Efficient production of l-menthol in a two-phase system with SDS using an immobilized Bacillus subtilis esterase
© Pan et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 19 April 2014
Accepted: 4 August 2014
Published: 30 September 2014
levo-Menthol is an important flavoring chemical, which can be prepared by enantioselective enzymatic hydrolysis of dl-menthyl esters. A recombinant esterase (BsE) cloned from Bacillus subtilis 0554 shows excellent enantioselectivity to dl-menthyl acetate and has been immobilized using cross-linked enzyme aggregates. Though BsE has relatively high substrate tolerance, the conversion of dl-menthyl acetate decreased sharply with the increase of substrate loading from 1 to 3 M in mono-aqueous system, which might be due to the severe inhibition of enzyme activity at extremely high load of substrate or product. In this work, enzymatic hydrolysis of dl-menthyl acetate with an extremely high load using the immobilized CLEA-BsE was investigated in an organic-aqueous biphasic system containing surfactant to establish a promising bioprocess for large-scale production of l-menthol.
An efficient biphasic reaction system of pentanol-water containing sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was developed for improving enantioselective hydrolysis of dl-menthyl acetate to produce l-menthol by immobilized BsE. Under the optimized reaction conditions, l-menthol was produced in >97% enantiomeric excess (ee) at a substrate load of up to 3.0 M with >40% conversion.
All the positive features demonstrate the potential applicability of the bioprocess for the large-scale production of l-menthol.
Menthol is an important cyclic monoterpene alcohol having eight optical isomers because of three chiral centers. Among them, l-menthol is not only one of the most important flavoring chemicals used extensively in oral products, pharmaceuticals, tobacco products, confectionaries, and shaving products ,, but also a useful chiral resolving reagent ,. In the past two decades, the global demand for l-menthol increased sharply from 6,300 to 20,000 t , and the production of l-menthol by extracting from mint can no longer meet the market demands. Therefore, considerable efforts have been devoted to the production of l-menthol by synthetic or semi-synthetic method.
Symrise Incorporation (Germany) first developed a chemical synthesis process for the industrial production of l-menthol using thymol as a raw material ,. Later, Takasago International Corporation (Japan) developed an elegant route from myrcene based on the catalytic asymmetric isomerization of geranyldiethylamine by using a chiral catalyst (S)-BINAP-Rh, invented by Nobel laureate Ryoji Noyori. The production of l-menthol has reached 1,000 t annually -.
Though chemical synthesis has been successfully commercialized, biosynthetic methods still attract much attention due to the advantages of high activity, mild reaction condition, little pollution, and excellent purity of product, and more importantly, the l-menthol produced is much closer to the natural product. Researchers from South Africa have developed a biosynthetic process for preparation of l-menthol by lipase-catalyzed kinetic resolution of dl-menthol at a scale of kilogram ,. Other biosynthetic approaches, including enantioselective esterification, transesterification, and hydrolysis, have also been reported -. In our laboratory, using racemic menthyl acetate as the sole carbon source and combining the strategy of habituated culture with increasing substrate concentration, a bacterial strain of Bacillus subtilis ECU0554 was isolated from soil samples, which exhibited very high substrate tolerance (100 g l−1, 0.5 M) and excellent enantioselectivity (E > 100) . The esterase (BsE) catalyzing the enantioselective hydrolysis of dl-menthyl acetate was cloned and overexpressed in Escherichia coli. The free BsE was not very stable, and its stability was improved by immobilization in the form of cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) . The thermostability of the immobilized BsE at 30°C was increased by 360 times, with only 8% activity loss after 10 cycles of repeated use in enzymatic resolution of dl-menthyl acetate.
The solubility of dl-menthyl acetate in mono-aqueous phase was very low, and ethanol was added as cosolvent to improve the substrate solubility . Although BsE showed relatively high substrate tolerance, the conversion decreased sharply with increase of substrate concentration from 1 to 3 M in mono-aqueous system, which might be due to the severe inhibition of enzyme activity at extremely high concentration of substrate or product. Organic-aqueous biphasic system was usually adopted to increase the substrate load and relieve the substrate/product inhibition . The addition of surfactant could facilitate the dispersal of the water-insoluble substrate through the formation of micellar system and improve the mass transfer of substrate , which is beneficial for the enzyme enantioselectivity . As well known, the increase of substrate concentration can often effectively facilitate the downstream separation and reduce the cost of the product. Additionally, immobilized enzymes are insoluble in the reaction medium, thus avoiding contamination of the product, which is feasible for separation and simplifies the downstream process. Hence, in this work, enzymatic hydrolysis of dl-menthyl acetate at an extremely high load using the immobilized CLEA-BsE was investigated to establish a promising bioprocess for large-scale production of l-menthol.
dl-Menthol was purchased from Alfa Aesar (Tianjin, China), and dl-menthyl acetate was synthesized as described before . All other reagents were obtained commercially and of analytic grade.
2.2 Preparation of immobilized BsE
The immobilized BsE was prepared as described previously . The crude BsE (10 g powder) was dissolved in 500 ml potassium phosphate buffer (KPB, 100 mM, pH 7.0), then 250 g (NH4)2SO4 was added slowly with gentle stirring at 0°C and continuously stirred for 10 min. A 25% glutaraldehyde solution (12 ml) was added to the mixture. The suspension was stirred at 0°C for 3 h, and the resultant immobilized BsE was separated by centrifugation (6,000×g, 4°C, 5 min). After washing twice with KPB, the collected immobilized BsE was lyophilized for later use.
For BsE activity assay, the BsE was appropriately diluted in 1.0 ml KPB (100 mM, pH 8.0) containing 10 mM dl-menthyl acetate and the reaction was performed at 30°C, 1,000 rpm for 10 min. Then 500 μl of reaction mixture was extracted with same volume of ethyl acetate, and the conversion of l-menthyl acetate was determined by gas chromatography (GC) analysis for the activity assay.
2.3 Enzymatic hydrolysis of dl-menthyl acetate
The reactions were performed in a 25-ml jacketed reactor with 10 ml of medium system. For mono-aqueous system, KPB (pH 8.0, 200 mM) containing 10% ethanol was used, and for organic-aqueous biphasic system, the volumetric ratio of KPB (pH 8.0, 200 mM) and organic solvent was 4:1. dl-Menthyl acetate was added together with the immobilized BsE. Surfactant was also added in some cases. The reactions were performed at 30°C with magnetic stirring at 300 rpm. The pH of reaction mixture was controlled at 8.0 by automatically titrating 1 M NaOH. Samples were withdrawn for GC analysis.
2.4 Reaction scaling up
Into a 250-ml, three-necked flask, 59.4 g dl-menthyl acetate, 5.5 g immobilized BsE, 0.25 g SDS, 80 ml KPB (pH 8.0, 200 mM), and 20 ml n-pentanol were added. The reaction mixture was incubated at 30°C and agitated at 300 rpm. The reaction pH was controlled at 8.0 by automatic titration of 1 M NaOH. After a certain period of time, samples were withdrawn for GC analysis.
After 84 h of reaction, immobilized BsE was removed by filtration. The organic phase was separated and distilled under vacuum. A flash chromatography of the residue was performed on a silica column using a mobile phase of petroleum-ethyl acetate (10:1, v/v) to get chemically pure l-menthol.
2.5 GC analysis
GC analysis was performed as described previously . The samples from the hydrolysis reaction mixture were analyzed on a GC-14 gas chromatography (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an FID detector. The enantiomeric excess of substrate (ees) was determined using Beta Dex™ 120 chiral column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm film thickness) from Supelco (Bellefonte, PA, USA) using N2 as carrier gas. The temperatures of column, injector, and detector were held at 130°C, 280°C, and 350°C, respectively. The enantiomeric excess of product (eep) was determined using Gamma Dex™ 120 chiral column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm film thickness) also from Supelco (USA) using N2 as carrier gas. The injector and detector temperatures were held at 280°C and 350°C, respectively. The oven temperature was programmed from 110°C, held for 15 min, then raised to 150°C at a rate of 10°C min−1 and finally held at 150°C for 1 min. The ees, eep, substrate conversion, and enantioselectivity were calculated according to the equations of Chen et al. . The conversion was calculated as c = ees/(ees + eep) and the E value was calculated as E = ln[l − c(l + eep)]/ln[1 − c(l − eep)].
3Results and discussion
3.1 Enzymatic hydrolysis of dl-menthyl acetate in mono-aqueous system
3.2 Enzymatic hydrolysis of dl-menthyl acetate in organic-aqueous biphasic system
High loading of substrate is very important for biocatalysis since it can reduce the difficulties of product separation and facilitate practical application. However, exorbitant concentrations of the substrate or product may inhibit the activity of free and immobilized BsE, and consequently, prevent the completion of the enzymatic reaction.
Enantioselective hydrolysis of dl -menthyl acetate by immobilized BsE in different organic-aqueous biphasic systems
Methyl t-butyl ether
Unfortunately, compared with the reaction in mono-aqueous phase, the enantioselectivity (E value) of the immobilized BsE decreased obviously in organic-aqueous biphasic system. Even in the best system composed of n-pentanol and buffer, the E value was only 26, far lower than that (E = 63) in mono-aqueous phase using 10% (v/v) ethanol as a cosolvent. The optical purity of the product also decreased from 94% ee to 85% ee. The decrease in enantioselectivity may be attributed to the diffusion limitation of substrate/product in the biphasic system. After the faster-reacting enantiomer (l-menthyl acetate) in the microenvironment of the enzyme was completely converted, the fresh l-menthyl acetate could not swiftly access to the active site of the enzyme due to diffusion limitation. In this case, the enzyme would catalyze the hydrolysis of the slower-reacting d-menthyl acetate, thus decreasing the optical purity of the product (l-menthol).
3.3 Improvement of enantioselectivity by adding a surfactant to biphasic system
Enantioselective hydrolysis of dl -menthyl acetate by immobilized BsE in biphasic pentanol-buffer system containing a certain surfactant
Hydrophilic lypophilic balance (HLB)
Critical micelle concentration (CMC, g l−1)
Enantioselective hydrolysis of dl -menthyl acetate by immobilized BsE in biphasic pentanol-buffer system with varied concentrations of SDS
SDS concentration (g l−1)
Enantioselective hydrolysis of dl -menthyl acetate at different substrate loads by immobilized BsE under the optimal reaction conditions
Reaction time (h)
1.0 M/198 g l−1
2.0 M/396 g l−1
3.0 M/594 g l−1
3.4 Preparation of l-menthol at decagram scale
To evaluate the feasibility of the biocatalytic process for practical application, the BsE-mediated reaction was scaled up to 100 ml, with a substrate load of 3 M (594 g l−1). The biocatalytic process was identical to that at 10-ml scale, reaching 41% conversion after 84 h with an eep of 97%. After the reaction was terminated, the reaction mixture was filtrated under vacuum. The filtrate was divided into two phases immediately, without forming any emulsion which is frequently encountered in the case of free enzyme-catalyzed reactions. The organic phase was separated, then the solvent was removed by vacuum distillation, and finally the crude product was further purified by silica gel column chromatography, affording 17.3 g l-menthol (97.2% ee), in a yield of 37% (the theoretical yield is 50% at maximum). Therefore, the biocatalytic process developed herein should be feasible for efficient transformation of highly loaded dl-menthyl acetate, demonstrating a good prospect for practical application in l-menthol manufacturing.
It has been proven that the use of immobilized BsE as a robust biocatalyst can perfectly catalyze the enantioselective hydrolysis of dl-menthyl acetate. In order to increase the substrate loading and to diminish the inhibition of enzyme activity by the product, an organic-aqueous two-phase system was adopted. To address the enantioselectivity decrease issue, several surfactants were tested for improving the mass transfer limitation between the two phases. Unexpectedly, anionic surfactant SDS as an additive could enhance the enantioselectivity from 26 to more than 150. By adopting these strategies, a high-performance bioprocess was successfully constructed for preparative synthesis of l-menthol with 97% ee. The substrate loading was as high as 3 M (594 g l−1), affording a very high space-time yield of 198 gl-menthol l−1 day−1. Compared with the reported enantioselective enzymatic esterification of dl-menthol - and hydrolysis of dl-menthyl propionate , the substrate loading was much higher. These results inspire us to explore the possibility of industrial biocatalysis in large-scale production of l-menthol.
The financial supports by the Ministry of Science and Technology, P.R. China (Nos. 2011AA02A210 and 2011CB710800), and the Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering (2060204), are gratefully acknowledged.
- Clark GS: Menthol. Perfum Flavor 1998, 23: 33–46.Google Scholar
- Clark GS: Aroma chemical profile: menthol. Perfum Flavor 2007, 32: 38–47.Google Scholar
- Rendler S, Auer G, Keller M, Oestreich M: Preparation of a privileged silicon-stereogenic silane: classical versus kinetic resolution. Adv Synth Catal 2006, 348: 1171–1182. 10.1002/adsc.200606071View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cattaruzza F, Fares V, Flamini A, Prosperi T (2006) Synthesis of enantiomeric menthol derivatives for forming and probing chiral surfaces. X-ray crystal and molecular structures of (+)-(1S,2R,5S)-1-(2-tricyanovinyl-1H-pyrrol-1-yl-methoxy)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcycl-ohexane. Tetrahedron-Asymmetry 17:1296–1300Google Scholar
- Michael M: Hot market for a cool chemical. Chem Eng News 2010, 88: 15–16.Google Scholar
- Fleischer J, Bauer K, Hopp R (1976) Separating optically pure d-l-isomers of menthol, neomenthol and isomenthol. US Patent 3,943,181,ᅟ, pGoogle Scholar
- Hopp R, Lawrence BM: Natural & synthetic menthol. In Mint: the genus Mentha. Edited by: Lawrence BM. CRC, Boca Raton; 2006:389.Google Scholar
- Tani K: Asymmetric isomerization of allylic compounds and the mechanism. Pure Appl Chem 1985, 57: 1845–1854. 10.1351/pac198557121845View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Akutagawa S: Enantioselective isomerization of allylamine to enamine: practical asymmetric synthesis of (−)-menthol by Rh–BINAP catalysts. Top Catal 1997, 4: 271–274. 10.1023/A:1019112911246View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Akutagawa S: Asymmetric synthesis by metal BINAP catalysts. Appl Catal A-Gen 1995, 128: 171–207. 10.1016/0926-860X(95)00097-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sumi K, Kumobayashi H: Rhodium/Ruthenium applications. Top Organomet Chem 2004, 6: 63–95.Google Scholar
- Chaplin JA, Gardiner NS, Mitra RK: Process for preparing (−)-menthol and similar compounds. US Patent 7,026,144 2006, ᅟ: ᅟ.Google Scholar
- Brad D, Reddy S, Mboniswa B, Steenkamp LH, Rousseau AL, Parkinson CJ, Chaplin J, Mitra RK, Moutlana T, Marais SF, Gardiner NS (2012) Biocatalytic enantiomeric resolution of l-menthol from an eight isomeric menthol mixture through transesterification. J Mol Catal B-Enzym 75:1–10Google Scholar
- Xu JH, Kawamoto T, Tanaka A: Efficient kinetic resolution of dl-menthol by lipase-catalyzed enantioselective esterification with acid anhydride in fed-batch reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1995, 43: 402–407. 10.1007/BF00218440View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ngo-Thi MT, Yin JG, Pan J, Zheng GW, Xu JH: Enantioselective hydrolysis of dl-menthyl benzoate by cell-free extract of newly isolated Acinetobacter sp. ECU2040. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2013, 170: 1974–1981. 10.1007/s12010-013-0355-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang DL, Nag A, Lee GC, Shaw JF (2002) Factors affecting the resolution of dl-menthol by immobilized lipase-catalyzed esterification in organic solvent. J Agric Food Chem 50:262–265Google Scholar
- Vorlova S, Bornscheuer UT, Gatfield I, Hilmer JM, Bertram HJ, Schmid RD: Enantioselective hydrolysis of D, L-menthyl benzoate to L-(−)-menthol by recombinant Candida rugosa lipase L1P1. Adv Synth Catal 2002, 344: l152–1155. 10.1002/1615-4169(200212)344:10<1152::AID-ADSC1152>3.0.CO;2-NView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu LJ, Xu Y, Wang XQ, Yu XW (2007) Highly enantioselective hydrolysis of DL-menthyl acetate to L-menthol by whole-cell lipase from Burkholderia cepacia ATCC25416. J Mol Catal B-Enzym 47:149–154Google Scholar
- Meng Y, Wu JP, Xu G, Yang LR (2010) Production of L-menthol by immobilized enzyme-catalyzed diastereoselective transesterification. Chin J Bioprocess Eng 8:39–44Google Scholar
- Ren MY, Bai S, Sun Y: Resolution of (±)-menthol in ionic liquid catalyzed by immobilized lipase on magnetic microspheres. Chin J Bioprocess Eng 2009, 7: 16–20.Google Scholar
- Xu JH, Zhu J, Takuo K, Atsuo T, Hu Y: Comparison of acid anhydrides with carboxylic acids in enantioselective enzymatic esterification of racemic menthol. Chin J Biotechnol 1997, 13: 387–393.Google Scholar
- Xu G, Li M, Sun MM, Wu JP, Yang LR: Screening of stereoselective lipase and its application in resolution of menthol. Chin J Bioprocess Eng 2013, 11: 1–4.Google Scholar
- Zheng GW, Yu HL, Zhang JD, Xu JH (2009) Enzymatic production of l-menthol by a high substrate concentration tolerable esterase from newly isolated Bacillus subtilis ECU0554. Adv Synth Catal 351:405–414Google Scholar
- Zheng GW, Pan J, Yu HL, Ngo-Thi MT, Li CX, Xu JH (2010) An efficient bioprocess for enzymatic production of l-menthol with high ratio of substrate to catalyst using whole cells of recombinant E. coli. J Biotechnol 150:108–114Google Scholar
- Zheng GW, Yu HL, Li CX, Pan J, Xu JH (2011) Immobilization of Bacillus subtilis esterase by simple cross-linking for enzymatic resolution of dl-menthyl acetate. J Mol Catal B-Enzym 70:138–143Google Scholar
- Zhang ZJ, Pan J, Liu JF, Xu JH, He YC, Liu YY (2011) Significant enhancement of (R)-mandelic acid production by relieving substrate inhibition of recombinant nitrilase in toluene-water biphasic system. J Biotechnol 152:24–29Google Scholar
- Li YG, Xing JM, Xiong XC, Li WL, Gao HS, Liu HZ: Improvement of biodesulfurization activity of alginate immobilized cells in biphasic systems. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2008, 35: 145–150. 10.1007/s10295-007-0268-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu YY, Xu JH, Hu Y: Enhancing effect of Tween-80 on lipase performance in enantioselective hydrolysis of ketoprofen ester. J Mol Catal B-Enzym 2000, 10: 523–529. 10.1016/S1381-1177(00)00093-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen CS, Fujimoto Y, Girdaukas G, Sih CJ: Quantitative analyses of biochemical kinetic resolutions of enantiomers. J Am Chem Soc 1982, 104: 7294–7299. 10.1021/ja00389a064View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang LJ, Li CX, Ni Y, Zhang J, Liu X, Xu JH (2011) Highly efficient synthesis of chiral alcohols with a novel NADH-dependent reductase from Streptomyces coelicolor. Bioresour Technol 102:7023–7028Google Scholar
- Ni Y, Li CX, Wang LJ, Zhang J, Xu JH: Highly stereoselective reduction of prochiral ketones by a bacterial reductase coupled with cofactor regeneration. Org Biomol Chem 2011, 9: 5463–5468. 10.1039/c1ob05285cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mori S, Yumoto H, Matsumi R, Nishigaki T, Ebara Y, Ueji S: A method to greatly improve the enantioselectivity of lipase-catalyzed hydrolysis using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as an additive. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16: 3698–3702. 10.1016/j.tetasy.2005.10.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.