several scientists have developed many algorithms for determination of enzymatic tunnels, such as CAVER (Kozlikova et al. 2014), MOLE (Sehnal et al. 2013), AQUA-DUCT (Magdziarz et al. 2017) and CCCPP (Benkaidali et al. 2014). However, compared with the prediction of tunnels, only a few experimental tunnel engineering examples were reported (Kress et al. 2018). Here, we aim to develop the application of tunnel engineering for modulating the substrate preference.

α-Alkenes are multifunctional compounds that perform an important industrial value and an extraordinary economic importance due to their flexible and active chemical performance. Particularly, long-chain α-alkenes can be used in the synthesis of high-value biofuel, lubrication and surfactant (Lee et al. 2008). However, α-alkenes mostly come from non-renewable petroleum cracking (Dutta et al. 2014). Energy-intensive process and harsh reaction conditions prompted researchers to focus on enzymatic synthetic strategy of α-alkenes (Schirmer et al. 2010). To date, three biotransformation strategies that convert fatty acids or its derivative to alkene were reported (Yi et al. 2014). A three-gene cluster from Micrococcus luteus represented a production of long-chain alkenes from a head-to-head condensation of fatty acids (Beller et al. 2010); type I polyketide synthases from Synechococcus sp. were involved in a production of medium-chain α-alkenes via an elongation decarboxylation mechanism (Mendez-Perez et al. 2011); and some members from cytochrome P450 family are able to decarboxylate fatty acids and produce α-alkenes directly (Grant et al. 2015; Hsieh and Makris 2016). Among those pathways, the decarboxylic reaction catalyzed by P450 is the simplest strategy. Free fatty acids could be used as substrate directly, which represent potential of producing α-alkenes on a large-scale based in engineered cell factory.

Representative P450 decarboxylases belong to CYP152 subfamily, such as P450Bsβ (CYP152A1) from Bacillus subtilis (Matsunaga et al. 1999), P450Spα (CYP152B1) from Sphingomonas paucimobilis (Matsunaga et al. 2000), and P450oleT (CYP152L1) from Jeotgalicoccus sp. (Yi et al. 2014). CYP152 family could utilize H2O2 as an oxidant, which is miscible with water and easy to directly add to the reaction than O2 employed by most of P450 monooxygenases (Jiang et al. 2019). P450oleT is a particularly remarkable member among CYP152 family since it presented prominent decarboxylation property, which is able to convert medium- or long-chain fatty acids to corresponding carboxylic acids (Rude et al. 2011). However, P450oleT shows severely inactivated under millimole concentrations of H2O2 (Dennig et al. 2015). In contrast, P450Bsβ has relatively high H2O2 tolerance (Wang, et al. 2020). As the first member of CYP152 subfamily, P450Bsβ was the research hotspot since it was discovered by Isamu et al. in 1999, although wild-type P450Bsβ showed higher hydroxylation activity rather than decarboxylation activity (Matsunaga, et al. 1999). Interestingly, some P450Bsβ variants also exhibited satisfactory decarboxylation ability. Using directed evolution method, Wang et al. evolved a P450BSβ variant (V74I/Q85H/F166M/G290V) which showed high reactivity towards saturated and unsaturated fatty acids (Wang et al. 2020). Xu et al. reported a P450BsβHI variant (Q85H/V170I) which displayed enhanced decarboxylation activity towards medium- or long-chain fatty acids (Xu et al. 2017). However, the yield of α-alkenes drops sharply as the length of the carbon chain of the substrate increases, which is the main limitation of the use of P450Bsβ for long-chain α-alkenes synthesis.

In the present work, the cytochrome P450BsβHI was used as research model. We systematically analyzed the access tunnels in this enzyme. In order to improve the decarboxylation activity of P450BsβHI to long-chain fatty acids, two residues related to the access tunnels diameter were identified and mutated. In addition, the substrate selection mechanism controlled by tunnels of P450BsβHI was briefly discussed.

Experimental

Strain, plasmid and chemicals

Escherichia. coli strain BL21(DE3) cells (used for gene expression) and TOP10 cells (used for molecular cloning) were purchased from TransGen Ltd. (China) The gene P450BsβHI (derived from P450Bsβ (NCBI Reference Sequence: WP_119898938.1) with a Q85H/V170I mutagenesis) was synthesized by Inovogen Ltd. (China). Fast Mutagenesis kit was from Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd (China). Plasmid extraction kits and gel extraction kits were obtained from Omega Bio-tek (USA). Capric acid, lauric acid, myristic acid, stearic acid, undecene and tridecene were purchased from BioRo Yee Ltd. (China). All chemicals used were of analytical grade.

Molecular modeling and simulation

The structure model of P450BsβHI was constructed by PyMoL Molecular Graphics System (version 2.3.3) based using the crystal structure of P450Bsβ from Bacillus subtilis (PDB code: 1IZO with the resolution in 2.10 Å) as template (Lee et al. 2003). Molecular dynamics simulation was carried out in YASARA (version 17.8.15) using the built-in MD macro “md_run.mrc” with the AMBER03 force field (Hess et al. 2008). Structure was solvated into a 12 Å cube simulation cell of water molecules. The box was filled with 3857 water molecules. The simulations of the protein–water system was performed at 303 K, pH value of 8.0. Na+ and Cl were used to neutralize the systems. In all simulations, constant pressure periodic boundary conditions were used for 5 ns MD production. The simulation snapshots were captured every 100 ps from 2.5 ns to 5 ns (after RMSD stabilizes).

Tunnel analysis

Tunnel analyzed by MOLEonline (Pravda et al. 2018) with following parameters: interior threshold 1.1 Å, bottleneck tolerance 3 Å, bottleneck radius 1.2 Å. Probe radius 5 Å, surface cover radius 10 Å. The starting point was the heme co-factor. Water molecules were not considered in tunnel analysis.

Tunnels analyzed by Caver Analyst 2.0 BETA (Jurcik et al. 2018) with following procedures: after the MD simulation, 25 snapshots were introduced to Caver Analyst 2.0 BETA. Tunnel calculations were performed with the analytical parameters as follows: probe radius of 1.4 Å, shell depth of 4 Å, shell radius of 3 Å, clustering threshold of 3.5, and the starting point of surrounding the residues of R242, P243, and heme. After the tunnel calculations, the influence of the tunnel by related residues was extracted from the function of tunnel statistics and residue graph. Finally, amino acid residues with significant influence on the tunnel bottleneck were selected for further mutagenesis experiments.

Evolutionary conservation analysis of P450BsβHI

The evolutionary conservation of P450BsβHI residues were analyzed by the ConSurf server (https://consurf.tau.ac.il/) (Ashkenazy et al. 2010, 2016; Celniker et al. 2013). The homolog search algorithm was HMMER, and the proteins database was UNIREF-90. There were 150 sequences used for a Multiple Sequence Alignment with the alignment method of MAFFT-L-INS-i.

Relative folding free energies (ΔΔGfold) analysis

The ΔΔGfold values were calculated using FoldX employing the YASARA plugin (version 19.12.4). The structure model of P450BsβHI and its variants were constructed by PyMoL Molecular Graphics System (version 2.3.3) based using the crystal structure of P450Bsβ from Bacillus subtilis (PDB code: 1IZO with the resolution in 2.10 Å) as template. The initial structure of P450BsβHI was constructed by the Automated Modeling Tool of Swiss Model Web Service (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/) using the crystal structure of P450Bsβ from Bacillus subtilis (PDB code: 1IZO with the resolution in 2.10 Å) as template. FoldX parameters were temperature 298 K, pH 8, and 0.05 M ionic strength.

Molecular docking

Ligand lauric acid was created and minimized in YASARA (version 19.12.14). A grid box of 8 Å around the active site was generated by centering the heme iron of P450BsβHI or its variants. Molecular docking simulations were performed in YASARA using the built-in macro “dock_run.mrc”. Docking method was VINA with a fixed protein backbone. 25 docking runs were performed for each variant, and the docking poses were clustered by applying a RMSD cutoff of 5 Å and using the default settings provided within the YASARA dock_run macro file.

Site-specific mutagenesis

The P450BsβHI gene was inserted into plasmid pET22b( +) between the NdeI and HindIII restriction nuclease sites, with the His-tag encoding sequence at N-terminal. All of the variants were done by Fast Mutagenesis kit.

The variants with single mutation used P450BsβHI as template, in which F79 and F173 sites were individually replaced with relatively small amino acids, including glycine, valine, alanine, serine, isoleucine, threonine, cysteine, leucine, and proline. Variants with double mutations used BsβHI-F173V variant as template.

Heterologous expression and purification

P450BsβHI and its variants were transferred to E. coli BL21(DE3) for expression. Recombinant E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells were grown in LB medium (5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L tryptone, and 5 g/L NaCl) supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/ml) at 37 ℃ until the OD600 reached about 0.6. All of genes were induced by the addition of 0.1 mM of isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 18 ℃ for 12 h. Then the cells were harvested and ultrasonically broken. Cell-free extractions were used for purification.

Enzymes were purified by His-tag affinity chromatography. Cell-free extractions was loaded onto a Ni–NTA column and equilibrated by lysis buffer (50 mM of Tris–HCl, 10 mM of imidazole and 300 mM of NaCl, pH 7.8). Then the protein was sequential eluted by wash buffer (50 mM of Tris–HCl, 30 mM of imidazole and 300 mM of NaCl, pH 7.8) and elution buffer (50 mM of Tris–HCl, 300 mM of imidazole and 300 mM of NaCl, pH 7.8). Eluates were concentrated with an ultrafiltration (Millipore, Germany). The concentrations of purified proteins were determined by BCA kit (Solarbio, China).

Enzymatic assay

The bio-catalytic system contained 10 µM P450BsβHI enzyme (or its variants), 500 µM fatty acid substrate (from a 100 mM stock solution in ethanol) and 1 mM H2O2 in a final volume of 1 mL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH = 8.0). The reaction was carried out at 30 ℃ for 2 h. After reaction, 200 µM of the tridecene was added as internal standard compound (particularly, undecene was used as internal standard when using myristic acid as the substrate), then additional 50 µL of 6 M HCl was used for reaction quenching. The mixture was extracted by 800 μL hexane. Following extraction, the alkene products were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS-QP2020, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with a Sh-Rxi-5Sil-Ms column (Shimadzu, Japan) using helium as carrier gas. In particular, for detection of hydroxyl fatty acid products, the extracted samples were additionally derivatized with 100 μL N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) at 50 ℃ for 2 h before GC–MS analysis. The oven temperature was controlled initially at 50 ℃ for 2 min, then increased at the rate of 10 ℃ min−1 to 280 ℃, and held for 10 min. The injecting temperature was 280 ℃. The concentration of alkene and hydroxyl fatty acid products was calculated by calibration curves with internal standards (Additional file 1: Figure S5).

Results and discussion

The result and discussion part is divided into three parts. In the first part, the P450BsβHI access tunnels were analyzed and two amino acids were identified as beneficial key residues. In the second part, the variants based on the two key residues were characterized with lauric acid substrate then 5 best variants were selected. In the third part, the substrate preference of selected P450BsβHI variants was investigated.

P450BsβHI access tunnel analysis and hot spots identification

Access tunnels are responsible for ligand transportation between active site and solvent environment in enzymes with buried active site (Kokkonen et al. 2019). Using MOLEonline server (Pravda et al. 2018), two access tunnels were found in P450BsβHI (Fig. 1a, b and Table 1). The tunnels showed typical cytochrome features. The F and G helix define the most common tunnels among cytochrome P450s (Cojocaru et al. 2007). The peripheral flexible F-G loop can control the tunnel topology then influence substrate\recognition. Representative tunnel in P450BsβHI is Tunnel 1, which goes through the A helix, B’ helix, B-B’ loop B’-C loop, and F-G loop. Tunnel 1 consists of a large number of nonpolar residues, which facilitates the access of hydrophobic substrates (Additional file 1: Table S1). Tunnel 2 threads through B-B’ loop and B’-C loop, which is also common among P450s. Compared with Tunnel 1, Tunnel 2 shows higher polarity and contains a hydrophilic area near the surface of P450BsβHI (Fig. 1c and Table 1). In addition to participating in substrate transport, this tunnel may be also involved the controlling water diffusion.

Fig. 1
figure1

The overall structure and substrate access tunnels information of P450BsβHI. The structure model of P450BsβHI was constructed by PyMoL based on the crystal structure of P450Bsβ (PDB: 1IZO). The access tunnel identification and hydrophobicity analysis were carried out with MOLEonline (Pravda, L, 2018). a and b The structure of the P450BsβHI enzyme. Access tunnel 1 (T1) and 2 (T2) were colored in yellow and green, respectively. The B-B’ loop, B’-C loop and F-G loop were colored in orange, purple and cyan, respectively, c The hydrophobicity property of identified tunnels. Hydrophobicity index according to Hilda Cid et al from the charged residues (Glu -1.14) to nonpolar residues (Ile 1.81) (Cid et al. 1992)

Table 1 The properties of identified access tunnels in P450BsβHI

In order to find potentially important residues, we set four criterions: (1) located in the tunnel bottleneck area; (2) being highly influential along the entire tunnel; (3) located in the loop area; (4) being not completely conserved in its homologous cytochromes. Caver Analyst 2.0 software was chosen for analyzing the residues influence, which provides an opportunity to explore the portion of the tunnel influenced by a particular amino acid (Jurcik et al. 2018). We analyzed the tunnel properties and bottleneck residues influence over 5 ns (Fig. 2). The results indicate that residues of F173 and V74 have high impact on Tunnel 1, and H85 and F79 are the main bottleneck residues in access Tunnel 2. Among high-impact residues, H85 is the core residues for P450BsβHI decarboxylation activity (Xu et al. 2017), V74 is located in the middle of B’ helix, while the two phenylalanine, F79 and F173, are non-conservative (Additional file 1: Figure S1) and located in the B’-C loop and F-G loop, respectively. Given that, F79 and F173 residues were chosen for further analysis to optimize the enzymatic property while avoid ruining tunnel architecture.

Fig. 2
figure2

Evolution of residues lining the access tunnels of P450BsβHI. The access tunnel analysis was carried out with Caver Analyst 2.0 BETA. The left part is bottleneck residues lining of tunnel 1 and 2. The upper right part shows graph representation plots the tunnel width along its centerline. Each line represents the tunnel in one timestep. The lower right part describes the list of all residues contributing to the tunnel. The horizontal position of the color in the line shows which part of the tunnel this residue influences. All tunnel structure information was from the 5-ns snapshot of MD simulation

Theoretically, the transport ability of substrates between enzyme active site and solvent environment could be adjusted by gates located at the access tunnels (Gora et al. 2013). Aromatic amino acids in access tunnels bottleneck often participated in the control of the putative gates (Pavlova et al. 2009). As shown in Fig. 2, the huge aromatic side chains of F79 and F173 were involved in the tunnel bottleneck regions. Here, the two phenylalanine residues F79 and F173 are presumed to be the “gatekeeper”, i.e., control the access of substrate from solvent environment to P450BsßHI active site. In addition, the F79 and F173 are also deemed to stabilize the fatty acid substrates via hydrophobic interactions (Lee et al. 2003). Based on the critical location of the two residues, it is assumed the large phenyl side chain of phenylalanine maintains substrate stability, but hinders the entry of long-chain fatty acid substrates. A more flexible substrate entrance may benefit to increase enzyme activity towards long-chain fatty acids substrate. To test the hypothesis, the F79 and F173 residues were replaced by relatively small amino acid including cysteine, isoleucine, leucine, alanine, glycine valine, serine, threonine and proline, in mutagenesis experiments, respectively. The variants stability was evaluated by analysis of the relative free energy of folding (ΔΔGfold) (Cui et al. 2020) and no unstable substitution was found (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Variants were heterologously expressed in E. coil BL21(DE3).

Decarbonylation activity of P450BsβHI variants

As a hydrogen peroxide-dependent enzyme, P450BsβHI relies on H2O2 as an electrons provider and oxygen supplier (Xu et al. 2017). To select promising variants of P450BsβHI, we examined the enzyme activity with the substrate of lauric acid using H2O2 as the sole co-factor. Decarboxylation efficiency was characterized by α-undecene yield. As shown in Fig. 3, 9 of 18 single-site variants showed improved yield of α-undecene. Particularly, BsβHI-F79A, BsbHI-F79S, BsβHI-F79T, BsβHI-F79V, and BsβHI-F173V exhibited more than 1.5-fold increase of α-undecene yield compared to P450BsβHI. The optimal variant BsβHI-F79T and BsβHI-F79V showed 3.1-fold improvement of α-undecene yield. Then we focused on the alterations of identified tunnels in beneficial variants using MOLEonline server (Additional file 1: Table S3). The trends of decreased tunnel length and increased bottleneck radius were observed in the putative substrate tunnels (Tunnel 1) among variants, which is consistent with our previous assumptions. F79A variant showed the shortest substrate tunnel and the widest bottleneck radius, which were 2.8 Å decrease and 0.4 Å improvement, respectively. Interestingly, for both F79 and F173, we observed that the best decarboxylation performances were achieved by the valine substitution. The obvious feature of those two variants is the wider Tunnel 2. It is speculated that Tunnel 2 also undertakes the tunnel transfer task although this tunnel prefers polar water. Compared with Tunnel 1, Tunnel 2 has a longer length and a narrower bottleneck, which indicates that the Tunnel 2 may only serve as an auxiliary transportation for substrate. In short, the results indicated that the replacement of phenylalanine residue in positions 79 and 173 with relatively small amino acids (less bulky) had significant effect on the tunnels property and enzyme activity of P450BsβHI.

Fig. 3
figure3

Evolution of the activity of P450BsβHI variants towards the decarboxylation of lauric acid. The α-undecene products were qualitatively determined by contrasting with standard sample, and quantified by external standard method. Every bio-catalytic system contained 10 µM P450BsβHI enzyme (or its variants), 500 µM lauric acid substrate (from a 100 mM stock solution in ethanol) and 1 mM H2O2 in a final volume of 1 mL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH = 8.0). Results shown are mean ± SD of duplicated experiments

To further investigate the influence of substitution combination on the catalytic performance of P450BsβHI, we recombined the beneficial substitutions. Therefore, a series of double-site variants were constructed, which were BsβHI-F79A/F173V, BsβHI-F79S/F173V, BsβHI-F79T/F173V, and BsβHI-F79V/F173V. However, all of the double-site variants show very low α-undecene production. One possibility is that the fatty acid substrates located in the binding pocket lost the sufficient stability in the double-site variants. It was reported that the F79 and F173 residues are important for stabilization of substrate by hydrophobic interaction (Lee et al. 2003). Given that, a molecular docking simulation was carried out to examine the substrate binding affinity of P450BsβHI and its variants (Additional file 1: Table S4). Except for BsβHI-F173V, all variants showed higher binding energies and dissociation constants. For the four double-site variants, this trend is even more pronounced, especially dissociation constants. Possibly, that substrate may not be structurally complementary to the P450BsβHI active site in the double-site variants, which inhibited the catalytic activity. In other words, although the lauric acid substrate is more accessible to the binding pocket in double-site variants, the lack of strong hydrophobic interaction with F79 and F173 residues resulted in flexible and unstable binding of substrate around heme. Hence, the single-site variants of BsβHI-F79A, BsbHI-F79S, BsβHI-F79T, BsβHI-F79V, and BsβHI-F173V were chosen for further test.

Investigation of substrate preference in P450BsβHI variants

Four additional fatty acids (capric acid, myristic acid, pentadecanoic acid, and palmitic acid) were investigated to probe the substrate profile of P450BsβHI variants and explain whether the decarboxylation activity of P450BsβHI variants is improved towards other medium- and long-chain fatty acids. In addition, given the important industrial application of styrene, phenylpropionic acid was also added for testing. As shown in Fig. 4, the decarboxylation activities of BsβHI-F79T, BsβHI-F79V, and BsβHI-F173V are higher than P450BsβHI with capric acid as the substrate, while toward long-chain fatty acids substrate, as a general trend, all candidates of P450BsβHI variants exhibit higher catalytic efficiency than P450BsβHI. Intriguingly, optimal decarboxylation efficiency toward different substrates exists in different variants. While BsβHI-F173V possesses the highest activity toward myristic acid and pentadecanoic acid, BsβHI-F79A is the best toward palmitic acid. Besides alkenes, product distribution analysis showed that the yield of hydroxyl fatty acids was also increased (Table 2). Both the variants possessed broader access tunnels than the tunnels in P450BsβHI (Additional file 1: Table S3). We reasoned that this observation may stem from the compatibility between the substrate and access tunnels. Alanine has the smallest side chain, so it provided the F79A variant the widest substrate tunnel, which is able to accommodate relatively larger fatty acid substrate, like palmitic acid. Meanwhile, hydrophobic interaction provided by nonpolar alanine or valine also reduces substrate flexibility to fatty acid substrates, leading to higher stability of enzyme–substrate complex during the reaction cycle. In addition, only trace styrene was detected when using the phenylpropionic acid as substrate, probably due to the strong preference of P450BsβHI towards fatty acid substrates (Xu et al. 2017).

Fig. 4
figure4

Decarboxylation performance of P450BsβHI and its variants towards various organic acid. Capric acid, myristic acid, pentadecanoic acid, palmitic acid, and phenylpropionic acid were used as substrate. All of the α-alkene products were qualitatively determined by contrasting with standard sample, and quantified by external standard method. Every bio-catalytic system contained 10 µM P450BsβHI enzyme (or its variants), 500 µM corresponding fatty acid substrate (from a 100 mM stock solution in ethanol) and 1 mM H2O2 in a final volume of 1 mL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH = 8.0). Results shown are mean ± SD of duplicated experiments

Table 2 Regioselectivity of P450BsβHI and two best variants (BsβHI-F79A and BsβHI-F173V) towards four fatty acid substrates

Conclusions

Overall, an access tunnel engineering was carried out to understand the substrate preference as well as for improving the decarboxylation activity and of P450BsβHI. The structure indicates that two residues (F79 and F173) locate in the bottleneck of tunnels. A series of variants of P450BsβHI were generated and investigated. Significantly improved decarboxylation activity was observed in BsβHI-F79A and BsβHI-F173V variants towards long-chain fatty acids. The results reveal that the appropriate reduction of the amino acid size at the gate of tunnels improves the enzymatic activity towards larger substrates, like long-chain fatty acids. Furthermore, our study shows that identifying and engineering key residues lining the access tunnels may be a valuable and efficient strategy for improving the performance of enzymes with buried active sites.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and the supplementary information file.

References

  1. Ashkenazy H, Abadi S, Martz E, Chay O, Mayrose I, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N (2016) ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res 44(W1):W344-350

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashkenazy H, Erez E, Martz E, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N (2010) ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 38(Web Server Issue):529–533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer D, Zachos I, Sieber V (2020) Production of propene from n-Butanol: a three-step cascade utilizing the cytochrome P450 fatty acid decarboxylase OleTJE. ChemBioChem 21(22):3273–3281

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beller HR, Goh EB, Keasling JD (2010) Genes involved in long-chain alkene biosynthesis in Micrococcus luteus. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(4):1212–1223

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Benkaidali L, Andre F, Maouche B, Siregar P, Benyettou M, Maurel F et al (2014) Computing cavities, channels, pores and pockets in proteins from non-spherical ligands models. Bioinformatics 30(6):792–800

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bornscheuer UT, Huisman GW, Kazlauskas RJ, Lutz S, Moore JC, Robins K (2012) Engineering the third wave of biocatalysis. Nature 485(7397):185–194

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bornscheuer UT, Pohl M (2001) Improved biocatalysts by directed evolution and rational protein design. Curr Opin Chem Biol 5(2):137–143

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Celniker G, Nimrod G, Ashkenazy H, Glaser F, Martz E, Mayrose I, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N (2013) ConSurf: using evolutionary data to raise testable hypotheses about protein function. Isr J Chem 53(3–4):199–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng Z, Cui W, Liu Z, Zhou L, Wang M, Kobayashi M et al (2016) A switch in a substrate tunnel for directing regioselectivity of nitrile hydratases towards α, ω-dinitriles. Catal Sci Technol 6(5):1292–1296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cid H, Bunster M, Canales M, Gazitúa F (1992) Hydrophobicity and structural classes in proteins. Protein Eng Des Sel 5(5):373–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cojocaru V, Winn PJ, Wade RC (2007) The ins and outs of cytochrome P450s. Biochim Biophys Acta 1770(3):390–401

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cui H, Cao H, Cai H, Jaeger KE, Davari MD, Schwaneberg U (2020) Computer-Assisted Recombination (CompassR) teaches us how to recombine beneficial substitutions from directed evolution campaigns. Chemistry 26(3):643–649

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Damborsky J, Brezovsky J (2014) Computational tools for designing and engineering enzymes. Curr Opin Chem Biol 19:8–16

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dennig A, Kuhn M, Tassoti S, Thiessenhusen A, Gilch S, Bulter T, Haas T, Hall M, Faber K (2015) Oxidative decarboxylation of short-chain fatty acids to 1-alkenes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 54(30):8819–8822

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Dutta K, Daverey A, Lin JG (2014) Evolution retrospective for alternative fuels: first to fourth generation. Renew Energ 69(3):114–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gora A, Brezovsky J, Damborsky J (2013) Gates of enzymes. Chem Rev 113(8):5871–5923

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grant JL, Hsieh CH, Makris TM (2015) Decarboxylation of fatty acids to terminal alkenes by cytochrome P450 compound I. J Am Chem Soc 137(15):4940–4943

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hess B, Kutzner C, Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4(3):435–447

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsieh CH, Makris TM (2016) Expanding the substrate scope and reactivity of cytochrome P450 OleT. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 476(4):462–466

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang Y, Li Z, Wang C, Zhou YJ, Xu H, Li S (2019) Biochemical characterization of three new alpha-olefin-producing P450 fatty acid decarboxylases with a halophilic property. Biotechnol Biofuels 12:79

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jurcik A, Bednar D, Byska J, Marques SM, Furmanova K, Daniel L et al (2018) CAVER Analyst 2.0: analysis and visualization of channels and tunnels in protein structures and molecular dynamics trajectories. Bioinformatics 34(20):3586–3588

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kingsley LJ, Lill MA (2015) Substrate tunnels in enzymes: structure-function relationships and computational methodology. Proteins 83(4):599–611

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kokkonen P, Bednar D, Pinto G, Prokop Z, Damborsky J (2019) Engineering enzyme access tunnels. Biotechnol Adv 37(6):107386

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kozlikova B, Sebestova E, Sustr V, Brezovsky J, Strnad O, Daniel L et al (2014) CAVER Analyst 1.0: graphic tool for interactive visualization and analysis of tunnels and channels in protein structures. Bioinformatics 30(18):2684–2685

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kress N, Halder JM, Rapp LR, Hauer B (2018) Unlocked potential of dynamic elements in protein structures: channels and loops. Curr Opin Chem Biol 47:109–116

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee DS, Yamada A, Sugimoto H, Matsunaga I, Ogura H, Ichihara K et al (2003) Substrate recognition and molecular mechanism of fatty acid hydroxylation by cytochrome P450 from Bacillus subtilis. Crystallographic, spectroscopic, and mutational studies. J Biol Chem 278(11):9761–9767

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee SK, Chou H, Ham TS, Lee TS, Keasling JD (2008) Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for biofuels production: from bugs to synthetic biology to fuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19(6):556–563

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lu Z, Li X, Zhang R, Yi L, Ma Y, Zhang G (2019) Tunnel engineering to accelerate product release for better biomass-degrading abilities in lignocellulolytic enzymes. Biotechnol Biofuels 12:275

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Magdziarz T, Mitusinska K, Goldowska S, Pluciennik A, Stolarczyk M, Lugowska M et al (2017) AQUA-DUCT: a ligands tracking tool. Bioinformatics 33(13):2045–2046

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Matsunaga I, Ueda A, Fujiwara N, Sumimoto T, Ichihara K (1999) Characterization of the ybdT gene product of Bacillus subtilis: novel fatty acid beta-hydroxylating cytochrome P450. Lipids 34(8):841

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Matsunaga I, Sumimoto T, Ueda A, Kusunose E, Ichihara K (2000) Fatty acid-specific, regiospecific, and stereospecific hydroxylation by cytochrome P450 (CYP152B1) from Sphingomonas paucimobilis: substrate structure required for α-hydroxylation. Lipids 35(4):365–371

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Mendez-Perez D, Begemann MB, Pfleger BF (2011) Modular synthase-encoding gene involved in α-olefin biosynthesis in Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7002. Appl Environ Microbiol (12): 4264–4267

  33. Pavlova M, Klvana M, Prokop Z, Chaloupkova R, Banas P, Otyepka M et al (2009) Redesigning dehalogenase access tunnels as a strategy for degrading an anthropogenic substrate. Nat Chem Biol 5(10):727–733

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Pravda L, Berka K, Vařeková RS, Sehnal D, Banáš P, Laskowski RA et al (2014) Anatomy of enzyme channels. BMC Bioinformatics 15(1):379

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pravda L, Sehnal D, Tousek D, Navratilova V, Bazgier V, Berka K et al (2018) MOLEonline: a web-based tool for analyzing channels, tunnels and pores (2018 update). Nucleic Acids Res 46(W1):W368–W373

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rude MA, Baron TS, Shane B, Murtaza A, Cardayre SB, Andreas S (2011) Terminal olefin (1-alkene) biosynthesis by a novel p450 fatty acid decarboxylase from Jeotgalicoccus species. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(5):1718

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Schirmer A, Rude MA, Li X, Popova E, Cardayre SBD (2010) Microbial biosynthesis of alkanes. Science (No.5991):559–562

  38. Sehnal D, Vařeková RS, Berka K, Pravda L, Navrátilová V, Banáš P et al (2013) MOLE 2.0: advanced approach for analysis of biomacromolecular channels. J Cheminformatics 5(1):39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang S, Jiang S, Chen H, Bai W-J, Wang X (2020) Directed evolution of a hydroxylase into a decarboxylase for synthesis of 1-alkenes from fatty acids. ACS Catalysis 14375–14379.

  40. Whitehouse CJ, Bell SG, Wong LL (2012) P450(BM3) (CYP102A1): connecting the dots. Chem Soc Rev 41(3):1218–1260

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu H, Ning L, Yang W, Fang B, Wang C, Wang Y et al (2017) In vitro oxidative decarboxylation of free fatty acids to terminal alkenes by two new P450 peroxygenases. Biotechnol Biofuels 10(1):208

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Yi L, Cong W, Jinyong Y, Wei Z, Wenna G, Xuefeng L et al (2014) Hydrogen peroxide-independent production of α-alkenes by OleTJE P450 fatty acid decarboxylase. Biotechnol Biofuels 7(1):28–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Yu X, Cojocaru V, Wade RC (2013) Conformational diversity and ligand tunnels of mammalian cytochrome P450s. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 60(1):134–145

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou HX, McCammon JA (2010) The gates of ion channels and enzymes. Trends Biochem Sci 35(3):179–185

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Zimmerman J, Eliezer N, Simha R (1968) The characterization of amino acid sequences in proteins by statistical methods. J Theor Biol 21(2):170–201

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 31961133017, 21978017, 21978020, 21861132017). These grants are part of MIX-UP, a joint NSFC and EU H2020 collaboration. In Europe, MIX-UP has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 870294. The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities XK1802-8. Shuaiqi Meng was supported by a Ph.D. scholarship from the China Scholarship Council (CSC No. 201906880011).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SQ-M performed the experiments and wrote this paper; RP-A and Prof. KL-N contributed to the calculation part; ZY-L analyzed the data; Prof. U-S, Dr. Y-J, Dr. MD-D helped to improve the paper; Prof. F-W, and Prof. M-Q and Dr. M-W were involved in project administration; Prof. L-L designed the project and wrote the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luo Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Additional Tables and Figures.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, S., An, R., Li, Z. et al. Tunnel engineering for modulating the substrate preference in cytochrome P450BsβHI. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 8, 26 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-021-00379-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Tunnel engineering
  • Substrate preference
  • Cytochrome P450BsβHI
  • α-Alkene biosynthesis
  • Rational design