Skip to main content

Development and fabrication of disease resistance protein in recombinant Escherichia coli


Cyanobacteria and Spirulina produce C-phycocyanin (CPC), a water soluble protein associated pigment, which is extensively used in food and pharmaceutical industries. Other therapeutic proteins might exist in microalgal cells, of which there is limited knowledge. Such proteins/peptides with antibiotic properties are crucial due to the emergence of multi-drug resistant pathogens. In addition, the native expression levels of such disease resistant proteins are low, hindering further investigation. Thus, screening and overexpression of such novel proteins is urgent and important. In this study, a protein which was identified as a putative disease resistance protein (DRP) in the mixture of Spirulina product has been explored for the first time. To improve protein expression, DRP was cloned in the pET system, co-transformed with pRARE plasmid for codon optimization and was significantly overexpressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) under induction with isopropyl-β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Furthermore, soluble DRP exhibited intense antimicrobial activity against predominant pathogens, and an inhibition zone of 1.59 to 1.74 cm was obtained for E. coli. At a concentration 4 mg/mL, DRP significantly elevated the growth of L. rhamnosus ZY up to twofold showing probable prebiotic activities. Moreover, DRP showed potential as an effective antioxidant, and the scavenging ability for ROS was in the order of hydroxyl > DPPH > superoxide radicals. A putative disease resistance protein (DRP) has been identified, sequenced, cloned and over-expressed in E. coli as a functional protein. Thus expressed DRP showed potential anti-microbial and antioxidant properties, with promising therapeutic applications.


Microalgae, including diatoms of Bacillariophyta, green algae Chlorella sp. and blue-green algae cyanobacteria, serve as a natural carbon sink, and are known as a sustainable feedstock for biodiesel and biofuel production. The protein rich microalgal biomass is also known for the co-production of a number of high-value products viz., carbohydrates, bioplastic polymers, cosmetics, and food additives (Li et al. 2018; Allen et al. 2018). Microalgae and cyanobacteria are naturally protein-rich (Teuling et al. 2019), and C-phycocyanin (CPC) is the dominant phycobiliprotein commonly seen in cyanobacteria (Eriksen 2008). CPC has been explored in pharmaceuticals as antibacterial, anticancer, antioxidants, health supplements, and vitamins mainly due to the increasing demand for alternative antimicrobial agents to counteract the rising antibiotic resistance in pathogens (Singh et al. 2011; Waghmare et al. 2016). The presence of carotenoids and chlorophylls alongside CPC is the major bottleneck in the CPC purification process. Thus the development of a pigment extraction cascade without any loss in essential proteins is vital (Marzorati et al. 2020). Other than that, extraction cascades have also been successfully applied to isolate fatty acids from the spent biomass after CPC extraction, which consisted of high amounts of PUFAs (Imbimbo et al. 2019). Furthermore, microalgae and cyanobacteria might possibly contain other therapeutic proteins/peptides with applications as novel drugs. However, discovery, extraction and purification of such novel algal proteins in a sustainable way is a critical issue.

Tandem mass spectrometry serves as a powerful tool to identify proteins and studying the relationship between protein functions and cellular behavior. Protein discovery related to a specific function is essential for advancement in emerging technologies such as synthetic biology which helps in solving global issues (Coon et al. 2005). For instance, the presence of asiaticoside in ethyl acetate extract from medicinal plant Centella asiatica Urban was confirmed by LC–MS (Gupta et al. 2018). Therefore, the advent of high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry invigorated proteomics—the classification of the protein complement expressed by the genome of an organism (Wolters et al. 2001). The most common application of proteomics is in the medical sector for therapeutics and diagnosis by identifying novel biomarkers of disease. Recently, Marchand and his colleagues developed a non-natural amino acid system in E. coli which was integrated by proteomics (Marchand et al. 2019). Moreover, proteomics plays a vital role in revealing the metabolism under different physiological stimulation and discovering new proteins for unique applications. For example, a robust multiple copper oxidase from an electrogen Proteus Hauseri ZMD44 was discovered and overexpressed in E. coli to be applied in gold recovery, because the organism exhibited tolerance to copper ions by automatically overexpressing the multiple copper oxidase (Ng et al. 2016; Tan et al. 2017).

Recombinant technology has become an essential tool at hand for high-level production of heterologous proteins (Rosano et al. 2014). The choice of the host cell and it’s protein synthesizing machinery is decisive in initiating the outline of the whole process. As a model organism, E. coli has been routinely used to produce heterologous proteins (Schlegel et al. 2017). Also, the advantages of using E. coli over other organisms are well-known, such as doubling time in glucose-salts media is about 20 min, and it is able to reach high cell density easily and stationary phase can be attained in a few hours (Sezonov et al. 2007). Previous studies have reported that CPC from cyanobacteria was successfully expressed in E. coli (Zhao et al. 2006; Guan et al. 2007; Yu et al. 2016).

In this study, a putative disease resistance protein (DRP) was screened from the mixture of Spirulina product and identified by MS/MS for the first time. Afterward, the whole DNA sequence of DRP was synthesized, cloned into pET21a(+) and further expressed in E. coli. The optimization of DRP production involved optimal codon usage and temperature effect. Furthermore, the novel functionalities of DRP are explored regarding antimicrobial activity, prebiotic promoting activity and anti-oxidant activity.

Materials and methods

Protein identification from nature product

The natural product, which was initially extracted from Spirulina species, was purchased from Febico Bio-Tec, Taiwan. The powder was dissolved in deionized water to a concentration of 10 g/L, and then the solution was centrifuged to collect the supernatant. The protein concentration of the supernatant was measured by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, USA) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a protein standard. The concentration of the protein solution was then adjusted to 1 g/L. The final solution was subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) to analyze the protein pattern, which was visualized by staining with Coomassie blue R-250. The targeted protein bands were sent for tandem MS/MS analysis.

Synthesis and cloning of DRP and co-transformation with pRARE plasmid

After identifying the amino acid sequence by MS/MS analysis, the DNA sequence of DRP was deduced by reverse translation using Vector NTI (Life Technologies, USA) as shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1, and then the entire gene sequence was synthesized by IDT (Coralville, USA). The DRP fragment was amplified by polymerase chain reaction and cloned into pET21a(+) plasmid at the restriction sites NdeI and XhoI (NEB, USA) (Additional file 1: Figure S2). The strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Strains, plasmids and primers used in this study

Culture conditions and overexpression of recombinant DRP

The Disease resistance protein (DRP) was cloned and expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3). First, recombinant colonies were grown on LB plates (1.5% tryptone, 1.5% NaCl and 0.5% yeast extract) with antibiotics (50 mg/L ampicillin for pET21a(+)-DRP and 12.5 mg/L chloramphenicol for pRARE) at 37 °C for 12 h. Next, a single colony was inoculated in LB medium with appropriate antibiotics for pre-culture at 37 °C for 12 h with shaking at 200 rpm. Then, the cells were diluted 1:100 in LB medium with antibiotics and cultured for about 3 h. Growth was monitored by measuring the biomass or optical density at 600 nm (OD600) using the spectrophotometer (SpectraMax 340, Molecular Devices, USA). As the OD600 reached 0.6  0.8, the cells were induced by the addition of 0.1 mM IPTG and further incubated at 25 and 30 °C for up to 12 h. Finally, the cells were harvested by centrifuging at 12,000×g for 10 min and washed with deionized water for two times. Then, the OD was adjusted to an appropriate concentration, and the cells were disrupted using a One-Shot high-pressure crusher to obtain soluble DRP. The whole-cell proteins and the soluble DRP protein were analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

Antibacterial activity

Antibacterial activity determination was performed by the agar well diffusion method, which was seeded with pathogen strains (Rani et al. 2018). Aeromonas hydrophila, Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus were inoculated in 20 mL of LB agar at 2% (v/v). For testing the antibacterial activity, various concentrations of soluble protein DRP were absorbed on the filter paper (diameter ± 0.25 cm) in a cooled agar plate. The size of the bacterial inhibition zone for each concentration was measured after culturing at 37 °C for 6 h. The positive control was CPC from natural product purchased from Febico Bio-Tec, Taiwan. All experiments were performed in duplicate independently.

Prebiotic activity

The prebiotic activity test was carried out by culturing 5% (v/v) of Lactobacillus rhamnosus ZY on 20 mL of MRS medium in a 100 mL of Erlenmeyer flask (Lai et al. 2019). Each culture flask was supplemented with different amounts of BL21(DE3) wild type and the recombinant strain expressing DRP. The cells were cultured at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm for 12 h. After that, samples were taken and diluted with deionized water 107 times before the screening process on MRS agar plate. The colony-forming units (CFU) of prebiotics were counted after incubation at 37 °C for 24 h.

Antioxidant activity

DRP samples were prepared in different protein concentrations (i.e., 0.1 ~ 4 mg/mL). Phycocyanin (CPC), one of the functional proteins, was extracted from the commercial product (Febico Bio-Tec, Taiwan) and diluted to 1 mg/mL as a control solution.

DPPH radical scavenging assay

The α, α-diphenyl-β-picrylhydrazil (DPPH) radical scavenging activity was performed according to a previous study (Xia et al. 2011) with some modification. First, 0.039 g of DPPH was added to 1 mL of anhydrous alcohol, and the DPPH solution was diluted 100 times with anhydrous alcohol. A 100 μL of DPPH solution was mixed with 100 μL of protein sample in a centrifuge tube. Samples were incubated in darkness at 25 °C for 30 min. After the reaction was completed, the precipitate was removed by centrifugation at 12,000×g for 1 min. A control was measured by replacing the protein sample with water. The mixture reaction (Ai) and control (A0) samples were transferred into 96-well microplate and the absorbance was measured at the wavelength of 517 nm. The DPPH scavenging rate was determined using the following equation:

$$ DPPH\;Scave\;nging\;rate\;\left( {\% } \right)\;\text{ = }\;\left[ {1\text{ - }\;\left( {A_{i} \;\text{ - }\;A_{0} } \right)\;\text{/}A_{i} } \right]\; \times \;100{\% }. $$

OH radical scavenging assay

The hydroxyl scavenging assay was conducted according to the Fenton reaction (Sies et al. 1993; Wang et al. 2017; Huang et al. 2019) with some modification. First, 0.085 g of FeSO4·7H2O was added to 50 mL of H2O2 to prepare a FeSO4(aq) solution (6 mM). Then, 200 μL of FeSO4(aq), 100 μL of sodium salicylate solution (10 mM), and 20 μL protein sample were added in a centrifuge tube, mixed well and incubated for 30 min. The hydroxyl radical reacts with salicylic acid to form 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid which absorbs UV light at 510 nm. After the reaction was completed, the precipitate was removed by centrifugation at 2000×g for 5 min. The reaction mixture was transferred into a 96-well microplate and the absorbance Ai was measured. The background absorbance Aj was measured by replacing the protein sample with water, and the blank absorbance A0 was measured by replacing the sodium salicylate solution with water. The following formula was used for the calculation of the scavenging rate of hydroxyl radical (OH):

$$ \text{OH}^{\text{ - }} \;\text{Scavenging}\;\text{rate}\;\left( {\% } \right)\;\text{ = }\;\left[ {\text{1}\;\text{ - }\left( {\text{A}_{\text{i}} \;\text{ - }\;\text{A}_{\text{0}} } \right)\text{/A}_{\text{j}} \;} \right]\;{ \times }\;{100\% }\text{.} $$

O2 radical scavenging assay

The superoxide radical scavenging activity was performed as reported previously (Patel et al. 2018) with some modifications. First, a 10 mM pyrogallol (C6H6O3) solution in 10 mM HCl and a 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer at pH 8.2 were prepared. Then, 500 μL of Tris–HCl buffer, 470 μL distilled water, and 10 μL of protein sample were added in a centrifuge tube, mixed well and incubated for 20 min at 25 °C. A 200 μL of the mixture was added to 20 μL of preheated 10 mM pyrogallol solution at 25 °C. The reaction mixture was transferred to a 96-well microplate and the kinetic absorbance (Ai) was measured at the wavelength of 325 nm for 2 min. The oxidation rate of pyrogallol ΔA was estimated by calculating the difference of absorbance per minute in the linear range. The auto-oxidation rate of pyrogallol ΔA0 was also estimated as above by replacing protein samples with pyrogallol solution. The following formula calculated the scavenging rate of superoxide anion (O2):

$$ O_{2}^{\text{ - }} \;Scavenging\;rate\;\left( {\% } \right)\;\text{ = }\;\left( {1\;\text{ - }\;\Delta A\text{/}\Delta A_{0} } \right)\; \times \;100{\% }\text{.} $$

Results and discussion

Identification of disease resistance protein from nature product

The native proteins from the commercial product were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1). The results showed a dominant band at a molecular weight of 17 kDa (NP-17), which was indicated to be the CPC beta subunit with 30% coverage by tandem MS analysis (Table 2). It is reasonable that the dominant band was CPC, because Spirulina species are known as a rich source of bioactive products, one of which was CPC (Demay et al. 2019). Besides, CPC has several functional properties such as anti-oxidative function, anti-inflammatory activity, anti-cancer function, immune enhancement function, liver, and kidney protection and other pharmacological effects (Jiang et al. 2017).

Fig. 1

Identification protein expression of natural products from Spirulina

Table 2 MASCOT analysis of protein identification and full sequence of target protein

Another protein at a molecular weight of 30 kDa (NP-30) was observed, which was further identified as a putative disease resistance protein (DRP) (Table 2). Interestingly, the homologous protein of DRP was present in a higher plant, Dichanthelium oligosanthes, according to the OEL30137 sequence in the GenBank database. We considered that DRP might be present in the natural product purchased from Febico Bio-Tec. On the other hand, the coverage of DRP from MS/MS result was only 5%, because it was present in trace amounts in the natural product, and has never been reported previously. Consequently, the whole DNA sequence for DRP was synthesized artificially and cloned into the pET21a(+) plasmid for overexpression in E. coli. The functional properties of the over-expressed DRP were further explored.

Over-expression of recombinant DRP in E. coli

The DRP gene acquired by DNA synthesis was amplified by PCR (Fig. 2a), and cloned in pET21a(+) vector. The recombinant gene expression was driven by T7/lac promoter and overexpressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3). Protein expression induced by IPTG was evaluated by SDS PAGE analysis. The recombinant protein was not overexpressed under the experimental conditions with the single plasmid (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2

a Gel electrophoresis analysis of DRP sequence by colony PCR. The N1 and N2 was the negative control by E. coli and pET21a(+) plasmid in the PCR reaction. The P indicates the positive control with DNA synthesis of DRP as a template, while numbers 1–4 represent each colony from pET21a-DRP in E. coli. M is the molecular weight of DNA marker. The targeted size is 832 bp. b DRP and DRP co-expression with pRARE vector for rare-codon optimization by SDS-PAGE analysis. S and WC represent the proteins from soluble and whole cell. The red arrows indicate the size of DRP

Next, to enhance the expression level of DRP in E. coli, pRARE plasmid was co-transformed with pET21a-DRP as dual plasmids and was cultured at 37 °C for 12 h. The pRARE plasmid was used to improve protein expression as it contains the rare codon encoding tRNAs and optimize codon usage for heterologous protein expression (Liu et al. 2006). As expected, the recombinant protein was successfully expressed at approximately 30 kDa; however, most DRP was aggregated into the inclusion body (Fig. 2b). To express the DRP as a soluble protein, the post- IPTG induction temperature was reduced to 30 °C and 25 °C instead of 37 °C. This is because inclusion bodies are formed due to improper folding or conformation of the overexpressed protein at high temperature, and induction at low temperature might assist proper folding of the proteins. This was a common phenomenon when using E. coli to produce most of the heterologous protein (Yu et al. 2016). As a result (Fig. 3), it was obvious that the protein expression at lower temperatures was maintained at the same level as that of 37 °C. Also, the soluble protein was significantly enhanced, and the highest soluble DRP was obtained by culturing at 25 °C. Due to the limited knowledge of DRP from commerical Spirulina extract, it is hard to evaluate the effect of post-translational modification of DRP at this juncture. In this study, the DRP expressed in E. coli is without any post-translational modification. Thus, we need to investigate the functional properties of DRP.

Fig. 3

Optimization of DRP protein expression in E. coli. Lane 1: M, lane 2: non-induction by IPTG, lane 3 to 7 are with 0.1 mM IPTG. M, X, W25, W30, C25, C30, and WT mean marker, whole cell which cultured at 25 °C, whole cell which cultured at 30 °C, crude enzyme which cultured at 25 °C, crude enzyme which cultured at 30 °C, and wild type of BL21(DE3). DRP has indicated by red arrow

Antibacterial activity of DRP

The recombinant DRP present in the cell-free extract was screened for antimicrobial activity against some relevant pathogens, namely S. aureus and B. cereus which are Gram positive; E. coli and A. hydrophila which are Gram-negative (Additional file 1: Table S1, Fig. 4). Among the pathogen strains, B. cereus was the most sensitive towards the DRP at 30 °C and 25 °C, with 0.99 ~ 1.91 cm and 1.01 ~ 1.86 cm clearance zone, respectively. Interestingly, S. aureus is also Gram-positive, but it was more resistant and showed the minimum clearance zone (0.83 ~ 1.11 cm). The resistance towards CPC was similar for S. aureus. In contrast, other studies have reported that S. aureus has high sensitivity compared to Gram-negative bacteria towards CPC from exopolysaccharide of S. thermophilus GST-6 (Zhang et al. 2016). We considered that the antibacterial compound contained in soluble DRP was slightly different from the one reported by Zhang et al., thus affecting the capability of inhibition in different pathogen strains. Furthermore, 0.25 mg/mL of DRP at 25 °C and 30 °C have shown 1.59 cm and 1.74 cm of clearance zone for E. coli, which is a highly virulent pathogen in nature (Silhavy et al. 2010; Najdenski et al. 2013). Besides, extracted commercial CPC has the strongest inhibition ability for E. coli (1.74 cm). Also, the exopolysaccharides from the cyanobacteria Nostoc commune (Quan et al. 2015) was highly active against E. coli. A high proportion of such antibacterial compound producing strains might be associated with an ecological role, probably displaying defensive measures to maintain their niche, or allow the invasion of strains into established microbial communities (Gillor et al. 2008). On the other hand, both Spirulina CPC and the recombinant DRP showed substantial inhibition zones with an increase in protein concentration. The antibacterial activity of DRP at 25 °C and 30 °C is in the order of B. cereus > E. coli > A. hydrophila > S. aureus.

Fig. 4

Effect of protein added on the antibacterial activities of Aeromonas hydrophila (red bar), Bacillus cereus (green bar), Escherichia coli (grey bar), and Staphylococcus aureus (white bar). C-PC is the positive control, while DRP_25 and DRP_30 represent to samples incubator at 25 °C and 30 °C, respectively. All the proteins concentrations are the same as 0.25 mg

Prebiotic activity of DRP

Figure 5 demonstrates the effect of adding different protein supplements on the growth of probiotic strain L. rhamnosus ZY. The evaluation was based on the CFU of L. rhamnosus ZY screened on MRS agar plate. After 24 h, the CFU of L. rhamnosus ZY without protein addition was 6.2 × 108. It is interesting to note that low levels of DRP supplementation successfully promoted the prebiotic activity, even higher than that of CPC at the same concentration (0.5 to 2 mg). Meanwhile, the highest CFU was attained by adding 4 mg/mL of CPC and soluble DRP, and the cell count was elevated up to twofolds (17.5 × 108) and 1.5-folds (16.0 × 108), respectively. Similar to antibacterial activity, the prebiotic activity was concentration-dependent. Despite this, the addition of WT-BL21(DE3) cell free extract seems to be inhibitory, since the CFU declined as soluble extract of WT-BL21(DE3) increased. Furthermore, the prebiotic activity of DRP was higher that the proteins obtained from Chlorella vulgaris FSP-E and Chlorella sorokiniana, since both the algal proteins attained only 7.8 to 8.7 × 108 CFU using a high concentration of protein (Lai et al. 2019).

Fig. 5

Effect of protein amounts added from BL21(DE3) (white bar), DRP at 25 °C (black bar), and DRP at 30 °C (grey bar) on the prebiotic activity of L. rhamnosus ZY

Antioxidant activity of DRP

The anti-oxidant potential of DRP was assessed by evaluating the scavenging potential of DRP for DPPH, hydroxyl, and superoxide radicals with a wide range of protein concentrations. DPPH is a stable nitrogen-centered free radical substance, and it is commonly used in free-radical scavenging assay (Sánchez-Moreno et al. 2002; Mahmoudi et al. 2020). Stable DPPH exhibits a violet color; and when the DPPH radical accepts an electron from an antioxidant compound, the color of DPPH turns yellow. The degree of discoloration indicates the scavenging potential of the antioxidant extract. Besides, it is most likely a decrease in absorbance caused by phenolic compounds in the reduction reaction between DPPH radicals and antioxidant molecules in protein. The results in Fig. 6a showed that the antioxidant activity of DRP expressed at 30 °C is higher than that at 25 °C. The antioxidant activity in both the samples improved by increasing the concentration of DRP, and 4 mg/mL showed the highest rate at 32.7% and 29.6%, respectively. The increasing of scavenging activity in protein extract might be due to the presence of antioxidant compounds, which are good electron donors (Easwar and Viswanatha 2020).

Fig. 6

Functional test based on (a) DPPH, (b) Hydroxyl, and (c) Superoxide radical scavenging activity of DRP protein, which cultured at 25 °C (black bar) and at 30 °C (grey bar)

Hydroxyl radical is an extremely reactive free radical formed in a biological system. It has been implicated as a highly damaging species in free radical pathology, capable of damaging almost every molecule found in living cells. This radical has the capacity to join nucleotides in DNA and cause strand breakage (Kaur et al. 2019). In this study, the results showed that soluble DRP effectively scavenged the reactive hydroxyl radical, and the antioxidant activity reached 56.4% and 54.0% at 25 °C and 30 °C, respectively (Fig. 6b). The hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of soluble DRP was higher than a previous study, which used Spirulina extract (Zayadi et al. 2020).

The superoxide radical scavenging activity results are shown in Fig. 6c. Among various concentrations of soluble DRP, only high concentrations (2 and 4 mg/mL) scavenged superoxide radical about 0.7 ~ 6.2%, while soluble DRP at 0.1 and 0.5 mg/mL had no superoxide radical scavenging activity. According to a previous study, the antioxidant activity against superoxide radical might be supported by CPC (Santiago-Morales et al. 2018).

By comparing the antioxidant activities of DRP and CPC from the commercial product as a control (Table 3), the extracted CPC revealed higher anti-oxidant potential than crude DRP at all assessments. Herein, DRP and CPC displayed the highest activity against hydroxyl radicals, which was 90.3% and 56.4%, respectively. The difference between the effect of CPC and DRP on the DPPH scavenging activity was not significant; meanwhile, the superoxide scavenging activity of CPC was tenfolds higher compared to DRP. However, the protein concentration of DRP was apparently 4 times higher than that of CPC. The results suggested that the scavenging capability was truly influenced by pure phycocyanin, although at less amount. Besides, the antioxidant potential of crude protein from E. coli BL21(DE3) was also assessed; however, no anti-oxidant activity was detected (data not shown).

Table 3 Comparison antioxidant activity of different protein sources

Furthermore, early studies from varied species exhibited high antioxidant activity. Zhang and his colleagues evaluated antioxidant activity from Lactobacillus plantarum C88 (2013) and microalgae strains (2019), including Chlorococcum sp., Scenedemus sp., and C. pyrenoidosa FACHB-9. The results demonstrated that originally microalgae strains displayed higher scavenging ability than L. plantarum C88 even though the concentration was four times lower, and it successfully scavenged DPPH and OH radical about 36.5 ~ 58% and 63.1 ~ 77.5%, respectively. It is worth noting that most of the studies cited use a purified product. However, to our best knowledge, purification of the recombinant DRP is laborious and expensive. Recently, researchers have applied some techniques to modify the biological activities of polysaccharides and CPC as well as enhance the antioxidant ability. Box-Behnken design was utilized beneficially to improve the antioxidant potential of microalgae P. versicolor NCC466, which showed an anti-oxidant activity of 88.7% for OH and 87.4% for O2 (Gammoudi et al. 2019). Yu et al. (2016) successfully scavenged the three free radicals (OH, DPPH, and O2) by Synechocystis PCC6803 by combining Plackett–Burman design and Box-Behnken design which was up to 78, 83, and 64%, respectively.

For a cost-effective process and screening a novel antioxidant agent candidate, this study successfully characterized the antioxidant activity of DRP using cell-free extract protein, which efficiently reduced process costs due to non-intricated techniques. The crude extract with DRP showed the highest anti-oxidant activity against the hydroxyl radicals. Despite this, purification of the protein is still needed for further examination to guarantee the safety of DRP use. Besides, another viable strategy is to use the probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 for the over-expression of DRP, which produces neither hemolysin nor other toxins.


We hereby demonstrated the process flow of the discovery of a novel protein from natural products and subsequent identification as a disease resistance protein (DRP). The overexpression of DRP was facilitated in the recombinant E. coli using pRARE plasmid for codon optimization. The crude extract containing DRP displayed potent inhibitory effects against common bacterial pathogens and showed prebiotic activity on the growth of L. rhamnosus ZY cells. DRP also showed strong anti-oxidant activity against hydroxyl radicals. The results reveal that DRP is a powerful candidate for nullifying free radicals.

Availability of data and materials

The authors approved the availability of data and materials for publishing the manuscript.


  1. Allen J, Unlu S, Demirel Y, Black P, Riekhof W (2018) Integration of biology, ecology and engineering for sustainable algal-based biofuel and bioproduct biorefinery. Bioresour Bioprocess 5(1):47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Coon JJ, Syka JE, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF (2005) Tandem mass spectrometry for peptide and protein sequence analysis. Biotechniques 38(4):519–523

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Demay J, Bernard C, Reinhardt A, Marie B (2019) Natural products from Cyanobacteria: focus on beneficial activities. Mar Drugs 17(6):320

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Easwar RD, Viswanatha CK (2020) Changes in the antioxidant intensities of seven different soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) cultivars during drought. J Food Biochem 44(2):e13118

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eriksen NT (2008) Production of phycocyanin—a pigment with applications in biology, biotechnology, foods and medicine. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 80(1):1–4

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gammoudi S, Athmouni K, Nasri A, Diwani N, Grati I, Belhaj D, Bouaziz-Ketata H, Fki L, El Feki A, Ayadi H (2019) Optimization, isolation, characterization and hepatoprotective effect of a novel pigment-protein complex (phycocyanin) producing microalga: Phormidium versicolor NCC-466 using response surface methodology. Int J Biol Macromol 137:647–656

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillor O, Etzion A, Riley MA (2008) The dual role of bacteriocins as anti-and probiotics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 81(4):591–606

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guan X, Qin S, Su Z, Zhao F, Ge B, Li F, Tang X (2007) Combinational biosynthesis of a fluorescent cyanobacterial holo-α-phycocyanin in Escherichia coli by using one expression vector. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 142(1):52–59

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta S, Bhatt P, Chaturvedi P (2018) Determination and quantification of asiaticoside in endophytic fungus from Centella asiatica (L.) Urban. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 34(8):111

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang G, Lin Y, Zhang L, Yan Z, Wang Y, Liu Y (2019) Synthesis of sulfur-selenium doped carbon quantum dots for biological imaging and scavenging reactive oxygen species. Sci Rep 9(1):1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Imbimbo P, Romanucci V, Pollio A, Fontanarosa C, Amoresano A, Zarrelli A, Olivieri G, Monti DM (2019) A cascade extraction of active phycocyanin and fatty acids from Galdieria phlegrea. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103(23–24):9455–9464

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang L, Wang Y, Yin Q, Liu G, Liu H, Huang Y, Li B (2017) Phycocyanin: a potential drug for cancer treatment. J Cancer 8(17):3416

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaur P, Purewal SS, Sandhu KS, Kaur M (2019) DNA damage protection: an excellent application of bioactive compounds. Bioresour Bioprocess 6(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lai YC, Chang CH, Chen CY, Chang JS, Ng IS (2019) Towards protein production and application by using Chlorella species as circular economy. Bioresour Technol 289:121625

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li SY, Ng IS, Chen PT, Chiang CJ, Chao YP (2018) Biorefining of protein waste for production of sustainable fuels and chemicals. Biotechnol Biofuels 11(1):1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu Z, Zhen Z, Zuo Z, Wu Y, Liu A, Yi Q, Li W (2006) Probing the catalytic center of porcine aminoacylase 1 by site-directed mutagenesis, homology modeling and substrate docking. J Biochem 139:421–430

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahmoudi R, Aghaei S, Salehpour Z, Mousavizadeh A, Khoramrooz SS, Taheripour SM, Christiansen G, Baneshi M, Karimi B, Bardania H (2020) Antibacterial and antioxidant properties of phyto-synthesized silver nanoparticles using Lavandula stoechas extract. Appl Organomet Chem 34(2):e5394

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marchand JA, Neugebauer ME, Ing MC, Lin CI, Pelton JG, Chang MC (2019) Discovery of a pathway for terminal-alkyne amino acid biosynthesis. Nature 567(7748):420–424

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marzorati S, Schievano A, Idà A, Verotta L (2020) Carotenoids, chlorophylls and phycocyanin from Spirulina: supercritical CO 2 and water extraction methods for added value products cascade. Green Chem 22(1):187–196

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Najdenski HM, Gigova LG, Iliev II, Pilarski PS, Lukavský J, Tsvetkova IV, Ninova MS, Kussovski VK (2013) Antibacterial and antifungal activities of selected microalgae and cyanobacteria. Int J Food Sci Technol 48(7):1533–1540

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ng IS, Ye C, Li Y, Chen BY (2016) Insights into copper effect on Proteus hauseri through proteomic and metabolic analyses. J Biosci Bioeng 121(2):178–185

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Patel HM, Rastogi RP, Trivedi U, Madamwar D (2018) Structural characterization and antioxidant potential of phycocyanin from the cyanobacterium Geitlerinema sp. H8DM. Algal Res 32:372–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Quan Y, Yang S, Wan J, Su T, Zhang J, Wang Z (2015) Optimization for the extraction of polysaccharides from Nostoc commune and its antioxidant and antibacterial activities. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 52:14–21

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rani RP, Anandharaj M, Ravindran AD (2018) Characterization of a novel exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus gasseri FR4 and demonstration of its in vitro biological properties. Int J Biol Macromol 109:772–783

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosano GL, Ceccarelli EA (2014) Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges. Front Microbiol 5:172

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sánchez-Moreno C (2002) Methods used to evaluate the free radical scavenging activity in foods and biological systems. Food Sci Technol Int 8(3):121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Santiago-Morales IS, Trujillo-Valle L, Márquez-Rocha FJ, Hernández JF (2018) Tocopherols, phycocyanin and superoxide dismutase from microalgae: as potential food antioxidants. Appl Food Biotechnol 5(1):19–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schlegel S, Genevaux P, de Gier JW (2017) Isolating Escherichia coli strains for recombinant protein production. Cell Mol Life Sci 74(5):891–908

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sezonov G, Joseleau-Petit D, d’Ari R (2007) Escherichia coli physiology in Luria-Bertani broth. J Bacteriol 189(23):8746–8749

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sies H (1993) Strategies of antioxidant defense. Eur J Biochem 215(2):213–219

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Silhavy TJ, Kahne D, Walker S (2010) The bacterial cell envelope. Cold Spring Harb Perspec Biol 2(5):a000414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Singh RK, Tiwari SP, Rai AK, Mohapatra TM (2011) Cyanobacteria: an emerging source for drug discovery. J Antibiot 64(6):401–412

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tan SI, Ng IS, Yu YJ (2017) Heterologous expression of an acidophilic multicopper oxidase in Escherichia coli and its applications in biorecovery of gold. Bioresour Bioprocess 4(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tegel H, Tourle S, Ottosson J, Persson A (2010) Increased levels of recombinant human proteins with the Escherichia coli strain Rosetta (DE3). Protein Expr Purif 69(2):159–167

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Teuling E, Schrama JW, Gruppen H, Wierenga PA (2019) Characterizing emulsion properties of microalgal and cyanobacterial protein isolates. Algal Res 39:101471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Waghmare AG, Salve MK, LeBlanc JG, Arya SS (2016) Concentration and characterization of microalgae proteins from Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Bioresour Bioprocess 3(1):16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang Y, Feng C, Yan L (2017) Enhancement of emerging contaminants removal using fenton reaction driven by H2O2 producing microbial fuel cell. Chem Eng J 307:679–686

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wolters DA, Washburn MP, Yates JR (2001) An automated multidimensional protein identification technology for shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 73(23):5683–5690

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xia F, Fan J, Zhu M, Tong H (2011) Antioxidant effects of a water-soluble proteoglycan isolated from the fruiting bodies of Pleurotus ostreatus. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 42(3):402–407

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yu P, Li P, Chen X, Chao X (2016) Combinatorial biosynthesis of Synechocystis PCC6803 phycocyanin holo-α-subunit (CpcA) in Escherichia coli and its activities. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100(12):5375–5388

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zayadi RA, Bakar FA (2020) Comparative study on stability, antioxidant and catalytic activities of bio-stabilized colloidal gold nanoparticles using microalgae and cyanobacteria. J Environ Chem Eng 10:103843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang L, Liu C, Li D, Zhao Y, Zhang X, Zeng X, Yang Z, Li S (2013) Antioxidant activity of an exopolysaccharide isolated from Lactobacillus plantarum C88. Int J Biol Macromol 54:270–275

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang J, Liu L, Ren Y, Chen F (2019) Characterization of exopolysaccharides produced by microalgae with antitumor activity on human colon cancer cells. Int J Biol Macromol 128:761–767

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhao KH, Su P, Li J, Tu JM, Zhou M, Bubenzer C, Scheer H (2006) Chromophore attachment to phycobiliprotein β-subunits phycocyanobilin: Cysteine-β84 phycobiliprotein lyase activity of CpeS-like protein from Anabaena sp. PCC7120. J Biol Chem 281(13):8573–8581

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are grateful for the financial support received for this project from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 108-2218-E-006-006 and MOST 109-2218-E-006-015) in Taiwan.


The authors are grateful for the financial support received from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 108-2218-E-006-006 and MOST 109-2218-E-006-015) in Taiwan.

Author information




ISN and SIT designed the experiment and analyzed the data, SSWE and SIT performed all of experiments. ISN, SSWE and SIT wrote the manuscript. CHC, JSC and CYC gave conceptual suggestion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I-Son Ng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the authors have read and agreed the ethics for publishing the manuscript.

Consent for publication

The authors approved the consent for publishing the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

The deducded DNA sequence of DRP. Figure S2. The gel electrophoresis analysis of the construction of pET21a-DRP by colony PCR. The N1 and the N2 was the negative control by adding the W3110 colony and pET21a plasmid into the PCR reaction. The P indicates the positive control with the addition of DNA synthesis of DRP as a template into the PCR reaction. The number 1 to 4 represents each colony. The targeted size is 832 bp. Table S1. Inhibition zone results of DRP protein in different pathogen strains.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Effendi, S.S.W., Tan, SI., Chang, CH. et al. Development and fabrication of disease resistance protein in recombinant Escherichia coli. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 7, 57 (2020).

Download citation


  • Disease resistance protein
  • Recombinant technology
  • Rare codon
  • Antibacterial
  • Antioxidant