- Open Access
Towards green biomanufacturing of high-value recombinant proteins using promising cell factory: Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast
Bioresources and Bioprocessing volume 9, Article number: 83 (2022)
Microalgae are cosmopolitan organisms in nature with short life cycles, playing a tremendous role in reducing the pressure of industrial carbon emissions. Besides, microalgae have the unique advantages of being photoautotrophic and harboring both prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression systems, becoming a popular host for recombinant proteins. Currently, numerous advanced molecular tools related to microalgal transgenesis have been explored and established, especially for the model species Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (C. reinhardtii hereafter). The development of genetic tools and the emergence of new strategies further increase the feasibility of developing C. reinhardtii chloroplasts as green factories, and the strong genetic operability of C. reinhardtii endows it with enormous potential as a synthetic biology platform. At present, C. reinhardtii chloroplasts could successfully produce plenty of recombinant proteins, including antigens, antibodies, antimicrobial peptides, protein hormones and enzymes. However, additional techniques and toolkits for chloroplasts need to be developed to achieve efficient and markerless editing of plastid genomes. Mining novel genetic elements and selectable markers will be more intensively studied in the future, and more factors affecting protein expression are urged to be explored. This review focuses on the latest technological progress of selectable markers for Chlamydomonas chloroplast genetic engineering and the factors that affect the efficiency of chloroplast protein expression. Furthermore, urgent challenges and prospects for future development are pointed out.
Microalgae are superior photoautotrophic chassis organisms for synthetic biology, and have great potential for application in the direct fixation of CO2 to produce various bioenergy products (food, feed, enzymes, biochemicals, degradable plastics, biofuels, etc.) (Li et al. 2022). The large-scale industrialization of microalgae is in line with the carbon neutral strategy, helping to develop a green economy and promote sustainable development. As a model species of algae, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is generally recognized as safe (GRAS) and has been employed to produce bioenergy products through metabolic engineering methods (Kato et al. 2022). Chlamydomonas has a well-defined genetic background and is amenable to multiple types of transgenic manipulations. The availability of a near-complete mutant library is also one of the unique advantages of C. reinhardtii (Li et al. 2019; Fauser et al. 2022). These Chlamydomonas mutants have important implications for research in the fields of basic biology, global carbon fixation and synthetic biology. Besides, Chlamydomonas chloroplasts have become a unique natural factory for the production of high-value exogenous proteins due to their prokaryotic expression characteristics, high-copy plastid genome, and compatibility with post-translational modifications (Ahmad et al. 2020) (Fig. 1).
The chloroplast genome of C. reinhardtii was first assembled in 2002 (Maul et al. 2002). The newest assembly shows that Chlamydomonas chloroplast is a circular genome of 205, 535 bp, containing two single-copy regions separated by two large inverted repeat sequences (~ 22 kb). The plastome encodes 108 genes (including rRNA, tRNAs and protein-coding genes) (Gallaher et al. 2018). The review has revealed that the foreign DNA insertion into plastids occurs exclusively through homologous recombination, which allows transgenes to enter specific loci with precision and predictability (Esland et al. 2018). Because of the apparent lack of gene silencing mechanism in chloroplasts, high levels of transgene expression are achieved by fusing the transgene to cis-elements (promoters and untranslated regions) and transgene expression remains stable in the absence of selection pressure. The product can be further modified simply after translation, such as disulfide bond formation (Mayfield et al. 2003). Combined with advances in synthetic biotechnology development, Chlamydomonas chloroplasts can serve as a testbed for synthetic biology (Jackson et al. 2021; Cutolo et al. 2022).
More than 100 different foreign proteins have been successfully produced in the Chlamydomonas chloroplast (Jackson et al. 2021), most of which were introduced into the plastome via a single cassette containing both the gene of interest and a resistance selectable marker. In addition, multigenic engineering was achieved, up to six gene cassettes in parallel (Gimpel et al. 2016; Macedo-Osorio et al. 2018; Larrea-Alvarez and Purton 2020; Jackson et al. 2022). Due to the limited diversity of dominant resistance selectable markers and the risk of horizontal transfer to other environmental organisms of resistance genes, the notable bottlenecks in genetic engineering are development of new dominant markers or recycling of resistance markers. Notably, strategies to cope with these challenges have been proposed or development in recent reports, as discussed later in this review (Sandoval-Vargas et al. 2018, 2019; Changko et al. 2020).
Chloroplast gene expression is a complex process that could be affected at the level of transcription, post-transcriptional mRNA processing, mRNA stability, translation initiation, protein stability, and protein transport (Eberhard et al. 2002; Marín-Navarro et al. 2007; Stern et al. 2010). Moreover, many of these processes are regulated by nuclear-encoded factors, which are usually gene-specific. Some of the factors were employed as tools to enhance the expression of the protein of interest (Surzycki et al. 2007; Carrera-Pacheco et al. 2020; Shahar et al. 2021).
In this paper, the current status of Chlamydomonas chloroplast gene engineering is summarized, and common strategies for heterologous genes expression using the Chlamydomonas chloroplast as an expression factory are discussed. Factors affecting gene expression are classified and summarized. Furthermore, perspectives on development of new genetic tools for chloroplast gene engineering in the future are provided.
The urgent need for green sustainable cell factories
Chlorophyta have been subdivided into four main classes (Chlorophyceae, Prasinophyceae, Trebouxiophyceae and Ulvophyceae) (Leliaert et al. 2012). The unicellular green alga C. reinhardtii (belongs to Volvocales from Chlorophyceae) has a well-defined genetic background, can be genetically manipulated, and has been used as a model organism in multiple different research fields over the past few decades (Salomé and Merchant 2019). Chlamydomonas is generally recognized as a safe host for the production of biofuels and high-value recombinant products, and has been successfully employed as a green cell factory for the production of various recombinant proteins, including antibodies, immunotoxins, hormones, protein drugs, vaccines, and industrial enzymes (Dyo and Purton 2018). However, transgene incorporation into the C. reinhardtii nuclear genome is a complex process. Transgenes targeting the nucleus are often randomly truncated by endogenous nucleases, and exogenous genes successfully integrated into the nuclear genome are likely to be difficult to express along with gene silencing (Tran and Kaldenhoff 2020). In contrast to the low yields achieved by nuclear-expressed transgenes of C. reinhardtii, the levels of heterologous proteins from chloroplast transgenic production were generally much higher. Chloroplasts of C. reinhardtii support efficient accumulation of recombinant proteins that are properly folded into biologically active soluble proteins. Chlamydomonas chloroplast is a suitable expression platform, with reported yields ranging from 0.5 to 5% of total soluble protein (TSP) (Taunt et al. 2018).
Chlamydomonas chloroplast expression products can be divided into immunogens, antibodies, functional drugs, food additives, etc. according to the application classification (Table 1). However, hitherto products based on recombinant expression of C. reinhardtii have not been used for commercial large-scale production. Recently, the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China approved C. reinhardtii as a new food raw material (NHC 2022). Globally, the existing microalgae companies have only developed some primary products, such as microalgae powder, natural oils (especially polyunsaturated fatty acids EPA and DHA), pigments (such as astaxanthin and phycocyanin), etc. These products are used in the fields of food, feed, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and biofuels (Hachicha et al. 2022).
With the advancement of sequencing and omics technologies, a growing amount of green microalgal chloroplast genome information was revealed in addition to that of Chlamydomonas (Table 2). These data indicate that there will be numerous algal chloroplasts that may be developed and utilized in the future to express a variety of proteins. Furthermore, development of genetic engineering inspires commercial application of eukaryotic microalgae (Shi et al. 2021).
High-efficiency gene delivery strategy
The most common method for transgenic C. reinhardtii chloroplasts is microparticle bombardment. Driven by high-pressure helium, DNA-coated gold or tungsten particles bombard solid plates coated with microalgal cells. Although particle bombardment produces stable conversions, the bombardment equipment and the gold or tungsten particles are expensive (Shamriz and Ofoghi 2016). More economical methods are electroporation and vortexing in the presence of glass beads. In the former method, cracks appeared in the cell and chloroplast membrane structure after electric shock, while in the latter, due to the abrasive action of glass beads, pores were generated in the cell and chloroplast membrane, and DNA directly enters the chloroplast. However, electroporation transformation of chloroplasts is rarely reported, and glass bead vortexing also requires consideration of cell type. The removal of cell wall might improve the transformation efficiency (Hwang et al. 2018). Transformation efficiencies of electroporation, glass bead vortexing and microparticle bombardment are shown in Table 3. Notably, there are multiple copies of the genome in Chlamydomonas chloroplasts, requiring multiple rounds of homologous recombination to get the transgene into each copy. This is why multiple rounds of selection are required to yield stable, homoplasmic clones.
Most of the existing cases of successful expression of chloroplast transgenes in Chlamydomonas are transformation of a single exogenous gene. There are many ways to achieve the transformation of multiple foreign genes. For example, co-transformation using multiple vectors allows multiple expression cassettes to be independently integrated into different loci in the genome (Larrea-Alvarez and Purton 2020). However, this method leads to difficulties in transformant screening, and often requires the use of multiple selectable markers, whereas too many resistance genes as selection markers are not popular in practical applications. Another method to transform multiple foreign genes is to ligate two or more expression cassettes into the same vector. This way is more commonly used because only a single screening marker needs to be carried. This method is limited by the maximum load that the vector able to carry. Therefore, linkers can be added between the coding regions of different exogenous genes to achieve multi-gene expression. Macedo-Osorio et al. used the endogenous intercistronic region of Chlamydomonas as a linker to connect the antibiotic marker gene and green fluorescent protein, and the bicistronic successfully expressed mRNA and protein (Macedo-Osorio et al. 2018). This linker has also been successfully used for fusion expression of dual marker proteins (Jackson et al. 2022). In nuclear genome editing, the 2A peptide gene from foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV) was shown to be successfully used for the fusion expression of two genes. The viral 2A peptide can achieve separate expression of the two proteins during translation through a mechanism of ribosome skipping (Rasala et al. 2012). This linker peptide might be used in chloroplast gene expression in the future.
Existing resistance markers
Since the expression mechanism in C. reinhardtii chloroplast is similar to that in prokaryotes, some antibiotics act on prokaryotic ribosome complex may also act on ribosome of chloroplast. Whereas there are only two antibiotic resistance genes were successfully used as dominant selectable marker. Besides, mutations in ribosomal proteins or in rRNA can confer resistance to several antibiotics.
The aadA sequence that encoded aminoglycoside 3′ adenosine transferase derived by Escherichia coli (Hollingshead and Vapnek 1985), was introduced into Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast genome through microprojectile bombardment. The exogenous gene was stable in chloroplast and its encoded product conferred resistance to spectinomycin and streptomycin in transformed cells (Goldschmidt-Clermont 1991), which become the first successful example of the stable expression of a foreign protein in a transgenic chloroplast. The aadA gene is now a portable selection marker widely used in chloroplast transformation. This gene can be employed to inactivate any genes that is not essential for viability.
The gene aphA-6 from Acinetobacter baumannii encodes the aminoglycoside 3′ phosphotransferase and confers resistance to kanamycin and other related aminoglycoside antibiotics (Shaw et al. 1993). Hence aphA-6 was chosen as a selectable marker to express exogenous gene and modify specific chloroplast genes (Bateman and Purton 2000; Muto et al. 2009; Macedo-Osorio et al. 2018).
In addition to the two strategies that require the insertion of resistance genes to obtain resistance, genetic mutations in some chloroplast genomes were reported to confer resistance to certain antibiotics in Chlamydomonas. Some aminoglycoside antibiotics that act on the small subunit of the ribosome interfere with the functional assembly of the ribosome, such as spectinomycin and streptomycin. For Chlamydomonas, specific mutations in the 16S RNA (rrnS) gene confer resistance to spectinomycin or streptomycin, while mutations in the 23S RNA (rrnL) gene can confer resistance to erythromycin (Newman et al. 1990).
However, point mutations in ribosomal RNA genes (rrnS and rrnL) confer resistance by reducing the sensitivity of affected ribosomes to antibiotics. These point-mutated gene markers must be integrated into specific sites in the plastid genome, and the original gene should be replaced by sufficient copy numbers for resistance. Although these mutations provide a selectable marker for chloroplast transformation, there are caveats. A proportion of spontaneous mutations can occur in the host, leading to antibiotic resistance in antibiotic-containing environments. Single antibiotic screening is prone to false positives, so it is better to use a combination of antibiotics to facilitate the selection of true transformants.
Development of markerless technologies is the future
Antibiotic resistance marker genes are often controversial in terms of ecological protection and food safety in genetically modified organisms, and the markerless technology provides a new strategy to address the concerns raised by antibiotic marker genes. In addition to some of the resistance markers mentioned above, some new biosafety markers are also applied in Chlamydomonas chloroplast genetic engineering (Table 4).
Restoration of photoautotrophic defects
Under natural conditions, C. reinhardtii is photoautotrophic. In the absence of light, its growth depends on organic carbon sources, such as acetic acid. Several reports described various photosynthetic mutants that are mutated in essential photosynthesis genes (Doron et al. 2016; Shamriz and Ofoghi 2016; Esland et al. 2018). Deletion mutants of the chloroplast atpB gene were first used as photosynthesis-deficient hosts, allowing restoration of normal photosynthesis phenotype after bombardment with a wild-type DNA fragment spanning the deletion region (Boynton et al. 1988). This provides a powerful means to screen transformants, replacing the selection strategy of resistance gene markers (Fig. 2A). In addition, similar strategies were employed by other chloroplast photosynthetic genes, such as rbcL (Boynton et al. 1988), tscA (Goldschmidt-Clermont 1991), psbA (Michelet et al. 2011; Bertalan et al. 2015) and psbH (Wannathong et al. 2016). When the mutant-free photosynthetic metabolism gene was introduced as a homology arm into the corresponding deficient strain, the transformants recovered the photoautotrophic phenotype in minimal medium (without acetic acid).
Construction of auxotrophs or function-added selectable marker
Complementary nutrition defective or additional special feature selectable markers could be utilized to screen the transgenic lines. The culture medium should be adjusted to confer certain stress conditions, such as the lack of essential nutrients. Once the completement gene is integrated into the chloroplast genome and encodes the functional enzyme, transformants have the ability to survive on the selective medium (Loppes and Heindricks 1986; Sandoval-Vargas et al. 2018, 2019; Changko et al. 2020).
For instance, the ARG9 gene that located in Arabidopsis thaliana nucleic genome encodes N-acetyl ornithine aminotransferase, involving in arginine synthesis (Remacle et al. 2009). The auxotroph cells with the mutant ARG fail to grow in the arginine-containing medium (Loppes and Heindricks 1986). On account of the similarity between the codon bias of nuclear genome of Arabidopsis and the bias of Chlamydomonas chloroplast genome The ARG9 cDNA of A. thaliana was successfully introduced into Chlamydomonas (mt+ arg9-2 mutant) chloroplast genome. As expected, the auxotroph mutants were restored into arginine prototrophs. Thus, A. thaliana ARG9 cassette has the potential to be developed as a screen marker for chloroplast transformation in Chlamydomonas (Remacle et al. 2009). Another example is the application of phosphite oxidation gene ptxD from Pseudomonas stutzeri WM 88, which encodes an NAD-dependent phosphite dehydrogenase that catalyzes the oxidation of phosphite to phosphate with the concomitant reduction of NAD+ to NADH (Costas et al. 2001). The ptxD gene was successfully inserted into the Chlamydomonas chloroplast genome and stably maintained in the plastome, accumulating the functional PTXD enzyme. The transplastomic lines could thrive in medium where phosphite is the sole source of phosphorus, whereas the proliferation of the wild type was inhibited (Sandoval-Vargas et al. 2018, 2019; Changko et al. 2020). This encouraging finding indicated that the ptxD gene can be utilized as a portable selection marker to replace antibiotic marker genes, and the phenotype is less prone to false positives. Cutolo et al. successfully expressed a chimeric endoglucanase (CelB)-PTXD protein in the C. reinhardtii chloroplast, avoiding insertion of antibiotic resistance marker genes into the plastomes (Cutolo et al. 2021) (Fig. 2B).
Removal of antibiotic marker gene
The above two types of marker-free transgenic strategies make huge progress in the genetic engineering of Chlamydomonas chloroplasts, beyond them, the controversial resistance gene markers could also be removed by some ingenious methods. The latest study reported a rapid iterative marker system (CpPosNeg) for the transformation of C. reinhardtii chloroplasts from wild-type strains to marker-free transformants. This system employed a fusion protein consisting of a spectinomycin resistance protein and a cytosine deaminase as a dual marker. Transformants that carrying the spectinomycin marker were able to grow in the presence of the antibiotic in the first round of selection. The second round of selection was performed with 5-fluorocytosine, which promoted a rapid loss of the dual marker by intramolecular recombination between the 3′UTR of the marker gene and the 3′UTR of the transgene (Fig. 2C). Cytosine deaminase converts 5-fluorocytosine to toxic 5-fluorouracil, hence transformants that lost the fusion marker in the second round of selection survived, and only the foreign transgene was inserted into the wild-type chloroplast genome (Jackson et al. 2022). Another approach to remove resistance marker genes relies on complementation of photosynthetic defects. In ΔpsbH strain (with downstream region deletion of the psbH gene), the psbH gene was inactivated by the insertion of the aadA gene. After the transforming plasmid (the entire downstream region of psbH as the homology arm) was introduced into the chloroplast of the ΔpsbH strain, the psbH gene was restored and the aadA gene was replaced with the gene-of-interest cassette (Fig. 2D) (Wannathong et al. 2016). Thus, transformants were able to restore phototrophic growth on acetic acid-free medium and were sensitive to spectinomycin.
Recent study has demonstrated that the Cas9/gRNA-mediated gene editing system has been successfully used for gene editing in Chlamydomonas chloroplasts, enabling precise insertion of foreign gene (Yoo et al. 2020). This is also the first example that this system has been used for genome editing of Chlamydomonas chloroplasts. In this study the insertion of foreign genes was achieved by homology-directed repair (HDR) after Cas9 generated double-strand breaks. In addition, during the process of gene editing, the Cas9-expressing plasmid is not integrated into the plastome, avoiding unnecessary DNA substances other than foreign genes left in the genome after the editing plasmid is segregated and removed. In this way, precise gene editing can be achieved, and the antibiotic marker gene carried on the editing plasmid can be removed.
Factors affecting expression efficiency need to be explored
Promoter is the most fundamental component of the synthetic biology, driving the gene’s transcription. Rational promoter engineering can achieve predefined transcriptional control (Cazier and Blazeck 2021). In E. coli, in the absence of inducer, the products of negative regulator lacI gene form tetrameric repressor proteins that tightly binds to the operator downstream of the promoter, preventing the initiation of transcription. After the inducer (lactose, IPTG, etc.) is added, the inducer binds to the lacI gene product, which then dissociates from the operon and thereby activates transcription of the lac operon (Jacob and Monod 1961). Since the expression mechanism of chloroplast is similar to that of prokaryotes, Kato et al. inserted lac operating sequences into different locations of 16S rRNA and rbcL promoters, respectively, to evaluate their ability to induce transcription after the addition of inducer IPTG (Kato et al. 2007). As a result, the expression of reporter gene was control by the inducer at the transcriptional level. However, despite that this artificially controlled gene expression system is a suitable laboratory tool for analyzing the function of chloroplast genes, it is less suitable for large-scale expression of valuable products at industrial level due to the high cost of inducers and the difficulty of removing IPTG.
Since no known inducible promoter is known in Chlamydomonas chloroplasts, Rochaix et al. established a chloroplast inducible system using the trans-acting factor Nac2 (Rochaix et al. 2014). By introducing the chimeric Cyc6 promoter-Nac2 gene system into the nac2 mutant, in the presence of copper, the Cyc6 promoter could not drive Nac2 expression, the chloroplast psbD transcript was unstable, and thus psbD expression was inhibited. If the exogenous gene GOI is fused with the 5′UTR of psbD, the expression of GOI can be achieved under copper-deficient conditions.
In other promoter engineering studies, exogenous proteins expressed in C. reinhardtii chloroplasts were mostly driven by endogenous promoters and 5′UTR (Barnes et al. 2005; Michelet et al. 2011; Rasala et al. 2011). High levels of mRNA accumulation were achieved using atpA and psbD promoters and 5′UTRs to drive the expression of exogenous gene gfp (Barnes et al. 2005). After fusion of the 16S rRNA promoter with atpA or psbA 5′UTR, the mRNA level of the exogenous gene luxCt was increased. Differently, for atpA 5′UTR, protein LuxCT was accumulated with the accumulation of mRNA, while for psbA 5′UTR, increased mRNA levels had little effect on protein accumulation (Rasala et al. 2011). In C. reinhardtii chloroplasts, distinct 5′UTRs led to significant differences in the mRNA and protein accumulation of exogenous genes, while 3′UTRs appeared to have relatively little effect.
The transcript usually requires further processing, and mRNA binding proteins bind to the 5′UTR or 3′UTR of the transcripts, protecting the transcripts from degradation by exonucleases with 5′–3′exonuclease activity (Macedo-Osorio et al. 2021). The helical repeat protein family is a type of RNA-binding proteins involved in post-transcriptional gene expression, including the Half-a-tetratricopeptide repeat (HAT), Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) and Octotricopeptide repeat (OPR) proteins. Most of these trans-acting factors are encoded by the nuclear genome and are classified by their functions as mRNA maturation/stability (M) and translation (T) factor in post-transcriptional and translational processes, respectively (Cavaiuolo et al. 2017).
Three HAT proteins were experimentally characterized: NAC2 (alias MBD1) (Kuchka et al. 1989; Boudreau et al. 2000; Surzycki et al. 2007), MAC1 (Douchi et al. 2016) and MBB1 (Vaistij et al. 2000a, b; Loizeau et al. 2014). They bind to the 5′UTR of psbD, psaC and psbB, respectively, and resist degradation by the exonucleases. Moreover, MBB1 is involved in the processing of psbB–psbT–psbH polycistronic transcripts, and also binds to the 5′UTR of the smaller psbH transcript (Loizeau et al. 2014).
In C. reinhardtii, 14 PPR proteins were identified (Tourasse et al. 2013), but only 4 PPR was characterized as the M factor. MCA1 (PPR14) (Loiselay et al. 2008), MRL1 (PPR2) (Johnson et al. 2010) and TCB1 (PPR1) (Cavaiuolo et al. 2017) bound to the 5′-end of petA, rbcL and petB mRNAs, respectively protecting the transcripts from exonucleases degradation. PPR7 was shown to be a part of ribonucleoprotein complex that not only stabilized the rbcL, rpoC2, psbH and tscA transcripts, but also processed atpA–psbI–cemA–atpH, psbJ–atpI–psaJ–rps12 and 16S rRNA operon polycistronic transcripts (Jalal et al. 2015).
Bioinformatic analysis of the Chlamydomonas genome revealed more than 120 OPR proteins that have not been fully experimentally confirmed (Macedo-Osorio et al. 2021). Previous studies showed that, similar to PPR and TPR, OPR proteins were extensively involved in the post-transcriptional control of chloroplast gene expression. As examples, MBC1 (OPR56) (Cavaiuolo et al. 2017), MBI1 (Wang et al. 2015), MCG1 (Wang et al. 2015), MCD1 (Murakami et al. 2005), MDA1 (Viola et al. 2019) and MTHI1 (Ozawa et al. 2020) act as M factors responsible for the stabilization of psbC, psbI, petG, petD, atpA and atpH/I mRNAs, respectively. Some OPR proteins participated in the RNA splicing process, including RAA1, RAA3, RAA8 (OPR120) and RAT2 jointly involved in the splicing of psaA mRNA (Reifschneider et al. 2017). However, spontaneous NCC1/NCC2 mutants in C. reinhardtii target the coding regions of two chloroplast transcripts, leading to destabilization of the atpA/petA transcripts, respectively (Boulouis et al. 2015).
Very recently, orthogonal regulators—those do not interact with host regulators—were first introduced into the C. reinhardtii to activate the expression of chloroplast transgenes (Shahar et al. 2021). The HCF107 protein (belong to HAT) in Arabidopsis thaliana is an orthologue of MBB1 in C. reinhardtii (Felder et al. 2001). Maize PPR10 activates expression of the chloroplast atpH gene at the post-transcriptional level (Pfalz et al. 2009; Prikryl et al. 2011). Tests indicated that ectopic expression of HCF107 and PPR10 in C. reinhardtii performed their native functions for psbH and atpA mRNA stability, respectively (Shahar et al. 2021).
The highly abundant accumulation of exogenous transgenic mRNA in chloroplast might be achieved by modifying the binding site of 5′UTR by relying on the post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism of natural nuclear coding proteins. In addition, the 3′UTR of rbcL is frequently used in chimeric structures downstream of heterologous genes, since the two inverted repeat sequence of the 3′UTR are cis-acting elements that regulate processing and stability of the transcript (Goldschmidt-Clermont et al. 2008).
Post-transcriptional processing and translation of mRNA occur simultaneously. Some OPR proteins play the function of T factor and participate in the translation process of mRNA, such as TAA1 (Lefebvre-Legendre et al. 2015; Reifschneider et al. 2017), TAB1 (Rahire et al. 2012), TBC2 (Auchincloss et al. 2002) and TDA1 (Eberhard et al. 2011; Carrera-Pacheco et al. 2020) involved in the translation of psaA, psaB, psbC and atpA mRNA respectively. Besides, different hosts have different codon preferences for gene expression. In Chlamydomonas chloroplasts, adenine (A) or thymine (T) is preferred at the third nucleotide of codon position (Nakamura et al. 2000). Absence of tRNAs matching the allogeneic codons in Chlamydomonas chloroplasts results in amino acid misincorporation and polypeptide chain truncation. One solution to this problem is to optimize the heterologous gene codons rationally, and to replace the rare codons of the foreign gene with more frequent codons in the expression host. C. reinhardtii chloroplast native tRNATrp is encoded by trnWUGG, which translates UGG codons to tryptophan. After the introduction of a temperature-sensitive trnWUCA gene into the chloroplast genome, the stop codon UGA could be translated into tryptophan, achieving cold-induced translation of UGA codons (Young and Purton 2018). However, considering the high cost of cooling, such temperature-induced system seems difficult to be practically applied in industry.
Proteolysis is one of the key factors affecting protein expression. The N-terminal region of proteins is a major determinant of protein stability in bacteria and eukaryotes (Bouchnak and van Wijk 2019). The N-end rule pathway is a proteolytic system present in almost all organisms. The prokaryotic proteasome-like apparatus consists of ATPase modules (e.g., ClpA, ClpX) and covalently linked (e.g., Lon) or dispersed proteolytic modules (e.g., ClpP), mediating the degradation of misfolded proteins in the cytoplasmic matrix (Mogk et al. 2007; Tasaki et al. 2012). Chloroplasts of C. reinhardtii contain proteases commonly found in bacteria, such as Clp, Deg and FtsH proteases (Mayfield et al. 2007; Zou and Bozhkov 2021). Altering the N-terminal region of exogenous protein could increase protein abundance. If the transgene is fused to a small portion of the gene coding region at the N-terminus of the endogenous chloroplast protein rather than to its AUG translation initiation codon, the proteolysis can be alleviated and high levels of expression will be accumulated (Kasai et al. 2003; Michelet et al. 2011; Hsu et al. 2019). Furthermore, the chloroplast of C. reinhardtii is regarded an attractive platform for the expression of antigens or antibodies because of its ability to form the disulfide bonds required for the folding of these proteins (Mayfield et al. 2003; Taunt et al. 2018; Shamriz and Ofoghi 2019).
However, the chloroplast organelle lacks glycosylation modification pathways. The enzymes involved in glycosylation are located in the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus, and the nuclear expression productions of the transgenes will undergo glycosylation modification (Mathieu-Rivet et al. 2017). Reconstructing the glycosylation pathway in the chloroplast is impractical, and it is extremely challenging to export proteins expressed in the chloroplast to the cytoplasm for glycosylation. Considering about this limitation, chloroplasts are ideal for producing proteins with little or no glycosylation.
Remaining challenges and future prospects
Although Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast has a prokaryotic expression mechanism, it contains a variety of molecular chaperones, protein disulfide isomerases and peptide isomerases that assist in the folding of complex proteins. This characteristic endows the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast as an expression factory to produce high value-added products that difficult to express (Fig. 3). On the other hand, it should be noticed that a significant disadvantage of exogenous protein expression in the chloroplast genome is the inability to glycosylate the target protein, limiting the production of protein products that need to meet glycosylation requirements.
Antimicrobial resistance gene screening markers are commonly used in laboratories and fermenters, while neither antibiotics nor antimicrobial genes used for genetic transformation should be ingested by animals or released into the natural environment. It is essential to alleviate concerns about escape and horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance markers. Therefore, it is necessary to develop novel, environment-friendly PTXD-like selection markers.
Analyzing the influencing factors of chloroplast gene expression is helpful to construct a novel and reliable exogenous protein expression platform. The limited number of endogenous promoters available is often a bottleneck in transcriptional regulation. Hybrid promoter engineering and the saturation mutagenesis of − 35 and − 10 motifs spacer regions are rational methods to modify prokaryotic promoter strength (Blazeck and Alper 2013), which is the first vital step to improve the activity of transcription for altering gene expression. With the analysis of a large number of promoter samples, the characteristics of promoter sequences can be summarized, and various structural parts of specific functions could be integrated together, and new promoter libraries of various strengths could be constructed.
The accumulation of endogenous proteins depends on the activity of multiple factors, which promote the stabilization and maturation of transcripts, further facilitate the translation of mRNA and enhance the stability of post-translational proteins. Therefore, it may be possible to assemble multiple M and T factors to achieve precise regulation of the processing and translation of foreign gene mRNAs. Moreover, drawing on the post-transcriptional regulation and expression mechanism of natural nuclear-encoded proteins, the binding site of the modified 5′UTR could be modified to recruit transcriptional or translational activators to achieve high-abundance accumulation of exogenous chloroplast transgenic mRNA or protein. Furthermore, constructing orthogonal regulatory systems can avoid host regulatory network disorder.
For the nuclear genome, Crozet et al. developed a Modular Cloning (MoClo) toolkit. This toolkit contains 7 promoters, 8 Immuno-purification tags, 12 UTRs (5′UTRs and 3′UTR), 12 reporters and 5 antibiotic resistance markers. It maximizes the modularity of expression elements for nuclear genetic engineering, which allows rapidly use of this toolkit for synthetic biology design in Chlamydomonas (Crozet et al. 2018). For the chloroplast genomes, similar toolkits can also be generated. In addition, by crossing, the chloroplast genome can be adapted to different nuclear genetic backgrounds. As long as the original chloroplast modification is in a mt+ strain (Joo et al. 2022).
With the rapid development of microalgal biotechnology, it is believed that chloroplasts with their unique advantages might become a low-cost and sustainable platform for large-scale production of valuable metabolites and compounds in the near future. Nevertheless, scale-up is one of the key steps to obtain these products on an industrial level. Only by solving the complex problems in large-scale research and improving the technical level can the chloroplast factory make progress in the production and manufacturing of the industrial level.
Ahmad N, Mehmood MA, Malik S (2020) Recombinant protein production in microalgae: emerging trends. Protein Peptide Lett 27(2):105–110. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929866526666191014124855
Auchincloss AH, Zerges W, Perron K, Girard-Bascou J, Rochaix J-D (2002) Characterization of Tbc2, a nucleus-encoded factor specifically required for translation of the chloroplast psbC mRNA in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Cell Biol 157(6):953–962. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200201060
Barnes D, Franklin SE, Schultz J, Henry R, Brown E, Coragliotti A, Mayfield SP (2005) Contribution of 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions of plastid mRNAs to the expression of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast genes. Mol Genet Genom 274(6):625–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-005-0055-y
Barrera DJ, Rosenberg JN, Chiu JG, Chang Y-N, Debatis M, Ngoi S-M, Chang JT, Shoemaker CB, Oyler GA, Mayfield SP (2015) Algal chloroplast produced camelid VHH antitoxins are capable of neutralizing botulinum neurotoxin. Plant Biotechnol J 13(1):117–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12244
Bateman JM, Purton S (2000) Tools for chloroplast transformation in Chlamydomonas: expression vectors and a new dominant selectable marker. Mol Gen Genet 263(3):404–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380051184
Bertalan I, Munder MC, Weiß C, Kopf J, Fischer D, Johanningmeier U (2015) A rapid, modular and marker-free chloroplast expression system for the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Biotechnol 195:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.12.017
Blazeck J, Alper HS (2013) Promoter engineering: recent advances in controlling transcription at the most fundamental level. Biotechnol J 8(1):46–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201200120
Bouchnak I, van Wijk KJ (2019) N-Degron pathways in plastids. Trends Plant Sci 24(10):917–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.06.013
Boudreau E, Nickelsen J, Lemaire SD, Ossenbuhl F, Rochaix J-D (2000) The Nac2 gene of Chlamydomonas encodes a chloroplast TPR-like protein involved in psbD mRNA stability. EMBO J 19(13):3366–3376. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.13.3366
Boulouis A, Drapier D, Razafimanantsoa H, Wostrikoff K, Tourasse NJ, Pascal K, Girard-Bascou J, Vallon O, Wollman F-A, Choquet Y (2015) Spontaneous dominant mutations in Chlamydomonas highlight ongoing evolution by gene diversification. Plant Cell 27(4):984–1001. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.15.00010
Boynton JE, Gillham NW, Harris EH, Hosler JP, Johnson AM, Jones AR, Randolph-Anderson BL, Robertson D, Klein TM, Shark KB (1988) Chloroplast transformation in Chlamydomonas with high velocity microprojectiles. Science 240(4858):1534–1538. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2897716
Carrera-Pacheco SE, Hankamer B, Oey M (2020) Light and heat-shock mediated TDA1 overexpression as a tool for controlled high-yield recombinant protein production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplasts. Algal Res 48:101921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2020.101921
Cavaiuolo M, Kuras R, Wollman F-A, Choquet Y, Vallon O (2017) Small RNA profiling in Chlamydomonas: insights into chloroplast RNA metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res 45(18):10783–10799. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx668
Cazier AP, Blazeck J (2021) Advances in promoter engineering: novel applications and predefined transcriptional control. Biotechnol J 16:e2100239. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202100239
Changko S, Rajakumar PD, Young REB, Purton S (2020) The phosphite oxidoreductase gene, ptxD as a bio-contained chloroplast marker and crop-protection tool for algal biotechnology using Chlamydomonas. Appl Microbiol Biot 104(2):675–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10258-7
Costas AMG, White AK, Metcalf WW (2001) Purification and characterization of a novel phosphorus-oxidizing enzyme from Pseudomonas stutzeri WM88. J Biol Chem 276(20):17429–17436. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M011764200
Crozet P, Navarro FJ, Willmund F, Mehrshahi P, Bakowski K, Lauersen KJ, Pérez-Pérez M-E, Auroy P, Gorchs Rovira A, Sauret-Gueto S et al (2018) Birth of a photosynthetic chassis: a MoClo toolkit enabling synthetic biology in the microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. ACS Synth Biol 7(9):2074–2086. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.8b00251
Cutolo E, Tosoni M, Barera S, Herrera-Estrella L, Dall’Osto L, Bassi R (2021) A chimeric hydrolase-PTXD transgene enables chloroplast-based heterologous protein expression and non-sterile cultivation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Algal Res 59:102429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102429
Cutolo EA, Mandala G, Dall’Osto L, Bassi R (2022) Harnessing the algal chloroplast for heterologous protein production. Microorganisms 10:743. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10040743
de Cambiaire J-C, Otis C, Lemieux C, Turmel M (2006) The complete chloroplast genome sequence of the chlorophycean green alga Scenedesmus obliquus reveals a compact gene organization and a biased distribution of genes on the two DNA strands. BMC Evol Biol 6:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-6-37
Doron L, Na S, Shapira M (2016) Transgene expression in microalgae-from tools to applications. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00505
Douchi D, Qu Y, Longoni P, Legendre-Lefebvre L, Johnson X, Schmitz-Linneweber C, Goldschmidt-Clermont M (2016) A nucleus-encoded chloroplast phosphoprotein governs expression of the photosystem I subunit psaC in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell 28(5):1182–1199. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.15.00725
Dyo YM, Purton S (2018) The algal chloroplast as a synthetic biology platform for production of therapeutic proteins. Microbiology 164(2):113–121. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000599
Eberhard S, Drapier D, Wollman F-A (2002) Searching limiting steps in the expression of chloroplast-encoded proteins: relations between gene copy number, transcription, transcript abundance and translation rate in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant J 31(2):149–160. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01340.x
Eberhard S, Loiselay C, Drapier D, Bujaldon S, Girard-Bascou J, Kuras R, Choquet Y, Wollman F-A (2011) Dual functions of the nucleus-encoded factor TDA1 in trapping and translation activation of atpA transcripts in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplasts. Plant J 67(6):1055–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04657.x
Esland L, Larrea-Alvarez M, Purton S (2018) Selectable markers and reporter genes for engineering the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biology 7:46. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology7040046
Fauser F, Vilarrasa-Blasi J, Onishi M, Ramundo S, Patena W, Millican M, Osaki J, Philp C, Nemeth M, Salome PA et al (2022) Systematic characterization of gene function in the photosynthetic alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Nat Genet 54(5):705–714. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01052-9
Felder S, Meierhoff K, Sane AP, Meurer J, Driemel C, Plücken H, Klaff P, Stein B, Bechtold N, Westhoff P (2001) The nucleus-encoded HCF107 gene of Arabidopsis provides a link between intercistronic RNA processing and the accumulation of translation-competent psbH transcripts in chloroplasts. Plant Cell 13(9):2127–2141. https://doi.org/10.1105/TPC.010090
Gallaher SD, Fitz-Gibbon ST, Strenkert D, Purvine SO, Pellegrini M, Merchant SS (2018) High-throughput sequencing of the chloroplast and mitochondrion of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to generate improved de novo assemblies, analyze expression patterns and transcript speciation, and evaluate diversity among laboratory strains and wild isolates. Plant J 93(3):545–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13788
Gimpel JA, Nour-Eldin HH, Scranton MA, Li D, Mayfield SP (2016) Refactoring the six-gene photosystem II core in the chloroplast of the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. ACS Synth Biol 5(7):589–596. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00076
Goldschmidt-Clermont M (1991) Transgenic expression of aminoglycoside adenine transferase in the chloroplast: a selectable marker for sitedirected transformation of Chlamydomonas. Nucleic Acids Res 19(15):4083–4089. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/19.15.4083
Goldschmidt-Clermont M, Rahire M, Rochaix J-D (2008) Redundant cis-acting determinants of 3’ processing and RNA stability in the chloroplast rbcL mRNA of Chlamydomonas. Plant J 53(3):566–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03365.x
Hachicha R, Elleuch F, Ben Hlima H, Dubessay P, de Baynast H, Delattre C, Pierre G, Hachicha R, Abdelkafi S, Michaud P et al (2022) Biomolecules from microalgae and cyanobacteria: applications and market survey. Appl Sci 12:1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041924
Hollingshead S, Vapnek D (1985) Nucleotide sequence analysis of a gene encoding a streptomycin/spectinomycin adenylyltransferase. Plasmid 13(1):17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-619X(85)90052-6
Hsu S-C, Browne DR, Tatli M, Devarenne TP, Stern DB (2019) N-terminal sequences affect expression of triterpene biosynthesis enzymes in Chlamydomonas chloroplasts. Algal Res 44:101662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2019.101662
Hwang H, Kim YT, Kang NS, Han JW (2018) A simple method for removal of the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cell wall using a commercially available subtilisin (Alcalase). J Mol Microb Biotech 28(4):169–178. https://doi.org/10.1159/000495183
Jackson HO, Taunt HN, Mordaka PM, Smith AG, Purton S (2021) The algal chloroplast as a testbed for synthetic biology designs aimed at radically rewiring plant metabolism. Front Plant Sci 12:708370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.708370
Jackson HO, Taunt HN, Mordaka PM, Kumari S, Smith AG, Purton S (2022) CpPosNeg: a positive-negative selection strategy allowing multiple cycles of marker-free engineering of the Chlamydomonas plastome. Biotechnol J. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202200088
Jacob F, Monod J (1961) Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J Mol Biol 3:318–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80072-7
Jalal A, Schwarz C, Schmitz-Linneweber C, Vallon O, Nickelsen J, Bohne A-V (2015) A small multifunctional pentatricopeptide repeat protein in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Mol Plant 8(3):412–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2014.11.019
Johnson X, Wostrikoff K, Finazzi G, Kuras R, Schwarz C, Bujaldon S, Nickelsen J, Stern DB, Wollman F-A, Vallon O (2010) MRL1, a conserved pentatricopeptide repeat protein, is required for stabilization of rbcL mRNA in Chlamydomonas and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22(1):234–248. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.066266
Joo S, Kariyawasam T, Kim M, Jin E, Goodenough U, Lee J-H (2022) Sex-linked deubiquitinase establishes uniparental transmission of chloroplast DNA. Nat Commun 13:1133. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28807-6
Kasai S, Yoshimura S, Ishikura K, Takaoka Y, Kobayashi K, Kato K, Shinmyo A (2003) Effect of coding regions on chloroplast gene expression in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Biosci Bioeng 95(3):276–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1389-1723(03)80029-4
Kato K, Marui T, Kasai S, Shinmyo A (2007) Artificial control of transgene expression in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast using the iac regulation system from Escherichia coli. J Biosci Bioeng 104(3):207–213. https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.104.207
Kato Y, Inabe K, Hidese R, Kondo A, Hasunuma T (2022) Metabolomics-based engineering for biofuel and bio-based chemical production in microalgae and cyanobacteria: a review. Bioresour Technol 344:126196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126196
Kindle KL, Richards KL, Stern DB (1991) Engineering the chloroplast genome: techniques and capabilities for chloroplast transformation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88(5):1721–1725. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.5.1721
Kuchka MR, Goldschmidt-Clermont M, van Dillewijn J, Rochaix JD (1989) Mutation at the Chlamydomonas nuclear NAC2 locus specifically affects stability of the chloroplast psbD transcript encoding polypeptide D2 of PS II. Cell 58(5):869–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90939-2
Larrea-Alvarez M, Purton S (2020) Multigenic engineering of the chloroplast genome in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Microbiology 166(6):510–515. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000910
Lee H, Bingham SE, Webber AN (1998) Specific mutagenesis of reaction center proteins by chloroplast transformation of ChIamydomonas reinhardtii. Method Enzymol 297:310–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(98)97023-9
Lefebvre-Legendre L, Choquet Y, Kuras R, Loubéry S, Douchi D, Goldschmidt-Clermont M (2015) A nucleus-encoded chloroplast protein regulated by iron availability governs expression of the photosystem I subunit PsaA in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol 167(4):1527–1540. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.253906
Leliaert F, Smith DR, Moreau H, Herron MD, Verbruggen H, Delwiche CF, De Clerck O (2012) Phylogeny and molecular evolution of the green algae. Crit Rev Plant Sci 31(1):1–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.615705
Li X, Patena W, Fauser F, Jinkerson RE, Saroussi S, Meyer MT, Ivanova N, Robertson JM, Yue R, Zhang R et al (2019) A genome-wide algal mutant library and functional screen identifies genes required for eukaryotic photosynthesis. Nat Genet 51(4):627–635. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0370-6
Li S, Li X, Ho S-H (2022) Microalgae as a solution of third world energy crisis for biofuels production from wastewater toward carbon neutrality: an updated review. Chemosphere 291:132863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132863
Loiselay C, Gumpel NJ, Girard-Bascou J, Watson AT, Purton S, Wollman F-A, Choquet Y (2008) Molecular identification and function of cis- and trans-acting determinants for petA transcript stability in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplasts. Mol Cell Biol 28(17):5529–5542. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.02056-07
Loizeau K, Qu Y, Depp S, Fiechter V, Ruwe H, Lefebvre-Legendre L, Schmitz-Linneweber C, Goldschmidt-Clermont M (2014) Small RNAs reveal two target sites of the RNA-maturation factor Mbb1 in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas. Nucleic Acids Res 42(5):3286–3297. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1272
Loppes R, Heindricks R (1986) New arginine-requiring mutants in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Arch Microbiol 143(4):348–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00412801
Macedo-Osorio KS, Pérez-España VH, Garibay-Orijel C, Guzmán-Zapata D, Durán-Figueroa NV, Badillo-Corona JA (2018) Intercistronic expression elements (IEE) from the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii can be used for the expression of foreign genes in synthetic operons. Plant Mol Biol 98(4–5):303–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-018-0776-z
Macedo-Osorio KS, Martinez-Antonio A, Badillo-Corona JA (2021) Pas de Trois: an overview of penta-, tetra-, and octo-tricopeptide repeat proteins from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and their role in chloroplast gene expression. Front Plant Sci 12:775366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.775366
Manuell AL, Beligni MV, Elder JH, Siefker DT, Tran M, Weber A, McDonald TL, Mayfield SP (2007) Robust expression of a bioactive mammalian protein in Chlamydomonas chloroplast. Plant Biotechnol J 5(3):402–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00249.x
Marín-Navarro J, Manuell AL, Wu J, Mayfield SP (2007) Chloroplast translation regulation. Photosynth Res 94(2–3):359–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-007-9183-z
Martínez-Alberola F, Barreno E, Casano LM, Gasulla F, Molins A, Moya P, González-Hourcade M, del Campo EM (2020) The chloroplast genome of the lichen-symbiont microalga Trebouxia sp. Tr9 (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta) shows short inverted repeats with a single gene and loss of the rps4 gene, which is encoded by the nucleus. J Phycol 56(1):170–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12928
Mathieu-Rivet E, Lerouge P, Bardor M (2017) Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: protein glycosylation and production of biopharmaceuticals. In: Hippler M (ed) Chlamydomonas: biotechnology and biomedicine. Microbiology monographs, vol 31. Springer, Cham, pp 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66360-9_3
Maul JE, Lilly JW, Cui L, dePamphilis CW, Miller W, Harris EH, Stern DB (2002) The Chlamydomonas reinhardtii plastid chromosome: islands of genes in a sea of repeats. Plant Cell 14(11):2659–2679. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.006155
Mayfield SP, Franklin SE, Lerner RA (2003) Expression and assembly of a fully active antibody in algae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(2):438–442. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0237108100
Mayfield SP, Manuell AL, Chen S, Wu J, Tran M, Siefker D, Muto M, Marin-Navarro J (2007) Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplasts as protein factories. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18(2):126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2007.02.001
Michelet L, Lefebvre-Legendre L, Burr SE, Rochaix J-D, Goldschmidt-Clermont M (2011) Enhanced chloroplast transgene expression in a nuclear mutant of Chlamydomonas. Plant Biotechnol J 9(5):565–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00564.x
Mogk A, Schmidt R, Bukau B (2007) The N-end rule pathway for regulated proteolysis: prokaryotic and eukaryotic strategies. Trends Cell Biol 17(4):165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2007.02.001
Murakami S, Kuehnle K, Stern DB (2005) A spontaneous tRNA suppressor of a mutation in the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii nuclear MCD1 gene required for stability of the chloroplast petD mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 33(10):3372–3380. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki651
Muto M, Henry RE, Mayfield SP (2009) Accumulation and processing of a recombinant protein designed as a cleavable fusion to the endogenous Rubisco LSU protein in Chlamydomonas chloroplast. BMC Biol 9:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-9-26
Nakamura Y, Gojobori T, Ikemura T (2000) Codon usage tabulated from international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):292–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.292
Newman SM, Boynton JE, Gillham NW, Randolph-Anderson BL, Johnson AM, Harris EH (1990) Transformation of chloroplast ribosomal RNA genes in Chlamydomonas: molecular and genetic characterization of integration events. Genetics 126:875–888. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/126.4.875
NHC (2022) http://www.nhc.gov.cn/sps/s7892/202205/fc11e1c1a90d4b99b87e313cce938697.shtml. Accessed 11 May 2022
Ozawa S-I, Cavaiuolo M, Jarrige D, Kuras R, Rutgers M, Eberhard S, Drapier D, Wollman F-A, Choquet Y (2020) The OPR protein MTHI1 controls the expression of two different subunits of ATP synthase CFo in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell 32(4):1179–1203. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.19.00770
Pfalz J, Bayraktar OA, Prikryl J, Barkan A (2009) Site-specific binding of a PPR protein defines and stabilizes 5′ and 3′ mRNA termini in chloroplasts. EMBO J 28(14):2042–2052. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.121
Pombert J-F, Lemieux C, Turmel M (2006) The complete chloroplast DNA sequence of the green alga Oltmannsiellopsis viridis reveals a distinctive quadripartite architecture in the chloroplast genome of early diverging ulvophytes. BMC Biol 4:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-4-3
Prikryl J, Rojas M, Schuster G, Barkan A (2011) Mechanism of RNA stabilization and translational activation by a pentatricopeptide repeat protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(1):415–420. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012076108
Rahire M, Laroche F, Cerutti L, Rochaix J-D (2012) Identification of an OPR protein involved in the translation initiation of the PsaB subunit of photosystem I. Plant J 72(4):652–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05111.x
Rasala BA, Muto M, Lee PA, Jager M, Cardoso RMF, Behnke CA, Kirk P, Hokanson CA, Crea R, Mendez M et al (2010) Production of therapeutic proteins in algae, analysis of expression of seven human proteins in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Biotechnol J 8(6):719–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00503.x
Rasala BA, Muto M, Sullivan J, Mayfield SP (2011) Improved heterologous protein expression in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii through promoter and 5′ untranslated region optimization. Plant Biotechnol J 9(6):674–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00620.x
Rasala BA, Lee PA, Shen Z, Briggs SP, Mendez M, Mayfield SP (2012) Robust expression and secretion of Xylanase1 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by fusion to a selection gene and processing with the FMDV 2A peptide. PLoS ONE 7:e43349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043349
Reifschneider O, Marx C, Jacobs J, Kollipara L, Sickmann A, Wolters D, Kück U (2017) A ribonucleoprotein supercomplex involved in trans-splicing of organelle group II introns. J Biol Chem 291(44):23330–23342. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.750570
Remacle C, Cline S, Boutaffala L, Gabilly S, Larosa V, Barbieri MR, Coosemans N, Hamel PP (2009) The ARG9 gene encodes the plastid-resident N-Acetyl ornithine aminotransferase in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eukaryot Cell 8(9):1460–1463. https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00108-09
Ren Q, Wang Y-c, Lin Y, Zhen Z, Cui Y, Qin S (2021) The extremely large chloroplast genome of the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis: genome structure, and comparative analysis. Algal Res 56:102308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102308
Robbens S, Derelle E, Ferraz C, Wuyts J, Moreau H, Van de Peer Y (2007) The complete chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA sequence of Ostreococcus tauri: organelle genomes of the smallest eukaryote are examples of compaction. Mol Biol Evol 24(4):956–968. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm012
Rochaix JD, Surzycki R, Ramundo S (2014) Tools for regulated gene expression in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas. In: Maliga P (ed) Chloroplast biotechnology. Methods in molecular biology, vol 1132. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-995-6_28
Salomé PA, Merchant SS (2019) A series of fortunate events: introducing Chlamydomonas as a reference organism. Plant Cell 31(8):1682–1707. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.18.00952
Sandoval-Vargas JM, Macedo-Osorio KS, Durán-Figueroa NV, Garibay-Orijel C, Badillo-Corona JA (2018) Chloroplast engineering of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to use phosphite as phosphorus source. Algal Res 33:291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2018.06.003
Sandoval-Vargas JM, Jiménez-Clemente LA, Macedo-Osorio KS, Oliver-Salvador MC, Fernández-Linares LC, Durán-Figueroa NV, Badillo-Corona JA (2019) Use of the ptxD gene as a portable selectable marker for chloroplast transformation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Mol Biotechnol 61(6):461–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-019-00177-3
Shahar N, Elman T, Williams-Carrier R, Ben-Zvi O, Yacoby I, Barkan A (2021) Use of plant chloroplast RNA-binding proteins as orthogonal activators of chloroplast transgenes in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Algal Res 60:102535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102535
Shamriz S, Ofoghi H (2016) Outlook in the application of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast as a platform for recombinant protein production. Biotechnol Genet Eng 32(1–2):92–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2017.1307673
Shamriz S, Ofoghi H (2019) Expression of recombinant PfCelTOS antigen in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and its potential use in detection of Malaria. Mol Biotechnol 61(2):102–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-018-0140-1
Shaw KJ, Rather PN, Hare RS, Miller GH (1993) Molecular genetics of aminoglycoside resistance genes and familial relationships of the aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. Microbiol Rev 57(1):138–163. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.57.1.138-163.1993
Shi Q, Chen C, Zhang W, Wu P, Sun M, Wu H, Wu H, Fu P, Fan J (2021) Transgenic eukaryotic microalgae as green factories: providing new ideas for the production of biologically active substances. J Appl Phycol 33(2):705–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02350-7
Smith DR, Lee RW, Cushman JC, Magnuson JK, Tran D, Polle JEW (2010) The Dunaliella salina organelle genomes: large sequences, inflated with intronic and intergenic DNA. BMC Plant Biol 10:83. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-83
Stern DB, Goldschmidt-Clermont M, Hanson MR (2010) Chloroplast RNA metabolism. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:125–155. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112242
Stoffels L, Taunt HN, Charalambous B, Purton S (2017) Synthesis of bacteriophage lytic proteins against Streptococcus pneumoniae in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Biotechnol J 15(9):1130–1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12703
Surzycki R, Cournac L, Peltiert G, Rochaix J-D (2007) Potential for hydrogen production with inducible chloroplast gene expression in Chlamydomonas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(44):17548–17553. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704205104
Surzycki R, Greenham K, Kitayama K, Dibal F, Wagner R, Rochaix J-D, Ajam T, Surzycki S (2009) Factors effecting expression of vaccines in microalgae. Biologicals 37(3):133–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2009.02.005
Tasaki T, Sriram SM, Park KS, Kwon YT (2012) The N-End rule pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 81:261–289. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-051710-093308
Taunt HN, Stoffels L, Purton S (2018) Green biologics: the algal chloroplast as a platform for making biopharmaceuticals. Bioengineered 9(1):48–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2017.1377867
Tourasse NJ, Choquet Y, Vallon O (2013) PPR proteins of green algae. RNA Biol 10(9):1526–1542. https://doi.org/10.4161/rna.26127
Tran NT, Kaldenhoff R (2020) Achievements and challenges of genetic engineering of the model green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Algal Res 50:101986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2020.101986
Turmel M, Otis C, Lemieux C (1999) The complete chloroplast DNA sequence of the green alga Nephroselmis olivacea: insights into the architecture of ancestral chloroplast genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(18):10248–10253. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.18.10248
Turmel M, Otis C, Lemieux C (2009) The chloroplast genomes of the green algae Pedinomonas minor, Parachlorella kessleri, and Oocystis solitaria Reveal a shared ancestry between the Pedinomonadales and Chlorellales. Mol Biol Evol 26(10):2317–2331. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp138
Vaistij FE, Goldschmidt-Clermont M, Wostrikoff K, Rochaix J-D (2000a) Stability determinants in the chloroplast psbB/T/H mRNAs of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant J 21(5):469–482. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00700.x
Vaistij FE, Boudreau E, Lemaire SD, Goldschmidt-Clermont M, Rochaix J-D (2000b) Characterization of Mbb1, a nucleus-encoded tetratricopeptide-like repeat protein required for expression of the chloroplast psbB/psbT/psbH gene cluster in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(26):14813–14818. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.26.14813
Viola S, Cavaiuolo M, Drapier D, Eberhard S, Vallon O, Wollman F-A, Choquet Y (2019) MDA1, a nucleus-encoded factor involved in the stabilization and processing of the atpA transcript in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas. Plant J 98(6):1033–1047. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14300
Wakasugi T, Nagai T, Kapoor M, Sugita M, Ito M, Ito S, Tsudzuki J, Nakashima K, Tsudzuki T, Suzuki Y et al (1997) Complete nucleotide sequence of the chloroplast genome from the green alga Chlorella vulgaris: The existence of genes possibly involved in chloroplast division. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(11):5967–5972. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.11.5967
Wang F, Johnson X, Cavaiuolo M, Bohne A-V, Nickelsen J, Vallon O (2015) Two Chlamydomonas OPR proteins stabilize chloroplast mRNAs encoding small subunits of photosystem II and cytochrome b6f. Plant J 82(5):861–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12858
Wannathong T, Waterhouse JC, Young REB, Economou CK, Purton S (2016) New tools for chloroplast genetic engineering allow the synthesis of human growth hormone in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Appl Microbiol Biot 100(12):5467–5477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7354-6
Yakun Z, Xianming S, Zhongming Z (2006) High-frequency electroporation and expression of human interleukin 4 gene in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast. J Huazhong Agric Univ 2006(02):110–116. https://doi.org/10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2006.02.003
Yoo B-C, Yadav NS, Orozco EM Jr, Sakai H (2020) Cas9/gRNA-mediated genome editing of yeast mitochondria and Chlamydomonas chloroplasts. PeerJ 8:e8362. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8362
Young R, Purton S (2018) CITRIC: cold-inducible translational readthrough in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii using a novel temperature-sensitive transfer RNA. Microb Cell Fact 17:186. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-1033-5
Zou Y, Bozhkov PV (2021) Chlamydomonas proteases: classification, phylogeny, and molecular mechanisms. J Exp Bot 72(22):7680–7693. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab383
We thank Xiaobo Li for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Project of China (2019YFA0906300 and 2020YFA0907304), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872608), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2019ZD17), Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (21ZR1416400), and Funding Project of the State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering.
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, K., Deng, L., Wu, H. et al. Towards green biomanufacturing of high-value recombinant proteins using promising cell factory: Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 9, 83 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00568-6
- Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
- Synthetic biology
- Green factory
- Selectable marker
- Protein expression